Conditional depletion of transcriptional kinases Ctk1 and Bur1 and effects on co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly and pre-mRNA splicing

References

• Wilkinson ME, Charenton C, Nagai K. RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2020;89:359–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander RD, Innocente SA, Barrass JD, et al. Splicing-dependent RNA polymerase pausing in yeast. Mol Cell. 2010;40:582–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameur A, Zaghlool A, Halvardson J, et al. Total RNA sequencing reveals nascent transcription and widespread co-transcriptional splicing in the human brain. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1435–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugiolo M, Herzel L, Neugebauer KM. Counting on co-transcriptional splicing. F1000Prime Rep. 2013;5:9. Available from: http://www.f1000.com/prime/reports/b/5/9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrillo Oesterreich F, Herzel L, Straube K, et al. Splicing of nascent RNA coincides with intron exit from RNA polymerase II. Cell. 2016;165:372–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo Oesterreich F, Preibisch S, Neugebauer KM. Global analysis of nascent RNA reveals transcriptional pausing in terminal exons. Mol Cell. 2010;40:571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görnemann J, Barrandon C, Hujer K, et al. Cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly and splicing are independent of the Prp40p WW domain. Rna. 2011;17:2119–2129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen KM, Trotta KL, Smith EE, et al. Comprehensive RNA polymerase II interactomes reveal distinct and varied roles for each phospho-CTD residue. Cell Rep. 2016;15:2147–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodor YL, Menet JS, Tolan M, et al. Cotranscriptional splicing efficiency differs dramatically between Drosophila and mouse. Rna. 2012;18:2174–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotovic KM, Lockshon D, Boric L, et al. Cotranscriptional recruitment of the U1 snRNP to intron-containing genes in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:5768–5779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacadie SA, Rosbash M. Cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly dynamics and the role of U1 snRNA:5′ss base pairing in yeast. Mol Cell. 2005;19:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listerman I, Sapra AK, Neugebauer KM. Cotranscriptional coupling of splicing factor recruitment and precursor messenger RNA splicing in mammalian cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojima T, Gomes T, Grosso ARF, et al. Mammalian NET-seq reveals genome-wide nascent transcription coupled to RNA processing. Cell. 2015;161:526–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilgner H, Knowles DG, Johnson R, et al. Deep sequencing of subcellular RNA fractions shows splicing to be predominantly co-transcriptional in the human genome but inefficient for lncRNAs. Genome Res. 2012;22:1616–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace EWJ, Beggs JD. Extremely fast and incredibly close: cotranscriptional splicing in budding yeast. Rna. 2017;23:601–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley DL. Rules of engagement: co-transcriptional recruitment of pre-mRNA processing factors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley DL. Coupling mRNA processing with transcription in time and space. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:163–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujardin G, Lafaille C, Petrillo E, et al. Transcriptional elongation and alternative splicing. Biochim Biophys Acta - Genet Regul Mech. 2013;1829:134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblihtt AR, De La Mata M, Fededa JP, et al. Multiple links between transcription and splicing. Rna. 2004;10:1489–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkhofer EC, Hu P, Johnson TL. Introduction to cotranscriptional RNA splicing. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1126:83–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perales R, Bentley D. ‘Cotranscriptionality’: the transcription elongation complex as a nexus for nuclear transactions. Mol Cell. 2009;36:178–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eick D, Geyer M. The RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) code. Chem Rev. 2013;113:8456–8490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhart A, Kamenski T, Hoeppner S, et al. A structural perspective of CTD function. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1401–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarnitsky P, Cho EJ, Buratowski S. Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2452–2460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho EJ, Kobor MS, Kim M, et al. Opposing effects of Ctk1 kinase and Fcp1 phosphatase at Ser 2 of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3319–3329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Greenleaf AL. CTD kinase large subunit is encoded by CTK1, a gene required for normal growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene Expr. 1991;1:149–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Warfield L, Zhang C, et al. Phosphorylation of the transcription elongation factor Spt5 by yeast Bur1 kinase stimulates recruitment of the PAF complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:4852–4863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu H, Hu C, Hinnebusch AG. Phosphorylation of the Pol II CTD by KIN28 enhances BUR1/BUR2 recruitment and Ser2 CTD phosphorylation near promoters. Mol Cell. 2009;33:752–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou K, Kuo WHW, Fillingham J, et al. Control of transcriptional elongation and cotranscriptional histone modification by the yeast BUR kinase substrate Spt5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6956–6961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzog GA, Fu J. The Spt4-Spt5 complex: a multi-faceted regulator of transcription elongation. Biochim Biophys Acta - Genet Regul Mech. 2013;1829:105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman K, Lis JT. Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:720–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer A, Lidschreiber M, Siebert M, et al. Uniform transitions of the general RNA polymerase II transcription complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:1272–1278. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nsmb.1903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood A, Shilatifard A. Bur1/Bur2 and the Ctk complex in yeast: the split personality of mammalian P-TEFb. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1066–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkowiak B, Liu P, Phatnani HP, et al. CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2303–2316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh M-C, Podolny V, Buratowski S. Bur1 kinase is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:7005–7018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidschreiber M, Leike K, Cramer P. Cap completion and C-terminal repeat domain kinase recruitment underlie the initiation-elongation transition of RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:3805–3816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gil A, García-Martínez J, Pelechano V, et al. The distribution of active RNA polymerase II along the transcribed region is gene-specific and controlled by elongation factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4651–4664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SH, Kim M, Buratowski S. Phosphorylation of serine 2 within the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain couples transcription and 3′ End processing. Mol Cell. 2004;13:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laribee RN, Krogan NJ, Xiao T, et al. BUR kinase selectively regulates H3 K4 trimethylation and H2B ubiquitylation through recruitment of the PAF elongation complex. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1487–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason PB, Struhl K. Distinction and relationship between elongation rate and processivity of RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol. Cell. 2005;17:831–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia S, Lidschreiber M, Baejen C, et al. RNA-dependent chromatin association of transcription elongation factors and pol II CTD kinases. Elife. 2017;6:e25637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu B, Eick D, Bensaude O. CTD serine-2 plays a critical role in splicing and termination factor recruitment to RNA polymerase II in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:1591–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David CJ, Boyne AR, Millhouse SR, et al. The RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain promotes splicing activation through recruitment of a U2AF65-Prp19 complex. Genes Dev. 2011;25:972–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong YW, Zhou Q. Stimulatory effect of splicing factors on transcriptional elongation. Nature. 2001;414:929–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Coutinho-Mansfield G, Wang D, et al. The splicing factor SC35 has an active role in transcriptional elongation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:819–826. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nsmb.1461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brès V, Gomes N, Pickle L, et al. A human splicing factor, SKIP, associates with P-TEFb and enhances transcription elongation by HIV-1 Tat. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1211–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura K, Fukagawa T, Takisawa H, et al. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat Methods. 2009;6:917–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Ochoa GI, Barrass JD, Terlouw BR, et al. A fast and tuneable auxin-inducible degron for depletion of target proteins in budding yeast. Yeast. 2019;36:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardiff DF, Rosbash M. Arrested yeast splicing complexes indicate stepwise snRNP recruitment during in vivo spliceosome assembly. Rna. 2006;12:968–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanzadeh V, Huang Y, Sanguinetti G, et al. Transcription rate strongly affects splicing fidelity and cotranscriptionality in budding yeast. Genome Res. 2018;28:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman LS, Weissman JS. Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution. Nature. 2011;469:368–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun Y, Joo YJ, Suh H, et al. Selective kinase inhibition shows that Bur1 (Cdk9) phosphorylates the Rpb1 linker in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2019;39. DOI:10.1128/MCB.00602-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronamraju R, Strahl BD. A feed forward circuit comprising Spt6, Ctk1 and PAF regulates Pol II CTD phosphorylation and transcription elongation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:870–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray S, Udupa R, Yao S, et al. Phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain by the Bur1 cyclin-dependent kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:4089–4096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudlin IE, Beggs JD. Spt5 modulates cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 2019;25:1298–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska M, Ulrich HD. An expanded tool kit for the auxin-inducible degron system in budding yeast. Yeast. 2013;30:341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volland C, Urban-Grimal D, Géraud G, et al. Endocytosis and degradation of the yeast uracil permease under adverse conditions. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:9833–9841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzog GA, Wada T, Handa H, et al. Evidence that Spt4, Spt5, and Spt6 control transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1998;12:357–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman LS, Weissman JS. Native elongating transcript sequencing (NET-seq). Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2012;1:1–17
   Google Scholar