References
- Abdalla N, Banerjee S, Ramachandran G, Arnold S. 2020. Bayesian state space modeling of physical processes in industrial hygiene. Technometrics. 62(2):147–160. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2019.1630009.
- Arnold FC, Engel AJ. 2001. Evaporation of pure liquids from open surfaces. In: Linders JBHJ, editor. Modelling of environmental chemical exposure and risk. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 61–71.
- Banerjee S, Ramachandran G, Vadali M, Sahmel J. 2014. Bayesian hierarchical framework for occupational hygiene decision making. Ann Occup Hyg. 58(9):1079–1093. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu060.
- Bonnell MA, Zidek A, Griffiths A, Gutzman D. 2018. Fate and exposure modeling in regulatory chemical evaluation: new directions from retrospection. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 20(1):20–31. doi: 10.1039/c7em00510e.
- Bruinen de Bruin Y, Franco A, Ahrens A, Morris A, Verhagen H, Kephalopoulos S, Dulio V, Slobodnik J, Sijm D, Vermeire T, et al. 2022. Enhancing the use of exposure science across EU chemical policies as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 32(4):513–525. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00388-4.
- Cherrie JW, Fransman W, Heussen GA, Koppisch D, Jensen KA. 2020. Exposure models for REACH and occupational safety and health regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(2):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020383.
- Cherrie JW, Schneider T. 1999. Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentrations. Ann Occup Hygiene. 43(4):235–245. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00023-X.
- ConsExpo. 2022. https://www.rivm.nl/en/consexpo
- Csiszar SA, Meyer DE, Dionisio KL, Egeghy P, Isaacs KK, Price PS, Scanlon KA, Tan YM, Thomas K, Vallero D, et al. 2016. Conceptual framework to extend life cycle assessment using near-field human exposure modeling and high-throughput tools for chemicals. Environ Sci Technol. 50(21):11922–11934. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02277.
- Cullen AC, Frey HC, Frey CH. 1999. Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Springer US.
- ERG. 2021. Generic scenario development process. Chantilly. Chantilly, VA.
- European Chemicals Agency. 2015. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.12: use description, Version 3.0. Helsinki. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r12_en.pdf/ea8fa5a6-6ba1-47f4-9e47-c7216e180197?t=1449153827710.
- European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Guidance on the compilation of safety data sheets. 4.0 ed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/2324906/sds_en.pdf/01c29e23-2cbe-49c0-aca7-72f22e101e20.
- Fehrenbacher MC, Hummel AA. 1996. Evaluation of the mass balance model used by the Environmental Protection Agency for estimating inhalation exposure to new chemical substances. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 57(6):526–536. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8651073. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014738.
- Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. 2016. Public Law No: 114–182. Stat. 15 U.S.C. §2601 et seq (June 22).
- Fransman W. 2017. How accurate and reliable are exposure models? Ann Work Expo Health. 61(8):907–910. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx068.
- Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, Cherrie JW, Tischer M, Schneider T, Schinkel J, Kromhout H, Warren N, Goede H, Tielemans E. 2011. Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(9):957–979. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer083.
- Huang SZ, Chuang YC, Hung PC, Chen CY, Chiang SY, Wu KY. 2021. Incorporating exposure measurement data from similar exposure scenarios to inform exposure modeling estimates: a demonstration using cluster analysis and Bayesian modeling. Ann Work Expo Health. 65(1):96–112. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa088.
- Isaacs KK, Glen WG, Egeghy P, Goldsmith MR, Smith L, Vallero D, Brooks R, Grulke CM, Ozkaynak H. 2014. SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. Environ Sci Technol. (21) 12750–12759. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222184. doi: 10.1021/es502513w.
- IT Environmental Programs. 1991. Chemical engineering branch manual for the preparation of engineering assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Jayjock MA. 1997. Uncertainty analysis in the estimation of exposure. Am Industr Hygiene Assoc J. 58(5):380–382. doi: 10.1080/15428119791012766.
- Jayjock MA, Armstrong T, Taylor M. 2011. The Daubert standard as applied to exposure assessment modeling using the two-zone (NF/FF) model estimation of indoor air breathing zone concentration as an example. J Occup Environ Hyg. 8(11):D114–122. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.624387.
- Jolliet O, Huang L, Hou P, Fantke P. 2021. High throughput risk and impact screening of chemicals in consumer products. Risk Anal. 41(4):627–644. doi: 10.1111/risa.13604.
- Jones RM, Burstyn I. 2017. Bayesian analysis of occupational exposure data with conjugate priors. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(5):504–514. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx032.
- Koivisto AJ, Jayjock M, Hameri KJ, Kulmala M, Van Sprang P, Yu M, Boor BE, Hussein T, Koponen IK, Londahl J, et al. 2022. Evaluating the theoretical background of Stoffenmanager and the advanced REACH tool. Ann Work Expo Health. 66(4):520–536. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab057.
- Koppisch D, Schinkel J, Gabriel S, Fransman W, Tielemans E. 2012. Use of the MEGA exposure database for the validation of the Stoffenmanager model. Ann Occup Hyg. 56(4):426–439. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer097.
- Lamb J, Galea KS, Miller BG, Hesse S, Van Tongeren M. 2017. Between-user reliability of tier 1 exposure assessment tools used under REACH. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(8):939–953. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx074.
- Lavoue J, Joseph L, Knott P, Davies H, Labreche F, Clerc F, Mater G, Kirkham T. 2019. Expostats: a Bayesian toolkit to aid the interpretation of occupational exposure measurements. Ann Work Expo Health. 63(3):267–279. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy100.
- Lee E, Feigley CE, Khan J, Hussey JR. 2007. The effect of worker’s location, orientation, and activity on exposure. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(8):572–582. doi: 10.1080/15459620701455197.
- Lee EG, Ceballos DM. 2020. Adoption of exposure assessment tools to assist in providing respiratory protection recommendations. Ann Work Expo Health. 64(5):547–557. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa023.
- Lee EG, Kim SW, Feigley CE, Harper M. 2013. Exposure models for the prior distribution in Bayesian decision analysis for occupational hygiene decision making. J Occup Environ Hyg. 10(2):97–108. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.748627.
- Marquart H, Franken R, Goede H, Fransman W, Schinkel J. 2017. Validation of the dermal exposure model in ECETOC TRA. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(7):854–871. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx059.
- Marquart H, Heussen H, Le Feber M, Noy D, Tielemans E, Schinkel J, West J, Van Der Schaaf D. 2008. ‘Stoffenmanager’, a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(6):429–441. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men032.
- Marquart H, Northage C, Money C. 2007. Exposure scenarios for workers. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 17 Suppl 1:S16–S25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500617.
- Meyer DE, Mittal VK, Ingwersen WW, Ruiz-Mercado GJ, Barrett WM, Gonzalez MA, Abraham JP, Smith RL. 2019. Purpose-driven reconciliation of approaches to estimate chemical releases. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 7:1260–1270. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04923.
- Money C. 2018. Improving the relevance and efficiency of human exposure assessments within the process of regulatory risk assessment. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 20(1):12–19. doi: 10.1039/c7em00434f.
- Money C, Margary A, Noij D, Hommes K. 2011. Generic exposure scenarios: their development, application, and interpretation under REACH. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(5):451–464. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer022.
- NIOSH. 2015a. Directory of engineering controls. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/engcontrols/
- NIOSH. 2015b. Hierarchy of controls. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html
- OECD. 2000. Guidance document on emission scenario documents. Paris. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2000)12&doclanguage=en.
- OECD. 2011. Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry. Paris. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2004)22/rev1&doclanguage=en.
- OSHA. 2006. OSHA fact sheet: personal protective equipment. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ppe-factsheet.pdf
- Phillips K, Minucci J, Purucker T, Isaacs K, Wambaugh J. 2021. Laying the groundwork for high-throughput occupational exposure modeling: data and models. https://epa.figshare.com/articles/presentation/Laying_the_Groundwork_for_High-Throughput_Occupational_Exposure_Modeling_Data_and_Models/17118836
- Pritchard JA. 1977. A guide to industrial respiratory protection. Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
- Quick H, Huynh T, Ramachandran G. 2017. A method for constructing informative priors for Bayesian modeling of occupational hygiene data. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(1):67–75. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxw001.
- Ramachandran G. 2019. Progress in Bayesian statistical applications in exposure assessment. Ann Work Expo Health. 63(3):259–262. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz007.
- SAIC. 1996. Generic scenario for automotive spray coating - draft report.
- Sauve JF, Sylvestre MP, Parent ME, Lavoue J. 2020. Bayesian hierarchical modelling of individual expert assessments in the development of a general-population job-exposure matrix. Ann Work Expo Health. 64(1):13–24. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz077.
- Savic N, Gasic B, Schinkel J, Vernez D. 2017. Comparing the Advanced REACH Tool’s (ART) estimates with Switzerland’s occupational exposure data. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(8):954–964. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx069.
- Schlüter U, Arnold S, Borghi F, Cherrie J, Fransman W, Heussen H, Jayjock M, Jensen KA, Koivisto J, Koppisch D, et al. 2022. Theoretical background of occupational-exposure models - report of an expert workshop of the ISES Europe Working Group “exposure models”. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19(3):1234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031234.
- Spinazzè A, Borghi F, Campagnolo D, Rovelli S, Keller M, Fanti G, Cattaneo A, Cavallo DM. 2019. How to obtain a reliable estimate of occupational exposure? Review and discussion of models’ reliability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(15):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152764.
- Sunger N, Beasley A, Landenberger BD, Arnold SM. 2020. High-throughput exposure assessment tool (HEAT) for exposure-based prioritization of chemicals. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Inter J. 26(4):1076–1086. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1554993.
- Tielemans E, Noy D, Schinkel J, Heussen H, Van Der Schaaf D, West J, Fransman W. 2008. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(6):443–454. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18621742. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men033.
- Tielemans E, Warren N, Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, McNally K, Tischer M, Ritchie P, Kromhout H, Schinkel J, Schneider T, et al. 2011. Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(9):949–956. p.]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22080161. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer094.
- Tielemans E, Warren N, Schneider T, Tischer M, Ritchie P, Goede H, Kromhout H, Van Hemmen J, Cherrie JW. 2007. Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 17(Suppl 1):S72–S80. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500604.
- Toxic Substances Control Act. 1976. Public Law No: 94-469. Stat. 15 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.
- Urbanus J, Henschel O, Li Q, Marsh D, Money C, Noij D, van de Sandt P, van Rooij J, Wormuth M. 2020. The ECETOC-targeted risk assessment tool for worker exposure estimation in REACH registration dossiers of chemical substances-current developments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(22):8443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228443.
- USEPA. 1985. Compilation of air pollutant emissions factors (AP-42). 4th ed. Research Triangle Park: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/ap42_4thed_orig.pdf
- USEPA. 2011. Generic model to estimate environmental releases from container residue for drums containing liquids (Draft).
- USEPA. 2015. Chemical screening tool for exposures and environmental releases (ChemSTEER) user guide.
- USEPA. 2016. Emission scenario document on chemical additives used in automotive lubricants.
- USEPA. 2019. TSCA new chemical determinations: a working approach for making determinations under TSCA section 5. https://www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicals-under-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/approach-making-determinations-tsca
- USEPA. 2022a. TSCA chemical substance inventory. [accessed 2023 Jan 9]. https://www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory/about-tsca-chemical-substance-inventory.
- USEPA. 2022b. Regulatory determinations made under Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). [accessed 2023 July 13]. https://www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicals-under-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/regulatory-determinations-made.
- USEPA. 2022c. EPA finds carbon tetrachloride poses an unreasonable risk to human health 2022. [accessed 2023 July 13]. https://www.epa.gov/chemicals-under-tsca/epa-finds-carbon-tetrachloride-poses-unreasonable-risk-human-health.
- USEPA. 2023a. How to access the TSCA inventory 2023. [accessed 2023 May 10]. https://www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory/how-access-tsca-inventory.
- USEPA. 2023b. Statistics for the new chemicals review program under TSCA 2023. [accessed 2023 Aug 14]. https://www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicals-under-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/statistics-new-chemicals-review#stats.
- USEPA. 2023c. ChemSTEER-Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases. [accessed 9 Jan 2023]. https://www.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/chemsteer-chemical-screening-tool-exposures-and-environmental-releases.
- van Tongeren M, Fransman W, Spankie S, Tischer M, Brouwer D, Schinkel J, Cherrie JW, Tielemans E. 2011. Advanced REACH Tool: development and application of the substance emission potential modifying factor. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(9):980–988. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer093.
- von Stackelberg K, Williams PRD. 2021. Evolving science and practice of risk assessment. Risk Anal. 41(4):571–583. doi: 10.1111/risa.13647.
- Wambaugh JF, Bare JC, Carignan CC, Dionisio KL, Dodson RE, Jolliet O, Liu X, Meyer DE, Newton SR, Phillips KA, et al. 2019. New approach methodologies for exposure science. Curr Opin Toxicol. 15:76–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.07.001.
- Wambaugh JF, Setzer RW, Reif DM, Gangwal S, Mitchell-Blackwood J, Arnot JA, Joliet O, Frame A, Rabinowitz J, Knudsen TB, et al. 2013. High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. Environ Sci Technol. 47(15):8479–8488. doi: 10.1021/es400482g.