Integrated multi-omics reveals common properties underlying stress granule and P-body formation

References

• Kroschwald S, Maharana S, Mateju D, et al. Promiscuous interactions and protein disaggregases determine the material state of stress-inducible RNP granules. Elife. 2015;4:e06807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Kedersha N. RNA granules: post-transcriptional and epigenetic modulators of gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(6):430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedersha N, Stoecklin G, Ayodele M, et al. Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J Cell Biol. 2005;169(6):871–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle NP, Castelli LM, Campbell SG, et al. Stress-dependent relocalization of translationally primed mRNPs to cytoplasmic granules that are kinetically and spatially distinct from P-bodies. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(1):65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah KH, Zhang B, Ramachandran V, et al. Processing body and stress granule assembly occur by independent and differentially regulated pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2013;193(1):109–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan JR, Muhlrad D, Parker R. P bodies promote stress granule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(3):441–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth U, Parker R. Decapping and decay of messenger RNA occur in cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science. 2003;300(5620):805–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki S, Anderson P. Reprogramming mRNA translation during stress. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(2):222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui J, Campbell SG, Ashe MP. Inhibition of translation initiation following glucose depletion in yeast facilitates a rationalization of mRNA content. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38(4):1131–1136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hubstenberger A, Courel M, Benard M, et al. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA Regulons. Mol Cell. 2017;68(1):144–57 e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brengues M, Teixeira D, Parker R. Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science. 2005;310(5747):486–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sc W, Cp B. Getting RNA and protein in phase. Cell. 2012;149(6):1188–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S, Wheeler JR, Walters RW, et al. ATPase-modulated stress granules contain a diverse proteome and substructure. Cell. 2016;164(3):487–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hondele M, Sachdev R, Heinrich S, et al. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature. 2019;573(7772):144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn JY, Dyakov BJA, Zhang J, et al. Properties of stress granule and P-body proteomes. Mol Cell. 2019;76(2):286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks N, Kedersha N, Ayodele M, et al. Stress granule assembly is mediated by prion-like aggregation of TIA-1. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(12):5383–5398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu KS, Dash D. Dynamic alpha-helices: conformations that do not conform. Proteins. 2007;68(1):109–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui J, Castelli LM, Pizzinga M, et al. Granules harboring translationally active mRNAs provide a platform for P-body formation following stress (In Press). Cell Rep. 2014;218:1564–1581.
   Google Scholar
• Kedersha N, Tisdale S, Hickman T, et al. Real-time and quantitative imaging of mammalian stress granules and processing bodies. Methods Enzymol. 2008;448:521–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Kedersha N. Stress granules: the Tao of RNA triage. Trends Biochem Sci. 2008;33(3):141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, et al. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast. 1999;15(10B):963–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello J, Castelli LM, Rowe W, et al. Global mRNA selection mechanisms for translation initiation. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowe W, Kershaw CJ, Castelli LM, et al. Puf3p induces translational repression of genes linked to oxidative stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(2):1026–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(9):2513–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G, Dickins BJ, Demeter J, et al. AGAPE (Automated Genome Analysis PipelinE) for pan-genome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geladaki A, Kocevar Britovsek N, Breckels LM, et al. Combining LOPIT with differential ultracentrifugation for high-resolution spatial proteomics. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatto L, Lilley KS. MSnbase-an R/Bioconductor package for isobaric tagged mass spectrometry data visualization, processing and quantitation. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(2):288–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12(2):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar L, EF M. Mfuzz: a software package for soft clustering of microarray data. Bioinformation. 2007;2(1):5–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Maaten L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Researc. 2014;15:3221–3245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijthe JH, Rtsne: t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding using a barnes-hut implementation 2015. [ Available from: https://github.com/jkrijthe/Rtsne].
   Google Scholar
• Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(9):731–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, et al. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Z, Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L. Genome-scale prediction of proteins with long intrinsically disordered regions. Proteins. 2014;82(1):145–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DT, Cozzetto D. DISOPRED3: precise disordered region predictions with annotated protein-binding activity. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(6):857–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, et al. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D607–D13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacic V, Uversky VN, Dunker AK, et al. Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of amino acid composition differences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8(1):211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelechano V, Wei W, Steinmetz LM. Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling. Nature. 2013;497(7447):127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and samtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subtelny AO, Eichhorn SW, Chen GR, et al. Poly(A)-tail profiling reveals an embryonic switch in translational control. Nature. 2014;508(7494):66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouskin S, Zubradt M, Washietl S, et al. Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature. 2014;505(7485):701–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neymotin B, Athanasiadou R, Gresham D. Determination of in vivo RNA kinetics using RATE-seq. RNA. 2014;20(10):1645–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dosReis M, Savva R, Wernisch L. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(17):5036–5044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann S, Frydman J. Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of cotranslational folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(2):237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlincy NJ, Ingolia NT. Transcriptome-wide measurement of translation by ribosome profiling. Methods. 2017;126:112–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Polanco F, Bates C, Lui J, et al. Core Fermentation (CoFe) granules focus coordinated glycolytic mRNA localization and translation to fuel glucose fermentation. iScience. 2021;24(2):102069.
   Google Scholar
• Swisher KD, Parker R. Localization to, and effects of Pbp1, Pbp4, Lsm12, Dhh1, and Pab1 on stress granules in saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson CE, Lui J, Kershaw CJ, et al. mRNA localization to P-bodies in yeast is bi-phasic with many mRNAs captured in a late Bfr1p-dependent wave. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 6):1254–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkley TP, Watson R, Griffin JL, et al. Localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT). Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(11):1128–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellacheruvu D, Wright Z, Couzens AL, et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. 2013;10(8):730–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell SF, Jain S, She M, et al. Global analysis of yeast mRNPs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(1):127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JA, Broman AT, Will J, et al. Genetic architecture of ethanol-responsive transcriptome variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Genetics. 2014;198(1):369–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijns MA, Alexander RD, Spiller MP, et al. A role for Q/N-rich aggregation-prone regions in P-body localization. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(15):2463–2472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet S, Cougot N, Wilczynska A, et al. Translationally repressed mRNA transiently cycles through stress granules during stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(10):4469–4479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulas A, Fay MM, Lyons SM, et al. Stress-specific differences in assembly and composition of stress granules and related foci. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(5):927–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou HX, Nguemaha V, Mazarakos K, et al. Do disordered and structured proteins behave differently in phase separation? Trends Biochem Sci. 2018;43(7):499–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Schmich F, Srivatsa S, et al. Context-dependent deposition and regulation of mRNAs in P-bodies. Elife. 2018;7:e29815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov P, Kedersha N, Anderson P. Stress granules and processing bodies in translational control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(5):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Treeck B, Protter DSW, Matheny T, et al. RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(11):2734–2739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong A, Matheny T, Jain S, et al. The stress granule transcriptome reveals principles of mrna accumulation in stress granules. Mol Cell. 2017;68(4):808–20 e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courel M, Clement Y, Bossevain C, et al. GC content shapes mRNA storage and decay in human cells. Elife. 2019;8:e49708.g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira D, Sheth U, Valencia-Sanchez MA, et al. Processing bodies require RNA for assembly and contain nontranslating mRNAs. RNA. 2005;11(4):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedersha N, Chen S, Gilks N, et al. Evidence that ternary complex (eIF2-GTP-tRNA(i)(Met))-deficient preinitiation complexes are core constituents of mammalian stress granules. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(1):195–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauber D, Tauber G, Khong A, et al. Modulation of RNA Condensation by the DEAD-Box Protein eIF4A. Cell. 2020;180(3):411–26 e16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak NA, Pichler G, Paron I, et al. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli LM, Lui J, Campbell SG, et al. Glucose depletion inhibits translation initiation via eIF4A loss and subsequent 48S preinitiation complex accumulation, while the pentose phosphate pathway is coordinately up-regulated. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(18):3379–3393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janapala Y, Preiss T, Shirokikh NE. Control of translation at the initiation phase during glucose starvation in yeast. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan D, Riordan D, Gerber A, et al. RNA-binding proteins interact with functionally related sets of RNAs, suggesting an extensive regulatory system. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(10):2297–2313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw CJ, Costello JL, Castelli LM, et al. The yeast La related protein Slf1p is a key activator of translation during the oxidative stress response. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(1):e1004903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw CJ, Costello JL, Talavera D, et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pleiotropic nature of the control of gene expression by Puf3p. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):15518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castelli LM, Talavera D, Kershaw CJ, et al. The 4E-BP Caf20p mediates both eIF4E-dependent and independent repression of translation. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(5):e1005233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello JL, Kershaw CJ, Castelli LM, et al. Dynamic changes in eIF4F-mRNA interactions revealed by global analyses of environmental stress responses. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youn JY, Dunham WH, Hong SJ, et al. High-density proximity mapping reveals the subcellular organization of mRNA-associated granules and bodies. Mol Cell. 2018;69(3):517–32 e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesla J. Metabolic enzymes that bind RNA: yet another level of cellular regulatory network? Acta Biochim Pol. 2006;53(1):11–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen-Boixet J, Kopach A, Holehouse AS, et al. RNA-induced conformational switching and clustering of G3BP drive stress granule assembly by condensation. Cell. 2020;181(2):346–61 e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Mathieu C, Rm K, et al. G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules. Cell. 2020;181(2):325–45 e28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders DW, Kedersha N, Lee DSW, et al. Competing protein-RNA interaction networks control multiphase intracellular organization. Cell. 2020;181(2):306–24 e28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar