Scalar Implicature in Absence of Epistemic Reasoning? The Case of Autism Spectrum Disorder

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2004). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th-TR ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th-TR ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62, 874–890. doi:10.1111/cdev.1991.62.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2013). Grammatical alternatives and pragmatic development. In Falaus, A., (Ed.), Alternatives in Semantics: Studies in Pramatics, Language and Cognition (238–266). New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Barner, D., & Bachrach, A. (2010). Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 40–62. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 188, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–402. doi:10.1007/BF02212194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, L., & Grodner, D. J. (2012). Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1450–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D., & Rumain, B. (1981). Development of comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31(1), 46–70. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(81)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevallier, C., Wilson, D., Happé, F., & Noveck, I. (2010). Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1104–1117. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0960-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville. Cascadilla Press. 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2012). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between syntax and semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. Von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 1). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 17, 417–431. doi:10.1017/S0305000900013842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchena, A., Eigsti, I. M., Worek, A., Ono, K. E., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Mutual exclusivity in autism spectrum disorders: Testing the pragmatic hypothesis. Cognition, 119, 96–113. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesendruck, G., & Markson, L. (2001). Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37, 630–641. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Examiner’s manual for the PPVT-III peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
   Google Scholar
• Eales, M. J. (1993). Pragmatic impairments in adults with childhood diagnoses of autism or developmental receptive language disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 593–617. doi:10.1007/BF01046104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foppolo, F., Guasti, M. T., & Chierchia, G. (2012). Scalar implicatures in child language: Give children a chance. Language Learning and Development, 8, 365–394. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.626386
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland, & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism. Neuron, 32, 969–979. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00552-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. D., & Stuhlmüller, A. (2013). Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition. Topics in cognitive science, 5(1), 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. doi:10.1007/BF02172093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstein, L., Bale, A., Fox, D., & Barner, D. (2014). Ignorance and inference: Do problems with Gricean epistemic reasoning explain children’s difficulty with scalar implicature?. Journal of Semantics, 33, 107–135.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English ( Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. (2011). Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition, 120, 67–81. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners. Cognition, 108, 732–739. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr, Leventhal, B. L., & DiLavore, P. C. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule—generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223. doi:10.1023/A:1005592401947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M., Wasow, J. L., & Hansen, M. B. (2003). Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 241–275. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00034-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minshew, N. J., Goldstein, G., & Siegel, D. J. (1995). Speech and language in high-functioning autistic individuals. Neuropsychology, 9, 255–261. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.2.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1996). An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language, 52, 411–434. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics- pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., & Tantalou, N. (2004). Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition, 12, 71–82. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Hagoort, P., Buitelaar, J., Teunisse, J. P., & Geurts, B. (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 607–618. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72, 1054–1070. doi:10.1111/cdev.2001.72.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 367–391. doi:10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Paul, R., McSweeny, J. L., Klin, A., Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (2001). Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 44, 1097–1115. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/087)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Children’s derivation of scalar implicatures: Alternatives and relevance. Cognition, 153, 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1980). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 191–205. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90057-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, B. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and gricean reasoning. Proceedings of the ESSLLI, 3, 277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2011, July). Ad-hoc scalar implicature in adults and children. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H. (1999). A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 325–334. doi:10.1080/09540269974203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. E. (2005). Language and communication in autism. In F. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorder (Vol. 1, pp. 335–364). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. E. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639–650. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Witkins.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta‐analysis of theory‐of‐mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. doi:10.1111/cdev.2001.72.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar