Customer perspectives on demand response in Europe: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

References

• Ali, F., M. Ashfaq, S. Begum, and A. Ali. 2020. “How ‘Green’ Thinking and Altruism Translate into Purchasing Intentions for Electronics Products: The Intrinsic-extrinsic Motivation Mechanism.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 24: 281–291. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M., K. Prakash, M. Hossain, and H. Pota. 2021. “Intelligent Energy Management: Evolving Developments, Current Challenges, and Research Directions for Sustainable Future.” Journal of Cleaner Production 314: 127904. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnyPLACE Consortium 2018a. Environmental and Societal Impacts Assessment: Deliverable 2.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646580/results.
   Google Scholar
• AnyPLACE Consortium 2018b. Field Trial: Deliverable 8.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646580/results.
   Google Scholar
• AnyPLACE Consortium 2018c. Policy and Regulatory Recommendations: Deliverable 1.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646580/results.
   Google Scholar
• Balta-Ozkan, N., R. Davidson, M. Bicket, and L. Whitmarsh. 2013. “Social Barriers to the Adoption of Smart Homes.” Energy Policy 63: 363–374. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartusch, C., and K. Alvehag. 2014. “Further Exploring the Potential of Residential Demand Response Programs in Electricity Distribution.” Applied Energy 125: 39–59. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellefontaine, S., and C. Lee. 2014. “Between Black and White: Examining Grey Literature in Meta-analyses of Psychological Research.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 23 (8): 1378–1388. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9795-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berka, A., and E. Creamer. 2018. “Taking Stock of the Local Impacts of Community Owned Renewable Energy: A Review and Research Agenda.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82: 3400–3419. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billanes, J., and P. Enevoldsen. 2021. “A Critical Analysis of Ten Influential Factors to Energy Technology Acceptance and Adoption.” Energy Reports 7: 6899–6907. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolderdijk, J., L. Steg, E. Geller, P. Lehman, and T. Postmes. 2013. “Comparing the Effectiveness of Monetary Versus Moral Motives in Environmental Campaigning.” Nature Climate Change 3 (4): 413–416. doi:10.1038/nclimate1767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolle, F., and P. Otto. 2010. “A Price Is a Signal: On Intrinsic Motivation, Crowding-out, and Crowding-in.” Kyklos 63 (1): 9–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, T., B. Fung, F. Iqbal, and B. Shah. 2018. “Security and Privacy Challenges in Smart Cities.” Sustainable Cities and Society 39: 499–507. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunholtz-Speight, T., C. McLachlan, S. Mander, M. Hannon, J. Hardy, I. Cairns, M. Sharmina, and E. Manderson. 2021. “The Long Term Future for Community Energy in Great Britain: A Co-created Vision of a Thriving Sector and Steps Towards Realising It.” Energy Research & Social Science 78: 102044. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten, N., R. Campbell, C. Pope, J. Donovan, M. Morgan, and R. Pill. 2002. “Using Meta Ethnography to Synthesise Qualitative Research: A Worked Example.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 7 (4): 209–215. doi:10.1258/135581902320432732.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broska, L. 2021. “It’s All About Community: On the Interplay of Social Capital, Social Needs, and Environmental Concern in Sustainable Community Action.” Energy Research & Social Science 79: 102165. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z., X. Fan, and J. Du. 2017. “Gender and Attitudes Toward Technology Use: A Meta-analysis.” Computers & Education 105: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., and K. Johnson. 2019. “Influences of Environmental and Hedonic Motivations on Intention to Purchase Green Products: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 18: 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., F. Friis, S. Bettin, W. Throndsen, M. Ornetzeder, T. Skjølsvold, and M. Ryghaug. 2020. “The Role of Competences, Engagement, and Devices in Configuring the Impact of Prices in Energy Demand Response: Findings from Three Smart Energy Pilots with Households.” Energy Policy 137: 111142. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Customer-Led Network Revolution (CLNR). 2013. Project Lessons Learned from Trial Recruitment: Customer Led Network Revolution Trials. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: CLNR. http://www.networkrevolution.co.uk/resources/project-library.
   Google Scholar
• Customer-Led Network Revolution (CLNR). 2014. Durham University Social Science Research: March 2014 Report. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: CLNR. http://www.networkrevolution.co.uk/resources/project-library.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, S. 2008. “Energy Feedback in Buildings: Improving the Infrastructure for Demand Reduction.” Building Research & Information 36 (5): 499–508. doi:10.1080/09613210802028428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, S., and E. McKenna. 2012. “Social Implications of Residential Demand Response in Cool Temperate Climates.” Energy Policy 49: 759–769. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decullier, E., V. Lhéritier, and F. Chapuis. 2005. “Fate of Biomedical Research Protocols and Publication Bias in France: Retrospective Cohort Study.” The BMJ 331 (7507): 19–22. doi:10.1136/bmj.38488.385995.8F.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Moura, P., C. Cavalli, and C. da Rocha. 2019. “Interface Design for In-home Displays.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 18: 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dütschke, E., and A. Paetz. 2013. “Dynamic Electricity Pricing: Which Programs Do Consumers Prefer?” Energy Policy 59: 226–234. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwan, K., D. Altman, J. Arnaiz, J. Bloom, A.-W. Chan, E. Cronin, E. Decullier, et al. 2008. “Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias.” PLoS One 3 (8): e3081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E-balance Consortium. 2017. Validation of the Proposed Use Cases and Business Models: Deliverable 2.5. Frankfurt: E-balance Consortium. http://ebalance-project.eu/deliverables.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenhard, M., B. Kijl, and L. Nieuwenhuis. 2014. “Market Adoption Barriers of Multi-stakeholder Technology: Smart Homes for the Aging Population.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89: 306–315. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellabban, O., and H. Abu-Rub. 2016. “Smart Grid Customers’ Acceptance and Engagement: An Overview.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 65: 1285–1298. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission 2011. Smart Grid Projects in Europe: Lessons Learned and Current Developments. Brussels: European Commission. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC65215.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2013. Communication from the Commission: Delivering the Internal Electricity Market and Making the Most of Public Intervention. Brussels: European Commission. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/delivering-internal-electricity-market-and-making-most-public-intervention-com2013-7243-0_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2016. Demand Response Status in EU Member States. Brussels: European Commission. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101191.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2017. Smart Grid Projects Outlook. Brussels: European Commission. https://ses.jrc.ec.europa.eu/smart-grids-observatory.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2020. 2030 Climate Target Plan. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eu-climate-action/2030_ctp_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2021. Annex to the Commission Recommendation on Energy Efficiency First: From Principles to Practice – Guidelines and Examples for Its Implementation in Decision-making in the Energy Sector and Beyond. Brussels: European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/1749/oj.
   Google Scholar
• Flex4Grid Consortium 2018. Validation of Second Pilot: Deliverable 6.6. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646428/results.
   Google Scholar
• FLEXICIENCY Consortium 2018. Results Achieved in the Swedish Demonstration: Deliverable 8.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646482/results.
   Google Scholar
• FLEXICIENCY Consortium 2019a. Cross-case Analysis of the Results from the Demonstrations: Deliverable 3.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646482/results.
   Google Scholar
• FLEXICIENCY Consortium 2019b. Report on the Results Achieved in the Italian Demonstrations: Deliverable 5.2. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646482/results.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., and R. Jegen. 2001. “Motivation Crowding Theory.” Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (5): 589–611. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Holgado, A., S. Marcos-Pablos, and F. García-Peñalvo. 2020. “Guidelines for Performing Systematic Research Projects Reviews.” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 6 (2): 9–144. doi:10.9781/ijimai.2020.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, K., J. Stapleton, S. Kirkpatrick, R. Hanning, and S. Leatherdale. 2015. “Applying Systematic Review Search Methods to the Grey Literature: A Case Study Examining Guidelines for School-based Breakfast Programs in Canada.” Systematic Reviews 4 (1): 138. doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gouveia, J., J. Seixas, and G. Long. 2018. “Mining Households’ Energy Data to Disclose Fuel Poverty: Lessons for Southern Europe.” Journal of Cleaner Production 178: 534–550. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. 2009. “Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed with a Practice Theory Approach.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 14 (1): 150–165. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyamfi, S., and S. Krumdieck. 2011. “Price, Environment and Security: Exploring Multi-modal Motivation in Voluntary Residential Peak Demand Response.” Energy Policy 39 (5): 2993–3004. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N., and H. Bayliss. 2015. “Shades of Grey: Two Forms of Grey Literature Important for Reviews in Conservation.” Biological Conservation 191: 827–829. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, R., S. Pahl, R. Jones, and A. Fuertes. 2020. “Energy Use in Social Housing Residents in the UK and Recommendations for Developing Energy Behaviour Change Interventions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 251: 119643. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handgraaf, M., M. Van Lidth de Jeude, and K. Appelt. 2013. “Public Praise vs. Private Pay: Effects of Rewards on Energy Conservation in the Workplace.” Ecological Economics 86: 86–92. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylen, E., D. Papadaskalopoulos, I. Konstantelos, and G. Strbac. 2020. “Dynamic Modelling of Consumers’ Inconvenience Associated with Demand Flexibility Potentials.” Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 21: 100298. doi:10.1016/j.segan.2019.100298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobman, E., E. Frederiks, K. Stenner, and S. Meikle. 2016. “Uptake and Usage of Cost-reflective Electricity Pricing: Insights from Psychology and Behavioural Economics.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 57: 455–467. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honebein, P., R. Cammarano, and C. Boice. 2011. “Building a Social Roadmap for the Smart Grid.” The Electricity Journal 24 (4): 78–85. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2011.03.015.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2020. Renewables 2020. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 °C: Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm.
   Google Scholar
• Juntunen, J. 2014. “Domestication Pathways of Small-scale Renewable Energy Technologies.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 10 (2): 4–18. doi:10.1080/15487733.2014.11908130.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, S. 2013. “Should It Be Automatic or Manual: The Occupant’s Perspective on the Design of Domestic Control Systems.” Energy and Buildings 65: 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, K., C. Kraan, L. Karg, S. Maggiore, P. Valkering, and E. Laes. 2016. “Fostering Residential Demand Response Through Dynamic Pricing Schemes: A Behavioural Review of Smart Grid Pilots in Europe.” Sustainability 8 (9): 929. doi:10.3390/su8090929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and A. Shcherbakova. 2011. “Common Failures of Demand Response.” Energy 36 (2): 873–880. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., J. Houghton, J. Thomas, and P. Weldon. 2014. Where Is the Evidence: Realising the Value of Grey Literature for Public Policy and Practice. Swinburne: Swinburne Institute for Social Research. doi:10.4225/50/5580b1e02daf9.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., T. Yigitcanlar, I. Erol, and A. Liu. 2021. “Motivations, Barriers and Risks of Smart Home Adoption: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework.” Energy Research & Social Science 80: 102211. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M., C. Henggeler Antunes, K. Janda, P. Peixoto, and N. Martins. 2016. “The Potential of Energy Behaviours in a Smart(er) Grid: Policy Implications from a Portuguese Exploratory Study.” Energy Policy 90: 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahood, Q., D. Van Eerd, and E. Irvin. 2014. “Searching for Grey Literature for Systematic Reviews: Challenges and Benefits.” Research Synthesis Methods 5 (3): 221–234. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marikyan, D., S. Papagiannidis, and E. Alamanos. 2019. “A Systematic Review of the Smart Home Literature: A User Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 139–154. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K., A. Borah, and R. Palmatier. 2017. “Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance.” Journal of Marketing 81 (1): 36–58. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mela, H., J. Peltomaa, M. Salo, K. Mäkinen, and M. Hildén. 2018. “Framing Smart Meter Feedback in Relation to Practice Theory.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3553. doi:10.3390/su10103553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, L., X. Gan, Y. Sun, T. Lv, L. Qiao, and T. Xu. 2021. “Effects of Monetary and Nonmonetary Interventions on Energy Conservation: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 149: 111342. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Munoz, A., F. Bellido-Outeirino, P. Siano, and M. Gomez-Nieto. 2016. “Mobile Social Media for Smart Grids Customer Engagement: Emerging Trends and Challenges.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53: 1611A–1616A. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, L., and Y. Strengers. 2015. “Peak Demand and the ‘Family Peak’ Period in Australia: Understanding Practice (In)Flexibility in Households with Children.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 116–124. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson, M., M. Fell, and G. Huebner. 2018. “Consumer Demand for Time of Use Electricity Tariffs: A Systematized Review of the Empirical Evidence.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 97: 276–289. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neighbourhood Oriented Brokerage ELectricity and monitoring system (NOBEL). 2011. Evaluation Plan: Deliverable 7.1. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/247926/reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbourhood Oriented Brokerage ELectricity and monitoring system (NOBEL). 2012. Evaluation and Assessment: Deliverable 7.3. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/247926/reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Paetz, A., E. Dütschke, and W. Fichtner. 2012. “Smart Homes as a Means to Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Study of Consumer Perceptions.” Journal of Consumer Policy 35 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1007/s10603-011-9177-2.
   Google Scholar
• Paez, A. 2017. “Gray Literature: An Important Resource in Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 10 (3): 233–240. doi:10.1111/jebm.12266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palm, J., and M. Tengvard. 2011. “Motives for and Barriers to Household Adoption of Small-scale Production of Electricity: Examples from Sweden.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 7 (1): 6–15. doi:10.1080/15487733.2011.11908061.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, B., P. Heptonstall, R. Gross, and B. Sovacool. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Motivations, Enablers and Barriers for Consumer Engagement with Residential Demand Response.” Energy Policy 138: 111221. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perri, C., C. Giglio, and V. Corvello. 2020. “Smart Users for Smart Technologies: Investigating the Intention to Adopt Smart Energy Consumption Behaviors.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 155: 119991. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott-McKellar, A., K. McNamara, P. Nunn, and J. Watson. 2019. “What Are the Barriers to Successful Community-based Climate Change Adaptation? A Review of Grey Literature.” Local Environment 24 (4): 374–390. doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1580688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaee, M., S. Hoseini, and I. Malekmohammadi. 2019. “Proposing a Socio-Psychological Model for Adopting Green Building Technologies: A Case Study from Iran.” Sustainable Cities and Society 45: 657–668. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesz, J., and M. Milligan. 2015. “Designing Electricity Markets for a High Penetration of Variable Renewables.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 4 (3): 279–289. doi:10.1002/wene.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdar, M., G. Hussain, and M. Lehtonen. 2019. “Costs of Demand Response from Residential Customers’ Perspective.” Energies 12 (9): 1617. doi:10.3390/en12091617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, A., B. Karlin, and R. Ford. 2018. “Understanding the Path to Smart Home Adoption: Segmenting and Describing Consumers Across the Innovation-decision Process.” Energy Research & Social Science 46: 274–283. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelli, I., and T. Morstyn. 2021. “Better Together: Harnessing Social Relationships in Smart Energy Communities.” Energy Research & Social Science 78: 102125. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN). 2018a. Solent Achieving Value from Efficiency (SAVE): PPR June 2018. Perth: SSEN. https://save-project.co.uk/reports-and-presentations/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN). 2018b. Solent Achieving Value from Efficiency (SAVE): SDRC 3.2 Improve Customer Engagement. Perth: SSEN. https://save-project.co.uk/reports-and-presentations/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN). 2019. Solent Achieving Value from Efficiency (SAVE): SDRC 8.8 Community Coaching Trial Report. Perth: SSEN. https://save-project.co.uk/reports-and-presentations/.
   Google Scholar
• Smart Energy Demand Coalition (SEDC) 2017. Explicit Demand Response in Europe: Mapping the Markets 2017. Brussels: SEDC. https://smarten.eu/explicit-demand-response-in-europe-mapping-the-markets-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. “Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (6): 1273–1285. doi:10.1068/a42282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siano, P. 2014. “Demand Response and Smart Grids: A Survey.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30: 461–478. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMART-UP Consortium 2018a. Final Report WP6: Deliverable 6.4. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/649669/results.
   Google Scholar
• SMART-UP Consortium 2018b. Final Status of Pilot Activities: Deliverable 5.4. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/649669/results.
   Google Scholar
• SMART-UP Consortium 2018c. Impact Report: Deliverable 7.8. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/649669/results.
   Google Scholar
• SMART-UP Consortium 2018d. Report on the Support to Households: Deliverable 5.3. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/649669/results.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S. 2007. “Improving the Evidence Base for Energy Policy: The Role of Systematic Reviews.” Energy Policy 35 (3): 1858–1871. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., S. Van Passel, and E. Laes. 2018. “Assessing the Success of Electricity Demand Response Programs: A Meta-analysis.” Energy Research & Social Science 40: 110–117. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, K., E. Frederiks, E. Hobman, and S. Cook. 2017. “Willingness to Participate in Direct Load Control: The Role of Consumer Distrust.” Applied Energy 189: 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., D. Kopin, E. Wilson, and T. Peterson. 2017. “Framing of Customer Engagement Opportunities and Renewable Energy Integration by Electric Utility Representatives.” Utilities Policy 47: 69–74. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2017.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2014. “Smart Energy in Everyday Life: Are You Designing for Resource Man?” Interactions 21 (4): 24–31. doi:10.1145/2621931.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2011. “Designing Eco-feedback Systems for Everyday Life.” In CHI ‘11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2135–2144. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979252.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., and A. Harden. 2008. “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8: 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd-Blick, A., C. Spurlock, L. Jin, P. Cappers, S. Borgeson, D. Fredman, and J. Zuboy. 2020. “Winners Are Not Keepers: Characterizing Household Engagement, Gains, and Energy Patterns in Demand Response Using Machine Learning in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science 70: 101595. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., K. Flemming, E. McInnes, S. Oliver, and J. Craig. 2012. “Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: ENTREQ.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 12: 181. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torriti, J., M. Hassan, and M. Leach. 2010. “Demand Response Experience in Europe: Policies, Programmes and Implementation.” Energy 35 (4): 1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, G., C. Faure, J. Schleich, and M. Guetlein. 2021. “The Heat Is Off! The Role of Technology Attributes and Individual Attitudes in the Diffusion of Smart Thermostats – Findings from a Multi-country Survey.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 163: 120508. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Power Networks. 2019a. Energywise: SDRC 9.4 – Customer Engagement. London: UK Power Networks. https://innovation.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/projects/energywise/.
   Google Scholar
• UK Power Networks. 2019b. Energywise: SDRC 9.6 – Energywise Knowledge Dissemination Report. London: UK Power Networks. https://innovation.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/projects/energywise/.
   Google Scholar
• UK Power Networks. 2019c. Energywise: The Final Energy Saving Trial Report. London: UK Power Networks. https://innovation.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/projects/energywise/.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy (USDOE). 2006. Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them – A Report to the United States Congress: Pursuant to Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Washington, DC: USDOE. https://www.energy.gov/oe/downloads/benefits-demand-response-electricity-markets-and-recommendations-achieving-them-report.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy (USDOE). 2013. Analysis of Customer Enrollment Patterns in Time-based Rate Programs: Initial Results from the SGIG Consumer Behavior Studies. Washington, DC: USDOE. https://www.energy.gov/oe/downloads/analysis-customer-enrollment-patterns-time-based-rate-programs-initial-results-sgig.
   Google Scholar
• UPGRID Consortium. 2017. Report of Societal Research, Socioeconomic Impact of Smart Grid, Report of Transfer Replication Strategy and Communication: Deliverable: D9.3. Brussels: European Union Publications Office. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/646531/results.
   Google Scholar
• VaasaETT. 2012. EMPOWER DEMAND 2. Energy Efficiency Through Information and Communication Technology – Best Practice Examples and Guidance. Helsinki: VaasaETT. https://www.esmig.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ESMIG-Empower-Demand-report-phase-II.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verkade, N., and J. Höffken. 2017. “Is the Resource Man Coming Home? Engaging with an Energy Monitoring Platform to Foster Flexible Energy Consumption in the Netherlands.” Energy Research & Social Science 27: 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigurs, C., C. Maidment, M. Fell, and D. Shipworth. 2021. “Customer Privacy Concerns as a Barrier to Sharing Data about Energy Use in Smart Local Energy Systems: A Rapid Realist Review.” Energies 14 (5): 1285. doi:10.3390/en14051285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, P. 2014. “The Use of Systematic Reviews to Analyse Demand-side Management Policy.” Energy Efficiency 7 (3): 417–427. doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9230-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western Power Distribution (WPD). 2013. Smart Hooky: Closedown Report. Castle Donington: WPD. https://www.westernpower.co.uk/innovation/projects/smart-hooky.
   Google Scholar
• Western Power Distribution and Regen SW (WPD&RSW). 2016. Sunshine Tariff: Customer Recruitment Learning Report. Exeter: WPD&RSW. https://www.regen.co.uk/project/sunshine-tariff/.
   Google Scholar
• Western Power Distribution and Regen SW (WPD&RSW). 2017. Sunshine Tariff: The Customer Response. Exeter: WPD&RSW. https://www.regen.co.uk/project/sunshine-tariff/.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, E. 1997. “Gender Differences in Computer-related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior 13 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., M. Charney, and B. Smith. 2015. “Growing Our Vision Together: Forming a Sustainability Community within the American Library Association.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 11 (2): 57–69. doi:10.1080/15487733.2015.11908147.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., B. Hwang, and Y. Lu. 2021. “Exploring the Influencing Paths of Behavior-driven Household Energy-saving Intervention – Household Energy Saving Option (HESO).” Sustainable Cities and Society 71: 102951. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S., and J. Lee. 2015. “Advancing Societal Readiness Toward Renewable Energy System Adoption with a Socio-technical Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 95: 170–181. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar