Promise of the obsolete: expectations for and experiments with self-driving vehicles in Norway

References

• Act Relating to Testing of Self-Driving Vehicles 2017. Lov om utprøving av selvkjørende kjøretøy (LOV-2017-12-15-112) [Act No. 112 of December 15, 2017 relating to the testing of self-driving vehicles]. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2017-12-15-112?q=lov%20om%20utprøving
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1995. “User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology.” In Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, edited by A. Rip, T. Misa, and J. Schot, 167–184. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. 2008. “On Politics and the Little Tools of Democracy: A Down-to-Earth Approach.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 9 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2008.9672953.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and J. Flint. 2004. “Snowball Sampling.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Vol. 1, edited by M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, and T. Liao, 1044–1044. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412950589.n931.
   Google Scholar
• Ballo, I. 2015. “Imagining Energy Futures: Sociotechnical Imaginaries of the Future Smart Grid in Norway.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F. 2006. “Normative Expectations in Systems Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 299–311. doi:10.1080/09537320600777010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology Studies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/0953732032000046024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster, eds. 2000. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., V. Broto, and G. Edwards. 2014. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, F., and C. Ratti. 2018. “The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities.” Journal of Urban Technology 25 (4): 3–18. doi:10.1080/10630732.2018.1493883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F., and A. Münch. 2015. “The Micro Smart Grid as a Materialised Imaginary Within the German Energy Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F., A. Wentland, and S. Pfotenhauer. 2019. “Testing Future Societies? Developing a Framework for Test Beds and Living Labs as Instruments of Innovation Governance.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103826. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandia, R., F. Antonialli, B. Cavazza, A. Neto, D. de Lima, J. Sugano, I. Nicolai, and A. Zambalde. 2019. “Autonomous Vehicles: Scientometric and Bibliometric Review.” Transport Reviews 39 (1): 9–28. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1518937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2012. “A Socio-Technical Analysis of Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing the Multi-Level Perspective into Transport Studies.” Journal of Transport Geography 24: 471–482. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., and R. Raven. 2006. “Non-Linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 375–392. doi:10.1080/09537320600777143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., and T. Schwanen. 2018. “Automated Mobility Transitions: Governing Processes in the UK.” Sustainability 10 (4): 956. doi:10.3390/su10040956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, F. 2016. “Automated Driving in Its Social, Historical and Cultural Contexts.” In Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, edited by M. Maurer, J. Gerdes, B. Lenz, and H. Winner, 41–68. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1994. “The Modernity of Science.” Translated by K. Behnke. New German Critique (61): 9–23. doi:10.2307/488618.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2017. What if Nothing Happens: Street Trials of Intelligent Cars as Experiments in Participation. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/95442/
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. 2017. Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Palgan, eds. 2018. Urban Living Labs: Experimenting with City Futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2000. “Futures of the Present.” In Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science, edited by N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 21–39. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., B. van Arem, and B. van Wee. 2017. “Policy and Society Related Implications of Automated Driving: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 21 (4): 324–348. doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport. 2017. Nasjonal transportplan 2018–2029 [National Transport Plan 2018–2019]. Oslo: Ministry of Transport. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/7c52fd2938ca42209e4286fe86bb28bd/no/pdfs/stm201620170033000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naber, R., R. Raven, M. Kouw, and T. Dassen. 2017. “Scaling Up Sustainable Energy Innovations.” Energy Policy 110: 342–354. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norheim, H. 2019. Nå skal denne selvkjørende bussen trafikkere Forus [This Self-driving Bus Will Soon Be Driving at Forus]. Stavanger Aftenblad, August 20. https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/lAl1rA/Na-skal-denne-selvkjorende-bussen-trafikkere-Forus
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. 2004. “Interviews.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, and D. Silverman, 15–33. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1108/14636680110803003.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, B. 2018. “The New Automobility: Lyft, Uber and the Future of American Cities.” http://www.schallerconsult.com/rideservices/automobility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2012. “The Emergence of New Cultures of Mobility: Stability, Openings and Prospects.” In Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, edited by F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, 180–202. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2000. “The City and the Car.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 737–757. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. 2014. “Back to the Futures: Retrospecting the Prospects of Smart Grid Technology.” Futures 63: 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T., and C. Lindkvist. 2015. “Ambivalence, Designing Users, and User Imaginaries in the European Smart Grid: Insights from an Interdisciplinary Demonstration Project.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L. 2005. “Car Use: Lust and Must. Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Motives for Car Use.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (2-3): 147–162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2018. “Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars.” Social Studies of Science 48 (1): 25–56. doi:10.1177/0306312717741687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture and Society 21 (4–5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Brummelen, J., M. O’Brien, D. Gruyer, and H. Najjaran. 2018. “Autonomous Vehicle Perception: The Technology of Today and Tomorrow.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 89: 384–406. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, H. 2012. “Navigating Foresight in a Sea of Expectations: Lessons from the Sociology of Expectations.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (8): 769–782. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.715478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, A. 2016. “Imagining and Enacting the Future of the German Energy Transition: Electric Vehicles as Grid Infrastructure.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29 (3): 285–302. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1159946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, A. 2017. “An Automobile Nation at the Crossroads: Reimagining Germany’s Car Society through the Electrification of Transportation.” In Imagined Futures in Science, Technology and Society, edited by G. Verschraegen, F. Vandermoere, L. Braeckmans, and B. Segaert, 137–165. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 1991. “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by J. Law, 58–102. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ziljstra, T., and F. Avelino. 2012. “A Socio-Spatial Perspective on the Car Regime.” In Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, edited by F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, 160–179. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar