Core Knowledge, Language, and Number

References

• Aagten-Murphy, D., Attucci, C., Daniel, N., Klaric, E., Burr, D., & Pellicano, E. (2015). Numerical estimation in children with autism. Autism Research, 8(6), 668–681. doi:10.1002/aur.1482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almoammer, A., Sullivan, J., Donlan, C., Marušič, F., Žaucer, R., O’Donnell, T., & Barner, D. (2013). Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 18448–18453. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313652110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, G. A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2007). How many objects can you attentively track? Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13), 1–10. doi:10.1167/7.13.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(18), 4909–4917. doi:10.1073/pnas.1603205113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner, D. (2016, March 9). Natural language and number word learning. Paper presented at the Lorentz Workshop on Tightening the Articulation between Language and Number, Leiden, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86(3), 201–221. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00178-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J. S., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. S. (2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98(3), 199–222. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, W. R., Simons, D. J., Stothart, C., & Stutts, C. (2013). The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: Why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 445–454. doi:10.1177/1745691613491271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M. (2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition, 83(3), 223–240. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., & Merritt, D. J. (2011). Evolutionary foundations of the approximate number system. In S. Dehaene, & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, Time, and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282(5389), 746–749. doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, N., Audet, J., & Barner, D. (2013). Pragmatic inference, not semantic competence, guides 3-year-olds’ interpretation of unknown number words. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1066–1075. doi:10.1037/a0029384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1999). What Counts: How Every Brain is Hardwired for Math. London, UK: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D. (2008). Numerical thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Australian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13179–13184. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806045105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2007). Basic math in monkeys and college students. Plos Biology, 5(12), e328. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantlon, J. F., Libertus, M. E., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Brannon, E. M., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2009). The neural development of an abstract concept of number. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2217–2229. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169–200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, H. M., & Lin, Y. H. (2007). Mathematical ability of students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism: A review of literature. Autism, 11, 547–556. doi:10.1177/1362361307083259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condry, K. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 22–38. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, M., Spaepen, E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Communicating about number without a language model: Innovation and integration of number devices into homesign grammar. Cognitive Psychology, 67, 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coubart, A., Izard, V., Spelke, E. S., Marie, J., & Streri, A. (2014). Dissociation between small and large numerosities in newborn infants. Developmental Science, 17, 11–22. doi:10.1111/desc.12108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., & Frith, C. (2009). Do calendrical savants use calculation to answer date questions? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 1417–1424. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, R. G., & Greene, R. L. (2000). Serial Learning: Cognition and Behavior. In E. Tulving, & F. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, K., Eng, K., & Barner, D. (2012). Does learning to count involve a semantic induction? Cognition, 123(1), 162–173. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D., Izard, V., Coubart, A., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4809–4813. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323628111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 653–660. doi:10.1177/0956797610366091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Spelke, E. S. (2015). The infancy of the human brain. Neuron, 88(1), 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, S., & Xu, F. (2010). Twelve- to 14-month-old infants can predict single-event probability with large set sizes. Developmental Science, 13(5), 798–803. doi:10.1111/desc.2010.13.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M. R., Pires, A. C., Hyde, D. C., & Spelke, E. S. (2015). Children’s expectations about training the approximate number system. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 411–418. doi:10.1111/bjdp.2015.33.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. doi:10.1086/431525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L. (2009). Pirahã culture and grammar: A reply to some critics. Language, Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 85(2), 405–442. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0104
   Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Language-selective and domain-general regions lie side by side in Broca’s area. Current Biology, 22, 2059–2062. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L. (2011). Objects, sets, and ensembles. In S. Dehaene, & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Attention and Performance, Volume XIV. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002). The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13(2), 150–156. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2008). Conceptual knowledge increases infants’ memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(29), 9926–9930. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709884105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3), 819–824. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1–2), 43–74. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, R. (1972). Logical capacity of very young children: Number invariance rules. Child Development, 43(1), 75–90. doi:10.2307/1127873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, R. (1991). Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures: Initial and transcendent constructions. In S. Carey, & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 293–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (1978). The Child’s Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589–591. doi:10.1038/nature05850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. (2015, November 13). The linguistic representation of symmetry. Keynote address: Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496–499. doi:10.1126/science.1094492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537. doi:10.1038/nature01647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Spaepen, E., & Levine, S. (2015). Approximate number word knowledge before the cardinal principle. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 35–55. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., Taing, L., & Lidz, J. (2008). The development of ‘most’ comprehension and its potential dependence on counting ability in preschoolers. Language Learning and Development, 4(2), 99–121. doi:10.1080/15475440801922099
   Google Scholar
• Hitch, G. J., Fastame, M. C., & Flude, B. (2005). How is the serial order of a verbal sequence coded? Some comparisons between models. Memory, 13(3–4), 247–258. doi:10.1080/09658210344000314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., Spelke, E., & Snedeker, J. (2010). When is four far more than three? Children’s generalization of newly acquired number words. Psychological Science, 21(4), 600–606. doi:10.1177/0956797610363552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (1981). Can preschool children add and subtract? Educational Psychology, 1(3), 207–219. doi:10.1080/0144341810010301
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., Khanum, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children. Cognition, 131, 92–107. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). All numbers are not equal: An electrophysiological investigation of small and large number representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1039–1053. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Neural signatures of number processing in human infants: Evidence for two core systems underlying numerical cognition. Developmental Science, 14(2), 360–371. doi:10.1111/desc.2011.14.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., Winkler-Rhoades, N., Lee, S. A., Izard, V., Shapiro, K. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Spatial and numerical abilities without a complete natural language. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 924–936. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., & Wood, J. N. (2011). Spatial attention determines the nature of nonverbal number representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2336–2351. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Exact equality and successor function: Two key concepts on the path towards understanding exact numbers. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 491–505. doi:10.1080/09515080802285354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812142106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, V., Streri, A., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Towards exact numbers: Understanding exact equality. Cognitive Psychology, 72, 27–53. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara-Ettinger, J., Piantadosi, S. T., Spelke, E. S., Levy, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). Mastery of the logic of natural numbers is not the result of mastery of counting: Evidence from late counters. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.12459
   Google Scholar
• Khanum, S., Hanif, R., Spelke, E. S., Berteletti, I., & Hyde, D. C. (2016). Effects of nonsymbolic approximate number practice on symbolic numerical abilities in Pakistani children PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164436.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural language. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and content. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 213–218. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S.-J., & Carey, S. (2009). Does the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language? Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1644–1653. doi:10.1037/a0015553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libertus, M. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. Developmental Science, 13(6), 900–906. doi:10.1111/desc.2010.13.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Preschool children’s mapping of number words to nonsymbolic numerosities. Child Development, 76(5), 978–988. doi:10.1111/cdev.2005.76.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2004). Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15(11), 776–781. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00755.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2007). Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18(8), 740–745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01969.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., & Bever, T. G. (1967). Cognitive capacity of very young children. Science, 158, 141–142. doi:10.1126/science.158.3797.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. (2012). Number-concept acquisition and general vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(6), 2019–2027. doi:10.1111/cdev.2012.83.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D., & Rodrigues, C. (2009). Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language, Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 85(2), 355–404.
   Google Scholar
• Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297(5587), 1708–1711. doi:10.1126/science.1072493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, L. M., Baumgartner, H. A., Barrett, F. S., Messenger, I. M., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Developmental changes in visual short-term memory in infancy: Evidence from eye-tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 697. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odic, D., Le Corre, M., & Halberda, J. (2015). Children’s mapping between number words and the approximate number system. Cognition, 138, 102–121. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odic, D., Pietroski, P., Hunter, T., Lidz, J., & Halberda, J. (2014). Young children’s understanding of ‘More’ and Discrimination of number and surface area. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2013–2019. doi:10.1177/0956797613482944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S. T., Jara-Ettinger, J., & Gibson, E. (2014). Children’s learning of number words in an indigenous farming-foraging group. Developmental Science, 17, 553–563. doi:10.1111/desc.2014.17.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547–555. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., Pica, P., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Dehaene, S. (2013). Education enhances the acuity of the non-verbal approximate number system. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1037–1043. doi:10.1177/0956797612464057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53(2), 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499–503. doi:10.1126/science.1102085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinhas, M., Donohue, S. H., Woldorff, M., & Brannon, E. M. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of the approximate number system in preschoolers’ processing of spoken number words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 1891–1904. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posid, T., & Cordes, S. (2015). Verbal counting moderates perceptual biases found in children’s cardinality judgments. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 621–637. doi:10.1080/15248372.2014.934372
   Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623–687. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08005566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnecka, B. W. (2016). How number concepts are like the earth (and unlike faces, loitering, or knitting). In D. Barner, & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnecka, B. W., Kamenskaya, V. G., Yamana, Y., Ogura, T., & Yudovina, Y. B. (2007). From grammatical number to exact numbers: Early meanings of ‘one’, ‘two’, and ‘three’ in English, Russian, and Japanese. Cognitive Psychology, 55(2), 136–168. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegal, M. (1999). Language and thought: The fundamental significance of conversational awareness for cognitive development. Developmental Science, 2, 1–14. doi:10.1111/desc.1999.2.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? Origins of Cognitive Skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E. S., Carey, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3163–3168. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015975108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaepen, E., Flaherty, M., Coppola, M., Spelke, E. S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Generating a lexicon without a language model: Do words for number count? Journal of Memory & Language, 69(4), 496–505. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1233–1243. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (forthcoming). Origins of knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, A. B., Libertus, M. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Infants show ratio-dependent number discrimination regardless of set size. Infancy, 18(6), 927–941. doi:10.1111/infa.2013.18.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2009). Contributions of primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to length and numerosity representation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(6), 2984–2994. doi:10.1152/jn.90713.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J. C., Romanowski, C. A. J., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(9), 3519–3524. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407470102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. B., & Johnson, S. C. (2011). An association between understanding cardinality and analog magnitude representations in preschoolers. Cognition, 119(1), 10–22. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. N., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Infants’ enumeration of actions: Numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Developmental Science, 8(2), 173–181. doi:10.1111/desc.2005.8.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. (1992a). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358(6389), 749–750. doi:10.1038/358749a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. (1992b). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220–251. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90008-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K. (1998). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 296–303. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01203-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F. (2007). Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 400–406. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 111–153. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Garcia, V. (2008). Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(13), 5012–5015. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704450105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00066-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar