Ensemble learning-based crop yield estimation: a scalable approach for supporting agricultural statistics

References

• Arnold, J., P. Brandt, and H. Gerighausen. 2021. “Testing of Satellite-Based Yield Estimation for Agricultural Statistics - the SatAgrarstat Project.” WISTA 6:1–29. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/WISTA-Wirtschaft-und-Statistik/2021/06/erprobung-satellitengestuetzte-ertragsschaetzung-062021.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Marschallinger, B., and S. Massart. 2023. Copernicus Global Land Operations “Vegetation and Energy, CGLOPS-1”. Quality Assessment Report. Update 2022. Soil Water Index Collection 1km. Version 1.0. Technical Report I1.00. TU Wien. https://land.copernicus.eu/global/sites/cgls.vito.be/files/products/CGLOPS1_QAR2022_SWI1km_V1_I1.00.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Marschallinger, B., C. Paulik, S. Hochstöger, T. Mistelbauer, S. Modanesi, L. Ciabatta, C. Massari, L. Brocca, and W. Wagner. 2018. “Soil Moisture from Fusion of Scatterometer and SAR: Closing the Scale Gap with Temporal Filtering.” Remote Sensing 10 (7): 1030. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, P. 2021. “A General Conceptual Framework for Multi-Dimensional Spatio-Temporal Data Sets.” Environmental Modelling & Software 143:105096. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstra, J., B. Komer, C. Eliasmith, D. Yamins, and D. D. Cox. 2015. “Hyperopt: A Python Library for Model Selection and Hyperparameter Optimization.” Computational Science & Discovery 8 (1): 014008. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1749-4699/8/1/014008/meta.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, F., P. Brandt, M. Schmidt, U. Stahl, B. Golla, H. Gerighausen, and M. Möller. 2023. “A Paradigm Shift Towards Decentralized Cloud-Integrated Spatial Data Infrastructures: Lessons Learned and Solutions Provided for Public Authorities.” Accessed October 19, 2023. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/5494/.
   Google Scholar
• BfN. 2023. “Maps and Data.” Accessed October 10, 2023. https://geodienste.bfn.de/ogc/wfs/gliederungen.
   Google Scholar
• Bognár, P., A. Kern, S. Pásztor, P. Steinbach, and J. Lichtenberger. 2022. “Testing the Robust Yield Estimation Method for Winter Wheat, Corn, Rapeseed, and Sunflower with Different Vegetation Indices and Meteorological Data.” Remote Sensing 14 (12): 2860. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojanowski, J. S., S. Sikora, J. P. Musiał, E. Woźniak, K. Dabrowska-Zielińska, P. Slesiński, T. Milewski, and A. Łaczyński. 2022. “Integration of Sentinel-3 and MODIS Vegetation Indices with ERA-5 Agro-Meteorological Indicators for Operational Crop Yield Forecasting.” Remote Sensing 14 (5): 1238. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrmann, P., P. Brandt, and H. Gerighausen. 2023. “MISPEL: A Multi-Crop Spectral Library for Statistical Crop Trait Retrieval and Agricultural Monitoring.” Remote Sensing 15 (14): 3664. Accessed July 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45 (1): 5–32. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucheli, J., T. Dalhaus, and R. Finger. 2022. “Temperature Effects on Crop Yields in Heat Index Insurance.” Food Policy 107:102214. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, A., S. Pfister, and S. Hellweg. 2016. “Spatially Explicit Analysis of Biodiversity Loss Due to Global Agriculture, Pasture and Forest Land Use from a Producer and Consumer Perspective.” Environmental Science & Technology 50 (7): 3928–3936. Accessed September 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., X. Jiao, L. Shi, J. Penuelas, L. Kumar, C. Nie, T. Wu, K. Liu, W. Wu, and X. Jin. 2022. “High-Resolution Crop Yield and Water Productivity Dataset Generated Using Random Forest and Remote Sensing.” Scientific Data 9 (1): 641. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed January 14, 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01761-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., and C. Guestrin. 2016. “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System.” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. Accessed December 2, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02754.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, T. 2022. “Choosing Multiple Linear Regressions for Weather-Based Crop Yield Prediction with ABSOLUT V1.2 Applied to the Districts of Germany.” International Journal of Biometeorology 66 (11): 2287–2300. Accessed July 18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02356-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croci, M., G. Impollonia, M. Meroni, and S. Amaducci. 2023. “Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data.” Remote Sensing 15 (1): 100. Accessed May 25, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deines, J. M., R. Patel, S.-Z. Liang, W. Dado, and D. B. Lobell. 2021. “A Million Kernels of Truth: Insights into Scalable Satellite Maize Yield Mapping and Yield Gap Analysis from an Extensive Ground Dataset in the US Corn Belt.” Remote Sensing of Environment 253:112174. Accessed May 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destatis. 2022. Besondere Ernte- und Qualitätsermittlung (BEE). Qualitätsbericht. Destatis. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/Qualitaet/Qualitaetsberichte/Land-Forstwirtschaft-Fischerei/ernte-qualitaet-bee.html.
   Google Scholar
• Destatis. 2023a. “Flächenerhebung nach Art der tatsächlichen Nutzung (GENESIS V5.0.0).” Accessed November 9, 2023. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online?sequenz=statistikTabellenselectionname=33111#abreadcrumb.
   Google Scholar
• Destatis. 2023b. “Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Fischerei. Wachstum und Ernte - Feldfrüchte 2022.” Technical Report Fachserie 3. Destatis. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Landwirtschaft-Forstwirtschaft-Fischerei/Feldfruechte-Gruenland/Publikationen/Downloads-Feldfruechte/feldfruechte-jahr-2030321227164.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Destatis. 2023c. “Regional Statistics Atlas.” Accessed June 23, 2023. https://agraratlas.statistikportal.de/.
   Google Scholar
• Destatis and state offices for statistics. 2023. “Regional Statistics Database - Germany (GENESIS V4.4.3).” Accessed October 19, 2023. https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online/.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, M. S., T. Dahms, C. Kuebert-Flock, T. Rummler, J. Arnault, I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Ullmann. 2023. “Integrating Random Forest and Crop Modeling Improves the Crop Yield Prediction of Winter Wheat and Oil Seed Rape.” Frontiers in Remote Sensing 3:3. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.1010978.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Environment of the European Commission, DLO-Alterra, DLO-Plant research International, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences (ITP), Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering (JTI), and NEIKER. 2011. Recommendations for Establishing Action Programmes Under Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources. Final Report. Part A, Review and Further Differentiation of Pedo-Climatic Zones in Europe. Technical Report. Alterra, Wageningen-UR. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e1d06bc3-58c4-43a3-b2bc-6ad6d53d7953/language-en/format-PDF/source-search.
   Google Scholar
• Dorogush, A. V., V. Ershov, and A. Gulin. 2018. “CatBoost: Gradient Boosting with Categorical Features Support.” Accessed December 2, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11363.
   Google Scholar
• DWD. 2023a. “DWD Climate Data Center (CDC).” Accessed April 25, 2023. https://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/CDC/.
   Google Scholar
• DWD. 2023b. “German Wether Station Precipition Data for Reference Period: 1991–2020.” Accessed April 21, 2023. https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/klimadatendeutschland/mittelwerte/nieder_9120_fest_html.html?view=nasPublication.
   Google Scholar
• EPSG (European Petroleum Survey Group Geodesy). 2020. “WGS 84/UTM Zone 32N - EPSG: 32632.” Accessed October 19, 2023. https://epsg.io/32632.
   Google Scholar
• Estévez, J., K. Berger, J. Vicent, J. Pablo Rivera-Caicedo, M. Wocher, and J. Verrelst. 2021. “Top-Of-Atmosphere Retrieval of Multiple Crop Traits Using Variational Heteroscedastic Gaussian Processes within a Hybrid Workflow.” Remote Sensing 13 (8): 1589. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2015. “Strategy for Agricultural Statistics for 2020 and Beyond.” Technical Report. European Comission. Accessed November 10, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/749240/749310/Strategy+on+agricultural+statistics+Final+version+for+publication.pdf/9c7787ca-0e00-f676-7a64-7f56e74ec813.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2022. Statistical Regions in the European Union and Partner Countries: NUTS and Statistical Regions 2021: 2022 Edition. Publications Office. Accessed January 14, 2024. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2785/321792.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2023. “FAOSTAT.” Accessed April 19, 2023. https://www.fao.org/faostat.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. 2022. “Administrative Areas of Germany 1: 250 000.” Accessed August 12, 2022. https://gdz.bkg.bund.de/index.php/default/wfs-verwaltungsgebiete-1-250-000-stand-01-01-wfs-vg250.html.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. 2023. “Digital Orthophotos - Spatial Resolution of 20 X 20 Cm.” Accessed February 12, 2023. https://gdz.bkg.bund.de/index.php/default/digitale-geodaten/digitale-orthophotos/digitale-orthophotos-bodenauflosung-20-cm-dop20.html.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources. 2014. “Soil Quality Rating for Cropland in Germany.” Accessed July 28, 2023. https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Boden/Ressourcenbewertung/Ertragspotential/Ertragspotential_node.html.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources. 2020. “Soil map of Germany (Bodenübersichtskarte, BÜK) 1: 200 000.” Accessed May 25, 2022. https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Boden/Projekte/Informationsgrundlagen-laufend/BUEK200/BUEK200.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, S., M. Adeel Hassan, Z. He, Z. Chen, M. Shu, J. Wang, C. Li, and Y. Xiao. 2021. “Assessment of Ensemble Learning to Predict Wheat Grain Yield Based on UAV-Multispectral Reflectance.” Remote Sensing 13 (12): 2338. Accessed July 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, D. 2019. “FORCE–Landsat + Sentinel-2 Analysis Ready Data and Beyond.” Remote Sensing 11 (9): 1124. Accessed June 9, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/9/1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, J., E. Carfagna, and B. Baruth. 2010. “Accuracy, Objectivity and Efficiency of Remote Sensing for Agricultural Statistics.” In Agricultural Survey Methods, 193–211. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accessed July 6, 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470665480.ch12.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., and X. Zhang. 2021. “Mapping Crop Phenology in Near Real-Time Using Satellite Remote Sensing: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Remote Sensing. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://spj.science.org/doi/full/10.34133/2021/8379391.
   Google Scholar
• German Aerospace Center. 2019. “Sentinel-2 MSI - Level 3A (MAJA/WASP Tiles) - Germany.” Accessed July 20, 2023. https://geoservice.dlr.de/data-assets/4hcq6dgkj648.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P., D. Mandal, S. Wilfling, J. Hollberg, D. Bargiel, and A. Bhattacharya. 2022. “Synergy of Optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar Data for Early-Stage Crop Yield Estimation: A Case Study Over a State of Germany.” Geocarto International 37 (25): 10743–10766. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2039306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, S. 2013. “Rasterio: Geospatial Raster I/O for Python Programmers.” https://github.com/rasterio/rasterio.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, R., V. Michel, D. Roßberg, and R. Neukampf. 2009. “Definition pflanzenartspezifischer Anbaugebiete für ein regionalisiertes Versuchswesen im Pflanzenbau.” Journal für Kulturpflanzen 61 (7): 247–253. Accessed May 24, 2023. https://www.openagrar.de/receive/openagrar_mods_00007745.
   Google Scholar
• He, X., L. Estes, M. Konar, D. Tian, D. Anghileri, K. Baylis, T. P. Evans, and J. Sheffield. 2019. “Integrated Approaches to Understanding and Reducing Drought Impact on Food Security Across Scales.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 40:43–54. Accessed September 22, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlaváčová, M., K. Klem, B. Rapantová, K. Novotná, O. Urban, P. Hlavinka, P. Smutná, et al. 2018. “Interactive Effects of High Temperature and Drought Stress During Stem Elongation, Anthesis and Early Grain Filling on the Yield Formation and Photosynthesis of Winter Wheat.” Field Crops Research 221:182–195. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., H. McNairn, S. Mitchell, L. Dingle Robertson, A. Davidson, and S. Homayouni. 2019. “Synthetic Aperture Radar and Optical Satellite Data for Estimating the Biomass of Corn.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 83:101933. Accessed April 17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huete, A. R. 1988. “A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI).” Remote Sensing of Environment 25 (3): 295–309. Accessed April 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. M. 2016. “A Comprehensive Assessment of the Correlations Between Field Crop Yields and Commonly Used MODIS Products.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 52:65–81. Accessed January 20, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, R. H. G., R. G. H. Bunce, M. J. Metzger, C. A. Mücher, D. C. Howard, and V. L. Mateus. 2006. “Objectives and Applications of a Statistical Environmental Stratification of Europe.” Landscape Ecology 21 (3): 409–419. Accessed May 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-6428-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordahl, K., J. Van Den Bossche, M. Fleischmann, J. Wasserman, J. McBride, J. Gerard, J. Tratner, et al. 2020. “geopandas/geopandas: v0.8.1.” Accessed October 19, 2023. https://zenodo.org/record/3946761.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, G., Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y. Liu. 2017. “LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30:1–9. Curran Associates, Inc. Accessed December 2, 2022. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kerner, H. R., R. Sahajpal, D. B. Pai, S. Skakun, E. Puricelli, M. Hosseini, S. Meyer, and I. Becker-Reshef. 2022. “Phenological Normalization Can Improve In-Season Classification of Maize and Soybean: A Case Study in the Central US Corn Belt.” Science of Remote Sensing 6:100059. Accessed April 17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2022.100059.
   Google Scholar
• Khaki, S., L. Wang, and S. V. Archontoulis. 2020. “A CNN-RNN Framework for Crop Yield Prediction.” Frontiers in Plant Science 10:10. Accessed June 1, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K.-H., Y. Doi, N. Ramankutty, and T. Iizumi. 2021. “A Review of Global Gridded Cropping System Data Products.” Environmental Research Letters 16 (9): 093005. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac20f4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobov, M., and K. Lopuhin. 2021. “ELI5.” Accessed May 2, 2023. https://eli5.readthedocs.io/en/latest/overview.html.
   Google Scholar
• Leukel, J., T. Zimpel, and C. Stumpe. 2023. “Machine Learning Technology for Early Prediction of Grain Yield at the Field Scale: A Systematic Review.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 207:107721. Accessed July 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q.-C., S.-W. Xu, J.-Y. Zhuang, J.-J. Liu, Y. Zhou, and Z.-X. Zhang. 2023. “Ensemble Learning Prediction of Soybean Yields in China Based on Meteorological Data.” Journal of Integrative Agriculture 22 (6): 1909–1927. Accessed July 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M., M. Belgiu, M. Boschetti, M. Pepe, A. Stein, and A. Nelson. 2022. “Field-Level Crop Yield Estimation with PRISMA and Sentinel-2.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 187:191–210. Accessed May 24, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ferrer, L., M. Piles, and G. Camps-Valls. 2021. “Crop Yield Estimation and Interpretability with Gaussian Processes.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 18 (12): 2043–2047. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.3016140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo-Sanchis, A., M. Piles, J. Amorós-López, J. Muñoz Mar, J. E. Adsuara, Á. Moreno-Martnez, and G. Camps-Valls. 2021. “Learning Main Drivers of Crop Progress and Failure in Europe with Interpretable Machine Learning.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 104:102574. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243421002816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meitner, J., J. Balek, M. Bláhová, D. Semerádová, P. Hlavinka, V. Lukas, F. Jurečka, et al. 2023. “Estimating Drought-Induced Crop Yield Losses at the Cadastral Area Level in the Czech Republic.” Agronomy 13 (7): 1669. Accessed June 23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071669.
   Google Scholar
• Meschede, M. 2015. Geologie Deutschlands: Ein prozessorientierter Ansatz. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Accessed November 7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45298-1.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, G., F. Cawkwell, and A. Wingler. 2020. “Status of Phenological Research Using Sentinel-2 Data: A Review.” Remote Sensing 12 (17): 2760. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M., L. Boutarfa, and J. Strassemeyer. 2020. “PhenoWin – an R Shiny Application for Visualization and Extraction of Phenological Windows in Germany.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 175:105534. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M., J. Doms, H. Gerstmann, and T. Feike. 2019. “A Framework for Standardized Calculation of Weather Indices in Germany.” Theoretical and Applied Climatology 136 (1–2): 377–390. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2473-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, A., A. Szabó, O. David Adeniyi, and J. Tamás. 2021. “Wheat Yield Forecasting for the Tisza River Catchment Using Landsat 8 NDVI and SAVI Time Series and Reported Crop Statistics.” Agronomy 11 (4): 652. Accessed September 20, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaki, V. A., S. K. Ghosh, B. K. Goodwin, and R. Shirota. 2008. “Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Agricultural Yield Data with an Application to Pricing Crop Insurance Contracts.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (4): 951–961. Accessed September 22, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01153.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The pandas development team. 2023. “pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas.” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7549438.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel, D., H. Boogaard, A. de Wit, M. van der Velde, M. Claverie, L. Nisini, S. Janssen, S. Osinga, and I. N. Athanasiadis. 2022. “Machine Learning for Regional Crop Yield Forecasting in Europe.” Field Crops Research 276:108377. Accessed June 23, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429021003233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel, D., A. de Wit, H. Boogaard, D. Marcos, S. Osinga, and I. N. Athanasiadis. 2023. “Interpretability of Deep Learning Models for Crop Yield Forecasting.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 206:107663. Accessed May 24, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169923000510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel, D., D. Marcos, A. de Wit, H. Boogaard, and I. N. Athanasiadis. 2023. “A Weakly Supervised Framework for High-Resolution Crop Yield Forecasts.” Environmental Research Letters 18 (9): 094062. Publisher: IOP Publishing. Accessed January 14, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf50e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, et al. 2011. “Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (85): 2825–2830. Accessed December 2, 2022. http://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html.
   Google Scholar
• Perich, G., M. Ozgur Turkoglu, L. Valentin Graf, J. Dirk Wegner, H. Aasen, A. Walter, and F. Liebisch. 2023. “Pixel-Based Yield Mapping and Prediction from Sentinel-2 Using Spectral Indices and Neural Networks.” Field Crops Research 292:108824. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. 2023. “rasterstats.” Accessed September 19, 2023. https://github.com/perrygeo/python-rasterstats.
   Google Scholar
• Piikki, K., J. Wetterlind, M. Söderström, and B. Stenberg. 2021. “Perspectives on Validation in Digital Soil Mapping of Continuous Attributes–A Review.” Soil Use and Management 37 (1): 7–21. Accessed July 26, 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/sum.12694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio, L., L. M. de Sousa, N. H. Batjes, G. B. M. Heuvelink, B. Kempen, E. Ribeiro, and D. Rossiter. 2021. “SoilGrids 2.0: Producing Soil Information for the Globe with Quantified Spatial Uncertainty.” SOIL 7 (1): 217–240. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestele, R., and P. H. Verburg. 2020. “The Overlooked Spatial Dimension of Climate-Smart Agriculture.” Global Change Biology 26 (3): 1045–1054. Accessed September 21, 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.14940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattalino, E., I. Juan, J. F. Andrade, K. G. Cassman, M. K. van Ittersum, M. P. van Loon, and P. Grassini. 2021. “Spatial Frameworks for Robust Estimation of Yield Gaps.” Nature Food 2 (10): 773–779. Number: 10 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed January 13, 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00365-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riedesel, L., M. Möller, P. Horney, B. Golla, H.-P. Piepho, T. Kautz, T. Feike, and M. M. Hamed. 2023. “Timing and Intensity of Heat and Drought Stress Determine Wheat Yield Losses in Germany.” PLOS ONE 18 (7): e0288202. Accessed September 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedesel, L., M. Möller, H.-P. Piepho, D. Rentel, C. Lichthardt, B. Golla, T. Kautz, and T. Feike. 2024. “Site Conditions Determine Heat and Drought Induced Yield Losses in Wheat and Rye in Germany.” Environmental Research Letters 19 (3): 034024. Accessed February 21, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad24d0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi, O., and L. Rokach. 2018. “Ensemble Learning: A Survey.” WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8 (4): e1249. Accessed July 27, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitzky, A., and M. J. E. Golay. 1964. “Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.” Analytical Chemistry 36 (8): 1627–1639. Accessed April 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, L., S. Fritz, L. You, N. Ramankutty, M. Herrero, C. Justice, I. Becker-Reshef, et al. 2015. “Improved Global Cropland Data As an Essential Ingredient for Food Security.” Global Food Security 4:37–45. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Segarra, J., M. Luisa Buchaillot, J. Luis Araus, and S. C. Kefauver. 2020. “Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture: Sentinel-2 Improved Features and Applications.” Agronomy 10 (5): 641. Accessed June 8, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/5/641.
   Google Scholar
• Senaratne, H., A. Mobasheri, A. Loai Ali, C. Capineri, and M. (. Haklay. 2017. “A Review of Volunteered Geographic Information Quality Assessment Methods.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (1): 139–167. Accessed November 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1189556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri, R. 2023. “Featurewiz.” Accessed May 2, 2023. https://github.com/AutoViML/featurewiz#license.
   Google Scholar
• Shahhosseini, M., G. Hu, I. Huber, and S. V. Archontoulis. 2021. “Coupling Machine Learning and Crop Modeling Improves Crop Yield Prediction in the US Corn Belt.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 1606. Accessed July 27, 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-80820-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shook, J., T. Gangopadhyay, L. Wu, B. Ganapathysubramanian, S. Sarkar, A. K. Singh, and A. Troccoli. 2021. “Crop Yield Prediction Integrating Genotype and Weather Variables Using Deep Learning.” PLOS ONE 16 (6): e0252402. Accessed June 1, 2023. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakun, S., E. Vermote, B. Franch, J.-C. Roger, N. Kussul, J. Ju, and J. Masek. 2019. “Winter Wheat Yield Assessment from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data: Incorporating Surface Reflectance, Through Phenological Fitting, into Regression Yield Models.” Remote Sensing 11 (15): 1768. Accessed April 17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A. K., N. Safaei, S. Khaki, G. Lopez, W. Zeng, F. Ewert, T. Gaiser, and J. Rahimi. 2022. “Winter Wheat Yield Prediction Using Convolutional Neural Networks from Environmental and Phenological Data.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 3215. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06249-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Ministry of Food and Agriculture Lower Saxony. 2022. “LEA-Portal.” Accessed October 7, 2022. https://sla.niedersachsen.de/landentwicklung/LEA/.
   Google Scholar
• State Ministry of the Interior Brandenburg. 2022. “GEOBROKER.” Accessed October 7, 2022. https://geobroker.geobasis-bb.de.
   Google Scholar
• Symank, A. 1994. “Neue Anforderungen im europäischen Naturschutz: Das Schutzgebietssystem Natura 2000 und die FFH - Richtlinie der EU.” Natur und Landschaft 69 (9): 395–406.
   Google Scholar
• Thales Alenia Space. 2021. Sentinel-2 Products Specification Document (PSD). Technical Report. European Space Agency (ESA). Accessed October 19, 2023. https://copernicus.eu/document-library/latest-documents/-/asset_publisher/EgUy8pfXboLO/content/sentinel-2-level-1-to-level-1c-product-specifications;jsessionid=8BE6EE17FECEE9CDECD948BD1F6A8522.jvm2.
   Google Scholar
• Uribeetxebarria, A., A. Castellón, and A. Aizpurua. 2023. “Optimizing Wheat Yield Prediction Integrating Data from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 with CatBoost Algorithm.” Remote Sensing 15 (6): 1640. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bussel Lenny, G., P. Patricio Grassini, J. Van Wart, J. Wolf, L. Claessens, H. Yang, H. Boogaard, et al. 2015. “From Field to Atlas: Upscaling of Location-Specific Yield Gap Estimates.” Field Crops Research 177:98–108. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429015000878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRossum, G., and F. L. Drake. 2009. Python 3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Veloso, A., S. Mermoz, A. Bouvet, T. Le Toan, M. Planells, J.-F. Dejoux, and E. Ceschia. 2017. “Understanding the Temporal Behavior of Crops Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2-Like Data for Agricultural Applications.” Remote Sensing of Environment 199:415–426. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, P., R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, et al. 2020. “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python.” Nature Methods 17 (3): 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemann, J., O. Clements, R. Marco Figuera, A. Pio Rossi, and S. Mantovani. 2018. “Geospatial Web Services Pave New Ways for Server-Based On-Demand Access and Processing of Big Earth Data.” International Journal of Digital Earth 11 (1): 7–25. Accessed September 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1351583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetton, R. L., Y. Zhao, S. Nawar, and A. M. Mouazen. 2021. “Modelling the Influence of Soil Properties on Crop Yields Using a Non-Linear NFIR Model and Laboratory Data.” Soil Systems 5 (1): 12. Accessed April 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5010012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., J. Liu, and W. Shen. 2022. “A Review of Ensemble Learning Algorithms Used in Remote Sensing Applications.” Applied Sciences 12 (17): 8654. Accessed April 17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178654.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., R. Guo, T. Liu, and K. Xu. 2021. “Crop Yield Prediction Based on Agrometeorological Indexes and Remote Sensing Data.” Remote Sensing 13 (10): 2016. Accessed June 8, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13102016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar