References
- Arnold SF. 2015. The use of heuristics and exposure models in improving exposure judgment accuracy [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/177073.
- Cauda E, Hoover MD. 2019, May 16. Right sensors used right: a life-cycle approach for real-time monitors and direct reading methodologies and data. A call to action for customers, creators, curators, and analysts. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2019/05/16/right-sensors-used-right/.
- Jahn, et al. 2015. A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures. 4th ed. Falls Church, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
- Lavoué J, Joseph L, Knott P, Davies H, Labrèche F, Clerc F, Mater G, Kirkham T. 2019. Expostats: a Bayesian toolkit to aid the interpretation of occupational exposure measurements. Ann Work Expo Health. 63(3):267–279. PMID: 30551169. www.expostats.ca. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy100
- Lavoué J, Joseph L, Kirkham T, Labrèche F, Mater G, Clerc F. 2020. WebExpo - towards a better interpretation of measurements of occupational exposure to chemicals in the workplace, Montréal (Québec), Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST R-1065). https://www.irsst.qc.ca/en/publications-tools/publication/i/101066/n/webexpo.
- Hewett P, Logan P, Mulhausen J, Gurumurthy R, Banerjee S. 2006. Rating exposure control using bayesian decision analysis. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(10):568–581. doi:10.1080/15459620600914641
- Logan P, Gurumurthy R, Mulhausen J, Hewett P. 2009. Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy? Ann Occup Hyg. 53(4):311–324. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mep011
- Rutkowski E. 2018, March. Predictive purposes. The Synergist. https://synergist.aiha.org/201803-predictive-purposes.