The Role of Single Talker Acoustic Variation in Early Word Learning

REFERENCES

• Apfelbaum, K. S., Hazeltine, R. E., & McMurray, B. (2013). Statistical learning in reading: Variability in irrelevant letters helps children learn phonics skills. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1348–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2011). Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: Associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1105–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballem, K. D., & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in children at 1;2. Journal of Child Language, 32(1), 159–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortfeld, H., & Morgan, J. L. (2010). Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 60(4), 241–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, J. F., & Kleiner, B. M. (1984). Distant transfer in coincident timing as a function of variability of practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(3), 851–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D. J., & Chaput, H. H. (2004). Habit X: A new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Creel, S., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition, 106(2), 633–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel, S. C., & Jiménez, S. R. (2012). Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 487–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fais, L., Werker, Janet F., Cass, B., Leibowich, J., Barbosa, A. V., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2012). Here’s looking at you, baby: What gaze and movement reveal about minimal pair word-object association at 14 months. Laboratory Phonology, 3(1), 91–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, C. T., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. Child Development, 81(5), 1376–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, C. T., & Werker, J. F. (2003). Early word learners’ ability to access phonetic detail in well-known words. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 245–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galle, M. E., & McMurray, B. (in press). The development of voicing categories: A quantitative review of 40 years of infant research. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsdingen, A. S., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollich, G. J. (2006). Combining techniques to reveal emergent effects in infants’ segmentation, word learning, and grammar. Language & Speech, 49(1), 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., Chung, H. L.,…Bloom, L. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3), i–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston, D. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). Infants’ long-term memory for the sound patterns of words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 29(6), 1143–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., Westrek, E., Nazzi, T., & Cutler, A. (2011). Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. Developmental Science, 14, 1002–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. C., Strand, E. A., & D’Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 359–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Mullennix, J. (1992). Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants. Cognition, 43, 253–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 94, 1242–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, C., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 306–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011). What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological Review, 118(2), 219–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 379–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 85(1), 365–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy, L. (2012). Getting specific: Early general mechanisms give rise to domain-specific expertise in word learning. Language Learning and Development, 8(1), 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S. (2001). Challenging the notion of innate phonetic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 110(3), 1598–1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L., Sommers, M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pater, J., Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (2004). The lexical acquisition of phonological contrasts. Language, 80, 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Bjork, R. A., Finley, J. R., & Linn, M. C. (2005). Linking cognitive science to education: Generation and interleaving effects. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12(2), 339–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning. Infancy, 15(6), 608–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmale, R., Hollich, G., & Seidl, A. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1096–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, L. (2008). Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition. Cognition, 106, 833–870.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & White, K. S. (2004). Preference and processing: The role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, L., White, K. S., & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Building a word-form lexicon in the face of variable input: Influences of pitch and amplitude on early spoken word recognition. Language Learning and Development, 4(2), 157–178.
   Google Scholar
• Slawinski, E., & Fitzgerald, L. K. (1998). Perceptual development of the categorization of the /r-w/ contrast in normal children, Journal of Phonetics, 26(1), 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388(6640), 381–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13(5), 480–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children’s word learning. Cognitive Psychology, 54(2), 99–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D. (2007). The effect of distributional information on children’s use of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 16–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D. (2010). Variability in lexical form facilitates children’s generalization of phonemic contrasts. Paper presented at the 17th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2014). Learning to contend with accents in infancy: Benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143(1), 340–350. doi:10.1037/a0032192
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, S. (2009). Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Fennell, C. T. (2004). Listening to sounds versus listening to words: Early steps in word learning. In G. Hall & S. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 79–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. H., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Learning words’ sounds before learning how words sound: 9-Month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information. Cognition, 113, 234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K. A., Fennell, C. T., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Fourteen-month-old infants learn similar-sounding words. Developmental Science, 12, 412–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar