Early Understanding of Pragmatic Principles in Children’s Judgments of Negative Sentences

References

• Austin, K., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Young children’s understanding of denial. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars ( No. 59). New York, NY: MIT Research Monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS One, 5, e10773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. (2007). What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation. Journal of Child Language, 34, 251–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H., & Chase, W. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1976). Semantics and comprehension. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 187. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Duran, N. (2011). The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 35, 983–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1975). Some facts one simply cannot deny. Journal of Child Language, 2, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M., & Balfour, G. (1968). Less is more: A study of language comprehension in children. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 461–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozd, K. (1995). Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation. Journal of Child Language, 22, 583–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiman, R., Mody, S., Sanborn, S., & Carey, S. (2017). What do you mean, no? Toddlers’ comprehension of logical no and not. Language Learning and Development, 13, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, I., Bloom, P., Childers, D., Roucos, S., & Perry, N. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20, 400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. (2012). Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science, 336, 998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Sugarman, E., Horowitz, A. C., Lewis, M. L., & Yurovsky, D. (2016). Using tablets to collect data from young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkerson, J., Hyams, N., & Curtiss, S. (2004). On the scope of negation: More evidence for early parameter setting. LOT Occasional Series, 3, 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A., Robertson, D., Jansen, J., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (1999). Not propositions. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 818–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualmini, A. (2004). Some knowledge children don’t lack. Linguistics, 5, 957–982.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 11–42). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummer, P., Wimmer, H., & Antes, G. (1993). On the origins of denial negation. Journal of Child Language, 20, 607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1971). Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 244–253.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. (1985). Development of the concept of truth-functional negation. Developmental Psychology, 21, 462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R., Clark, E., & Macken, M. (1973). Asymmetries in the acquisition of polar adjectives: Linguistic or conceptual? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16, 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loder, L. (2006). Early understanding of negation: The word “not” ( Masters Thesis). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, J., Friedrich, C., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm. The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1355–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, J., & Kaup, B. (2006). Context effects when reading negative and affirmative sentences. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1735–1740) Vancouver, British Columbia,Canada, July 26-29, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M., & Kuperberg, G. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle. Psychological Science, 19, 1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2013). Measuring the comprehension of negation in 2-to 4-year-old children. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Canada, July 23-26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2014a). A pragmatic account of the processing of negative sentences. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Canada, July 23-26, 2014..
   Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2014b). The role of context in young children’s comprehension of negation. Journal of Memory and Language, 77, 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2015a). Children are sensitive to the contexts of negative sentences. In Society for Research in Child Development 2015 Biennial Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, March 19–21, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2015b). Negation is only hard to process when it is pragmatically infelicitous. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena, CA, USA, July 23-25 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In D. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 156–186). New York, NY: Norton New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. (1982). Origins of verbal logic: Spontaneous denials by two-and three-year olds. Journal of Child Language, 9, 597–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, T., Feiman, R., & Snedeker, J. (2017). Getting to no: Pragmatic and semantic factors in two-and three-year-olds’ understanding of negation. Child Development.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wason, P. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 7–11.
   Google Scholar