Narratives of urban mobility in Germany: on the threshold of a departure from the car-centered city?

References

• Adey, P. 2010. Mobility. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartling, H. 2006. “Suburbia, Mobility, and Urban Calamities.” Space and Culture 9 (1): 60–62. doi:10.1177/1206331205283674.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Biegoń, D., and F. Nullmeier. 2014. “Narrationen über Narrationen. Stellenwert und Methodologie der Narrationsanalyse (Narrations about Narrations. Significance and Methodology of Narrative Analysis).” In Politische Narrative (Political Narratives), edited by F. Gadinger, S. Jarzebski, and T. Yildiz, 39–65. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMUB). 2016. Climate Action Plan 2050. Principles and Goals of the German Government's Climate Policy. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1978. “Questions and Answers about the Pentad.” College Composition and Communication 29 (4): 330–335. doi:10.2307/357013.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B.,. O. Waever, and J. De Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, S., J. Ohayon, A. de Wit, J. Hammond, K. Melanson, M. Moritsch, R. Davenport, et al. 2018. “Best Practices: Social Research Methods to Inform Biological Conservation.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25 (1): 6–23. doi:10.1080/14486563.2017.1420499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. 2011 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deffner, J., T. Hefter, C. Rudolph, and T. Ziel, 2012. Handbook on Cycling Inclusive Planning and Promotion. Capacity Development Material for the Multiplier Training within the Mobile2020 Project. Frankfurt am Main/Hamburg: Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Dingler, J. 2003. Postmoderne und Nachhaltigkeit. Eine diskurstheoretische Analyse der sozialen Konstruktionen von nachhaltiger Entwicklung [Postmodernity and Sustainability. A Discourse-Theoretical Analysis of the Social Constructions of Sustainable Development]. München: Ökom.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. 2015. “Participant Observation.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. Wright, 530–534. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972 [1969]. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J. and F. Neidhardt. 1990. Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze [Structures and Functions of the Modern Public: Questions and Approaches]. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., and S. Cohen. 2014. “Why Sustainable Transport Policies Will Fail: EU Climate Policy in the Light of Transport Taboos.” Journal of Transport Geography 39: 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, K. 2011. “Nachhaltige Mobilität (Sustainable Mobility).” In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie [Environmental Sociology Handbook], edited by M. Groß, 325–347. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Götz, K., and J. Deffner. 2009. “Eine neue Mobilitätskultur in der Stadt – praktische Schritte zur Veränderung [A New Mobility Culture in the City – Practical Steps towards a Change].” In Urbane Mobilität. Verkehrsforschung des Bundes für die kommunale Praxis [Urban Mobility. Federal Transport Research for Municipal Practice], edited by Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, 39–52. Bremerhaven: NW-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas, A. J. 1983. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gürtler, K., and M. Rivera. 2019. “New Departures – Or a Spanner in the Works? Exploring Narratives of Impact-Driven Sustainability Research.” Sustainability 11 (22): 6506. doi:10.3390/su11226506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln [Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik [Remarks on Discourse Ethics]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1997. “Discourse Analysis.” In The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, edited by M. Hajer, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. 2010. “Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability.” Gender, Place and Culture 17 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/09663690903498225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., and D. Banister. 2014. Transport, Climate Change and the City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunecke, M., S. Haustein, S. Grischkat, and S. Böhler. 2007. “Psychological, Sociodemographic, and Infrastructural Factors as Determinants of Ecological Impact Caused by Mobility Behavior.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (4): 277–292. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerchner, B. 2006. “Diskursanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft. Ein Forschungsüberblick [Discourse Analysis in Political Science. A Literature Review].” In Foucault: Diskursanalyse der Politik [Foucault: Discourse Analysis of Politics], edited by B. Kerchner, and S. Schneider, 33–67. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, T., and M. Lanzendorf. 2016. “Moving between Mobility Cultures: What Affects the Travel Behavior of New Residents?” Transportation 43 (2): 243–271. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9574-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, R. 1999. “Beyond ‘Women and Transport’: Towards New Geographies of Gender and Daily Mobility.” Progress in Human Geography 23 (4): 567–588. doi:10.1191/030913299666161864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2000. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative Content Analysis].” In Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch [Qualitative Research. A Handbook], edited by U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke, 468–475. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2010. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative Content Analysis].” In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook Qualitative Research in Psychology], edited by G. Mey, and K. Mruck, 601–613. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Neebe, M., and T. Kallenbach. 2019. Status Quo statt Verkehrswende. Narrative urbaner Mobilität in Deutschland [Status Quo Instead of Mobility Transformation. Narratives of Urban Mobility in Germany]. IASS Study. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, S. 2008. “Zwischen Sicherheitsdispositiven und Securitization: Zur Analytik illiberaler Gouvernementalität [Between Security Dispositifs and Securtization: On the Analysis of Illiberal Governmentality].” In Gouvernementalität und Sicherheit. Zeitdiagnostische Beiträge im Anschluss an Foucault [Governmentality and Security. Time-Diagnostic Contributions after Foucault], edited by P. Purtschert, K. Meyer, and Y. Winter, 201–228. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J., and F. Rajé. 2007. “Accessibility, Mobility and Transport-Related Social Exclusion.” Journal of Transport Geography 15 (3): 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichow, H. B. 1959. Die autogerechte Stadt – Ein Weg aus dem Verkehrs-Chaos [The Car-Friendly City – A Way out of the Traffic Chaos]. Ravensburg: Otto Maier Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters 2019. Merkel Calls for “Radical Shift” in German Mobility Sector. Toronto: Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, M., and P. Nanz. 2018. “Erzählend handeln, Handeln erzählen: Fragen an Narrative nachhaltiger Entwicklung [Act Narratively, Narrate Acting: Questions for the Narrative of Sustainable Development].” In Leben im Anthropozän: Christliche Perspektiven für eine Kultur der Nachhaltigkeit [Life in the Anthropocene: Christian Perspectives for a Culture of Sustainability], edited by B. Bertelmann, and K. Heidel, 137–148. München: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, O., and M. Rivera. 2020. “No People, No Problem – Narrativity, Conflict, and Justice in Debates on Deep-Seabed Mining.” Geographica Helvetica 75 (2): 139–150. doi:10.5194/gh-75-139-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 1–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Schwegler, C. 2018. “Nachhaltigkeit in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Eine diskurslinguistische Untersuchung von Argumentationen und Kommunikationsstrategien [Sustainability in Business and Society. A Discourse-Linguistic Analysis of Argumentations and Communication Strategies].” Doctoral Dissertation, Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2000. “The City and the Car.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 737–757. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, M. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23 (5): 605–649. doi:10.1007/BF00992905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnberger, M., and M. Gross. 2018. “Rebound Effects in Practice: An Invitation to Consider Rebound from a Practice Theory Perspective.” Ecological Economics 154: 14–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport and Environment. 2019. Less (Cars) is More: How to Go from New to Sustainable Mobility. Brussels: Transport and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt (UBA). 2019a. Grafiken und Tabellen zur Klimabilanz 2018 [Graphs and Tables on the 2018 Climate Footprint]. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt (UBA). 2019b. “Gesunde Luft [Healthy Air].” Das Magazin des Umweltbundesamtes 1/2019. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viehöver, W. 2001. “Diskurse als Narrationen [Discourses as Narrations].” In Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 1: Theorien und Methoden [Handbook Social-Science Discourse Analysis. Volume 1: Theories and Methods], edited by R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Scheider, and W. Viehöver, 177–206. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Walnum, H., C. Aall, and S. Løkke. 2014. “Can Rebound Effects Explain Why Sustainable Mobility Has Not Been Achieved?” Sustainability 6 (12): 9510–9537. doi:10.3390/su6129510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 1975. The American Historical Review. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/80.4.961-a.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2017. Ambient Air Pollution: Pollutants. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar