Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention

References

• Harrison, R.M., and J. Yin: Particulate matter in the atmosphere: Which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Sci. Total Environ. 249(1):85–101 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., D.C. Christiani, D.W. Dockery, and L. Wang: Exposure-response relationships between occupational exposures and chronic respiratory illness: A community-based study. Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 146(2):413–418 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brook, R.D., S. Rajagopalan, C.A. Pope, et al.: Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121(21):2331–2378 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S.C., A. Cassidy, and D.C. Christiani: A systematic review of occupational exposure to particulate matter and cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 7(4):1773–1806 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, C.I., R.F. Phalen, and P.A. Solomon: Airborne particulate matter and human health: a review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39(8):737–749 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 7708, Air Quality-Particle Size Fraction Definitions for Health-Related Sampling. Geneva: ISO, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN): EN 481, Workplace Atmospheres - Size Fraction Definitions for Measurement of Airborne Particles. Brussels: CEN, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH): TLV's and BEI's Based on the Documention of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, P., P.A. Baron, and K. Willeke (eds.): Aerosol Science - Principles, Techniques, and Applications (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T.L., and J.L. Birkett: The human head as a dust sampler. In Inhaled Particles IV, Pt. 1, pp. 93–105. Oxford: Pergamon, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, L., and H. Breuer: Investigations into defining inhalable dust. In Inhaled Particles V, pp. 21–32. Oxford: Pergamon, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J.H., and D. Mark: Applications of blunt sampler theory to the definition and measurement of inhalable dust. In Inhaled Particles V, pp. 3–19. Oxford: Pergamon, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Görner, P., X. Simon, R. Wrobel, E. Kauffer, and O. Witschger: Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54(2):165–187 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L.C., R.J. Aitken, P.E.J. Baldwin, G.C. Beaumont, and A.D. Maynard: The sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in low air movement environments. J. Aerosol Sci. 30(5):627–638 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeth, D.K., and J.H. Vincent: Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(2):207–220 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): “Method no. PV2121, Gravimetric Determination.” Salt Lake City, UT: OSHA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Clere, J.H., and F. Hearl: “Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated, Total 0500;” In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/0500.pdf. (accessed April 11, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Demange, M., J.C. Gendre, B. Herve-Bazin, B. Carton, and A. Peltier: Aerosol evaluation difficulties due to particle peposition on filter holder inner walls. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 34(4):399–403 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puskar, M.A., J.M. Harkins, J.D. Moomey, and L.H. Hecker: Internal wall losses of pharmaeutical products during closed-face, 37-mm polystyrene cassette sampling. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 52(7):280–286 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinkenbeard, R.E., E.C. England, D.L. Johnson, N.A. Esmen, and T.A. Hall: A field comparison of the IOM inhalable aerosol sampler and a modified 37-mm cassette. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 17(9):622–627 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendricks, W., F. Stones, and D. Lillquist: On wiping the interior walls of 37-mm closed-face cassettes: An OSHA perspective. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 6(12):732–734 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, K., and M. Harper: Closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling: Guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10(3):D29–D33 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witschger, O., S.A. Grinshpun, S. Fauvel, and G. Basso: Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 48(4):351–368 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D.M., D.K. Sleeth, M.S. Thiese, and R.R. Larson: A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12(3):199–204 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffer, E., R. Wrobel, P. Görner, et al.: Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54(2):188–203 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, T.R., D. Sleeth, and J. Volckens: Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13(2):148–158 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, D., and J. H. Vincent: A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 30(31):89–102 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenny, L.C., R. Aitken, C. Chalmers, et al.: A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41(2):135–153 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, P.A.: Factors affecting aerosol sampling (Chapter AE). In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, G., and G. Bergman: Weighing imprecision and handleability of the sampling cassettes of the IOM sampler for inhalable dust. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 45(3):241–252 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Orange, C., K. Anderson, D. Sleeth, T.R. Anthony, and J. Volckens: A simple and disposable sampler for inhalable aerosol. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60(2):150–160 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R.N., H.A. Feng and K. Ashley: Interlaboratory evaluation of cellulosic acid-soluble internal air sampling capsules for multi-element analysis. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg 13:40–47 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.-N., D.A. Lundgren, and D. Rovell-Rixx: Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 61(4):506–516 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizenberg, V., S.A. Grinshpun, K. Willeke, J. Smith, and P.A. Baron: Measurement of the sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers using a simplified protocol. J Aerosol Sci. 31(2):169–179 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmees, D.K., W. Yi-Hsuan, and J. H. Vincent: Experimental methods to determine inhalability and personal sampler performance for aerosols in ultra-low windspeed environemnts. J. Environ. Monit: 10:1426–1436 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeth, D.K., S.A. Balthaser, S. Collingwood, and R.R. Larson: Estimation of the human extrathoracic deposition fraction of inhaled particles using a polyurethane foam collection substrate in an IOM sampler. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health 13:292 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, P.E.J., and A.D. Maynard: A survey of windspeeds in indoor workplaces. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42(5):303–313 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar