Copula Omission in Down Syndrome

References

• Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word-order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 491–539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999). EPP without Spec, IP. In D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches (pp. 93–109). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Andreou, G., & Katsarou, D. (2013). Language learning in Down syndrome (DS): Receptive and expressive morphosyntactic abilities in children with DS. Procedia, 93, 921–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.304
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Shalom, E., & Snyder, W. (1998). Root infinitives in child Russian: A comparison with Italian and Polish. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. K. Shillcoc (Eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing (pp. 22–27). University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, P., 1995. Null subjects. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2000). The development of the copula in child English: the lightness of be [Doctoral Dissertation]. UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2002). The development of the copula in child English: The lightness of be. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2 (1) , 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1075/arla.2.03bec
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2003). Is isn’t be. Lingua, 114(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00066-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2004). Copula omission is a grammatical reflex. Language Acquisition, 12(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1202_2
   Google Scholar
• Bel, A. (2001). The projection of aspect: A key in the acquisition of finiteness? In M., Almgren, A., Brreña, M.J., Ezeizabarrena, I., Idiazabel & B., MacWhinney, (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition. Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international association for the study of child language (pp. 1297–1313). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, A., Onofrio, D., & Caselli, M. C. (2014). Nouns and predicates comprehension and production in children with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(4), 491–504 https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, G., & Kuiken, F. (1990). Grammatical analysis of developmental language disorders - a study of the morphosyntax of children with specific language disorders, with hearing impairment and with Downs-syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 4(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209008985472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron-Faulkner, T., & Kidd, E. (2007). I’m are what I’m are: The acquisition of first person singular present BE. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprin, C., & Guasti, M.T. (2009). The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408090024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English [Doctoral Dissertation]. UMass.
   Google Scholar
• Caselli, M. C., Monaco, L., Trasciani, M., & Vicari, S. (2008). Language in Italian children with Down syndrome and with specific language impairment. Neuropsychology, 22(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. S., Seung, H., Schwartz, S. E., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (1998). Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome: II. Production deficits. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charest, M., & Leonard, L. B. (2004). Predicting tense: Finite verb morphology and subject pronouns in speech of typically-developing children and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checa, E., Galeote, M., & Soto, P. (2016). Spanish children with Down syndrome and their peers with typical development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C. (2011). Cypriot Greek Down Syndrome: Their Grammar and its Interfaces [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C. (2013). Tense and aspect in Cypriot Greek Down syndrome: Developmental patterns and coping strategies. Linguistic Variation, 13(2), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.13.2.02chr
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C. (2014). Towards a unified analysis of the linguistic development of Down syndrome. Invited presentation at ling lunch, Department of linguistics and philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. November 6, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C. (in preparation). A unified analysis of language development.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C., & Mavrogiorgos, M. (2015). The development of default case in Greek. 12th generative approaches to language acquisition conference (GALA 12) Nantes, France, University of Nantes, September 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C., & Wexler, K. (2016). The morphosyntactic development of case in Down syndrome. Lingua, 184, 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, C., Wiltschko, M. (2012). Function without content: Evidence from Greek subjunctive na, and A. M. Di Sciullo (Ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces (pp. 117–140). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (2017). Morphology in Language Acquisition. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 374–389). Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cleave, P. L., & Rice, M. L. (1997). An examination of the morpheme BE in children with specific language impairment: The role of contractibility and grammatical form class. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40(3), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4003.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., & Tomas, E. (2016). Understanding the Contributions of Prosodic Phonology to Morphological Development: Implications for Children with Specific Language Impairment. First Language, 36(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715626066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, P. A., Fey, M. E., Douglas, J. M., & Parsons, C. L. (2002). Profiles of grammatical morphology and sentence imitation in children with specific language impairment and Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(4), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/058)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltmate, K., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (2008). Language learning in four bilingual children with Down syndrome: A detailed analysis of vocabulary and morphosyntax. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 32(1), 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, S. (2003). Input flooding and the acquisition of Spanish verbs: Ser and estar for beginning-level adult learners [Doctoral Dissertation]. Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Gagarina, N. (2002). Thoughts on Optional Infinitives (in Russian). In D. Hole, P. Law, & N. Zhang (Eds.), Linguistics by Heart, Webfest for Horst-Dieter Gasde (pp. 1–23). ZAS.
   Google Scholar
• Galeote, M., Soto, P., Checa, E., Gómez, A., & Lamela, E. (2008). The acquisition of productive vocabulary in Spanish children with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33(4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250802441870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeote, M., Soto, P., Sebastián, E., Checa, E., & Sánchez-Palacios, C. (2013). Early grammatical development in Spanish children with Down syndrome. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, L., & Shady, M. E. (1996). The picture selection task. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee, & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax (pp. 125–145). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M. L. (2010). Ser and estar: Their syntax semantics pragmatics and acquisition in Mexican Spanish [Doctoral Dissertation]. Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, P. A., & Rice, M. L. (1996). Emergent uses of BE and DO: Evidence from children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 5(3), 209–243. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0503_2
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L. B. (2000). Specific language impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(4), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4304.848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis. Language, 78(3), 482–526. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyams, N. (2001). Now you hear it, now you don’t: The nature of optionality in child language. Proceedings of the 25th BUCLD Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, N. (2008). The Acquisition of Inflection: A Parameter-setting Approach. Reprinted in Language Acquisition, (Acquisition Archives 15, 192–209.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. L., Serratrice, L., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2002). Development of copula and auxiliary BE in children with specific language impairment and younger unaffected controls. First Language, 22(2), 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370202206502
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, H. (1996). The Spec Head configuration. In E. Garrett, and F. Lee (Eds.), Syntax at Sunset, UCLA Working Papers in Syntax and Semantics, Number 1, 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, H. (2000). The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larrañaga, P., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012). The acquisition of copula verbs in Basque by bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(3), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912438995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1324–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B. (1989). Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., Caselli, M. C., & Devescovi, A. (2002). Italian children’s use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years. First Language, 22(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370202206604
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Deevy, P. (2004). Specific language impairment in children: A comparison of English and Swedish. Language Acquisition, 12(3–4), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.1995.9671744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liceras, J. M., Bel, A., Perales, S. (2006). ‘Living with optionality’: Root infinitives, bare forms and inflected forms in child null subject languages. In N. Sagarra & J. A. Toribio, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 hispanic linguistic symposium (pp. 203–216). Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liceras, J. M., & Fernández Fuertes, R. (2019). Subject omission/production in child bilingual English and child bilingual Spanish: The view from linguistic theory. Probus, 31(2), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2016-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liceras, J. M., Fernández Fuertes, R., & Alba de la Fuente, A. (2012). Overt subjects and copula omission in the Spanish and the English grammar of English–Spanish bilinguals: On the locus and directionality of interlinguistic influence. First Language, 32(1–2), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711403980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust, B., Flynn, S., Foley, C. (1996). What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. In D. McDaniel & C. McKee (Eds.), Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax (pp. 55–76). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinis, T. (2011). On the nature and cause of specific language impairment: A view from sentence processing and infant research. Lingua, 121(3), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, D., McKee, C., Cairns, H. S. (1996). Eliciting judgements of grammaticality and reference. In D. McDaniel & C. McKee (Eds.), Methods for assessing children’s syntax (pp. 233–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murasugi, K. (2015). Root infinitive analogues in child Japanese, and M. Nakayama (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese Psycholinguistics (pp. 117–147). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Orfitelli, R., & Hyams, N. (2008). An experimental study of children’s comprehension of null subjects: Implications for grammatical/performance accounts. In Proceedings of the 32nd BUCLD, Vols. 1 & 2: 335–346, Sommerville, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Penke, M. (2018). Verbal agreement inflection in German children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(9), 2217–2234. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perovic, A. (2006). Syntactic deficit in Down syndrome: More evidence for the modular organisation of language. Lingua, 116(10), 1616–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring, M., & Clahsen, H. (2005). Morphosyntax in Down’s syndrome: Is the extended optional infinitive hypothesis an option? Stem-, Spraak-en Taalpathologie, 13, 3–13. d oi:1 0.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M., Hadley, P. A., & Holt, J. K. (2012). Sequence and system in the Acquisition of tense and agreement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0272)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In B. Lust, G. Hermon, & J. Kornfilt (Eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 249–272). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (2000). Remarks on early null subjects. In M. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (Eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax (pp. 269–292). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (2012). On the Grammatical Basis of Language Development: A Case Study. In G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195136517.013.0002
   Google Scholar
• Sano, T., & Hyams, N. (1994). Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. S. Powers & C. Hamann Eds., Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization. Proceedings of NELS 24 (pp. 345–396). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoudaki, E., & Varlokosta, S. (2014). Pronoun comprehension in Down syndrome: Deviance or delay? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57(4), 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, J., & Ben Shalom, D. (2004). On root infinitives in child Hebrew. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_4
   Google Scholar
• Schaner-Wolles, C. (2004). Spared domain-specific cognitive capacities? Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. In S. Bartke & J. Siehmüller (Eds.), Williams Syndrome across languages (pp. 93–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., & Miller, K. (2007). Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua, 117(11), 1907–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütze, C. T. R. (2003). The non-omission of nonfinite BE. Nordlyd, 31(3), 606–622 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/46.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, C. T. R. (2004). Why nonfinite BE is not omitted while finite BE is. In Proceedings of the 28th BUCLD, (pp. 506–521). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, C. T., & Wexler, K. (1996). Subject Case Licensing and English Root Infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th BUCLD, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Sera, M. D. (1992). To be or to be: Use and acquisition of the Spanish copulas. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(3), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90021-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sera, M. D. (2008). Commentary on “Copular Acquisition” – a Response to Silva-Corvalán and Montanari. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 361–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sera, M. D., Bales, D. W., & Pintado, J. C. (1997). ‘Ser’ helps Spanish speakers identify ‘real’ properties. Child Development, 68(5), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01964.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, U. (2009). Hebrew as a partial null-subject language. Studia Linguistica: A Journal of General Linguistics, 63(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01156.x
   Google Scholar
• Silva-Corvalán, C., & Montanari, S. (2008). The acquisition of ser, estar (and be) by a Spanish–English bilingual child: The early stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890800357X
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, N. 2009. The Linguistic Profile of Greek Individuals with Down Syndrome: Evidence from Syntactic and Morphological Phenomena. [Doctoral Dissertation], University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, N., & Clahsen, H. (2009). The perfective past tense in Greek adolescents with Down syndrome. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 57(8), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C. (2001). Down syndrome phonology: Developmental patterns and intervention strategies. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(3), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.3104/reviews.118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szagun, G., Steinbrink, C., Franik, M., & Stumper, B. (2006). Development of vocabulary and grammar in young German-speaking children assessed with a German language development inventory. First Language, 26(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723706056475
   Google Scholar
• Tsimpli, I. M. (1990). Clause structure and word order in modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 226–255.
   Google Scholar
• Vicari, S., Caselli, M. C., Gagliardi, C., Tonucci, F., & Volterra, V. (2002). Language acquisition in special populations: A comparison between Down and Williams syndromes. Neuropsychologia, 40(13), 2461–2470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00083-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari, S., Caselli, M. C., & Tonucci, F. (2000). Asynchrony of lexical and morphosyntactic development in children with Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00110-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–362). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106(1–4), 23–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00029-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, K. (2011). Grammatical Computation in the Optional Infinitive Stage. In J. de Villiers & T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (Vol. 41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1688-9_3.
   Google Scholar
• Whistler, E. A. (2014). Cross-Domain Effects in Children with Down Syndrome. [Master of Science Dissertation], University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Winitz, H., & Sagana, B. (2007). Acquiring explicit grammatical knowledge using the Spanish verbs ser and estar as examples. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9047-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampini, L., & D’Odorico, L. (2011). Lexical and syntactic development in Italian children with Down’s syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46 (4) , 386–396 https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.508764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar