Life of the death system: shifting regimes, evolving practices, and the rise of eco-funerals

References

• Augenstein, K., B. Bachmann, M. Egermann, V. Hermelingmeier, A. Hilger, M. Jaeger-Erben, A. Kessler, et al. 2020. “From Niche to Mainstream: The Dilemmas of Scaling up Sustainable Alternatives.” GAIA 29 (3): 1–18. doi:10.14512/gaia.29.3.3.
   Google Scholar
• Aveline-Dubach, N., ed. 2012. Invisible Population: The Place of the Dead in East Asian Megacities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, V., and W. Burger. 2017. “Change and Innovation in the Funeral Industry: A Typology of Motivations.” Omega – Journal of Death and Dying 75 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1177/0030222815612605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, E. 1973. The Denial of Death. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, E., and T. Jahn. 2006. Soziale Ökologie: Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den Gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen [Social Ecology: Outline of a Science of Societal Relations to Nature]. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2012. “Fear of the Dead, Fear of Death: Is It Biological or Psychological?” Mortality 17 (4): 322–337. doi:10.1080/13576275.2012.734986.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, G., and P. Davies. 2015. “Urban Cemetery Planning and the Conflicting Role of Local and Regional Interests.” Land Use Policy 42: 450–459. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2002. “Introduction.” In Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, edited by F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremation Association of North American (CANA). n.d. Cremation Process. Wheeling, IL: CANA. https://www.cremationassociation.org/page/CremationProcess
   Google Scholar
• Cremation Association of North American (CANA). 2023. Industry Statistical Information. Wheeling, IL: CANA. https://www.cremationassociation.org/page/Industry­Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, L., and I. Szmigin. 2010. “Death and Disposal: The Universal, Environmental Dilemma.” Journal of Marketing Management 26 (11–12): 1129–1142. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2010.509580.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, L., I. Szmigin, and C. Vaessen. 2016. “Consumer Acceptance of Radical Alternatives to Human Disposal: An Examination of the Belgian Marketplace.” In Death in a Consumer Culture, edited by S. Dobscha, 228–241. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casal, A., J. Aragonés, and G. Moser. 2010. “Attachment Forever: Environmental and Social Dimensions, Temporal Perspective, and Choice of One’s Last Resting Place.” Environment and Behavior 42 (6): 765–778. doi:10.1177/0013916510367412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2022. “Adult Obesity Facts.” Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html
   Google Scholar
• Clayden, A., T. Green, J. Hockey, and M. Powell. 2015. Natural Burial: Landscape, Practice and Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts, C., C. Basmajian, J. Sehee, S. Kelty, and P. Williams. 2018. “Natural Burial as a Land Conservation Tool in the US.” Landscape and Urban Planning 178: 130–143. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J. 1980. Inventing the American Way of Death, 1830–1920. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., L. Rezende, A. De Souza Barbosa, P. De Carvalho, N. De Lima, and A. Carvalho. 2017. “Economic, Human and Environmental Health Benefits of Replacing Formaldehyde in the Preservation of Corpses.” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 145: 490–495. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, S., J. Breuer, C. Pusch, S. Holley, J. Wahl, J. Ingwersen, and M. Graw. 2012. “Graveyards – Special Landfills.” The Science of the Total Environment 419: 90–97. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., and J. Keene. 2009. Death and Dying in America. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, E. 2018. The Green Burial Guidebook: Everything You Need to Plan an Affordable, Environmentally Friendly Burial. Novato, CA: New World Library.
   Google Scholar
• Green Burial Council (GBC). 2023. Cemeteries. https://www.greenburialcouncil.org/cemeteries.html
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2010. “Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective.” Research Policy 39 (4): 495–510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2019. “Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39: 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabalov, P. 2018. “Public Life among the Dead: Jogging in Malmö Cemeteries.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 33: 75–79. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L., and C. Holling, eds. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L., C. Allen, and A. Garmestani, eds. 2022. Applied Panarchy: Applications and Diffusions across Disciplines. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., N. Longhurst, and G. Seyfang. 2013. “Up, Down, Round and Round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (2): 402–420. doi:10.1068/a45124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harra, T. 2022. Last Rites: The Evolution of the American Funeral. Boulder, CO: Sounds True.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, L. 2019. Reimagining Death: Stories and Practical Wisdom for Home Funerals and Green Burials. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hof, A., D. van Vuuren, F. Berkhout, and F. Geels. 2020. “Understanding Transition Pathways by Bridging Modelling, Transition and Practice-Based Studies: Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151: 119665. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneda, T., and C. Haub. 2022. How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth? Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau. https://www.prb.org/articles/how-many-people-have-ever-lived-on-earth/
   Google Scholar
• Kastenbaum, R. 2007. Death, Society, and Human Experience. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kastenbaum, R., and R. Aisenberg. 1972. The Psychology of Death. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keijzer, E. 2017. “The Environmental Impact of Activities after Life: Life Cycle Assessment of Funerals.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 22 (5): 715–730. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M., M. Sahakian, and L. Hirt. 2022. “Connecting the Multi-Level-Perspective and Social Practice Approach for Sustainable Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 44: 14–28. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, S., and E. Kemp. 2007. “Consumer Awareness of the Legal Obligations of Funeral Providers.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 41 (2): 326–340. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2007.00083.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 2019. Learning and Everyday Life: Access, Participation, and Changing Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., J. Wittmayer, F. Avelino, T. von Wirth, and N. Frantzeskaki. 2020. “Transformative Innovation and Translocal Diffusion.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35: 251–260. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMurray, N., and R. Futrell. 2021. “Ecological Death Reform and Death System Change.” Omega – Journal of Death and Dying 83 (4): 859–883. doi:10.1177/0030222819869485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari, M., and J. Domingo. 2010. “Toxic Emissions from Crematories: A Review.” Environment International 36 (1): 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2009.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, A. 2023. “Where is Aquamation Legal? Which States Have Legalized Aquamation or Bio Cremation?” US Funerals Online. https://www.us-funerals.com/where-is-aquamation-legal-which-states-have-legalized-aquamation-or-bio-cremation
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, P., and C. Shilling. 1993. “Modernity, Self-Identity and the Sequestration of Death.” Sociology 27 (3): 411–431. doi:10.1177/0038038593027003005.
   Google Scholar
• Mitford, J. 1963. The American Way of Death Revisited. Reprint, 2000. London: Virago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, A. 2009. “Conceptual Niche Management of Grassroots Innovation for Sustainability: The Case of Body Disposal Practices in the UK.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (8): 1026–1043. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute (NCI). 2011. Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk. Bethesda, MD: NCI. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet.
   Google Scholar
• National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA). 2020. Trends in Funeral Service. Brookfield, WI: NFDA. https://www.nfda.org/news/trends-in-funeral-service
   Google Scholar
• National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA). 2021. 2021 NFDA General Price List Study Shows Funeral Costs Not Rising as Fast as Rate of Inflation. Brookfield, WI: NFDA https://nfda.org/news/media-center/nfda-news-releases/id/6182/2021-nfda-general-price-list-study-shows-funeral-costs-not-rising-as-fast-as-rate-of-inflation
   Google Scholar
• National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA). 2022. 2022 NFDA Cremation & Burial Report. Brookfield, WI: NFDA. https://californiahealthline.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/09/2022_Cremation-and-Burial-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• New Hampshire Funeral Resources and Education (NHFRE). 2023. “Green Burial Cemeteries in the US and Canada.” Holderness, NH: NHFRE. https://www.nhfuneral.org/green-burial-cemeteries-in-the-us-and-canada.html
   Google Scholar
• Nordh, H., K. Evensen, and M. Skår. 2017. “A Peaceful Place in the City – A Qualitative Study of Restorative Components of the Cemetery.” Landscape and Urban Planning 167: 108–117. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordh, H., D. House, M. Westendorp, A. Maddrell, C. Wingren, S. Kmec, K. McClymont, et al. 2021. “Rules, Norms and Practices – A Comparative Study Exploring Disposal Practices and Facilities in Northern Europe.” Omega – Journal of Death and Dying. Published online September 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228211042138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Z. 2017. The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, B., P. Quinteiro, C. Caetano, H. Nadais, L. Arroja, E. da Silva, and M. Matias. 2013. “Burial Grounds’ Impact on Groundwater and Public Health: An Overview.” Water and Environment Journal 27 (1): 99–106. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, P. 2016. “Custody of the Corpse: Controlling Alkaline Hydrolysis in US Death Care Markets.” In Death in a Consumer Culture, edited by S. Dobscha, 75–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. 2018. “Domesticating Deathcare: The Women of the U.S. Natural Deathcare Movement.” The Journal of Medical Humanities 39 (2): 195–215. doi:10.1007/s10912-016-9424-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipps, D. 2018. “Arlington Cemetery, Nearly Full, May Become More Exclusive.” The New York Times, May 28. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/28/us/arlington-cemetery-veterans.html
   Google Scholar
• Podoshen, J. 2016. “Examining Death and Learning about Life.” In Death in a Consumer Culture, edited by S. Dobscha, 316–318. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Recompose. 2023. “Recompose Opens $5M Community Raise, Celebrates Expansion of Human Composting.” https://recompose.life/2023/recompose-opens-5m-community-raise
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, J., L. Luvuno, J. Rieb, E. Crockett, K. Malmborg, M. Schoon, and G. Peterson. 2022. “Panarchy: Ripples of a Boundary Concept.” Ecology and Society 27 (3): 21. doi:10.5751/ES-13374-270321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, J. 2022. “Social Justice and Cemetery Systems.” Death Studies 46 (4): 861–874. doi:10.1080/07481187.2020.1776791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, G. 2010. “The Dismal Trade as Culture Industry.” Poetics 38 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoch-Spana, M. 2000. “Implications of Pandemic Influenza for Bioterrorism Response.” Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 31 (6): 1409–1413. doi:10.1086/317493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C., ed. 2018. Researching Society and Culture. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Statista 2022. “Market Size of Funeral Homes in the United States From 2015 to 2022.” Statista.‌ https://www.statista.com/statistics/883227/revenue-of-funeral-homes-in-the-us
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. 2002. The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau (USCB) 2019. By 2030, All Baby Boomers Will Be Age 65 or Older. Washington, DC: USCB. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/12/by-2030-all-baby-boomers-will-be-age-65-or-older.html
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2005. “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Other Solid Waste Incineration Units.” Federal Register 70 (241): 74870–74924. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2005-12-16/pdf/05-23716.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2023. Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator.
   Google Scholar
• United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2021. “Landmarks and Government Buildings: Cemeteries” (Dataset). United States Geological Survey/Esri U.S. Federal Datasets. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/fedmaps::landmarks-and-government-buildings/about?layer=0
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. 2012. “How Theories of Practice Can Inform Transition to a Decarbonized Transport System.” Journal of Transport Geography 24: 488–496. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, R. 2000. Facing the “King of Terrors:” Death and Society in an American Community, 1750-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. Infection Prevention and Control for the Safe Management of a Dead Body in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/infection-prevention-and-control-for-the-safe-management-of-a-dead-body-in-the-context-of-covid-19-interim-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., S. Murphy, K. Kochanek, and E. Arias. 2022. Mortality in the United States, 2021: NCHS Data Brief No. 456. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db456.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Żychowski, J. 2012. “Impact of Cemeteries on Groundwater Chemistry: A Review.” Catena 93: 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar