Emissions associated with operations of four different additive manufacturing or 3D printing technologies

References

• Afshar-Mohajer N, Wu C-Y, Ladun T, Rajon DA, Huang Y. 2015. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build Environ. 93:293–301. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain NE, Stephens B. 2016. Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ Sci Technol. 50 (3):1260–1268. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton DJ. 2002. Burton field guide for industrial hygiene. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan FL, House R, Kudla I, Lipszyc JC, Rajaram N, Tarlo SM. 2018. Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occup Med (Lond). 68(3):211–214. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqy042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantarasopak C, Herrick R. 2015. Exposure assessment of 3D printer emissions. Paper Presented at the AIHce 2015, May 30–June 4, Salt Lake City, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Damanhuri AAM, Subki ASA, Hariri A, Tee BT, Fauadi MHFM, Hussin MSF, Mustafa MSS. 2019. Comparative study of selected indoor concentration from selective laser sintering process using virgin and recycled polyamide nylon (PA12). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 373:012014. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/373/1/012014
   Google Scholar
• Davis A, Zhang Q, Wong JPS, Weber RJ, Black MS. 2019. Characterization of volatile organic compound emissions from consumer level material extrusion 3D printers. Build Env. 160. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106209
   Google Scholar
• Du Preez S, Johnson A, LeBouf R, Linde S, Stefaniak AB, Du Plessis J. 2018. Exposures during industrial 3-D printing and post-processing tasks. Rapid Prototype J. 24 (5):865–871. doi:10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euromines. 2020. Position of the European Extractive Industry on the proposed reduction of occupational exposure limit values for nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2) at the workplace. Brussels: Euromines.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd EL, Wang J, Regens JL. 2017. Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(7):523–533. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1302587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford SLN. 2014. Additive manufacturing technology: Potential implications for U.S. manufacturing competitiveness. J Int Commerce Econom. 35p. https://www.usitc.gov/journals/Vol_VI_Article4_Additive_Manufacturing_Technology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Geiss O, Bianchi I, Barrero-Moreno J. 2016. Lung-deposited surface area concentration measurements in selected occupational and non-occupational environments. J Aerosol Sci. 96:24–37. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff P, Stahlbom B, Nordenberg E, Graichen A, Johansson P, Karlsson H. 2017. Evaluating measuring techniques for occupational exposure during additive manufacturing of metals: a pilot study. J Ind Ecol. 21 (Suppl 1):S120–S129. doi:10.1111/jiec.12498
   Google Scholar
• Gumperlein I, Fischer E, Dietrich-Gumperlein G, Karrasch S, Nowak D, Jorres RA, Schierl R. 2018. Acute health effects of desktop 3D printing (fused deposition modeling) using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid materials: an experimental exposure study in human volunteers. Indoor Air. 28(4):611–623. doi:10.1111/ina.12458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House R, Rajaram N, Tarlo SM. 2017. Case report of asthma associated with 3D printing. Occup Med (Lond). 67(8):652–654. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqx129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes J, Rezayat T, Wallace WD, Lynch JP. 2016. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with inhaled exposure to nylon powder for 3-D printing: a variant of nylon flock worker's lung disease? Am J Respir Critic Care Med. 193:A7071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern DG, Crausman RS, Durand KT, Nayer A, Kuhn C. 3rd. 1998. Flock worker's lung: chronic interstitial lung disease in the nylon flocking industry. Ann Intern Med. 129(4):261–272. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-4-199808150-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern DG, Kuhn C, Ely EW, Pransky GS, Mello CJ, Fraire AE, Müller J. 2000. Flock worker's lung: broadening the spectrum of clinicopathology, narrowing the spectrum of suspected etiologies. Chest. 117(1):251–259. doi:10.1378/chest.117.1.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Kim S, Kwon O, Tsai PJ. 2015. Emissions of nanoparticles and gaseous material from 3D printer operation. Environ Sci Technol. 49(20):12044–12053. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Lee J, Yoo D, Kim Y. 2017. Characterization and control of nanoparticle emission during 3D printing. Environ Sci Technol. 51(18):10357–10368. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leith D, Miller-Lionberg D, Casuccio G, Lersch T, Lentz H, Marchese A, Volckens J. 2014. Development of a transfer function for a personal, thermophoretic nanoparticle sampler. Aerosol Sci Technol. 48(1):81–89. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.861593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell B, Jimenez Guzman X, Dolack M, Simpson TW, JM. Cimbala. 2016. 3D printing in the wild: a preliminary investigation of air quality in college maker spaces. In Solid freeform fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference, edited by Solid Freeform Fabrication. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes L, Kangas A, Kukko K, Mølgaard B, Säämänen A, Kanerva T, Flores Ituarte I, Huhtiniemi M, Stockmann-Juvala H, Partanen J, et al. 2017. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J Ind Ecol. 21 (Suppl 1):S94–S106. doi:10.1111/jiec.12569
   Google Scholar
• Ryan T, Hubbard D. 2016. 3-D printing hazards: literature review & preliminary hazard assessment. Profess Safe. 61:656–662.
   Google Scholar
• Sahmel J, Unice K, Scott P, Cowan D, Paustenbach D. 2009. The use of multizone models to estimate an airborne chemical contaminant generation and decay profile: occupational exposures of hairdressers to vinyl chloride in hairspray during the 1960s and 1970s. Risk Anal. 29(12):1699–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01311.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks LE. 1996. IAQ model for windows. Risk Version 1.5. Elmsford, NY: WexTech Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Bowers LN, Knepp AK, Luxton TP, Peloquin DM, Baumann EJ, Ham JE, Wells JR, Johnson AR, LeBouf RF, et al. 2019. Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16 (8):519–531. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1612068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Johnson A, Du Preez S, Hammond DR, Wells JR, Ham J, LeBouf R, Martin SB, Jr.,Duling M, Bowers LN, et al. 2019. Insights into emissions and exposures from use of industrial-scale additive manufacturing machines. Safety Health Work. 10(2):229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, LeBouf RF, Duling MG, Yi J, Abukabda AB, McBride CR, Nurkiewicz TR. 2017. Inhalation exposure to three-dimensional printer emissions stimulates acute hypertension and microvascular dysfunction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 335:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, LeBouf RF, Yi J, Ham J, Nurkewicz T, Schwegler-Berry DE, Chen BT, Wells JR, Duling MG, Lawrence RB, et al. 2017. Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional printer. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14 (7):540–550. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1302589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinle P. 2016. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13 (2):121–132. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1091957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens B, Azimi P, Orch ZE, Ramos T. 2013. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos Environ. 79:334–339. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1994a, September. Method 5050: bomb preparation method for solid waste. Revision 0. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1994b, September. Method 9056: determination of inorganic anions by ion chromatography. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1999, January. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air. 2nd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Environmental Research Information, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).
   Google Scholar
• Väisänen AJK, Hyttinen M, Ylönen S, Alonen L. 2019. Occupational exposure to gaseous and particulate contaminants originating from additive manufacturing of liquid, powdered and filament plastic materials and related post-processes. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(3):258–271. doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1557784
   Google Scholar
• Vance ME, Pegues V, Van Montfrans S, Leng W, Marr LC. 2017. Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3D printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environ Sci Technol. 51(17):9516–9523. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland DA, Lynch DA, Jensen SP, Newell JD, Miller DE, Crausman RS, Kuhn C, 3rd, Kern DG. 2003. Thin-section CT findings in flock worker's lung, a work-related interstitial lung disease. Radiology. 227(1):222–231. doi:10.1148/radiol.2271011063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li L. 2018. Total volatile organic compound emission evaluation and control for stereolithography additive manufacturing process. J Clean Prod. 170:1268–1278. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi J, LeBouf RF, Duling MG, Nurkiewicz T, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry D, Virji MA, Stefaniak AB. 2016. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 79(11):453–465. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon C. 2016. O48-1 exposure assessment and deposition modelling at the different sites at the respiratory tract of nanoparticles during 3D printing. Occup Environ Med. 73(Suppl 1):A91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Q, Sharma G, Wong JPS, Davis AY, Black MS, Biswas P, Weber RJ. 2018. Investigating particle emissions and aerosol dynamics from a consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printer with a lognormal moment aerosol model. Aerosol Sci Technol. 52(10):1099–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitting A, Savolainen H. 1980. Effects of single and repeated exposures to thermo-oxidative degradation products of poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) (ABS) on rat lung, liver, kidney, and brain. Arch Toxicol. 46(3–4):295–304. doi:10.1007/BF00310447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek TL, Ogle BR, Jankovic JT, Hollenbeck SM. 2017. An exposure assessment of desktop 3D printing. J Chem Health Safe. 24(2):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar