Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers

References

• Azimi, P., D. Zhao, C. Pouzet, N.E. Crain, and B. Stephens: Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50:1260–1268 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., S.J. Cao, A. Chen, and Y. Guo: The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction. Build. Environ. 104:311–319 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, E.L., J. Wang, and J.L. Regens: Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:523–533 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., C. Yoon, S. Ham, et al.: Emissions of nanoparticles and gaseous material from 3D printer operation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:12044–12053 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile, L., M. Scungio, G. Buonanno, F. Arpino, and G. Ficco: Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: The effect of filament material and printing temperature. Indoor Air 27:398–408 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinle, P.: Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13:121–132 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., P. Azimi, Z. El Orch, and T. Ramos: Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos. Environ. 79:334–339 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., R.F. LeBouf, M.G. Duling, et al.: Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3-D) printer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 79:453–465 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, L., A. Kangas, K. Kukko, et al.: Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J. Indust. Ecol. 21:S94–S106 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M.E., V. Pegues, S. Van Montfrans, W. Leng, and L.C. Marr: Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3D printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51:9516–9523 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., J.P.S. Wong, A.Y. Davis, M.S. Black, and R.J. Weber: Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51:1275–1286 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and L. Li: Total volatile organic compound emission evaluation and control for stereolithography additive manufacturing process. J. Cleaner Prod. 170:1268–1278 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization: Additive manufacturing — General principles — Terminology (ISO/ASTM 52900) [Standard]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Short, D.B., D. Volk, P.D. Badger, J. Melzer, P. Salerno, and A. Sirinterlikci: 3D printing (rapid prototyping) photopolymers: An emerging source of antimony to the environment. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 1:24–33 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Creytens, K., L. Gilissen, S. Huygens, and A. Goossens: A new application for epoxy resins resulting in occupational allergic contact dermatitis: The three-dimensional printing industry. Contact Dermatitis 77:349–351 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumoto, I., A. Tamura, M. Matsumura, H. Miura, and N. Yui: Sensitization potential of dental resins: 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate and its water-soluble oligomers have immunostimulatory effects. PLoS ONE 8:e82540 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heratizadeh, A., T. Werfel, S. Schubert, and J. Geier: Contact sensitization in dental technicians with occupational contact dermatitis. Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2001–2015. Contact Dermatitis (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mousawi, A., C. Poriel, F. Dumur, et al.: Zinc Tetraphenylporphyrin as high performance visible light photoinitiator of cationic photosensitive resins for LED projector 3D printing applications. Macromolecules 50:746–753 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech, Z., A. Butwin, U. Gåuch, and J. Kabatc: Influence of selected photoinitiators on important properties of photoreactive acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives. J. Appl. Polymer Sci 123:118–123 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiak, J., and J.F. Rabek: Photoinitiators for visible light polymerization. Polimery 44:X1–461 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, P., J. Zhang, D. Campolo, et al.: Copper and iron complexes as visible-light-sensitive photoinitiators of polymerization. J. Polymer Sci., Part A: Polymer Chem. 53:2673–2684 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R., N. Rajaram, and S.M. Tarlo: Case report of asthma associated with 3D printing. Occup. Med. 67:652–654 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A.B., R.F. LeBouf, M.G. Duling, et al.: Inhalation exposure to three-dimensional printer emissions stimulates acute hypertension and microvascular dysfunction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 335:1–5 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F.L., R. House, I. Kudla, J.C. Lipszyc, N. Rajaram, and S.M. Tarlo: Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occup. Med. 68:211–214 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A.B., L.N. Bowers, A.K. Knepp, et al.: Three-dimensional printing with nano-enabled filaments releases polymer particles containing carbon nanotubes into air. Indoor Air 28:840–851 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM: 6670: Standard Practice for Full-Scale Chamber Determination of Volatile Organic Emissions from Indoor Materials/Products. West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moylan, S., J. Slotwinski, A. Cooke, K. Jurrens, and M.A. Donmez: An additive manufacturing test artifact. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119:429–459 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J.R., and J.E. Ham: A new agent for derivatizing carbonyl species used to investigate limonene ozonolysis. Atmos. Environ. 99:519–526 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM): Test Method for the Determination of Emissions from Hardcopy Devices RAL-UZ-205. [Standard] St. Augustin, Germany: BAM, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Entink, R.H., C. Bekker, W.F. Fransman, and D.H. Brouwer: Analysis of time series of particle size distributions in nano exposure assessment. J. Aerosol Sci. 81:62–69 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Entink, R.: NanoPSDA: Analysis of Time Series of Particle Size Distribution Data in Nano Exposure Assessment. R package version 1.0 ed, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R-Code Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R package version 3.3.1 ed, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Asgharian, B., W. Hofmann, and R. Bergmann: Particle deposition in a multiple-path model of the human lung. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34:332–339 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP: International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 66: Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Byrley, P., B.J. George, W.K. Boyes, and K. Rogers: Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 655:395–407 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshar-Mohajer, N., C.Y. Wu, T. Ladun, D.A. Rajon, and Y. Huang: Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build. Environ. 93:293–301 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, P., B. Ståhlbom, E. Nordenberg, A. Graichen, P. Johansson, and H. Karlsson: Evaluating measuring techniques for occupational exposure during additive manufacturing of metals: A pilot study. J. Indust. Ecol. 21:S120–S129 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, D.B., A. Sirinterlikci, P. Badger, and B. Artieri: Environmental, health, and safety issues in rapid prototyping. Rapid Proto. J. 21:105–110 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, J., M. Wensing, E. Uhde, and T. Salthammer: Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer. Environ. Int. 123:476–485 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulf, M., T. Weiss, A. Lotz, et al.: Analysis of inflammatory markers and metals in nasal lavage fluid of welders. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 79:1144–1157 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, P., M. Jarvela, T. Tuomi, et al.: Systemic inflammatory responses following welding inhalation challenge test. Toxicol. Rep. 2:357–364 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fireman, E., A.B. Shai, Y. Alcalay, N. Ophir, S. Kivity, and V. Stejskal: Identification of metal sensitization in sarcoid-like metal-exposed patients by the MELISA(R) lymphocyte proliferation test — A pilot study. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 11:18 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, S.S., G.K. Harris, and X. Shi: Metal-induced oxidative stress and signal transduction. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 37:1921–1942 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH: "Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards." Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/default.html (accessed March 15, 2019), 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Alliance for Risk Science: "Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels." Available at https://www.tera.org/OARS/WEEL.html (accessed March 15, 2019), 2014.
   Google Scholar