An adaptive indicator framework for monitoring regional sustainable development: a case study of the INSURE project in Limburg, The Netherlands

References

• Bell, S. & Morse, S. 2004. Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: a case study relating to a “Blue Plan” project in Malta. Sustainable Development 12(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bouman, B., Jansen, H., Schipper, R., Nieuwenhuyse, A., Hengsdijk, H., & Bouma, J. 1999. A framework for integrated biophysical and economic land use analysis at different scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 75(1–2):55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler-Natour, C. & Herzog, F. 1999. Criteria for sustainability and their application at a regional level: the case of clearing islands in the Dübener Heide nature park (Eastern Germany). Landscape and Urban Planning 46(1–3):51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, P. 2006. Why Any Substantial Definition of Sustainability Must Fail–and Why This Is a Good, Not A Bad Story. The 12th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference. April 6–8. The Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004. EU Member State experiences with sustainable development indicators. Eurostat No. KS-AU-04-001. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2005. Sustainable Development Indicators to Monitor the Implementation of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Measuring Progress Towards a More Sustainable Europe. Eurostat No. KS-77-07-115-EN-N. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Graymore, M., Sipe, N., & Rickson, R. 2008. Regional sustainability: how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? Ecological Economics 67(3):362– 372.
   Google Scholar
• Grosskurth, J. & Rotmans, J. 2005. The scene model: getting a grip on sustainable development in policy making. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7(1):135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Ulloa, A., Charles, A., Lluch-Cota, S., Ramirez-Aguirre, H., Hernandez-Vazquez, S., & Ortega-Rubio, A. 2003. A regional-scale sustainable development index: the case of Baja California Sur, Mexico. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 10(4):353–360.
   Google Scholar
• INSURE. 2007. Guidelines to Develop a S-Indicator. Work Package 4. Maastricht: International Centre for Integrated assessment and Sustainable development, Maastricht University. http://www.icis.unimaas.nl/downloads/insure/GUIDELINES/INSURE%20indicator%20guideline%20final%20feb%2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) & Joint Research Center of the European Commission (JRC). 2009. The Millennium Development Goals Dashboard. http://esl.jrc.it/dc/. February 3, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• International Human Dimensions Programme (IHDP). 2008. Knowledge and Social Learning for Societal Change and Sustainability: Developing a New Cross-Cutting Research Theme for IHDP. Bonn: IHDP Secretariat. http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/file/public/Knowledge...+Concept+Note.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. & Moles, R. 2002. The development of Local Agenda 21 in the mid-west region of Ireland: a case study in interactive research and indicator development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45(6):889–912.
   Google Scholar
• King, C., Gunton, J., Freebairn, D., Coutts, J., & Webb, I. 2000. The sustainability indicator industry: where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(4):631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, P. 2006. Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2(1):36–41. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol2iss1/communityessay.martens.html.
   Google Scholar
• McCool, S. & Stankey, G. 2004. Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management 33(3):294–305.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, P. 2008. Mines, wines and thoroughbreds: towards regional sustainability in the Upper Hunter, Australia. Regional Studies 42(9):1275–1290.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P. & Melanen, M. 2009. The role of co-operation between academia and policymakers for the development and use of sustainability indicators: a case from the Finnish Kymenlaakso Region. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(12): 1086–1100.
   Google Scholar
• National Marine Protected Areas Center. 2004. Stakeholder Participation: A Synthesis of Current Literature. Silver Spring, MD: National Marine Protected Areas Center.
   Google Scholar
• Parris, T. & Kates, R. 2003. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28:559–586.
   Google Scholar
• Pirk, S. 2002. Expanding public participation in environmental justice: methods, legislation, litigation and beyond. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 17(1):207–240.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2005a. Limburgmonitor. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2005b. Versnellingsagenda 2005: Limburg op weg naar 2012. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2005c. Duurzaamheid Duurt Het Langst: Programma Duurzaam Limburg 2005–2007. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2006. Trendrapport: Inspiratie voor de Bestuursperiode 2007–2011. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2007a. Investeren en Verbinden: Coalitieakkoord 2007–2011. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2007b. Limburgmonitor. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. 2007c. Evaluatie Coalitieakkoord 2003–2007. Maastricht: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg (België). 2006. Duurzaamheidsbarometer Limburg. Hasselt: Provincie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Putzhuber, F. & Hasenauer, H. 2010. Deriving sustainability measures using statistical data: a case study from the Eisenwurzen, Austria. Ecological Indicators 10(1):32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, T. 2009. Development of regional sustainability indicators and the role of academia in this process: the Portuguese practice. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(12):1101–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, T. & Caeiro, S. 2009. Meta-performance evaluation of sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators 10(2):157– 166.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M., Fraser, E., & Dougill, A. 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics 59(4):406– 418.
   Google Scholar
• Regeer, B., Hoes, A., van Amstel-van Saane, M., Caron-Flinterman, F., & Bunders, J. 2009. Six guiding principles for evaluating mode-2 strategies for sustainable development. American Journal of Evaluation 30(4):515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, P. 2005. Sustainability science: and what’s needed beyond science. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 1(1):77–80. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol1iss1/communityessay.reitan.html.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48(4):369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C., Howarth, R., & Norgaard, R. 2006. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics 57(2):253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J. 2002. Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development. Ecological Indicators 2(3):295–309.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbuka, I. & Wolff, P. 2007. Indicators and Better Policy-Making: The Case of Sustainable Development. Luxembourg: Eurostat. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/sdi/files/LISBON%20ISI%20AUG%202007%20REV2.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. & Ball, J. 1998. Sustainability and materiality: the bioregional and cultural challenges to evaluation. Local Environment 3(2):191–209.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 3rd ed. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Zeijl-Rozema, A., Cörvers, R., Kemp, R., & Martens, P. 2008. Governance for sustainable development: a framework. Sustainable Development 16(6):410–421.
   Google Scholar
• Viglizzo, E., Pordomingo, A., Castro, M., & Lertora, F. 2003. Environmental assessment of agriculture at a regional scale in the pampas of Argentina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 87(2):169–195.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, A. 2006. Sustainability indicators: is there consensus among stakeholders? International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 5(3):287–296.
   Google Scholar
• Wiek, A. & Binder, C. 2005. Solution spaces for decision-making: a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25(6):589–608.
   Google Scholar
• Zilahy, G. & Huisingh, D. 2009. The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(12):1057–1066.
   Google Scholar
• Zilahy, G., Huisingh, D., Melanen, M., Phillips, V., & Sheffy, J. 2009. Roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives: outreach for a more sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(12):1053–1056.
   Google Scholar