167
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

One Is Not Enough: Interactive Role of Word Order, Case-marking, and Verbal Morphology in Children’s Comprehension of Suffixal Passive in Korean

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., Ferguson, H., & Pine, J. (2017). Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences?: A permutation analysis. PloS one, 12(10), e0186129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186129
  • Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/136828200247278
  • Bae, S. (1997). hankwukatonguy mwunpephyengthayso suptukey kwanhan yenkwu: Cosa ‘ka, i, nun, to, lul’ [A study on children’s acquisition of grammatical morphemes: Particle ‘ka, i, nun, to, lul’]. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 2, 1–14.
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11(3), 245–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90017-8
  • Benavides-Varela, S., & Gervain, J. (2017). Learning word order at birth: A NIRS study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.03.003
  • Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). Wiley and Sons.
  • Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & A. E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 123–172). Reidel.
  • Brooks, P. J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.29
  • Cournane, A. (2020). Learning modals: A grammatical perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12399
  • de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(4), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067055
  • Deen, K. D., Bondoc, I. P., & Camp, A. (2018). Repetition brings success: Revealing knowledge of the passive voice. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 200–213).
  • Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of Sesotho passive. Language, 65(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/414842
  • Diamond, A. (1985). Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants’ performance on AB. Child Development, 56(4), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130099
  • Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath, (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 30 October 2019 http://wals.info/chapter/81on
  • Fox, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1998). Children’s passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553761
  • Garcia, R., & Kidd, E. (2020). The acquisition of the Tagalog symmetrical voice system: Evidence from structural priming. Language Learning and Development, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1670184
  • Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.010
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Mylander, C. The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. (2008). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(27), 9163–9168. In R. Gelman (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710060105
  • Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090001271X
  • Gordon, P., & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36(3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90058-R
  • Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.002
  • Israel, M., Johnson, C., & Brooks, P. J. (2000). From states to events: The acquisition of english passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1/2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.005
  • Jin, K.-S., Kim, M. J., & Song, H.-J. (2015). The development of Korean preschooler’ ability to understand transitive sentences using case-markers. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(3), 75–90. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE06508267
  • Kim, S. Y., Sung, J. E., & Yim, D. (2017). Sentence comprehension ability and working memory capacity as a function of syntactic structure and canonicity in 5-and 6-year-old children. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 22(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17420
  • Lee, H. (2004). 2sey hankwuk atonguy cwue paltal thukseng [Developmental characteristics of subject by 2-year-old children]. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 9(2), 19–32.
  • Lee, C., & Cho, S. W. (2009). Acquisition of the subject and topic nominals and markers in the spontaneous speech of young children in Korean. In C. Lee, G. B. Simpson, & Y. Kim (Eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 23–33). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, K. O., & Lee, Y. (2008). An event-structural account of passive acquisition in Korean. Language and Speech, 51(1/2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309080510010801
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008
  • Messenger, K., & Fisher, C. (2018). Mistakes weren’t made: Three-year-olds’ comprehension of novel-verb passives provides evidence for early abstract syntax. Cognition, 178, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.002
  • No, G. (2009). Acquisition of case markers and grammatical functions. In C. Lee, G. B. Simpson, & Y. Kim (Eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 51–62). Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Grady, W., & Lee, M. (2005). A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language, 92(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.009
  • Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 22(2), 158–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.943903
  • Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026
  • Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1/2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Sano, T., Endo, M., & Yamakoshi, K. (2001). Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 668–683). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Shin, G.-H. (2020). Connecting input to comprehension: First language acquisition of active transitives and suffixal passives by Korean-speaking preschool children. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
  • Shin G. (2021). Limits on the Agent‐First Strategy: Evidence from Children's Comprehension of a Transitive Construction in Korean. Cognitive Science, 45(9), 10.1111/cogs.13038
  • Sinclair, H., & Bronckart, J. P. (1972). SVO A linguistic universal? A study in developmental psycholinguistics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90055-0
  • Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6
  • Snyder, W., & Hyams, N. (2015). Minimality effects in children’s passives. In E. D. Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 343–368). John Benjamins.https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223
  • Sohn, H. M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.
  • Stromswold, K., Pinker, S., & Kaplan, R. (1985). Cues for understanding the passive voice. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 24, 123–130.
  • Suzman, S. M. (1987). Passives and prototypes in Zulu children’s speech. African Studies, 46(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020188708707677
  • Suzuki, T., & Kobayashi, T. (2017). Syntactic cues for inferences about causality in language acquisition: Evidence from an argument-drop language. Language Learning and Development, 13(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1193019
  • Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
  • Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167(3917), 392–393. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3917.392
  • Wexler, K. (2004). Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. In A. Csirmaz, A. Gualmini, & A. Nevins (Eds.), Plato’s problem: Problems in language acquisition (pp. 159–209). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
  • Yeon, J. (2015). Passives. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 116–136). John Wiley & Sons.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.