CITEMO^XMBD: A flexible single-cell multimodal omics analysis framework to reveal the heterogeneity of immune cells

References

• Stuart T, Satija R. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(5):257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Preissl S, Ren B. Single-cell multimodal omics: the power of many. Nat Methods. 2020;17(1):11–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, et al. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell. 2019;177(1888–902.e21):1888–1902.e21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, et al. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):411–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, et al. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):495–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573–3587.e29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu X, Mao Q, Tang Y, et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat Methods. 2017;14(10):979–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf FA, Hamey FK, Plass M, et al. PAGA: graph abstraction reconciles clustering with trajectory inference through a topology preserving map of single cells. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Street K, Risso D, RB F, et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cannoodt R, Saelens W, Sichien D, et al. SCORPIUS improves trajectory inference and identifies novel modules in dendritic cell development. bioRxiv. 2016;079509.
   Google Scholar
• Aibar S, González-Blas CB, Moerman T, et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat Methods. 2017;14(11):1083–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Sande B, Flerin C, Davie K, et al. A scalable SCENIC workflow for single-cell gene regulatory network analysis. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(7):2247–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Mishra B, Athar M, et al. Inference of Gene Regulatory Network from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data Using pySCENIC. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2328:171–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding H, EF D Jr., AM S, et al. Quantitative assessment of protein activity in orphan tissues and single cells using the metaVIPER algorithm. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Manno G, Soldatov R, Zeisel A, et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature. 2018;560(7719):494–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen V, Lange M, Peidli S, et al. Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(12):1408–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao J, Spielmann M, Qiu X, et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2019;566(7745):496–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govek KW, Troisi EC, Miao Z, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of mIHC images via antigen mapping. Sci Adv. 2021;7(10):eabc5464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Liu Y, Mints M, et al. Single-Cell Deconvolution of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(6):1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Getz G, Single-cell GI. RNA sequencing: one step closer to the clinic. Nat Med. 2021;1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichmann S, Efremova M. Method of the Year 2019: single-cell multimodal omics. Nat Methods. 2020;17(1):17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay IC, Ponting CP, Voet T. Single-Cell Multiomics: multiple Measurements from Single Cells. Trends Genet. 2017;33(2):155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Zhou X. Applications of Single-Cell Sequencing for Multiomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1754:327–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Todorovic V. Single-cell RNA-seq—now with protein. Nat Methods. 2017;14(11):1028–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron M, Yanai I. New skin for the old RNA-Seq ceremony: the age of single-cell multi-omics. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoeckius M, Hafemeister C, Stephenson W, et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat Methods. 2017;14(9):865–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeckius M, Zheng S, Houck-Loomis B, et al. Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson VM, Zhang KX, Kumar N, et al. Multiplexed quantification of proteins and transcripts in single cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(10):936–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei AP, Bava F-A, Zunder ER, et al. Highly multiplexed simultaneous detection of RNAs and proteins in single cells. Nat Methods. 2016;13(3):269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Fan B, Cao S, et al. A microfluidic flow cytometer enabling absolute quantification of single-cell intracellular proteins. Lab Chip. 2017;17(18):3129–3137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth AD, Gherardini PF, Sykorova M, et al. Multiplexed profiling of RNA and protein expression signatures in individual cells using flow or mass cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(3):901–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky AS, Johnston AP, Trau M, et al. Analysis of RNA-protein interactions by flow cytometry. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2003;5(3):235–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee J, Soper SA, Murray KK. Microfluidic chips for mass spectrometry‐based proteomics. J Mass Spectrom. 2009;44(5):579–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayoso A, Steier Z, Lopez R, et al. Joint probabilistic modeling of single-cell multi-omic data with totalVI. Nat Methods. 2021;18(3):272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews TS, Hemberg M. False signals induced by single-cell imputation. F1000Research 2018; 7.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews TS, Kiselev VY, McCarthy D, et al. Tutorial: guidelines for the computational analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli A, Michel T, Thérésine M, et al. CD56 bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology. 2009;126(4):458–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen J, Themeli M, Dam OT, et al. Protocol for Isolation, Stimulation and Functional Profiling of Primary and iPSC-derived Human NK Cells. Bio-protocol. 2020;10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecca A, Barili V, Rizzo D, et al. Intratumor Regulatory Noncytotoxic NK Cells in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cells. 2021;10(3):614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanier LL, Le AM, Phillips JH, et al. Subpopulations of human natural killer cells defined by expression of the Leu-7 (HNK-1) and Leu-11 (NK-15) antigens. J Immunol. 1983;131(4):1789–1796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonges LE, Albertsson P, Van Vlierberghe RL, et al. The phenotypic heterogeneity of human natural killer cells: presence of at least 48 different subsets in the peripheral blood. Scand J Immunol. 2001;53(2):103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckinney EF, Cuthbertson I, Harris KM, et al. A CD8+ NK cell transcriptomic signature associated with clinical outcome in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernyshov VP, Dons’Koi BV, Sudoma IO, et al. Comparison of T and NK lymphocyte subsets between human endometrial tissue and peripheral blood. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2019;44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucia B, Jennings C, Cauda R, et al. Evidence of a selective depletion of a CD16+ CD56+ CD8+ natural killer cell subset during HIV infection. Cytometry. 1995;22(1):10–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Z, Zhang Z, Lei Z, et al. CD14: biology and role in the pathogenesis of disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019;48:24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez AA, Foster GA, Soderberg SR, et al. An Allosteric Shift in CD11c Affinity Activates a Proatherogenic State in Arrested Intermediate Monocytes. J Immunol. 2020;205(10):2806–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapellos TS, Bonaguro L, Gemünd I, et al. Human Monocyte Subsets and Phenotypes in Major Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgobo M, Heinrichs M, Hapke N, et al. Terminally Differentiated CD4+ T Cells Promote Myocardial Inflammaging. Front Immunol. 2021;12:584538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo Y, Sheng Z, Lu DR, et al. Blinatumomab-induced T cell activation at single cell transcriptome resolution. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JF. Effect of thymectomy in adult mice on immunological responsiveness. Nature. 1965;208(5017):1337–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claman HN, Chaperon EA, Triplett RF. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966;122(4):1167–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprent J. Restricted helper function of F1 hybrid T cells positively selected to heterologous erythrocytes in irradiated parental strain mice. II. Evidence for restrictions affecting helper cell induction and T-B collaboration, both mapping to the K-end of the H-2 complex. J Exp Med. 1978;147(4):1159–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HQ, Xia P, Huang HH, et al. CD4+CD19+ conjugates favor HIV-1 infection and latency during chronic HIV-1 infection. Aids. 2019;34(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Burel JG, Pomaznoy M, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, et al. Circulating T cell-monocyte complexes are markers of immune perturbations. Elife. 2019;8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonutti E, Sala P, Feruglio C, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity of persistent expansions of CD4+ CD8+ T cells. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;73(3):312–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overgaard NH, Jung JW, Steptoe RJ, et al. CD4 +/CD8+ double-positive T cells: more than just a developmental stage? J Leukoc Biol. 2015;97(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkers SM, Meisel C, Terhorst-Molawi D, et al. Clonal expansion of CD4+CD8+ T cells in an adult patient with Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated Erythema multiforme majus. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Buttlar H, Bismarck D, Alber G. Peripheral canine CD4(+)CD8(+) double-positive T cells - unique amongst others. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015;168(3–4):169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foppoli M, Ferreri AJ. Gamma-delta t-cell lymphomas. Eur J Haematol. 2015;94(3):206–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Acquisto F, Crompton T. CD3+CD4-CD8- (double negative) T cells: saviours or villains of the immune response? Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82(4):333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers TW, Vossen MT, Gent MR, et al. Frequencies of Circulating Cytolytic, CD45RA +CD27 −, CD8 +T Lymphocytes Depend on Infection with CMV. J Immunol. 2003;170(8):4342–4348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callender LA, Carroll EC, Beal R, et al. Human CD8+ EMRA T cells display a senescence-associated secretory phenotype regulated by p38 MAPK. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Borst J, Hendriks J, Xiao Y. CD27 and CD70 in T cell and B cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(3):275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch RD, Shen X, Sims GP, et al. Stepwise differentiation of CD4 memory T cells defined by expression of CCR7 and CD27. J Immunol. 2005;175(10):6489–6497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remedios KA, Meyer L, Zirak B, et al. CD27 Promotes CD4+Effector T Cell Survival in Response to Tissue Self-Antigen. J Immunol. 2019;203(3):639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibrián D, Sánchez-Madrid F. CD69: from activation marker to metabolic gatekeeper. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47(6):946–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerritsen B, Pandit A. The memory of a killer T cell: models of CD8+T cell differentiation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2016;94(3):236–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göschl L, Scheinecker C, Bonelli M. Treg cells in autoimmunity: from identification to Treg-based therapies. Semin Immunopathol. 2019;41(3):301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menning A, Höpken UE, Siegmund K, et al. Distinctive role of CCR7 in migration and functional activity of naive- and effector/memory-like Treg subsets. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37(6):1575–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson V. Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(2):147–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan NK, Vajpayee M, Mojumdar K, et al. Study of CD4+ CD8+ Double positive T‐lymphocyte phenotype and function in Indian patients infected with HIV‐1. J Med Virol. 2012;84(6):845–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jg A, Xin WB, Shuang QA, et al. Continuous tracking of COVID-19 patients’ immune status. In: International Immunopharmacology. 2020. p. 89.
   Google Scholar
• Luecken MD, Theis FJ. Current best pra ctices in single-cell RNA-seq anal ysis: a tuto rial. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15(6):e8746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreatta M, Corria-Osorio J, Müller S, et al. Interpretation of T cell states from single-cell transcriptomics data using reference atlases. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(1):38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine JH, Simonds EF, Bendall SC, et al. Data-Driven Phenotypic Dis section of AML Reveals Pro genitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis. Cell. 2015;162(1):184–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS, et al. Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature. 2007;450:411-U7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar