Background radiation and cancer risks: A major intellectual confrontation within the domain of radiation genetics with multiple converging biological disciplines

References

• Adolph EF. 1949. Quantitative relationships in the physiological constitutions of mammals. Science. 109(2841):579–585. doi: 10.1126/science.109.2841.579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert RE. 1994. Carcinogen risk assessment in the US Environmental Protection Agency. Crit Rev Toxicol. 24(1):75–85. doi: 10.3109/10408449409017920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock EB, Collins JL. 1929. Does natural ionizing radiation control rate of mutation? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 15(8):623–628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.15.8.623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billen D. 1990. Spontaneous DNA damage and its significance for the negligible dose controversy in radiation protection. Rad. Res. 124(2):242–245. doi: 10.2307/3577872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn H. 2021. John ‘Jack’ Gofmann. Researcher and social activist. ‘Fair-haired boy’ and ‘enemy within’. Amer J Cardiol. 154:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2009. The road to linearity: why linearity at low does became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment. Arch Toxicol. 83(3):203–225. doi: 10.1007/s00204-009-0412-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2017a. The threshold vs LNT showdown: dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model. Part 1. The Russell-Muller debate. Environ Res. 154:435–451. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2017b. The threshold vs LNT showdown: dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model. Part 2 How a mistake lead BEIR I to adopt LNT. Environ Res. 154:452–458. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2017c. Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: an historical assessment. Environ Res. 158:773–788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2019. The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response model: a comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. Chem Biol Interact. 301:6–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2020. The Muller-Neel dispute and the fate of cancer risk assessment. Environ Res. 190:109961. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109961.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. 2023. The Gofman-Tamplin cancer risk controversy and its impact on the creation of BEIR I and the acceptance of LNT. Med Lav. 114(1):e20023007. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i1.14006.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ, Shamoun DY, Agathokleous E. 2022. Dose-response and risk assessment: Evolutionary foundations. Environ Pollut. 309:119787. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow JF. 1995. Quarreling geneticists and a diplomat. Genetics. 140(2):421–426. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenberg H. 1958. On endogenous carcinogenesis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 83(39):1726–1732. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1113859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bont R, van Larebeke N. 2004. Endogenous DNA damage in humans: a review of quantitative data. Mutagenesis. 19(3):169–185. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geh025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JL, Lupold S. 2014. Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. Mol Hum Reprod. 20(12):1180–1189. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gau067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Rodriguez A, Gosalvez J, Agarwal A, Roy R, Johnston S. 2018. DNA damage and repair in human reproductive cells. IJMS. 20(1):31. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010031.
   Google Scholar
• Giles N. 1940. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations in Tradescantia. Genetics. 25(1):69–87. doi: 10.1093/genetics/25.1.69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass B. 1957. The genetic hazards of nuclear radiations. Science. 126(3267):241–246. doi: 10.1126/science.126.3267.241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofman JW, Tamplin AR. 1970. ‘Population control’ through nuclear pollution. Chicago (IL): Nelson-Hall Co. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gofman JW, Tamplin AR. 1971. Poison power. Emmanus (PA): Rodale Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gofman AR, Tamplin AR. 1970. Documents submitted by Dr. John W. Gofman. Bio-medical Research Division, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. VIII. Document No. 9. Major fallacies in the AEC staff comments on demonstrated validity of the doubling dose concept as used by Gofman and Tamplin. Hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 91st Congress of the United States. GT-111-70, p. 2133.
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed TH, Olson AR. 1928. The production of variation in nicotine species by X-ray treatment of sex cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 14(1):66–69. doi: 10.1073/pnas.14.1.66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta RC, Lutz WK. 1999. Background DNA damage from endogenous and unavoidable exogenous carcinogens: A basis for spontaneous cancer incidence? Mut Res. 424:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RC, Spencer-Beach G. 1996. Natural and endogenous DNA adducts as detected by 32P-postlabeling. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 23(1 Pt 1):14–21. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldane JB. 1955.  Genetical effects of radiation from products of nuclear explosions. Nature . 176(4472):115–115. doi: 10.1038/176115a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldane JB. 1956a. Untitled letter to editor. Nature. 177(4501):227. doi: 10.1038/177227a0.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane JB. 1956b. Radiation hazards. Lancet. 270(6931):1066. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)90828-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harman D. 1956. Aging-A theory based on free-radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol. 11(3):298–300. doi: 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harman D. 1962. Role of free radical in mutation, cancer, aging, and maintenance of life. Rad Res. 16(5):753. doi: 10.2307/3571274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman D. 1980. Free-radical theory of aging-origin of life, evolution, and aging. Age. 3(4):100–102. doi: 10.1007/BF02432267.
   Google Scholar
• Hart RW, Setlow RB. 1974. Correlation between deoxyribonucleic acid excision-repair and life-span in a number of mammalian species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 71(6):2169–2173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley JBS. 1955. Genetical effects of radiation from products of nuclear explosions. Nature. 177:227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AL, Loeb LA. 2001. The contribution of endogenous sources of DNA damage to the multiple mutations in cancer. Mutat Res. 477(1-2):7–21. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00091-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk Science. 2023. Emails reveal: bureaucrats censor radiation risk science fraud by cancelling whistleblowers; Huge implications for nuclear power and more; [accessed 2023 Aug 18]. https://junkscience.com/2023/06/emails-reveal-radiation-safety-establishment-tries-to-censor-blockbuster-debunking-of-the-lnt-and-cleanse-the-health-physics-society-of-lnt-critics/.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood TBL. 1977. Evolution of aging. Nature. 270(5635):301–304. doi: 10.1038/270301a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl T. 1996. Endogenous damage to DNA. Phil Trans Biol Sci. 351:1529–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl T, Barnes DE. 2000. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 65(0):127–133. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2000.65.127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutz WK. 1990. Endogenous genotoxic agents and processes as a basis of spontaneous carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 238(3):287–295. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(90)90020-c.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch M. 2008. The cellular, developmental and population-genetic determinations of mutation-rate evolution. Genetics. 180(2):933–943. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M. 2010a. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(3):961–968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912629107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M. 2010b. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 26(8):345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marnett LJ, Burcham PC. 1993. Endogenous DNA adducts: Potential and paradox. Chem Res Toxicol. 6(6):771–785. doi: 10.1021/tx00036a005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council (MRC). 1956. The hazards to man of nuclear and allied radiations. London: MRC. p. 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science. 66(1699):84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1699.84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1929. The method of evolution. Sci Month. 63(689):481–486. doi: 10.1086/280282.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1954a. The nature of the genetic effects produced by radiation. In: Hollaender A, editor. Radiation biology, Vol. 1, Chapter 7. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company. p. 351–473.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1954b. The manner of production of mutations by radiation. In: Hollaender A, editor. Radiation biology, Vol. 1, Chapter, 8. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company. p. 475–626.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1955. How radiation changes the genetic constitution. Bull Atomic Sci. 11(9):329–338. doi: 10.1080/00963402.1955.11453653.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1956a. Report to BEAR I genetics panel. Muller File. Bloomingdale (IN): Lilly Library, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1956b. The relation between chromosome changes and gene mutations. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 8:126–147.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ, Mott-Smith LM. 1930. Evidence that natural radioactivity is inadequate to explain the frequency of “nature” mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 16(4):277–285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.16.4.277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1956. Biological effects of atomic radiation (BEAR). Washington (DC): NAS/NRC.
   Google Scholar
• NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1972. Biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR-I). Washington (DC): NAS/NRC.
   Google Scholar
• NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1980. Biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR-III). Washington (DC): NAS/NRC.
   Google Scholar
• Olson AR, Lewis GN. 1928. Natural radioactivity and the origin of species. Nature. 121(3052):673–674. doi: 10.1038/121673a0.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkel D. 1958. The use of body surface area as a criterion of drug dose in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 18:853–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipkin SB, Sullivan WN. 1959. A search for genetic change in Drosophila melanogaster exposed to cosmic radiation at extreme altitude. Aerosp Med. 30:585–598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE. 2003. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Hum Exp Toxicol. 22(6):290–306. doi: 10.1191/0960327103ht365oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddi OS, Rao MS. 1964. Genetic effects of cosmic radiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 201(4914):96–97. doi: 10.1038/201096a0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricci P, Calabrese EJ. 2022. Resolving an open science-policy question: should the LNT still be an omnibus regulatory assumption. Sci Total Environ. 825:153917. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci PF, Tharmalingam S. 2019. Ionizing radiations epidemiology does not support the LNT model. Chem-Bio Inter. 301:128–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson AR, Yousefzadeh MJ, Rozgaja TA, Wang J, Li X, Tilstra JS, Feldman CH, Gregg SQ, Johnson CH, Skoda EM, et al. 2018. Spontaneous DNA damage to the nuclear genome promotes senescence, redox imbalance and aging. Redox Biol. 17:259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WL. 1951. X-ray-induced mutations in mice. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 16(0):327–336. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russell WL. 1967. Factors that affect the radiation induction of mutations in the mouse. An da Acad Brasileira de Ciências. 39:65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Russell WL. 1981. Problems and solutions in the estimation of genetic risks from radiation and chemicals. In: Berg GG, Maillie HD, editors, Measurement of risks. New York (NY): Plenum Press, pagesp. 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Russell WL, Kelly EM. 1982. Mutation frequencies in male mice and the estimation of genetic hazards of radiation in men. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 79(2):542–544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell LB, Russell WL. 1996.  Spontaneous mutations recovered as mosaics in the mouse specific-locus test.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93(23):13072–13077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell LB, Russell WL. 1997. Correction: Spontaneous mutations recovered as mosaics in the mouse specific-locus test (vol 93, pg.13072, 1996). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94(8):4233–4233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WL, Russell LB, Kelly EM. 1958. Radiation dose rate and mutation frequency. Science. 128(3338):1546–1550. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3338.1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safe Drinking Water Committee. 1977. Drinking water and health. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan K, Wassom JS. 2008. Reflections on the impact of advances in the assessment of genetic risk of exposure to ionizing radiation on international radiation protection recommendations between the med-1950s and the present. Mutat Res. 658(1-2):1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby B, Calabrese EJ. 2023. How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 898:165402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setlow RB. 1988. Relevance of phenotypic variation in risk assessment: the scientific viewpoint. In: Woodhead AD, Bender MA, Leonard RC, editors. Phenotypic variation in populations: relevance to risk assessment. New York (NY): Plenum Press. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KC. 1992. Spontaneous mutagenesis: experimental, genetic and other factors. Mutat Res. 277(2):139–162. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90002-q.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soloway AH, LeQuesne PW. 1980. Potential endogenous mutagens-carcinogens. J Theor Biol. 85(1):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90286-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer WP. 1935. The non-random nature of visible mutations in Drosophila. Amer Nat. 69(722):223–238. doi: 10.1086/280595.
   Google Scholar
• Spiers FW, Haldane JB. 1956. Genetical effects of radiations from products of nuclear explosions. Nature. 177(4501):226–227. doi: 10.1038/177226b0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadler LJ. 1930. Some genetic effects of X-rays in plants. J Heredity. 21(1):3–20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103249.
   Google Scholar
• Sternglass EJ. 1963. Cancer-relation of prenatal radiation to development of disease in childhood. Science. 140(3571):1102–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3571.1102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternglass EJ. 1969. Infant mortality and nuclear tests. Bull Atomic Sci. 25(4):18–20. doi: 10.1080/00963402.1969.11455200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofeeff-Ressovsky NW, Zimmer KG, Delbruck M. 1935. Nachrichtenvon der gesellschaft der wissenchaften zu Gottingen. Uber die nature der genmutation und der genstruktur. Biologie Band 1:189–245.
   Google Scholar
• Totter JR. 1980. Spontaneous cancer and its possible relationship to oxygen-metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 77(4):1763–1767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubbs A, Nussenzweig A. 2017. Endogenous DNA damage as a source of genomic instability in cancer. Cell. 168(4):644–656. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijg J. 2021. From DNA damage to mutations: all roads lead to aging. Ageing Res Rev. 68:101316. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeford R, Kendal GM, Little MP. 2009. The proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionizing radiation. Leukemia. 23(4):770–776. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GM, Jeffrey AM. 2000. Oxidative DNA damage: endogenous and chemically induced. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 32(3):283–292. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefzadeh M, Henpita C, Vyas R, Soto-Palma C, Robbins P, Niedernhofer L. 2021. DNA damage—how and why we age? Elife. 10:e62852. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar