Effects and Non-Effects of Late Language Exposure on Spatial Language Development: Evidence from Deaf Adults and Children

References

• Arık, E. (2013). Expressions of space in Turkish Sign Language. In E. Arık (Ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research (pp. 219–242). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. (1959). Right-left discrimination and finger localization. Hoeber-Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2012). The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic or cognitive constraints? Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2006). Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500139363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 385-436). The MIT Press. 
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard U. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartmill, E. A., Rissman, L., Novack, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). The development of iconicity in children’s co-speech gesture and homesign. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 8(1), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.03car
   Google Scholar
• Casasola, M. (2008). The development of infants’ spatial categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola, M., Cohen, L. B., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six‐month‐old infants’ categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74(3), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., & Mayberry, R. I. (2019). Acquiring a first language in adolescence: The case of basic word order in American Sign Language. Journal of Child Language, 46(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C., & Beale, I. L. (1976). The psychology of left-right. LawrenceErlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2003). How composite is a fall? Adult’s and children’s descriptions of different types of falls in Danish Sign Language. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. (pp. 311-332). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fulop, S. A., & Chater, N. (2013). Learnability theory. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Özyürek, A., Gürcanli, Ö., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 127(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. (1990). Learnability and feedback. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoroglou, M., Johanson, M., & Papafragou, A.. Pragmatic factors in the acquisition of spatial language: The case of front and back. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000663
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. (1972). Discrimination of left and right, and development of the logic relations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18(4), 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hermer-Vazquez, L., Moffet, A., & Munkholm, P. (2001). Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: The case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition, 79(3), 263–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00120-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, I., & Templeton, W. (1966). Human spatial orientation.  JohnWiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• İlkbaşaran, D. (2015). Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. R., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000252X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., Vermeerbergen, M., Schembri, A., & Leeson, L. (2007). “Real data are messy”: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Australian Sign Language (Auslan), Vlaamse Gebarentaal (VGT), and Irish Sign Language (ISL). In P. Perniss, R. Pfau, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on sign languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 163–205). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, R. (1980). The acquisition of classifiers in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 28(1), 198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Manhardt, F., Ozyurek, A., Sumer, B., Mulder, K., Karadöller, D. Z., & Brouwer, S. (2020). Iconicity guides visual attention: A comparison between signers’ and speakers’ eye gaze during message preparation. Journal for Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Sera, M. D. (2006). The acquisition of spatial constructions in American Sign Language and English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enl004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1258–1270. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I. (2010). Early language acquisition and adult language ability: What sign language reveals about the critical. In M. Marschark, P. E. Spencer, & P. E. Nathan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 281–291). Oxford Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., & Kluender, R. (2018). Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism. Language and Cognition, 21(5), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005
   Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P. (2003). Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners. Linguistics, 41(4; ISSU 386), 681–722. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., Herman, R., Barriere, I., & Woll, B. (2008). The onset and mastery of spatial language in children acquiring British Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnich, E., & Landau, B. (2010). Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language. Language Learning and Development, 6(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440903249979
   Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L., & Meier, R. P. (1985). Acquisition of American Sign Language. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 881–938). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (1988). Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences, 10(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(88)90010-1
   Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A., Zwitserlood, I. E. P., & Perniss, P. M. (2010). Locative expressions in signed languages: A view from Turkish Sign Language (TID). Linguistics: An International Review, 48(5), 1111–1145. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.036
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. (2007). Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I., & Ozyurek, A. (2015). Does space structure spatial language? A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language, 91(3), 611–641. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I., & Özyürek, A. (2015). Does space structure spatial language?: A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language, 91(3), 611–641 doi:10.1353/lan.2015.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1972). Judgment and reasoning in the child. Littlefield, Adams. ( Originally work published 1928)
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. J. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives (Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06). University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, N. F., Lieberman, A. M., & Mayberry, R. I. (2013). The initial stages of language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language, 40(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, B. (1990). The effects of morphosyntactic structures on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1595–1600). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., & Thumann, H. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 271–296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sümer, B., Zwitserlood, I., Perniss, P. M., & Özyürek, A. (2012). Development of locative expressions by Turkish deaf and hearing children: Are there modality effects? In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 36) (pp. 568–580). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sümer, B., Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I. E. P., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Learning to express “left-right” & “front-behind” in a sign versus spoken language. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sümer, B. (2015). Acquisition of Spatial language by signing and speaking children: A comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Sümer, B., Perniss, P. M., & Özyürek, A. (2016). Viewpoint preferences in signing children’s spatial descriptions. In J. Scott & D. Waughtal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 40) (pp. 360–374). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sümer, B., & Özyürek, A. (2020). No effects of modality in development of locative expressions of space in signing and speaking children. Journal of Child Language. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supalla, T. R. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. UCSD.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3(99), 57–149.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2003). The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 169–195). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G., Sze, F., & Lam, S. (2007). Acquisition of simultaneous constructions by deaf children of Hong Kong Sign Language. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson, & O. Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages (pp. 283–316). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In 5th international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006) (pp. 1556–1559).
   Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, I. (2012). Classifiers: Meaning in the hand. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 158–186). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar