Performance evaluation of disposable inhalable aerosol sampler at a copper electrorefinery

References

• International Organization Standardization (ISO): Air quality–particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling. ISO 7708:1995(en). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization Standardization (1995).
   Google Scholar
• European Standardization Committee (CEN): Workplace atmospheres – Size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles. CEN EN481:1993. Brussels, Belgium: European Standardization Committee (1993).
   Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH): 2018 TLVs^® and BEIs^® - Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agent & biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, L.C., R. J. Aitken, P.E.J. Baldwin, G.C. Beaumont, and A.D. Maynard: The sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in low air movement environments. J. Aerosol Sci. 30:627–38 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorner, P., X. Simon, R. Wrobel, E. Kauffer, and O. Witschger: Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54:165–87 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demange, M., J.C. Gendre, B. Herve-Bazin, B. Carton, and A. Peltier: Aerosol evaluation difficulties due to particle deposition on filter holder inner walls. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 34:399–403 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, K., and M. Harper: Analytical performance issues—Closed face filter cassette (CFC) sampling—Guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10:D29–D33 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, M., and K. Ashley: Acid-soluble internal capsules for closed face cassette elemental sampling and analysis of workplace air. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10:297–306 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R.N., H.A. Feng, and K. Ashley: Interlaboratory evaluation of cellulosic acid-soluble internal air sampling capsules for multi-element analysis. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13:40–47 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.G., W.P. Chisholm, D.A. Burns, J.H. Nelson, M.L. Kashon, and M. Harper: Comparison of lead and tin concentrations in air at a solder manufacturer from the closed-face 37-mm cassette with and without a custom cellulose-acetate cassette insert. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11:12, 819–825 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Orange C., K. Anderson, D. Sleeth, T.R. Anthony, and J. Volckens: A simple and disposable sampler for inhalable aerosol, Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60(2):150–160 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., D.K. Sleeth, R.G. Handy, L.F. Pahler, T.R. Anthony, and J. Volckens: Assessment of increased sampling pump flow rates in a disposable, inhalable aerosol sampler, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:3, 207–213 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, T.R., C. Cai, J. Mehaffy, D. Sleeth, and J. Volckens: Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:313–322 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): “Method 7303, NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM).” NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM) 4th ed., Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/7303.pdf (accessed September 2, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, R.W., and L.D. Reed: Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondectable values. Appl. Occup. Environ Hyg. 5:46–51 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L.I.: A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., A.S. Hedayat, B. Sinha, and M. Yang: Statistical methods in assessing agreement: models, issues, and tools. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 97:257–270 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart, H.X., M. Haber, and J. Song: Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 58:1020–1027 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, J.L., and L. Jover: Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics 59:849–858 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T., M. Harper, J.E. Slaven, K. Lee, R.J. Rando, and E.H. Maples: Wood dust sampling: Field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55:180–191(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.G., R. Magram, M. Kusti, et al.: Comparison between active (pumped) and passive (diffusive) sampling methods for formaldehyde in pathology and histology laboratories. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:1, 31–39 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Permissible Exposure Limits – Annotated Tables, Available at https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/chemResult.html/recNo=541 (accessed on November 3, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Publication No. 2005-149, DHHS, September 2007. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-149/pdfs/2005-149.pdf (accessed on November 3, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Demange M., P. Görner, J. Elcabache, and R. Wrobel: Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 17:3, 200–208 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stacey, P., M. Mecchia, S. Verpaele, et al.: Differences between samplers for respirable dust and the analysis of quarts – An international study. Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles. In Second Symposium on Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles, STP 1565, M. Harper and T. Lee (eds.), ASTM International (2013).
   Google Scholar