The Learnability of Phonotactic Patterns in Onset and Coda Positions

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Bentea, A., & Durrleman-Tame, S. (2013). Children don’t like restrictions: Evidence from the acquisition of object A’-dependencies in French. Poster presentation at 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLA), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. (2011). An onset is an onset: Evidence form extraction of newly-learned phonotactic constraints. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoncini, J., Floccia, C., Nazzi, T., & Mehler, J. (1995). Morae and syllables: Rhythmical basis of speech representation in Neonates. Language and Speech, 38(4), 311–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1981). Syllable as units in infant speech perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijeljac-Babic, R., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1993). How do 4-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 711–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. Goldsmith ( Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.2.28) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, K. E., Onishi, K. H., & Fisher, C. (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 87(2), B69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, K. E., Onishi, K. H., & Fisher, C. (2011). Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy. Language Learning and Development, 7(4), 287–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cristià, A. (2010). Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 424–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Mehler, J., & Norris, D. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle ( Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders Series, 24, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Denes, P. (1955). Effect of duration on the perception of vocing. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 27(4), 761–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Some cross-linguistic evidence for modulation of implicational universals by language-specific frequency effects in phonological development. Language Learning and Development, 4(2), 122–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eilers, R. E. (1977). Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 61(5), 1321–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D. (1994). Categorization in early infancy and the continuity of development. Cognition, 50, 83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J. (2010). Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 235–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fais, L., Kajikawa, S., Amano, S., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Infant discrimination of a morphologically relevant word-final contrast. Infancy, 14(4), 488–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & Swingley, D. (2001). When half a word is enough: infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child Development, 72, 1003–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3728–3740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Wessels, J. M. I. (1993). Phonotacitc knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception of Psychophysics, 54, 287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. A., & Slater, A. (2008). Three-month-olds’ detection of alliteration in syllables. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(1), 153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. R.-C. L. P. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in Infancy Research, 5, 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W. (1977). Perception of syllable-final stop consonants by 2-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 21(5), 450–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Goodman, M. B., & Baumann, A. (1999). Nine-month-olds’ attention to sound similarities in syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 62–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., & Thompson, E. (1978). Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 23(2), 105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karzon, R. G. (1985). Discrimination of polysyllabic sequences by one- to four-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(2), 326–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., & Hsu, C.-S. (2003). Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple ( Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI ( pp. 143–161). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langeslag, J., Altvater-Mackensen, N., & Fikkert, P. (2008). Bringing together perception and production: the stop-fricative contrast in the acquisition of Dutch. Poster presented at IASCL, Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, C. C. (2012). Perception mirrors production in 14- and 18-month-olds: The case of coda consonants. Cognition, 123(1), 174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition, 8, 237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W. (1974). Perceptual units in speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., & Frauenfeld, U. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298–305.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 30(3), 319–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001). A cross-language comparison of /d /--/ð/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5), 2190–2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar: New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, and Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Redford, M. A., & Diehl, R. L. (1999). The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 106(3), 1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 484–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69(2), 105–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., & Buckley, E. (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development, 1, 289–316.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., Cristià, A., Bernard, A., and Onishi, K. (2009). Allophones and phonemes in infants’ phonotactic learning. Language, Learning, and Development, 5, 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., & Johnson, E. K. (2008). Boundary alignment enables 11-month-olds to segment vowel initial words from speech. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shady, M. E. (1996). Infants’ sensitivity to function morphemes. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, M., Wexler, K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2002). English-learning toddlers’ sensitivity to agreement morphology in receptive grammar. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., Sundara, M., & Demuth, K. (2009). Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular -s. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 52(3), 623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundara, M., Demuth, K., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Sentence-position effects on children’s comprehension & production of English 3rd person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 54, 55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2005). 11-month-old’s knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science, 8(5), 432–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2009). Onsets and codas in 1.5-year-olds’ word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(2), 252–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 53–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). Are word-final sounds perceptually salient for infants? In D. Huston, A. Seidl, G. Hollich, E. Johnson, & A. M. Jusczyk (Eds.), Jusczyk Lab Final Report. Retrieved from http://hincapie.psych.purdue.edu/Jusczyk/pdf/CutCup.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, B., Bertoncini, J., Sansavini, A., & Mehler, J. (1997). Do weak syllables count for newborns? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(6), 3735–3741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, A. C. (1987). Young children’s detections of word-initial and -final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained context. Cognitive Development, 2, 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Seidl, A., & Crista, A. (in revision). Acoustic-phonetic differences between infant- and adult-directed speech: The role of stress and utterance position. Journal of Child Language.
   Google Scholar
• Weisler, S., & Milekic, S. (1999). Theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wightman, C. W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1707–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S. (2006). Sensitivity to word-final phonotactics in 9- to 16-month-old infants. Infancy, 10(1), 77–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Gerken L. A., & Hammond, M. (2004a). The acquisition of phonology based on input: A closer look at the relation of cross-linguistic and child language data. Lingua, 115(10), 1329–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L., & Hammond, M. (2004b). Phonotactic probabilities in young children’s speech production. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 515–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar