194
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Semantic Preview Benefit of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals during Chinese Reading

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish –. English Bilinguals, 63(5), 875–890. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194444
  • Ashby, J., & Rayner, K. Language and cognitive processes representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. (2004). Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. Representing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000233
  • Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of experimental psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 2(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.3.386
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Maechler, M. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version, 0.999999–2. http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=lme4
  • Beyer, S. V. (1992). The classical Tibetan language. SUNY Press.
  • Chodag, T. (1988). Tibet, the Land and the People. New World Press.
  • Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43(9), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1
  • Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding. Language Learning, 58(March), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00433.x
  • Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2010). The Role of phonological decoding in second language word-meaning inference. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp061
  • Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
  • Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033670
  • Inhoff, A. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90027-D
  • Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Eike, M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18(5), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902986058
  • Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive process in second language reading: Transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 4(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765838800400203
  • Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197248
  • Li, N., Wang, S., Mo, L., & Kliegl, R. (2018). Contextual constraint and preview time modulate the semantic preview effect: Evidence from Chinese sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 241–249.
  • Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248
  • Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
  • Postiglione, G. A. (2008). Making Tibetans in China: The educational challenges of harmonious multiculturalism. Educational Review, 60(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910701794481
  • Qu, Q., Cui, Z., & Damian, M. F. (2018). Orthographic effects in second- language spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000520
  • Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2019). The role of orthography in second-language spoken word production: Evidence from Tibetan Chinese bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2597–2604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819850382
  • Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In H. R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 213–234). Elsevier Science.
  • Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Reichle, E. D., & Yu, L. (2018). Models of Chinese reading: Review and analysis. Cognitive Science, 42 (S4), 1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12564
  • Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213770
  • Tsai, J., Lee, C., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.005
  • Wang, A., Yeon, J., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Yan, M. (2016). Cross-language parafoveal semantic processing: Evidence from Korean – Chinese bilinguals. Psychological Bulletin Review, 23(1), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0876-6
  • Wang, A., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Yan, M. (2014). Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: Evidence from reading Chinese as a second language. Acta Psychologica, 152, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.010
  • Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9
  • Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2003). Alphabetic readers quickly acquire orthographic structure in learning to read Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8438(June), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0702
  • Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2015). Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000093
  • Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movements and the perceptual span during first- and second-language sentence reading in bilingual older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039971
  • Xiandai Hanyu Changyong Cibiao [Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese]. (2008). Beijing. The Commercial Press.
  • Xiandai Hanyu Pinlu Cidian [Modern Chinese frequency dictionary]. (1986). Beijing. Beijing Language Institute Press.
  • Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N +1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N +2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019329
  • Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.561
  • Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(4), 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026935
  • Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9281-8
  • Zhou, W., Shu, H., Miller, K., & Yan, M. (2018). Reliance on orthography and phonology in reading of Chinese: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12111
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2663
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.