The agony of nuclear: sustaining democratic disagreement in the anthropocene

References

• Asafu-Adjaye, J., L. Blomqvist, S. Brand, B. Brook, R. de Fries, E. Ellis, C. Foreman, et al. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Oakland: Breakthrough Institute. http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto-english.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. 1997. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., and J. Fressoz. 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon. 2011. “Nuclear Power after Japan: The Social Dimensions.” Environment 53 (6): 3–14. doi:10.1080/00139157.2011.623051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). 2017. “Q&A: Nuclear Power.” Accessed 25 May 2020. cnduk.org/resources/nuclear-power-qa/
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). 2018. “Nuclear Power and Nuclear Weapons.” Accessed 25 May 2020. cnduk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Nuclear-power-and-nuclear-weapons-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. 2009. The Politics of the Environment. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1086/596640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN. 2013. “Top Climate Change Scientists’ Letter to Policy Influencers.” CNN, November 3. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/03/world/nuclear-energy-climate-change-scientists-letter/.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crist, E. 2013. “On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature.” Environmental Humanities 3 (1): 129–147. doi:10.1215/22011919-3611266.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P., and E. Stoermer. 2000. “The ‘Anthropocene’.” Global Change Newsletter (41): 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Di Nucci, M., A. Brunnengräber, L. Mez, and M. Schreurs. 2015. “Comparative Perspectives on Nuclear Waste Governance.” In Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison, edited by A. Brunnengräber, M. Di Nucci, A. Losada, L. Mez, and M. Schreurs, 25–43. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. 2011. “The Planet of No Return: Human Resilience on an Artificial Earth.” The Breakthrough Journal (2): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2019. “EUCO 29/19.” www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41768/12-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Green Party. 2014. “Adopted Resolution: No New Nuclear Power in Europe.” Accessed 31 May 2020. europeangreens.eu/content/resolution-no-new-nuclear-power-europe
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, T. 2010. “The Future of Nuclear Energy to 2030 and Its Implications for Safety, Security and Non-proliferation: Overview.” The Centre for International Governance Innovation. http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/NuclearEnergyFuture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, F., and V. Lipińska. 2014. The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A., B. Sovacool, P. Johnstone, and A. Stirling. 2017. “Cost Overruns and Financial Risk in the Construction of Nuclear Power Reactors: A Critical Appraisal.” Energy Policy 102: 644–649. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, K. 2015. “Slowing the Nanotechnology Treadmill: impact Science versus Production Science for Sustainable Technological Development.” Environmental Sociology 1 (3): 143–151. doi:10.1080/23251042.2015.1041211.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 2009. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2020. “Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors: Learning for the Past, Enabling the Future”. Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications/14680/management-of-spent-fuel-from-nuclear-power-reactors.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2019. “Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System.” International Energy Agency. www.iea.org/reports/nuclear-power-in-a-clean-energy-system.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P. 2010. “The Nuclear Power Renaissance in the UK: Democratic Deficiencies with the ‘Consensus’ on Sustainability.” Human Geography 3 (2): 91–104. doi:10.1177/194277861000300207.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P. 2014. “Planning Reform, Rescaling, and the Construction of the Postpolitical: The Case of the Planning Act 2008 and Nuclear Power Consultation in the UK.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (4): 697–713. doi:10.1068/c1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., and A. Stirling. 2020. “Comparing Nuclear Trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From Regimes to Democracies in Sociotechnical Transitions and Discontinuities.” Energy Research & Social Science 59: 101245. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya, K.,. K. Ozasa, S. Akiba, O. Niwa, K. Kodama, N. Takamura, E. K. Zaharieva, Y. Kimura, and R. Wakeford. 2015. “From Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Fukushima 1: Long-Term Effects of Radiation Exposure on Health.” The Lancet 386 (9992): 469–478. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61167-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J., A. Yip, and T. Nordhaus. 2016. “Historical Construction Costs of Global Nuclear Power Reactors.” Energy Policy 91: 371–382. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, A., H. Lovins, and L. Ross. 1980. “Nuclear Power and Nuclear Bombs.” Foreign Affairs 58 (5): 1137–1177. doi:10.2307/20040586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurshina, D., N. Karpov, M. Kirkegaard, and E. Semenov. 2019. “Why Nuclear Power Plants Cost so Much – and What Can Be Done about It.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Accessed September 2020. thebulletin.org/2019/06/why-nuclear-power-plants-cost-so-much-and-what-can-be-done-about-it/.
   Google Scholar
• Lynas, M. 2011. The God Species. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, A. 2013. Negotiating Climate Change: Radical Democracy and the Illusion of Consensus. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, A. 2017. “Sustaining Democracy: Science, Politics and Disagreement in the Anthropocene.” In Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften und die Suche nach neuen Wissensregimen (Sustainbility Sciences and the Search for New Knowledge Regimes), edited by Thomas Pfister, 169–186. Munich: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, A. 2019. “Democracy in the Anthropocene: The Challenges of Knowledge.” Environmental Values 28 (3): 347–365. doi:10.3197/096327119X15519764179836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A. 2020. “Democracy, Disagreement, Disruption: Agonism and the Environmental State.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 155–172. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1684739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A., and G. Smith. 2014. “Means, Ends, Beginnings: Environmental Technocracy, Ecological Deliberation or Embodied Democracy?” Ethical Perspectives 21 (1): 47–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masco, J. 2004. “Mutant Ecologies: Radioactive Life in Post-Cold War New Mexico.” Cultural Anthropology 19 (4): 517–550. doi:10.1525/can.2004.19.4.517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meitner, L., and O. Frisch. 1939. “Products of the Fission of the Uranium Nucleus.” Nature 143 (3620): 471–472. doi:10.1038/143471a0.
   Google Scholar
• Monastersky, R. 2015. “First Atomic Blast Proposed as Start of Anthropocene.” Nature 519 (7542): 144–147. doi:10.1038/519144a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., and M. Pollak. 1980. “Ideology as Strategy: The Discourse of the Anti-Nuclear Movement in France and Germany.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 5 (30): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A., and O. Geden. 2016. “No Fudging on Geoengineering.” Nature Geoscience 9 (12): 859–860. doi:10.1038/ngeo2851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepermans, Y., and P. Maeseele. 2014. “Democratic Debate and Mediated Discourses on Climate Change: From Consensus to De/Politicization.” Environmental Communication 8 (2): 216–232. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.906482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. 1990. “Campaigns, Skirmishes and Battles: Anti-Nuclear Movements in the USA, France and West Germany.” Industrial Crisis Quarterly 4 (3): 193–222. doi:10.1177/108602669000400304.
   Google Scholar
• Ruser, A., and A. Machin. 2016. “Technology Can Save Us, Can’t It? The Emergence of the ‘Techno-fix’ Narrative in Climate Politics.” Paper presented at Technology + Society =? Future. Montenegrin Academy of Science and Art Conference Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., A. Froggat J. Hazemann, T. Katsuta, A. Lovins, M. Ramana, C. von Hirschhausen, B. Wealer, A. Stienne, and F. Meinass. 2019. “World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2019.” Accessed 24 May 2020. www.worldnuclearreport.org/IMG/pdf/wnisr2019-v2-lr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sime, R. 1998. “Lise Meitner and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission.” Scientific American 278 (1): 80–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., A. Bouville, and C. Land. 2006. “Fallout from Nuclear Weapons Tests and Cancer Risks.” American Scientist 94 (1): 48–57. doi:10.1511/2006.57.48.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., A. Gilbert, and D. Nugent. 2014. “An International Comparative Assessment of Construction Cost Overruns for Electricity Infrastructure.” Energy Research and Social Science 3: 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. McNeill. 2011. “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 369 (1938): 842–867. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., and A. Machin. 2019. Society and Climate: Transformations and Challenges. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology and Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulberg, A., and M. Fuhrmann. 2013. “Introduction: Understanding the Nuclear Renaissance.” In The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security, edited by A. Stulberg and M. Fuhrmann, 1–16. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K. 2019. “From Hiroshima to Now, Can Nuclear Ever be Peaceful.” Greenpeace.org. Accessed 31 May 2020. www.greenpeace.org/international/story/23650/from-hiroshima-to-now-can-nuclear-ever-be-peaceful/
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2011. “‘Whose Environment’: The End of Nature, Climate Change and the Politics of Post-Politicisation.” Ambiente and Sociedade 14(2): 78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B., and M. Galarraga. 2013. “Geoengineering Knowledge: Interdisciplinarity and the Shaping of Climate Engineering Research.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (12): 2817–2824. doi:10.1068/a45647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., M. Lehtonen, and M. Martiskainen. 2011. “Climate Change, Energy Security, and Risk‒Debating Nuclear New Build in Finland, France and the UK.” Energy Policy 39 (6): 3434–3442. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 2001. “An Ecological Ethics for the Present.” In Governing for the Environment: Global Problems, Ethics and Democracy, edited by B. Gleeson and N. Low, 147–164. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2010. “Unpolitical Democracy.” Political Theory 38 (1): 65–92. doi:10.1177/0090591709348188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenman, M. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliarty, S. 2013. “Nuclear Power in Germany and France.” Polity 45 (2): 281–296. doi:10.1057/pol.2013.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association (WNA). 2020. “World Nuclear Performance Report 2020,” Report No. 2020/008. London: World Nuclear Association. www.world-nuclear.org/getmedia/3418bf4a-5891-4ba1-b6c2-d83d8907264d/performance-report-2020-v1.pdf.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., C. Waters, M. Williams, A. Barnosky, A. Cearreta, P. Crutzen, E. Ellis, et al. 2015. “When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level is Stratigraphically Optimal.” Quaternary International 383: 196–203. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar