German Children’s Use of Word Order and Case Marking to Interpret Simple and Complex Sentences: Testing Differences Between Constructions and Lexical Items

References

• Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247––264.
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, I. (2010). Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 37, 27–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arosio, F., Guasti, M. T., & Stucchi, N. (2011). Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 40, 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arosio, F., Yatsushiro, K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2012). Morphological information and memory resources in children’s processing of relative clauses in German. Language Learning and Development, 8, 340–364.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-33.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & D’Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study. 1999. Language and Cognitive Processes,14( 1), 69–123.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language aquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55(2), 341–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, H. (2006). The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, J. R., MacWhinney, B., & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development, 71(4), 981–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, S., Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 325–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, S., Kidd, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 539–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. Discourse, Consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2), 267–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. (2010). Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1984). Der Erwerb von Kasusmarkierungen in der deutschen Kindersprache. Linguistische Berichte, 89, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Devescovi, A., D’Amico, S., & Gentile, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: A reaction time study. First Language, 19, 129–163.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 93–126.
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1411–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, M.T., Stavrakaki, S., & Arosio, F. (2012). Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in the acquisition of relative clauses: Evidence from Greek and Italian. Lingua, 122, 700–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünloh, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2011). German children use prosody to identify participant roles in transitive sentences. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 393–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case-marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543–587.
   Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 860–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., Stewart, A., & Serratrice, L. (2011). Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38, 222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (1999). Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 177–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES-project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2007). A unified model. In N. Ellis & P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 127–150.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Pleh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C., & Bates, E. (1985). The development in sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 178–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 94–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M., & Rowland, C. F. (1998). Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category. Linguistics, 36(4), 807–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.H. (2007). Word-chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 161–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., & Lieven, E. (2009). Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 33, 75–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T. (2011). A case-marking cue for filler–gap dependencies in children’s relative clauses in Japanese. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1084–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szagun, G. (2001). Learning different regularities: The acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language, 21, 109–141.
   Google Scholar
• Szagun, G. (2004). Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language, 31, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 217–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74(3), 209–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85, 79–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues act locally. First Language, 25(1), 103–125.
   Google Scholar