Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems

References

• Berger, E.H.: Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79(6):1655–1687 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Noise Labeling Requirements for Hearing Protectors,” Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 211. 1979. pp. 56130–56147.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H., J.R. Franks, and F. Lindgren: International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation. In Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, A. Axlesson, H. Borchgrevink, R. P.Hamernik, P. Hellstrom, D. Henderson, and R. J. Salvi, (eds.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 1996. pp. 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI): American National Standard Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors [ANSI/ASA S12.6–1997(R2002)]. [Standard] New York: ANSI, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, W.J., D.C. Byrne, D. Gauger, et al.: “Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Interlaboratory Comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 Methods A and B.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125(5):3262–3277 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, L.D.: Fit-testing hearing protectors: An idea whose time has come. Noise Health 13(51):147–151 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, T.Y.: Individual fit-testing of hearing protectors: A review of uses. Noise Health 13(51):152–162 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHCA - NIOSH - OSHA Alliance: Best Practice Bulletin: Hearing Protection - Emerging Trends: Individual Fit Testing, 1–3 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: A Real-Ear Field Method for the Measurement of the Noise Attenuation of Insert-type Hearing Protectors, by P.L. Michael, R.L. Kerlin, G.R. Bienvenue, J.H. Prout, and J.I. Shampan ( Publication No. 76-181). DHEW NIOSH, June 1976.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI): American National Standard Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors [ANSI/ASA S12.6-2008]. [Standard] New York: ANSI, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Soli, S., A. Vermiglio, and V. Larson: “A system for assessing the fit of hearing protectors in the field.” Presentation at the National Hearing Conservation Association Conference, Tucson, AZ, February 24–26, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor, G.W., and W. Cochran: Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Ames, IA: University Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J.R., W.J. Murphy, D.A. Harris, J.L. Johnson, and P.B. Shaw: Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. AIHA J. 64:501–509 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompette, N., A. Kusy, and J. Ducourneau: Suitability of commercial systems for earplug individual fit testing. Appl. Acoust. 90:88–94 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive: Assessment of subjective and objective measurement systems of earplug attenuation on an individual, by L. Brueck, HSE RR975, Derbyshire, UK, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kotarbińska, E., and K. Rogowski: Real-world performance of earplugs measured by Personal Attenuation Rating. In Forum Acusticum. pp. 1–8 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, J., and L.M. Levine: Attenuation of ear protectors by loudness balance and threshold methods. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29(8):889–894 (1957).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb, L., and M.L. Touger: Variation in ear protector attenuation as measured by different methods. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32(2):245–224 (1960).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudmose, W.: The case of the missing 6 dB. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(3):650–659 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, T.W., and M.J. Ellenbecker: Hearing protector attenuation measurement by bone conduction loudness balance compared with real-ear attenuation at threshold in a sound field. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12:69–75 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, W.J., and J.R. Franks: Evaluation of a FitCheck hearing protector test system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(4–2):2263 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Royster, J. D., E.H. Berger, C.J. Merry, et al.: Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1506–1526 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H., J.R. Franks, A. Behar, et al.: Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:665–72 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, W.J., J.R. Franks, E.H. Berger, et al.: Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: Sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115(1):331–323 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, W.J., M.R. Stephenson, D.C. Byrne, B. Witt, and J. Duran: Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation. Noise Health 13:132–141 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, A., J. Punch, M.R. Stephenson, E. Wolfe, N. Paneth, and W.J. Murphy: The Effects of training format on earplug performance. Int. J Aud. 46:609–618 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI): Methods of Estimating Effective A-weighted Sound Pressure Levels When Hearing Protectors are Worn. [ANSI/ASA S12.68-2007 R2012]. [Standard] New York: ANSI, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• EPA: “40 CFR 211 Subpart B Proposed Revised Rule,” Federal Register 74:149 (August 5, 2009). pp. 39150–39196.
   Google Scholar
• “Noise Control Act of 1972”, Public Law 92-574, Section 8, U.S. Code, Title 42, Pt. 4907, Labeling. Oct. 27, 1972.
   Google Scholar