A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods

References

• OSHA: “Respiratory Protection–OSHA.” Available at http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_docu-ment?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=13749.
   Google Scholar
• CDC: “Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Health Care Facilities.” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr4313.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CDC: “Measles (Rubeola): For Healthcafe Professionsals.” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/measles/hcp/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• CDC: “Prevention Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Settings Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/healthcaresettings.htm.
   Google Scholar
• CDC: “Guidance on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to be Used by Healthcare Workers during Management of Patients with Confirmed Ebola or Persons under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola who are Clinically Unstable or Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea in U.S. Hospitals, Including Procedures for Donning and Doffing PPE.” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register: 42 Code of Federal Regulations Part 84. Respiratory Protective Devices. Final Rules and Notice. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: Office of Federal Register, 60:30335–30398 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: “Procedure No. TEB-APR-STP-0059, Revision 2.0. Determination of particulate filter efficiency level for N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, airpurifying respirators standard testing procedure (STP).” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/TEB-APR-STP-0059.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, G.A., and E.S. Moyer: “Worst case” aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate. Amer. Industr. Hyg. Assoc. J. 50:257–264 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.W., and B.Y.H. Liu: On the minimum efficiency and the most penetrating particle size for fibrous filters. Air Pollut. Cont. Assn. 30:377–381 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S.B., Jr., and E.S. Moyer: Electrostatic respirator filter media: filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size effects. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 15:609–617 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FDA: “Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Surgical Masks - Premarket Notification [510(K)] Submissions; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072549.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: ASTM F2299-03, Standard Test Method for Determining the Initial Efficiency of Materials Used in Medical Face Masks to Penetration by Particulates Using Latex Spheres. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: F2101- 01: Standard test method for evaluating the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of medical face mask materials, using a biological aerosol of Staphylococcus aereus. Ann. ASTM Stand. (F2101-01): 1553–1557 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: F2100: Standard specification for performance of materials used in medical face masks. Ann. Book ASTM Standards, Philadelphia, PA, 2011. pp. 447–449.
   Google Scholar
• Filligent: “510(k) Summary - BioFriendTM BiomaskTM N95 Surgical Respirator.” Available at http://www.access-data.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf12/K122702.pdf (2013).
   Google Scholar
• GlaxoSmithKline: “510(k) Summary - Actiprotect UF N95 Respirator.” Available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/K081923.pdf (2009.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: “ASTM F1215 - 89. Test Method for Determining the Initial Efficiency of a Flatsheet Filter Medium in an Airflow Using Latex Spheres (Withdrawn 1998).” Philadelphia, PA: ASTM International, 2003. (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Greene, V.W., and D. Vesley: Method for evaluating effectiveness of surgical masks. J. Bacteriol. 83:663–667 (1962).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., A. Miller, and B. Eimer: Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering-facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 8:23–30 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., G. Walbert, W. Newcomb, et al.: Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators - A comparison study. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 58:206–216 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Z.L. Zuo, D.A. Japuntich, and D.Y.H. Pui: Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56:581–594 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI: Penetration of N95 filtering facepiece respirators by charged and charge neutralized nanoparticles. TSI Application Note RFT-007 (US) (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Y.-M.G. Lee, H.-L. Huang, et al.: Aerosol penetration properties of an electret filter with submicron aerosols with various operating factors. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 42:51–57 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W.C.: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brosseau, L.M., N.V. McCullough, and D. Vesley: Mycobacterial aerosol collection efficiency of respirator and surgical mask filters under varying conditions of flow and humidity. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12:435–445 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., K. Willeke, S.A. Grinshpun, J. Donnelly, and C.C. Coffey: Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. Am. Industr. Hyg. Assoc. J. 59:128–132 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., K. Willeke, S.A. Grinshpun, and J. Donnelly: Performance of N95 respirators: Reaerosolization of bacteria and solid particles. Am. Industr. Hyg. Assoc. J. 58:876–880 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.K., D. Vesley, L.M. Brosseau, and J.H. Vincent: Evaluation of single-use masks and respirators for protection of health care workers against mycobacterial aerosols. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 22:65–74 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, N.V., L.M. Brosseau, and D. Vesley: Collection of three bacterial aerosols by respirator and surgical mask filters under varying conditions of flow and relative humidity. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41:677–690 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish, D.A., B.K. Heimbuch, M. Husband, et al.: Challenge of N95 filtering facepiece respirators with viable H1N1 influenza aerosols. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 34:494–499 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E.M., A.W. Richardson, S.D. Harpest, K.C. Hofacre, and R.E. Shaffer: Reaerosolization of MS2 bacteriophage from an N95 filtering facepiece respirator by simulated coughing. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56: 15–325 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau, L.M., and R.E. Shaffer: “Do We Need to Challenge Respirator Filters With Biological Aerosols?” Available at http://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2014/04/02/respirator-filter-testing/.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: “Summary of Comments and NIOSH Responses to Docket 272.” Available at http://www.regulations.gov/index.jsp#!documentDetail;D=CDC-2014-0005-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi, D.J., M.S. Bergman, E. Sinkule, and R.E. Shaffer: Evaluation of the filtration performance of21 N95 filtering facepiece respirators after prolonged storage. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 37:381–86 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Laboratories “VFE110 - Virus Filtration Efficiency (VFE): Bacteriophage.” Available at https://www.nelsonlabs.com/Test/Viral-Filtration-Efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Honeywell: “One-fit Surgical N95 Respirators.” Available at http://www.honeywellsafety.com/Supplementary/Documents_and_Downloads/Respiratory_Protection/Single_Use_(Disposable)_Respirators/19141/1033.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg, T., and L.M. Brosseau: Surgical mask filter and fit performance. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 36:276–282 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., B. Eimer, and J. Szalajda: A quantitative assessment of the total inward leakage of NaCl aerosol representing sumicron size bioaerosol through N95 filtering facepiece respirators and surgical masks. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11:388–396 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balazy, A., M. Toivola, A. Adhikari, S.K. Sivasubramani, T. Reponen, and S.A. Grinshpun: Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks? Am. J. Infect. Control 34:51–57 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., A. Miller, B. Eimer, and R.E. Shaffer: Filtration performance of FDA-cleared surgical masks. J. Int. Soc. Res. Prot. 26:54–70 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., B. Eimer, and R.E. Shaffer: Nanoparticle filtration performance of commercially available dust masks. J. Int. Soc. Res. Prot. 25:27–41 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., B. Eimer, and R.E. Shaffer: Simple respiratory protection - Evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54:789–798 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, Jr., C.J., E.M. Kettleson, M-L. Lee, B. Ramaswami, L.T. Angenent, and P. Biswas: Sampling methodologies and dosage assessment techniques for submicrometre and ultrafine virus aerosol particles. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99:1422–1434 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish, D.A., B.K. Heimbuch, C. Balzli, et al.: Capture of 0.1 um aerosol particle containing viable H1N1 influenza virus by N95 filtering facepiece respirators. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13:D46–D49 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, S., D. Sbarra, J. Nwoko, and R.E. Shaffer: Resistance to synthetic blood penetration of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators and surgical N95 respirators. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 43:1190–1196 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A., D.B. Jernign, L. Liedtke, and L. Strausbaugh: Hospital preparedness for severe acute respiratory syndrome in the United States: Views from a national survey of infectious diseases consultants. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:272–274 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, L., E. Rees, and N. Pavelchak: Respiratory protection policies and practices among the health care workforce exposed to influenza in New York State: Evaluating emergency preparedness for the next pandemic. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 42:240–245 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, M., J. Grant, E. Bryce, P. Chilton, and L. Forrester: Facial protective equipment, personnel, and pandemics: impact of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus on personnel and use of facial protective equipment. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 31:1011–1016 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, S., B. Materna, S. Goldmacher, et al.: Evaluation of respiratory protection programs and practices in California hospitals during the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am. J. Infect. Cont. 41:1024–1031 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar