Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles

References

• TRW. (2015). Forward Looking Safety. Retrieved January 20, 2016 from https://www.trw.com/sites/default/files/TRW_ge_forwardlookingsafety_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aeberhard, M., Rauch, S., Bahram, M., Tanzmeister, G., Thomas, J., Pilat, Y., … & Kaempchen, N. (2015). Experience, results and lessons learned from automated driving on Germany's highways. IEEE Intelligent transportation systems magazine, 7(1), 42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniotti, M., Desphande, A., & Girault, A. (1997). Microsimulation analysis of multiple merge junctions under autonomous AHS operation. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation System, (pp. 147–152).
   Google Scholar
• Arnaout, G. M., & Arnaout, J. P. (2014). Exploring the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on highway traffic flow using microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Planning and Technology, 37(2), 186–199. doi:10.1080/03081060.2013.870791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arturo, D., & Nombela, M. (2011). Sartre-Safe Road Trains for the Environment Reducing Fuel Consumption through lower Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient (No. 2011-36-0060). SAE Technical Paper.
   Google Scholar
• ArvindRaj, R., Kumar, S., & Karthik, S. (2011). Cruise control operation from zero to preset speed-simulation and implementation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(1), 9. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2011.V1.2.
   Google Scholar
• AutoSpeed (2016). Technology, efficiency, performance. Retrieved January 31, 2016 from http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html
   Google Scholar
• Berman, B. (2015). Lower-cost lidar is key to self-driving future. Automotive Engineering Magazine, SAE.
   Google Scholar
• Brackstone, M., & McDonald, M. (1999). Car-following: A historical review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2(4), 181–196. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00005-X.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, J., Godbole, D. N., & Sengupta, R. (1998). Safety and capacity analysis of automated and manual highway systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(1), 69–99. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00009-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, R. E., Herman, R., & Montroll, E. W. (1958). Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following. Operations Research, 6(2), 165–184. doi:10.1287/opre.6.2.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. H., & Lai, I. S. (1997). Analysis of characteristics of mixed traffic flow of autopilot vehicles and manual vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(6), 333–348. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(97)00020-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2015). Travel-time valuation for automated driving: A use-case-driven study 2. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting (No. 15-4259).
   Google Scholar
• Daamen, W., Loot, M., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2010). Empirical analysis of merging behavior at freeway on-ramp. Transportation Research Record, 2188, 108–118. doi:10.3141/2188-12.
   Google Scholar
• Delis, A. I., Nikolos, I. K., & Papageorgiou, M. (2015). Macroscopic traffic flow modeling with adaptive cruise control: Development and numerical solution. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 70(8), 1921–1947. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delphi (2014) Delphi's industry-leading electronically scanning radar brings safety to one million vehicles. Retrieved January 20, 2016 from http://investor.delphi.com/investors/press-releases/press-release-details/2014/Delphis-Industry-Leading-Electronically-Scanning-Radar-Brings-Safety-to-One-Million-Vehicles/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Dickmann, J. (2014). How we gave sight to the mercedes robotic car. Retrieved January 27, 2016 from http://spectrum.ieee.org/transportation/self-driving/how-we-gave-sight-to-the-mercedes-robotic-car
   Google Scholar
• Dongbin, Z., & Zhongpu, X. (2013). Adaptive optimal control for the uncertain driving habit problem in adaptive cruise control system. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety, (pp. 159–164).
   Google Scholar
• Ervin, R., Sayer, J., LeBlanc, D., Bogard, S., Mefford, M., Hagan, M., & Winkler, C. (2005). Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test Report: Methodology and Results. Report No. UMTRI-2005-7-1 (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan).
   Google Scholar
• Falcocchio, J. C., & Levinson, H. S. (2015). Overview of mitigation strategies that reduce traffic demand. In Road traffic congestion: A concise guide (pp. 281–284). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fancher, P. (1998). Intelligent cruise control field operational test. Final report. Volume I: Technical report. (The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, H. T., & Ag, D. B. (1994). A model for traffic simulation. Traffic Engineering + Control, 35(5), 317–321.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Castro, A., & Monzon, A. (2014). Homogenization effects of variable speed limits. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 15(2), 130–143. doi:10.2478/ttj-2014-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Gazis, D. C., Herman, R., & Potts, R. B. (1959). Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Operations Research, 7(4), 499–505. doi:10.1287/opre.7.4.499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, P. G. (1981). A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 15, 105–111. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbole, D. N., Eskafi, F., Singh, E., & Varaiya, P. (1995). Design of entry and exit maneuvers for IVHS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference (Vol. 5, pp. 3576–3580).
   Google Scholar
• Greibe, P. (2007). Braking distance, friction and behavior. Trafitec, Scion-DTU. Retrieved from http://www.trafitec.dk/sites/default/files/publications/braking%20distance%20-%20friction%20and%20driver%20behaviour.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamdar, S., & Mahmassani, H. (2009). Life in the fast lane: Duration-based investigation of driver behavior differences across freeway lanes. Transportation Research Record, 2124, 89–102. doi:10.3141/2124-09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Montroll, E. W., Potts, R. B., & Rothery, R. W. (1959). Traffic dynamics: Analysis of stability in car following. Operations Research, 7(1), 86–106. doi:10.1287/opre.7.1.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydecker, B. G., & Addison, J. D. (2011). Analysis and modelling of traffic flow under variable speed limits. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(2), 206–217. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, R., van Arem, B., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2014). Automated Driving, Traffic Flow Efficiency, and Human Factors: Literature Review. Transportation Research Record, 2422, 113–120. doi:10.3141/2422-13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibeo. (2014). Self-driving cars getting closer. Retrieved from http://www.ibeo-as.com/files/themes/ibeo_theme/projects/Nissan/Valeo_News.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jabari, S. E., Zheng, J., & Liu, H. X. (2014). A probabilistic stationary speed–density relation based on Newell's simplified car-following model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 68, 205–223. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, S., Tsugawa, S., Tokuda, K., Matsui, T., & Fujii, H. (2002). Vehicle control algorithms for cooperative driving with automated vehicles and intervehicle communications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 3(3), 155–161. doi:10.1109/TITS.2002.802929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosz, Ben, W., Susan, M., Grant-Muller, & Djemame, K. (2014). A macroscopic forecasting framework for estimating socioeconomic and environmental performance of intelligent transport highways. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(2), pp. 723–736. doi:10.1109/TITS.2013.2284638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, C. C., & Machemehl, R. B. (1997). Modeling driver behavior during merge maneuvers (No. SWUTC/97/472840-00064-1). Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Kudarauskas, N. (2007). Analysis of emergency braking of a vehicle. Transport, 22(3), 154–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, R., Haberstroh, M., Ramakers, R., Henning, K., & Jeschke, S. (2011). Automated truck platoons on motorways – a contribution to the safety on roads. In Automation, communication and cybernetics in science and engineering 2009/2010 (pp. 415–426), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Ahn, D. R., & Yang, J. H. (2014). Mode confusion in driver interfaces for adaptive cruise control systems. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 4105–4106).
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T. W., Hwang, S. L., & Green, P. A. (2009). Effects of time-gap settings of adaptive cruise control (ACC) on driving performance and subjective acceptance in a bus driving simulator. Safety Science, 47(5), 620–625. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X. Y., Tan, H. S., Shladover, S. E., & Hedrick, J. K. (2004). Automated vehicle merging maneuver implementation for AHS. Vehicle System Dynamics, 41(2), 85–107. doi:10.1076/vesd.41.2.85.26497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J. B., Godbole, D. N., Lygeros, J., & Sengupta, R. (1998). Capacity analysis of traffic flow over a single-lane automated highway system. Journal of Intelligent Transportation System, 4(1–2), 49–80. doi:10.1080/10248079808903736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanés, V., Godoy, J., Villagrá, J., & Pérez, J. (2011). Automated on-ramp merging system for congested traffic situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 500–508. doi:10.1109/TITS.2010.2096812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanés, V., & Shladover, S. E. (2014). Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 48, 285–300. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanés, V., Shladover, S. E., Spring, J., Nowakowski, C., Kawazoe, H., & Nakamura, M. (2014). Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(1), 296–305. doi:10.1109/TITS.2013.2278494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidis, I., & Wu, K. (Eds.). (2010). Ad-Hoc, mobile and wireless networks. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference, ADHOC-NOW 2010, Edmonton, AB, Canada, August 20–22 ( Vol. 6288). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Noon, R. K. (1994). Engineering analysis of vehicular accidents. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, C., Cody, D., O'Connell, J., & Shladover, S. E. (2010). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Driver acceptance of following gap settings less than one second. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, C., O'Connell, J., Shladover, S. E., & Cody, D. (2010). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Driver acceptance of following gap settings less than one second. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, (Vol. 54, No. 24, pp. 2033–2037). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, C., Shladover, S. E., Cody, D., Bu, F., O'Connell, J., Spring, J., Dickey, S., & Nelson, D. (2011). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Testing drivers' choices of following distances (PATH research report UCB-ITS-PRR-2011-01). Available from http://database.path.berkeley.edu/reports/index.cgi?reqtype=displayrecord&record=1032
   Google Scholar
• Olia, A. (2016). Modelling and assessment of the transportation potential impacts of connected and automated vehicles (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/19896
   Google Scholar
• Olia, A., Abdelgawad, H., Abdulhai, B., & Razavi, S. N. (2016). Assessing the potential impacts of connected vehicles: Mobility, environmental, and safety perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(3), 229–243. doi:10.1080/15472450.2015.1062728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olia, A., Abdelgawad, H., Abdulhai, B., & Razavi, S. (2017). Optimizing the number and locations of freeway roadside equipment units for travel time estimation in a connected vehicle environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 296–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olstam, J. J., & Tapani, A. (2004). Comparison of car-following models (VTI report 960A). Swedish National road and Transport Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Paramics, Q. (2009). The paramics manuals, version 6.6. 1, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: Quastone Paramics Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinini, G. F. B., Rodrigues, C. M., Leitão, M., & Simões, A. (2015). Reaction to a critical situation during driving with adaptive cruise control for users and non-users of the system. Safety Science, 72, 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg, J., Scheepers, B., Van Nunen, E., Van de Wouw, N., & Nijmeijer, H. (2011). Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. Paper presented at the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (pp. 260–265).
   Google Scholar
• Pueboobpaphan, R., Liu, F., & Van Arem, B. (2010, September). The impacts of a communication based merging assistant on traffic flows of manual and equipped vehicles at an on-ramp using traffic flow simulation. Paper presented at the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (pp. 1468–1473).
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani, R., Tan, H. S., Law, B. K., & Zhang, W. B. (2000). Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 8(4), 695–708. doi:10.1109/87.852914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran, B., Leight, S., & Chang, B. (1999). A microscopic simulation model for merging control on a dedicated-lane automated highway system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(6), 369–388. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00028-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risto, M. (2014). Cooperative In-Vehicle Advice: A Study into Drivers' Ability and Willingness to follow Tactical Driver Advice, T2014/10, TRAIL Thesis Series, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Saifuzzaman, M., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 48, 379–403. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi, T., Uno, A., Kato, S., & Tsugawa, S. (2000). Cooperative driving of automated vehicles with inter-vehicle communications. Paper presented at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 516–521).
   Google Scholar
• Scariza, J. R. (2003). Evaluation of Coordinated and Local Ramp Metering Algorithms using Microscopic Traffic Simulation, MSc. Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E., Lu, X.-Y., Cody, D., Nowakowski, C., Qiu, Z., Chow, A., Connell, J., Nienhuis, J., & Su, D. (2010). Development and evaluations of selected mobility applications for VII (PATH research report UCB-ITS-PRR-2010-25). Available from http://database.path.berkeley.edu/reports/index.cgi?reqtype=displayrecord&record=1011
   Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E., Lu, X-Y., & Nowakowski, C. (2011). Development and assessment of selected mobility applications for VII: Principal findings. UC Berkeley: California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r33k6wk
   Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E., Nowakowski, C., Lu, X. Y., & Ferlis, R. (2015). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Definitions and operating concepts. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting (No. 15-3265).
   Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E., Nowakowski, C., O'Connell, J., & Cody, D. (2010). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Driver selection of car-following gaps, Paper presented at the ITS World Congress, Busan, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Shladover, S., Su, D., & Lu, X. Y. (2012). Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transportation Research Record, 2324, 63–70. doi:10.3141/2324-08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaroop, D., & Rajagopal, K. R. (2001). A review of constant time headway policy for automatic vehicle following. Paper presented at the Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 65–69).
   Google Scholar
• Swetha, A., Radhamani, P. V., & Punnekat, S. (2014). Design, analysis and implementation of improved adaptive fault tolerant model for cruise control multiprocessor system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 86, 15, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Talebpour, A., Mahmassani, H., & Hamdar, S. (2011). Multiregime sequential risk-taking model of car-following behavior: Specification, calibration, and sensitivity analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2260, 60–66. doi:10.3141/2260-07.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Information and Control Systems (2002). ISO 15622: Adaptive cruise control systems performance requirements and test procedures.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, T., & Katerelos, I. (2015). A psycho-social agent-based model of driver behavior dynamics. In Game theoretic analysis of congestion, safety and security (pp. 91–111). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (2016). Federal automated vehicles policy. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrived 18 May, 2017 from https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/AV%20policy%20guidance%20PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uno, A., Sakaguchi, T., & Tsugawa, S. (1999). A merging control algorithm based on inter-vehicle communication. Presented at the IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 783–787).
   Google Scholar
• Urban Transportation Task Force. (2012). The high cost of congestion in Canadian cities. Ottawa, Canada: Council of Ministers Transportation and Highway Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Van Arem, B., Van Driel, C. J., & Visser, R. (2006). The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(4), 429–436. doi:10.1109/TITS.2006.884615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hinsbergen, C. P. I. J., Schakel, W. J., Knoop, V. L., van Lint, J. W. C., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2015). A general framework for calibrating and comparing car-following models. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 11(5), 420–440. doi:10.1080/23249935.2015.1006157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander, W. J., Shladover, S., Miller, M., & Kourjanskaia, N. (2002). Effects of adaptive cruise control systems on highway traffic flow capacity. Transportation Research Record, 1800, 78–84. doi:10.3141/1800-10.
   Google Scholar
• Varaiya, P., & Shladover, S. E. (1991). Sketch of an IVHS systems architecture. Paper presented at the Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, ( Vol. 2, pp. 909–922).
   Google Scholar
• Copradar. (2016). Vehicle Radar. Retrieved January 31 2016, from http://copradar.com/rdrcar/
   Google Scholar
• Vijayenthiran, V. (2015). Volvo, Mercedes and Google accept liability for autonomous cars. Motor authority. Retrieved 28 January, 2016 from http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1100422_volvo-mercedes-and-google-accept-liability-for-autonomous-cars
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2005). A simulation model for motorway merging behaviour. Transportation and Traffic Theory, 16, 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S. P., & van Arem, B. (2014). Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part II: Cooperative sensing and cooperative control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 290–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Kulik, L., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2007). Proactive traffic merging strategies for sensor-enabled cars. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth ACM international Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc Networks, (pp. 39–48).
   Google Scholar
• Whitwam, R. (2014). How Google's self-driving cars detect and avoid obstacles. ExtremeTech. Accesesed 21 January, 2016 from http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/189486-how-googles-self-driving-cars-detect-and-avoid-obstacles
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, R. (1974). Simulation des Straßenverkehrsflusses (Traffic flow simulations). Institute for Transportation Science, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wired (2016). System that any automaker can use to build self-driving cars. Retrieved January 31, 2016, from http://www.wired.com/2014/11/delphi-automated-driving-system/
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Peng, L., Huang, Z., Zhong, M., & Chu, D. (2014). A method of vehicle motion prediction and collision risk assessment with a simulated vehicular cyber physical system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 47, 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Zhang, H., Gartner, N. H., & Arsava, T. (2017). Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(2), 136–147. doi:10.1080/15472450.2016.1248288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., Hedrick, K., Sengupta, R., & VanderWerf, J. (2002). Effects of vehicle-vehicle/roadside-vehicle communication on adaptive cruise controlled highway systems. Paper presented at the IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference ( Vol. 2, pp. 1249–1253).
   Google Scholar