2,011
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Challenge to Whole-word Phonology? A Study of Japanese and Mandarin

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aitchison, J., & Chiat, S. (1981). Natural phonology or natural memory? The interaction between phonological processes and recall mechanisms. Language and Speech, 24(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400402
  • Allen, G. D., & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child Phonology, 1: Production (pp. 227–256). Academic Press.
  • Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris publications.
  • Berko Gleason, J., Perlmann, R. Y., Ely, R., & Evans, D. W. (1994). The baby talk register: Parents’ use of diminutives. In J. L. Sokolov & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Handbook of research in language using CHILDES (pp. 50–76). Erlbaum.
  • Chang, K. L., Hu, P., & Abrams, L. (2022). The tip-of-the-Mandarin tongue: Phonological and orthographic priming of TOT resolution in Mandarin speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(7), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2033803
  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row.
  • Choo, R. Q. (2022). The acquisition of segments and tones in children learning Mandarin: An observational and experimental study [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of York.
  • Cychosz, M., Erskine, M., Munson, B., & Edwards, J. (2021). A lexical advantage in four-year-old children’s word repetition. Journal of Child Language, 48(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000094
  • de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0045
  • Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In J. N. Beckman (Ed.), NELS 25: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (pp. 13–25). Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association).
  • Deng, L., & Dang, J. (2007). Speech analysis: The Production-Perception perspective. In H.-Z. Li & C.-H. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Chinese spoken language processing (pp. 3–32). World Scientific.
  • Dollaghan, C. A., Biber, M. E., & Campbell, T. F. (1995). Lexical influences on nonword repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007098
  • Echols, C., & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2(3), 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0203_1
  • Farrell, M. T., & Abrams, L. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue states reveal age differences in the syllable frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021328
  • Faytak, M. D. (2018). Articulatory uniformity through articulatory reuse: Insights from an ultrasound study of Sūzhōu Chinese. Unpublished [PhD thesis], University of California.
  • Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51(2), 419–439. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 93-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/412864
  • Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
  • Fikkert, P., & de Hoop, H. (2009). Language acquisition in optimality theory. Journal of Linguistics, 47, 311–358.
  • Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C. (2008). How does Place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing grammars. In P. Avery, E. Dresher, & K. Rice (Eds.), Contrast in phonology: Theory, perception, acquisition (pp. 231–270). Mouton.
  • Gnanadesikan, A. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 73–108). CUP.
  • Goad, H. (1997). Consonant harmony in child language: An optimality-theoretic account. In S. J. sh & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 113–142). John Benjamins.
  • Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hayashi, A., Tsuji, S., Mazuka, R., & Nazzi, T. (2014). The role of the input on the development of the LC bias: A crosslinguistic comparison. Cognition, 132(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.004
  • Grunwell, P. (1982). Clinical phonozlogy. Croom Helm.
  • Hallé, P., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1994). Emergence of an early receptive lexicon: Infants‘ recognition of words. Infant Behavior and Development, 17(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(94)90047-7
  • Hallé, P., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1996). The format of representation of recognized words in infants‘ early receptive lexicon. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90007-7
  • Huff, C. L. (2017). A study of Mandarin homophony [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Oxford University.
  • Ingram, D. (1976). Phonological disability in children. Elsevier Press.
  • Keren-Portnoy, T., & Segal, O. (2016). Phonological development in Israeli Hebrew-learning infants and toddlers: Perception and production. In R. Berman (Ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (pp. 69–94). John Benjamins.
  • Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R., Whitaker, C., & Williams, N. A. (2010). The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1280–1293.
  • Khattab, G., & Al-Tamimi, J. (2013). Early phonological patterns in Lebanese Arabic. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 374–414). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lleó, C. (1990). Homonymy and reduplication: On the extended availability of two strategies in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013763
  • Lou, S. (2021) Early phonological development in Mandarin: An analysis of prosodic structures and tones from babbling through the single word period [Unpublished PhD thesis], University of York.
  • Macken, M. A. (1979). Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua, 49(1), 11–49. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(79)90073-1
  • Macken, M. A. (1980). Aspects of the acquisition of stop systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. In G. Yeni-komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology, I: Production (pp. 143–192). Academic Press.
  • Ma, L., Perrier, P., & Deng, J. (2015). Strength of syllabic influences on articulation in Mandarin Chinese and French: Insights from a motor control approach. Journal of Phonetics, 53, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.005
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. In U. H. Frauenfelder & L. K.Tyler (Eds.), Spoken word recognition (pp. 71–102). Elsevier.
  • Ma, J., Wu, Y., Zhu, J., & Chen, X. (2022). The phonological development of Mandarin voiceless affricates in three- to five-year-old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 809722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809722
  • McAllister Byun, T., Inkelas, S., & Rose, Y. (2016). The A-map model: Articulatory reliability in child-specific phonology. Language, 92(1), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0000
  • Menn, L. (1971). Phonotactic rules in beginning speech: A study in the development of English discourse. Lingua, 26(3), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(71)90011-8
  • Menn, L. (1978). Phonological units in beginning speech. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 157–171). North-Holland.
  • Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production (Vol. 2, pp. 3–50). Academic Press. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 168-214.
  • Mok, P. K. P. (2010). Language-specific realizations of syllable structure and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466859
  • Oh, Y. M. (2015). Linguistic complexity and information: Quantitative approaches [Unpublished doctoral thesis], University of Lyon.
  • Ota, M. (2003). The development of prosodic structure in early words. John Benjamins.
  • Ota, M. (2013). Lexical frequency effects on phonological development: The case of word production in Japanese. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 415–438). CUP.
  • Ota, M., Davies-Jenkins, & Skarabela, B. (2018). Why choo-choo is better than train: The role of register-specific words in early vocabulary growth. Cognitive Science, 42, 1974–1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12628
  • Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, 6(3), 201–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0603_2
  • Pater, J. (2004). Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 219–244). Cambridge University Press.
  • Pater, J., & Werle, P. (2003). Direction of assimilation in child consonant harmony. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(3–4), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100000712
  • Priestly, T. M. S. (1977). One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language, 4(1), 45–66. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900000477
  • Rose, Y. (2000). Headedness and prosodic licensing in the L1 acquisition of phonology [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. McGill University.
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2007). Geminate template: A model for first Finnish words. First Language, 27(4), 347–359. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723707081728
  • Segal, O., Keren-Portnoy, T., & Vihman, M. (2020). Robust effects of stress on early lexical representation. Infancy, 25(4), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12340
  • Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: A case study. The University Press.
  • Snow, D. (1998). A prominence account of syllable reduction in early speech development: The child’s prosodic phonology of tiger and giraffe. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(5), 1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4105.1171
  • Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua, 68(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(86)90021-5
  • Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. Garland.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C., & Stemberger, J. (1994). Consonant harmony and phonological underspecification in child speech. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 63–80). Singular Publishing Group.
  • Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function in child language. In J. Greenberg, C. A. Fergu-son, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language (Vol. 2, pp. 281–334). Stanford University Press.
  • Vihman, M. M. (1993). Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21(1–2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31321-X
  • Vihman, M. M. (2016). Prosodic structures and templates in bilingual phonological development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000790
  • Vihman, M. M. (2019). Phonological templates in development. Oxford University Press.
  • Vihman, M. M. (2022). The developmental origins of phonological memory. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000354
  • Vihman, M. M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45(4), 683–725. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 17-57. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.021
  • Vihman, M. M., & Greenlee, M. (1987). Individual differences in phonological development: Ages one and three years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3004.503
  • Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (Eds.). (2013a). The Emergence of Phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2013b). Introduction. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.
  • Vihman, M. M., & Kunnari, S. (2006). The sources of phonological knowledge: A cross-linguistic perspective. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 35(35), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1467
  • Vihman, M. M., & Majorano, M. (2017). The role of geminates in infants’ early words and word-form recognition. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000793
  • Vihman, M. M., & McCune, L. (1994). When is a word a word? Journal of Child Language, 21(3), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009442
  • Vihman, M. M., & Miller, R. (1988). Words and babble at the threshold of language acquisition. In M. D. Smith & J. L. Locke (Eds.), The Emergent Lexicon (pp. 151–183). Academic Press.
  • Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Hallé, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.004
  • Vihman, M. M., Ota, M., Keren-Portnoy, T., Lou, S., & Choo, R. Q. (2022). Child phonological responses to variegation in adult words: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000393
  • Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: A prosodic view. Journal of Linguistics, 7(2), 179–211. Reprinted in Vihman & Keren-Portnoy, 2013a, pp. 61-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700002917
  • Wauquier, S., & Yamaguchi, N. (2013). Templates in French. In M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (Eds.), The Emergence of Phonology: Whole-word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 317–342). CUP.