294
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Towards Abstract Syntax at 24 Months: Evidence from Subject-Verb Agreement with Conjoined Subjects

, , &

References

  • Arunachalam, S., Escovar, E., Hansen, M. A., & Waxman, S. R. (2013). Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 417–425. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.641744
  • Arunachalam, S., Syrett, K., & Chen, Y. X. (2016). Lexical disambiguation in verb learning: evidence from the conjoined-subject intransitive frame in English and Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 138. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00138
  • Badecker, W. (2007). A feature principle for partial agreement. Lingua, 117, 1541–1565. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.006
  • Barner, D., Thalwitz, D., Wood, J., Yang, S., & Carey, S. (2007). On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one. Developmental Science, 10(3), 365–373. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00591.x
  • Barrière, I., Goyet, L., Kresh, S., Nazzi, T., & Legendre, G. (2016). Uncovering productive morphosyntax in french-learning toddlers: A multidimensional methodology perspective. Journal of Child Language, 43(5), 1131–1157. doi:10.1017/S0305000915000495
  • Barrière, I., Kresh, S., Aharodnik, K., Legendre, G., & Nazzi, T. (2019). The comprehension of 3rd person singular by nyc english-speaking pre-schoolers. In T. Ionin & M Rispoli (Eds.), Three streams of generative language acquisition research. Selected papers from the 7th meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Vol.63, pp. 7–33). Amsterdam, The Netherlands / Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S., & Christophe, A. (2007). Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development, 3(4), 325–341. doi:10.1080/15475440701542609
  • Brandt-Kobele, O., & Höhle, B. (2014). The detection of subject-verb agreement violations by German-speaking children: An eye-tracking study. Lingua, 144, 7–20. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.008
  • Brandt-Kobele, O.-C., & Höhle, B. (2010). What asymmetries within comprehension reveal about asymmetries between comprehension and production: The case of verb inflection in language acquisition. Lingua, 120(8), 1910–1925. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.008
  • Brusini, P., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dutat, M., Goffinet, F., & Christophe, A. (2016). ERP evidence for on-line syntactic computations in 2-year-olds. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 164–173. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.02.009
  • Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S., & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language & Speech, 51, 61–75. doi:10.1177/00238309080510010501
  • Culbertson, J. (2010). Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language, 86(1), 85–132. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0183
  • Culbertson, J., Koulaguina, E., Gonzalez Gomez, N., Legendre, G., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Developing representations of non-adjacent dependencies. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2174–2183. doi:10.1037/dev0000246
  • de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Lin, I., & Christophe, A. (2017). Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers. Cognition, 163, 67–79. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.018
  • Deevy, P., Leonard, L. B., & Marchman, V. A. (2017). Sensitivity to morphosyntactic information in 3-year-old children with typical language development. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 60, 668–674. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0153
  • Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008276
  • Fonseca-Greber, B., & Waugh, L. (2002). The subject clitics of conversational European French: Morphologization, grammatical change, semantic change, and change in progress. In R. Núñez-Cedeño, L. López, & R. Cameron (Eds.), A romance perspective on language knowledge and use (pp. 99–117). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(4), 371–404. doi:10.1080/01690960143000254
  • Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124(1), 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.010
  • Gómez, R., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183–206. doi:10.1207/s15327078in0702_4
  • Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hsin, L., Barrière, I., Nazzi, T., & Legendre, G. (2017). Agarra, agarran: Evidence of early comprehension of subject-verb agreement in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 33–49. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.010
  • Gout, A., Christophe, A., & Morgan, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access. II: Infant data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 548–567. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.002
  • Gxilishe, S., Smouse, M., Xhalisa, T., & de Villiers, J. G. (2009). Children’s insensitivity to information from the target of agreement: The case of Xhosa. In J. Crawford, K. Otaki, & M. Takahashi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 46–53). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Höhle, B., Schmitz, M., Santelmann, L. M., & Weissenborn, J. (2006). The recognition of discontinuous verbal dependencies by German 19-month-olds: Evidence for lexical and structural influences on children’s early processing capacities. Language Learning and Development, 2, 277–300. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0204_3
  • Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 69–95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
  • Jakubowicz, C., & Rigaut, C. (1997). L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en français. In A. Zribi-Hertz (Ed.), Les pronoms: Syntaxe, morphologie et typologie (pp. 57–99). Vincennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
  • Johnson, E. K., & Tyler, M. D. (2010). Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Developmental Science, 13(2), 339–345. doi:10.1111/desc.2010.13.issue-2
  • Johnson, V. E., de Villiers, J. G., & Seymour, H. N. (2005). Agreement without understanding? the case of third person singular /s/. First Language, 25(3), 317–330. doi:10.1177/0142723705053120
  • Kiss, K. E. (2012). Patterns of agreement with coordinate noun phrases in Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1027–1060.
  • Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: The singular-plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2, 1–25. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0201_1
  • Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T. (2010a). Comprehension of infrequent subject–Verb agreement forms: Evidence from French-learning children. Child Development, 81(6), 1859–1875. doi:10.1111/cdev.2010.81.issue-6
  • Legendre, G., Culbertson, J., Barrière, I., Nazzi, T., & Goyet, L. (2010b). Experimental and empirical evidence for the status and acquisition of subject clitics and agreement marking in adult and child Spoken French. In V. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarro, & J. Gutierrez (Eds.), Movements and clitics: Adult and child grammar (pp. 333–360). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Legendre, G., Hagstrom, P., Vainikka, A., & Todorova, M. (2002). Partial constraint ordering in child French syntax. Language Acquisition, 10(3), 189–227. doi:10.1207/S15327817LA1003_1
  • Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S.-J., & Carey, S. (2009). Does the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language? Developmental Psychology, 45, 1644–1653. doi:10.1037/a0015553
  • Lorimor, H. (2007). Conjunctions and grammatical agreement. Thesis. Champaign, IL: Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. (2016). Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns. Cognition, 146, 349–370. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning in 7-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. doi:10.1126/science.283.5398.77
  • Mersad, K., & Nazzi, T. (2012). When mommy comes to the rescue of statistics: Infants combine top-down and bottom-up cues to segment speech. Language Learning and Development, 8, 303–315. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.609106
  • Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: An overview. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), From signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early language acquisition (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Morgenstern, A., & Parisse, C. (2007). Codage et interprétation du langage spontané d’enfants de 1 à 3 ans [Coding and interpreting 1-3-year-old children’s spontaneous speech]. Corpus n°6 Interprétation, Contextes, Codage, 6, 55–78.
  • Naigles, L. R. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357–374.
  • Nazzi, T., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., Kresh, S., & Legendre, G. (2011). Tracking irregular morphophonological dependencies in natural language: Evidence from the acquisition of subject-verb agreement in French. Cognition, 120, 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.004
  • Oshima-Takane, Y., Ariyama, J., Kobayashi, T., Katerelos, M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2011). Early verb learning in 20-month-old Japanese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 38, 455–484. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000127
  • Palasis, K. (2015). Subject clitics and preverbal negation in European French: Variation, acquisition, diatopy and diachrony. Lingua, 161, 125–143. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.012
  • Pérez-Leroux, A.-T. (2005). Number problems in children. In C. Gurski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Canadian linguistic association annual conference (pp. 12). London, Canada: University of Western Ontario. Retrieved from http://ling.uwo.ca/publications/CLA-ACL/CLAACL2005.htm
  • Pierce, A. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: a comparative analysis of french and english child grammars. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Rubino, R. B., & Pine, J. M. (1998). Subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: What low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language, 25, 35–39.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
  • Santelmann, L., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing. Cognition, 69, 105–134. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00060-2
  • Shi, R., & Melançon, A. (2010). Syntactic categorization in French-learning infants. Infancy, 15, 517–533. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00022.x
  • Soderstrom, M., White, K. S., Conwell, E., & Morgan, J. L. (2007). Receptive grammatical knowledge of familiar content words and inflection in 16-month-olds. Infancy, 12, 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00231.x
  • Tager-Flusberg, H., De Villiers, J., & Hakuta, K. (1983). The development of sentence coordination. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development. Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 201–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706–716. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706
  • Tincoff, R., Santelmann, L., & Jusczyk, P. (2000). Auxiliary verb learning and 18-month-olds’ acquisition of morphological relationships. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.). Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 726–737). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
  • Van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Linking infants’ distributional learning abilities to natural language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.04.001
  • Van Heugten, M., & Shi, R. (2010). Infants’ sensitivity to non-adjacent dependencies across phonological phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, EL223–EL228. doi:10.1121/1.3486197
  • Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J. L., Braun, I. E., & Lavin, T. (2009). Twenty-four-month-old infants’ interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 67–95. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.001
  • Wood, J., Kouider, S., & Carey, S. (2009). Acquisition of singular–Plural morphology. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 202–206. doi:10.1037/a0014432

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.