How Transitional Probabilities and the Edge Effect Contribute to Listeners’ Phonological Bootstrapping Success

References

• Aslin, R., Woodward, J., LaMendola, N., & Bever, T. (1996). Models of word segmentation in fluent maternal speech to infants. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 117–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brar, J. K., Tyler, M. D., & Johnson, E. K. (2013). What you see is what you hear: How visual prosody affects artificial language learning in adults and children. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19, 060068.
   Google Scholar
• Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93–125. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00719-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, K. E., Onishi, K. H., & Fisher, C. (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 87, B69–77. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00233-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoophe, A., Guasti, T., Nespor, M., Dupoux, M., & Van Ooyen, B. (1997). Reflections on phonological bootstrapping: Its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 585–612. doi:10.1080/016909697386637
   Google Scholar
• Christophe, A., Mehler, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). Perception of prosodic boundary correlates by newborn infants. Infancy, 2, 385–394. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0203_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition, 96, 233–262. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daland, R., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2011). Learning diphone-based segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35, 119–155. doi:10.1111/cogs.2011.35.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., & Hauser, M. D. (2010). Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 177–199. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J. (2009). The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 351–367. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J. (2010). Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 235–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley, S., & Badecker, W. (2012). Learning biases for vowel height harmony. Journal of Cognitive Science, 13, 287–327.
   Google Scholar
• Gambell, T., & Yang, C. (2005). Mechanisms and constraints in word segmentation. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Golinkoff, R., & Alioto, A. (1995). Infant-directed speech facilitates lexical learning in adults hearing Chinese: Implications for language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 22, 703–726. doi:10.1017/S0305000900010011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K. (2008). Infants use prosodically conditioned acoustic-phonetic cues to extract words from speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, EL144–EL148.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K. (2012). Bootstrapping language: Are infant statisticians up to the job? In P. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 55–90). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K. (2016). Building a proto-lexicon: An integrative approach to infant language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). Exploring the effect of language-specific knowledge on infants’ segmentation of an artificial language. In D. Houston, A. Seidl, G. Hollich, E. K. Johnson, & A. Jusczyk (Eds.), Jusczyk Lab Final Report (pp. 129–139). Retrieved from http://hincapie.psych.purdue.edu/Jusczyk/pdf/LangSpecific.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., Lahey, M., Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A. (2013). A multimodal corpus of speech to infant and adult listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, EL534–EL540. doi:10.1121/1.4828977
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., & Seidl, A. H. (2008). Clause segmentation by 6-month-old infants: A crosslinguistic perspective. Infancy, 13, 440–455. doi:10.1080/15250000802329321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., Seidl, A. H., & Tyler, M. (2014). The edge factor in early word segmentation: Utterance-level prosody enables word form extraction by 6-month- olds. PLoS One, 9(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., & Tyler, M. (2010). Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Developmental Science, 13, 339–345. doi:10.1111/desc.2010.13.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W. (1999). How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 323–328. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01363-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843. doi:10.1038/nrn1533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetto, E., & Bonatti, L. L. (2013). Words and possible words in early language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 67, 130–150. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersad, K., & Nazzi, T. (2012). When mommy comes to the rescue of statistics: Infants combine top down and bottom up cues to segment speech. Language Learning and Development, 8, 303–315. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.609106
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37, 545–564. doi:10.1017/S0305000909990511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi, K. H., Chambers, K. E., & Fisher, C. (2002). Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 83, B13–23. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00165-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 225–237. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordin, M., & Nespor, M. (2013). Transition probabilities and different levels of prominence in segmentation. Language Learning, 63, 800–834. doi:10.1111/lang.2013.63.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., & Saffran, J. R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. Child Development, 80, 674–685. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01290.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604–607. doi:10.1126/science.1072901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., Tyler, M. D., Galland, N., & Peereman, R. (2004). Learning nonadjacent dependencies: No need for algebraic-like computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 573–583. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilon, R. (1981). Segmentation of speech in a foreign language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 113–122. doi:10.1007/BF01068032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996a). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996b). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology, 39, 484–494. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Werker, J., & Werner, L. (2006). The infant’s auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In R. Siegler & D. Kuhn (Eds.), Handbook of child development (pp. 58–108). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sahni, S. D., Seidenberg, M. S., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Connecting cues: Overlapping regularities support cue discovery in infancy. Child Development, 81, 727–736. doi:10.1111/cdev.2010.81.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., & Buckley, E. (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development, 1, 289–316. doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9671950
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., & Johnson, E. K. (2008). Boundary alignment enables 11-month-olds to segment vowel initial words from speech. Journal of Child Language, 35, 1–24. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, A. H., & Johnson, E. K. (2006). Infant word segmentation revisited: Edge alignment facilitates target extraction. Developmental Science, 9(6), 565–573. doi:10.1111/desc.2006.9.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2007). An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, M., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 6038–6043. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017617108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 86–132. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2009). Contributions of infant word learning to language development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3617–3632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E., & Saffran, J. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706–716. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., & Erickson, L. C. (2013). Discovering words in fluent speech: The contribution of two kinds of statistical information. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 590. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2007). Learning to learn: Infants’ acquisition of stress- based segmentation strategies for word segmentation. Language, Learning and Development, 3, 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 367–376. doi:10.1121/1.3129127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Weijer, J. (1998). Language input for word discovery ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Max Planck Series in Psycholinguistics 9. MPI Dissertation Series in Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234. doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. D. (2004). Universal grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 451–456. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar