Validation of N95 respirator models for pressure drop and particle capture efficiency

References

• Balazy A, Toivola M, Reponen T, Podgorski A, Zimmer A, Grinshpun SA. 2006. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. Ann Occup Hyg. 50(3):259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandi M. 2020. Electrocharged facepiece respirator fabrics using common materials. Proc R Soc A. 476(2243):20200469.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Loffler F, Umhauer H. 1986. Deep-bed electret filters: the determination of single fiber charge and collection efficiency. IEEE Trans Elect Insul. EI-21(3):477–486. doi:10.1109/TEI.1986.349096.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Zhuang Z, Brochu E, Palmiero A. 2015. Fit assessment of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Strategic National Stockpile. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 32(2):50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bian Y, Zhang L, Chen C. 2018. Experimental and modeling study of pressure drop across electrospun nanofiber air filters. Build Environ. 142:244–251. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RC. 1993. Air filtration: an integrated approach to the theory and applications of fibrous filters. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Huang SH. 1998. The effects of particle charge on the performance of a filtering facepiece. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 59(4):227–233. doi:10.1080/15428119891010488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Lehtimaki M, Willeke K. 1993. Loading and filtration characteristics of filtering facepieces. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 54(2):51–60. doi:10.1080/15298669391354324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CN. 1953. The separation of airborne dust and particles. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 167(1b):185–213. doi:10.1177/002034835316701b13.
   Google Scholar
• Fukakusa J, Rosenblat J, Jang B, Ribeiro M, Kudla I, Tarlo S. 2011. Factors influencing respirator use at work in respiratory patients. Occup Med (Lond). 61(8):576–582. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris Z. 2021. Adjusting a commonly used respirator pressure drop equation for use with modern respirators. Iowa City: The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Higdon J, Ford G. 1996. Permeability of three-dimensional models of fibrous porous media. J Fluid Mech. 308:341–361. doi:10.1017/S0022112096001504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds WC. 1999. Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Vol. 2nd. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons. Book, Whole.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini S, Tafreshi HV. 2010. Modeling permeability of 3-D nanofiber media in slip flow regime. Chem Eng Sci. 65(6):2249–2254. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson GW, James DF. 1986. The permeability of fibrous porous media. Can J Chem Eng. 64(3):364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaoka C, Emi H, Otani Y, Iiyama T. 1987. Effect of Charging State of Particles on Electret Filtration. Aerosol Sci Tech. 7(1):1–13. doi:10.1080/02786828708959142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koponen A, Kandhai D, Hellen E, Alava M, Hoekstra A, Kataja M, Niskanen K, Sloot P, Timonen J. 1998. Permeability of three-dimensional random fiber webs. Phys Rev Lett. 80(4):716–719. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara S. 1959. The forces experienced by randomly distributed parallel circular cylinders or spheres in a viscous flow at small Reynolds numbers. J Phys Soc Jpn. 14(4):527–532. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.14.527.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrache R, Fissan H. 1987. Enhancement of particle deposition in filters due to electrostatic effects. Filtr Sep. 24(6):418–422.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KW, Liu BYH. 1982. Theoretical study of aerosol filtration by fibrous filters. Aerosol Sci Technol. 1(2):147–161. doi:10.1080/02786828208958584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneau P, Mulcey P, Vendel J. 1987. Effect of dust loading on the pressure drop and efficiency of HEPA filters. Filtr Sep. 24(4):265–267.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2019a. Asbestos and other fibers by PCM. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 7400(3). [Internet] https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/pdf/7400.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2019b. Determination of particulate filter efficiency level for N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, air-purifying respirators standard testing procedure. Procedure No. TEB-APR-STP-0059, Revision 3.2. Pittsburgh (PA): National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy PT, Schmoll LH. 2013. Particle count statistics applied to the penetration of a filter challenged with nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol. 47(6):616–625. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.778954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy PT, Strzelecki B, Ortiz-Hernandez M, Aubin P, Jing X, Chang Q, Xiang J, Thorne PS, Stapleton JT. 2021. Characterization of performance and disinfection resilience of nonwoven filter materials for use in 3D-printed N95 respirators. J Occup Environ Hyg. 18(6):265–275. doi:10.1080/15459624.2021.1913283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy PT. 2022. Review and demonstration of equations applied to models of filtering facepiece respirator particle capture efficiency. J Occup Environl Hyg. 19(10–11):615–628. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2112685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani Y, Emi H, Mori J. 1993. Initial collection efficiency of electret filter and its durability for solid and liquid particles [translated]. KONA Powder Part J. 11(0):207–214. doi:10.14356/kona.1993023.
   Google Scholar
• Payet S, Boulaud D, Madelaine G, Renoux A. 1992. Penetration and pressure drop of a HEPA filter during loading with submicron liquid particles. J Aerosol Sci. 23(7):723–735. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(92)90039-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pich J. 1966. Pressure drop of fibrous filters at small Knudsen numbers. Ann Occup Hyg. 9(1):23–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdy M. 2019. Comparison of facemask characteristics with user assessment of comfort. Iowa City: The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez JA, O’Shaughnessy PT. 2017. Filter penetration and breathing resistance evaluation of respirators and dust masks. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(2):148–157. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1237027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romay FJ, Liu BY, Chae S-J. 1998. Experimental study of electrostatic capture mechanisms in commercial electret filters. Aerosol Sci Tech. 28(3):224–234. doi:10.1080/02786829808965523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer RE, Janssen LL. 2015. Selecting models for a respiratory protection program: what can we learn from the scientific literature? Am J Infect Control. 43(2):127–132. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabti B, Dascalescu L, Plopeanu M, Antoniu A, Mekideche M. 2009. Factors that influence the corona charging of fibrous dielectric materials. J Electrostat. 67(2–3):193–197. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2009.01.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabti B, Mekideche M, Plopeanu M, Dumitran L, Herous L, Dascalescu L. 2010. Corona-charging and charge-decay characteristics of nonwoven filter media. IEEE Trans on Ind Applicat. 46(2):634–640. doi:10.1109/TIA.2010.2041090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen DR, Pui DYH. 2006. Modeling of filtration efficiency of nanoparticles in standard filter media. In: Maynard AD, Pui DYH, editors. Nanotechnology and occupational health. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5859-2_11.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Kim SC, Pui DYH. 2008. Figure of merit of composite filters with micrometer and nanometer fibers. Aerosol Sci Tech. 42(9):722–728. doi:10.1080/02786820802249133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lee W-MG, Huang H-L, Huang Y-C, Luo C-H, Wu C-C, Yu K-P. 2007. Aerosol penetration properties of an electret filter with submicron aerosols with various operating factors. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 42(1):51–57. doi:10.1080/10934520601015651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar