Phonological Motivation for the Acquisition of Onomatopoeia: An Analysis of Early Words

References

• Abbott, D. (2004). Animal sounds. [Online resource]. Retrieved from: http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/animal.html.
   Google Scholar
• Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. W. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyama, K., & Davis, B. L. (2017). Non-adjacent consonant sequence patterns in English target words during the first-word period. Journal of Child Language, 44, 1065–1087. doi:10.1017/S0305000916000404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H., & Thierry, G. (2015). Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. Cortex, 63, 196–205. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, H. (2006). The input–Output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 2–24. doi:10.1080/01690960400001721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunwald, S. R. (1976). Mother-child communication: the function of maternal language input., (ed.)Great Britain: International Linguistics Association. 28-50.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, A. J, & Streeter, M. (1977). Child phonology: data collection and preliminary analyses. In Papers and reports on child language development. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1199–1211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P. F., & Matyear, C. L. (2002). Acquisition of serial complexity in speech production: A comparison of phonetic and phonological approaches to first word production. Phonetica, 59, 75–107. doi:10.1159/000066065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., Culbertson, J., & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49, 137–173. doi:10.1177/00238309060490020201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, M, & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6, 654–672. doi:10.1002/lnc3.361
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. (2017). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration : On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 501–532. doi:10.1017/S002222671600030X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 603–615. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb, Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitaets verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., … Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–185. doi:10.2307/1166093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1983). Reduplication in child phonology. Journal of Child Language, 10, 239–243. doi:10.1017/S0305000900005274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C. (2008). How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing phonological grammar. In P. Avery, E. Dresher, & K. Rice (Eds.), Contrast in phonology: Theory, perception and acquisition (pp. 231–270). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-968X.1948.tb00556.x
   Google Scholar
• Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20130298. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal Of Child Language, 1, 49-64. doi:10.1017/S0305000900000076
   Google Scholar
• Kanero, J., Imai, M., Okuda, J., Okada, H., & Matsuda, T. (2014). How sound symbolism is processed in the brain: A study on Japanese mimetic words. PLoS One, 9, e97905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 65–90). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, S. (2010). Les premiers mots du jeune enfant français: Analyse quantitative et qualitative du vocabulaire réceptif et productif des deux premières années de vie. Rééducation orthophonique, 244, 149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, S., & Gayraud, F. (2010). L’inventaire français du développement communicatif. Grenoble: France: La Cigale.
   Google Scholar
• Khattab, G., & Al-Tamimi, J. (2013). Influence of geminate structure on early Arabic templatic patterns. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 374–414). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N., & Davis, B. L. (2015). A phonetic approach to consonant repetition in early words. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in syllables: Evidence from early word production in Finnish. First Language, 22, 119–135. doi:10.1177/014272370202206501
   Google Scholar
• Laing, C. E. (2014). A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language, 34, 387–405. doi:10.1177/0142723714550110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, C. E. (2015). What does the cow say? A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early phonological development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of York, York, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32–45. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, C. E., Vihman, M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2017). How salient are onomatopoeia in the early input? A prosodic analysis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 44, 1117–1139. doi:10.1017/S0305000916000428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, W. F. (1939). Speech development of a bilingual child, 1: Vocabulary growth in the first two years. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W., & Perlman, M. (2017). Quantifying iconicity’s contribution during language acquisition: Implications for vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Communication, 2, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2017.00004
   Google Scholar
• McCune, L., & Vihman, M. M. (2001). Early phonetic and lexical development: A productivity approach. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 670–684. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/054)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., & Vihman, M. M. (2011). Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In N. Clements & R. Ridouane Eds., Where do phonological features come from? Cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categories (Language F, pp. 261–301). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pačesová, J. (1968). The development of vocabulary in the child. Brno, Czech Republic: Universita J. E. Purkyne.
   Google Scholar
• Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, 6, 201–253. doi:10.1207/s15327817la0603_2
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Mapping language to the world: The role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, 21, e12551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS One, 10, e0137147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., Winter, B., Massaro, D. W., & Lupyan, G. (2018). Iconicity in the speech of children and adults. Developmental Science, 21, 1–8. doi:10.1111/desc.2018.21.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2013). Geminate template: A model for first finnish words. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 362–373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. V. (2004). Universal tendencies in the child’s acquisition of phonology. In B. Lust & C. Foley (Eds.), First Language Acquisition: The essential readings (pp. 294–306). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1–34. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271. doi:10.1017/S0305000900005766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szreder, M. (2013). The acquisition of consonant clusters in polish: A case study. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 343–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44, 929–938. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. (2016). Prosodic structures and templates in bilingual phonological development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 69–88. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M., & Majorano, M. (2017). The role of geminates in infants’ early word production and word-form recognition. Journal of Child Language, 44, 158–184. doi:10.1017/S0305000915000793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function in child language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 281–334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (1992). Early syllables and the construction of phonology. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 393–422). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (2014). Phonological development: The first two years (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (2017). Learning words and learning sounds: Advances in language development. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 1–27. doi:10.1111/bjop.12207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (2019a). The development of prosodic structure: A usage-based approach. In P. Prieto & N. EsteveGilbert (Eds.), The development of prosody in first language acquisition (pp. 185–206). TiLAR. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (2019b). Phonological Templates in Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a “radical” template phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725. doi:10.1515/LING.2007.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (Eds.). (2013). The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M., & Vihman, V-A. (2011). From first words to segments: A case study in phonological development. In I. Arnon & E. V. Clark (eds.), Experience, Variation, and Generalization: Learning a first language (pp. 109-133). TiLar 7. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology : A prosodic view. Journal of Linguistics, 7, 179–211. doi:10.1017/S0022226700002917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauquier, S., & Yamaguchi, N. (2013). Templates in French. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 317–342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Which words are most iconic? Interaction Studies, 18, 430–451. doi:10.1075/is.18.3.07win
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar