Particle size and metal composition of gouging and lancing fumes

References

• Flynn, M.R., and P. Susi: Local exhaust ventilation for the control of welding fumes in the construction industry—A literature review. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(7):764–776 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer: Welding, Molybdenum Trioxide, and Indium Tin Oxide. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 118, World Health Organization (ed.). Lyon, France, 2018. pp. 37–265. Available at http://publications.iarc.fr/569 (accessed May 02, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Platcow, P.A., andG.S. Lyndon: “Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries. Metal Processing and Metal Working Industry. Metal Processing and Metal Working. Welding and Thermal Cutting. International Labour Organization Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety.” Available at http://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/part-xiii-12343/metal-processing-and-metal-working-industry/metal-processing-and-metal-working/136-metal-processing-and-metal-working/welding-and-thermal-cutting (accessed May 2, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, I.D., J.D. Colt, R.C. Fernicola, C.A. Landry, and C.B. Wilsoncroft: Arc cutting and gouging. In Welding Handbook Volume 2: Welding Processes, Part 1, A. O’Brien (ed.). Miami, FL: American Welding Society, 2004. p. 651.
   Google Scholar
• Berlinger, B., U. Skogen, C. Meijer, and Y. Thomassen: Workplace exposure to particulate matter, bio-accessible, and non-soluble metal compounds during hot work processes. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 16(6):378–386 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, N., D. Loomis, K.Z. Guyton, et al.: Carcinogenicity of welding, molybdenum trioxide, and indium tin oxide. Lancet Oncol. 18(5):581–582 (2017). Available at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30255-3/fulltext (accessed May 2, 2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cena, L.G., M.J. Keane, W.P. Chisholm, S. Stone, M. Harper, and B.T. Chen: A novel method for assessing respiratory deposition of welding fume nanoparticles. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11(12):771–780 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler-Erdely, P.C., A. Erdely, and J. M. Antonini: Immunotoxicology of arc welding fume: Worker and experimental animal studies. J. Immunotoxicol. 9(4):411–425 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler-Erdely, P.C., L.M. Falcone, and J.M. Antonini: Influence of welding fume metal composition on lung toxicity and tumor formation in experimental animal models. J.Occup. Environ. Hyg. 16(6):372–377 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, S., D. Heederik, A. Burdorf, et al.: Current and new challenges in occupational lung diseases. Eur. Respir. Rev. 26(146):170080 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M.: Welding fume is a group 1 carcinogen with no OEL and no method – Suggestions for a path forward. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 16(6):367–371 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislawska, M., T. Halatek, M. Cieslak, et al.: Coarse, fine and ultrafine particles arising during welding – Analysis of occupational exposure. Microchem. J. 135:1–9 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnyakov, V.I., S.A. Kiro, M.V. Oprya, and A.A. Ennan: Effects of shielding gas temperature and flow rate on the welding fume particle size distribution. J. Aerosol. Sci. 114:55–61 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, J.D., P. Susi, and M.R. Flynn: Manganese and welding fume exposure and control in construction. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 4:943–951 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., T. Hoang, E.L. Floyd, and J.L. Regens: Characterization of particulate fume and oxides emission from stainless steel plasma cutting. Ann. Work Expo. Health 61(3):311–320 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini, J.M.: Health effects of welding. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 33(1):61–103 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plog, B.A.: Overview of industrial hygiene. In Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene, B. A. Plog and P. J. Quinlan (eds.). United States of America: National Safety Council, 2002. pp. 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pickford, G., and B. Davies: Aerosols. In Principles of Occupational Health & Hygiene: An Introduction, C. Tillman (ed.). Singapore: ANL Printers, 2007. pp. 125–171.
   Google Scholar
• Iavicoli, I., V. Leso, L. Fontana, D. Cottica, and A. Bergamaschi: Characterization of inhalable, thoracic, and respirable fractions and ultrafine particle exposure during grinding, brazing, and welding activities in a mechanical engineering factory. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 55(4):430–445 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlinger, B., N. Benker, S. Weinbruch, et al.: Physicochemical characterization of different welding aerosols. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 399:1773–1780 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, K.W., R. Andrews, S. Bertke, and K. Ashley: Manganese fractionation using a sequential extraction method to evaluate welders’ shielded metal arc welding exposure during construction projects in oil refineries. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12:774–784 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnert, M., B. Pesch, A. Lotz, et al.: Exposure to inhalable, respirable, and ultrafine particles in welding fume. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(5):557–567 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, L., M. Bauer, J. Bertram, et al.: Assessment of the biological effects of welding fumes emitted from metal inert gas welding processes of aluminium and zinc-plated materials in humans. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 217(2-3):160–168 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persoons, R., D. Arnoux, T. Monssu, et al.: Determinants of occupational exposure to metals by gas metal arc welding and risk management measures: A biomonitoring study. Toxicol. Lett. 231(2):135–141 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, K., G.X. Lin, A.M. Jefferson, et al.: Modifying welding process parameters can reduce the neurotoxic potential of manganese-containing welding fumes. Toxicology 328:168–178 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni, B., and C. Viti: Grain size, chemistry, and structure of fine and ultrafine particles in stainless steel welding fumes. Aerosol. Sci. 40(11):938–949 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini, J.M., S. Stone, J.R. Roberts, et al.: Effect of short-term stainless steel welding fume inhalation exposure on lung inflammation, injury, and defense responses in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 223:234–245 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cena, L.G., W.P. Chisholm, M.J. Keane, and B.T. Chen: A field study on the respiratory deposition of the nano-sized fraction of mild and stainless steel welding fume metals. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12:721–728 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprya, M., S. Kiro, A. Worobiec, et al.: Size distribution and chemical properties of welding fumes of inhalable particles. J. Aerosol. Sci. 45:50–57 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennan, A.A., S.A. Kiro, M.V. Oprya, and V.I. Vishnyakov: Particle size distribution of welding fume and its dependency on conditions of shielded metal arc welding. J. Aerosol. Sci. 64:103–110 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrie, J.W., and R.J. Aitken: Measurement of human exposure to biologically relevant fractions of inhaled aerosols. Occup. Environ. Med. 56:747–752 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notø, H.P., K.C. Nordby, and W. Eduard: Relationships between personal measurements of ‘total’ dust, respirable, thoracic, and inhalable aerosol fractions in the cement production industry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60(4):453–466 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Air Quality – Particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling (ISO 7708). [Standard] Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster: Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 113(7):823–839 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., A.B. Kane, R.D. Klaper, and R.H. Hurt: Nanotoxicology. In Casarett & Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poison, C.D. Klaassen (ed.). China: McGraw-Hill, 2013. pp. 1189–1229.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, P., K. Lenz, U. Reisgen, and T. Kraus: Number size distribution of fine and ultrafine fume particles from various welding processes. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57(3):305–313 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, D.L., and J.H. Vincent: Sampling conventions for estimating ultrafine and fine aerosol particle deposition in the human respiratory tract. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55(7):696–709 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cena, L.G., T.R, Anthony, and T.M. Peters: A personal nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(15):6483–6490 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, G.S., P.A. Gillespie, A. Gunnison, A.L. Moreira, K.M. Tchou-Wong, and L.C. Chen: Long-term inhalation exposure to nickel nanoparticles exacerbated atherosclerosis in a susceptible mouse model. Environ. Health Perspect. 119(2):176–181 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman-McKeeman, L.D.: Absorption, distribution and excretion of toxicants. In Casarett & Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poison, C.D. Klaassen (ed.). China: McGraw-Hill, 2013. pp. 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P.T., C. Isaxon, A.C. Eriksson, et al.: Nano-objects emitted during maintenance of common particle generators: Direct chemical characterization with aerosol mass spectrometry and implications for risk assessments. J. Nanopart. Res. 15:1–16 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C., P. Demokritou, M. Shafer, and D. Christiani: Physicochemical and toxicological characteristics of welding fume derived particles generated from real time welding processes. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts 15:214–224 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokar, E.J., W.A. Boyd, J.H. Freedman, and M.P. Waalkes: Toxic effects of metals. In Casarett & Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poison, C.D. Klaassen (ed.). China: McGraw-Hill, 2013. pp. 981–1030.
   Google Scholar
• Pujalté, I., I. Passagne, B. Brouillaud, et al.: Cytotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by different metallic nanoparticles on human kidney cells. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 8(10):1–16 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma, H.S., S. Hussain, J. Schlager, S.F. Ali, and A. Sharma.: Influence of nanoparticles on blood-brain barrier permeability and brain edema formation in rats. In Brain Edema XIV, Z. Czernicki, A. Baethmann, U. Ito, Y. Katayama, T. Kuriwa, D. Mendelow (eds.). Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2010. pp. 359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, H.S., and A. Sharma: Nanoparticles aggravate heat stress induced cognitive deficits, blood-brain barrier disruption, edema formation and brain pathology. Prog. Brain Res. 162:245–273 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivulka, D.J., B.R. Conard, G.W. Hall, and J.H. Vincent: Species-specific inhalable exposures in the nickel industry: A new approach for deriving inhalation occupational exposure limits. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 48:19–34 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Particle Technology Labs: “Particle size distribution analyses.” Available at https://www.particletechlabs.com/analytical-testing/particle-size-distribution-analyses (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J.Y., J.S. Park, and P.G. Kim: Characterization of total and size-fractionated manganese exposure by work area in a shipbuilding yard. Saf. Health Work 7:150–155 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D.E., B.K. Ku, M. Eileen, and K.H. Dunn: Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: Mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54(5):514–531 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PennState Eberly College of Science: “The Latin Square Design.” Available at https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat503/node/21 (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE): General methods for sampling and gravimetric analysis of respirable, thoracic and inhalable aerosols. In Methods for Determining Hazardous Substances (MDHS 14/4), United Kingdom: HSE, 2014. Available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/mdhs/pdfs/mdhs14-4.pdf (accessed May 16, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Method 0600: Particulates not otherwise regulated, respirable. In Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Cincinnati, Oh.: NIOSH, 1998. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/0600.pdf (accessed May 16, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Stebounova L.V., N.I. Gonzalez-Pech, J.H. Park, T.R. Anthony, V.H. Grassian, and T.M. Peters: Particle concentrations in occupational settings measured with a nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler. Ann. Work Expo. Health 62(6):699–710 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zefon International Inc.: “Zefon NRD Samplers Operating Instructions.” Zefon International Inc., Ocala, FL. Available at https://www.zefon.com/Content/Products/SamplingMedia/LA03061-NRD.pdf (accessed May 16, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Method 0500: Particulates not otherwise regulated, total. In Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, 1994. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/0500.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Precisa Gravimetrics AG: “Precisa 360 EP Operating Instructions.” Precisa Gravimetrics AG, Dietikon, Switzerland. 2012. Available at https://www.precisa.com/images/downloads/Manual/en_360EP_Handbook.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): ID-125G: Metal and Metalloid Particulates in Workplace Atmospheres (ICP Analysis). Salt Lake City, UT: OSHA, 2002. Available at https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/inorganic/id125g/id125g.pdf (accessed June 7, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Method 7300: Elements by ICP. In Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, 2003. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/7300.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: “Thermo Scientific™ Element 2™ High Resolution ICP-MS.” Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA. Available at https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/IQLAAEGAAMFABWMAFC (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Horiba Ltd.: “Dynamic Light Scattering Particle Size Distribution Analyzer LB-550.” Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan. Available at http://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/Documents/PSA/LB550_bro.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Horiba Ltd.: “Dynamic Light Scattering Particle Size Analyzer LB-550.” Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan. Available at http://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/Documents/PSA/LB550_operation_man.pdf (accessed June 19, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Horiba Instruments Inc.: “A guidebook to particle size analysis.” Available at https://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/eMag/PSA/Guidebook/pdf/PSA_Guidebook.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ganser, G.H., and P. Hewett: An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(4):233–244 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimadzu Corporation: “Particle size distribution dependent on principle of measurement.” Available at http://www.shimadzu.com/an/powder/support/practice/p01/lesson02.html (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Elihn, K., and P. Berg: Ultrafine particle characteristics in seven industrial plants. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 53(5):475–484 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., W.J. McClellan, J. Candela, D. Andrews, and P. Biswas: Reduction of nanoparticle exposure to welding aerosols by modification of the ventilation system in a workplace. J. Nanoparticle Res. 9:127–136 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandeh, M., S. Fathi, M.J.Z. Sakhvidi, J.Z. Reza, and L. Sedghian: Oxidative stress and early DNA damage in workers exposed to iron-rich metal fumes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24(10):9645–9650 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg, T.G., T.A. Stueckle, J.M. Antonini, et al.: Potential toxicity and underlying mechanisms associated with pulmonary exposure to iron oxide nanoparticles: Conflicting literature and unclear risk. Nanomaterials 7(10):307 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer: Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 100C, World Health Organization (ed.). Lyon, France, 2012. pp. 1–511. Available at https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono100C.pdf (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Centre of Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS): “Synergism.” Available at https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/synergism.html (accessed May 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G., R.J. Tropp, S.D. Kohl, X. Wang, and J.C. Chow: Filter processing and gravimetric analysis for suspended particulate matter samples. Aerosol Sci. Eng. 1:93–105 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, D.: Analytical performance issues. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9:D25–D32 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo, J., K. Monaghan, T. Lee, M. Kashon, and M. Harper: Air sampling filtration media: Collection efficiency for respirable size-selective sampling. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50(1):76–87 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, J.F.P., P.C.S. Albuquerque, R.M.M. Miranda, and M.T.F. Vieira: Determination of airborne nanoparticles from welding operations. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 75:747–755 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, P., C. Geraci, R. Zumwalde, M. Hoover, and E. Kuempel: Occupational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5(4):239–249 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy S., W.P. King, B.C. Eimer, and R.E. Shaffer: Filtering performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5(9):556–564 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer R.E., and S. Rengasamy: Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: A review. J. Nanopart. Res. 11:1661–1672 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Castillo, A.M.P: Nanomaterials: what are the issues for workers? In Small and smarter electronics, big impact: The importance of micro- and nanoelectronics in our digital economy and society, European Trade Union Institute. European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), Brussels, November 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar