Unlocking rewards for sustainability: a framework for valuing pro-environmental behaviors in Polish cities

References

• Ainsworth, B., W. Haskell, S. Herrmann, N. Meckes, D. Bassett, C. Tudor-Locke, J. Greer, J. Vezina, M. Whitt-Glover, and A. Leon. 2011. “2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: A Second Update of Codes and MET Values.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 43 (8): 1575–1581. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, H., M. Ljunggren Söderman, and A. Nordelöf. 2019. “Resource and Environmental Impacts of Using Second-Hand Laptop Computers: A Case Study of Commercial Reuse.” Waste Management 88: 268–279. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balemans, A., H. Houdijk, G. Koelewijn, M. Piek, F. Tubbing, A. Visser-Meily, and O. Verschuren. 2019. “A Comparison of the Physiology of Sedentary Behavior and Light Physical Activity in Adults With and Without a Physical Disability.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 16 (10): 894–901. doi:10.1123/jpah.2019-0059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., O. Rakotonarivo, A. Bhargava, A. Duthie, W. Zhang, R. Sargent, A. Lewis, and A. Kipchumba. 2023. “Financial Incentives Often Fail to Reconcile Agricultural Productivity and Pro-Conservation Behavior.” Communications Earth & Environment 4 (1): 27. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, T., and H. Farzaneh. 2022. “Quantifying the Multiple Environmental, Health, and Economic Benefits From the Electrification of the Delhi Public Transport Bus Fleet, Estimating a District-Wise Near Roadway Avoided PM2.5 Exposure.” Journal of Environmental Management 321: 116027. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bina, O., A. Inch, and L. Pereira. 2020. “Beyond Techno-Utopia and Its Discontents: On the Role of Utopianism and Speculative Fiction in Shaping Alternatives to the Smart City Imaginary.” Futures 115: 102475. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej (BIP) 2022. Waste Management Plan for the Pomeranian Voivodeship 2022. Gdańsk: BIP of the Marshal’s Office of the Pomeranian Voivodeship. https://bip.pomorskie.eu/m,432,plan-gospodarki-odpadami-dla-wojewodztwa-pomorskiego-2022-pgowp-2022.html
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, P., K. Romanok, K. Smalling, J. Masoner, D. Kolpin, and S. Gordon. 2023. “Predicted Aquatic Exposure Effects From a National Urban Stormwater Study.” Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 9 (12): 3191–3199. doi:10.1039/D2EW00933A.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, J., M. LaBarge, L. White, and M. Mitchell. 2020. “Examining Responsiveness to an Incentive-Based Mobile Health App: Longitudinal Observational Study.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (8): e16797. doi:10.2196/16797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caleman, S., G. Monteiro, and G. Hendrikse. 2017. “Sustainable Food Chains: The Role of Collective Action and Government Incentives.” Organizações & Sociedade 24 (83): 618–632. doi:10.1590/1984-9240834.
   Google Scholar
• Casaló, L., J.-J. Escario, and C. Rodriguez-Sanchez. 2019. “Analyzing Differences Between Different Types of Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Do Attitude Intensity and Type of Knowledge Matter?” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 149: 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, F., R. Fontoura, A. da Conceição Junior, A. Cruz, N. Nimer, P. Morais, B. Omena, E. dos Santos, A. Silvestrini, and R. Andrade. 2020. “Reduction of Management Costs and Avoidance of Air Release of Carcinogens Through a Waste Segregation Program in a Brazilian Medical Institution.” Frontiers in Public Health 8: 583962. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.583962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Gdańsk. 2017. Implementation of the Recommendations of the First Citizens’ Panel. Gdańsk: Oficjalny Portal Miasta. https://www.gdansk.pl/panel-obywatelski/wdrazanie-rekomendacji-pierwszego-panelu-obywatelskiego,a,81961
   Google Scholar
• Coulibaly, S., C. Aubry, F. Provent, S. Rousset-Rouvière, and S. Joimel. 2023. “The Role of Green Roofs as Urban Habitats for Biodiversity Modulated by Their Design: A Review.” Environmental Research Letters 18 (7): 073003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J., T. English, and T. Braver. 2022. “Cognitive Effort-Based Decision-Making Across Experimental and Daily Life Indices in Younger and Older Adults.” The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 78 (1): 40–50. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbac167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czechowski, P., K. Piksa, P. Da Browiecki, A. Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek, E. Czermański, T. Owczarek, A. Badyda, and G. Cirella. 2022. “Financing Costs and Health Effects of Air Pollution in the Tri-City Agglomeration.” Frontiers in Public Health 10: 831312. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.831312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jesus, A., P. Antunes, R. Santos, and S. Mendonça. 2019. “Eco-Innovation Pathways to a Circular Economy: Envisioning Priorities Through a Delphi Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production 228: 1494–1513. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Molli, F., J. Mengis, and A. van Marrewijk. 2020. “The Aestheticization of Hybrid Space: The Atmosphere of the Locarno Film Festival.” Organization Studies 41 (11): 1491–1512. doi:10.1177/0170840619867348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deszczka-Tarnowska, M., and M. Wąsowicz. 2016. “The Principle of Subsidiarity in Rational Waste Management for Example of Cities with District Rights.” Journal of Modern Science 30 (3): 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Deyaert, J., T. Harms, D. Weenas, J. Gershuny, and I. Glorieux. 2017. “Attaching Metabolic Expenditures to Standard Occupational Classification Systems: Perspectives from Time-Use Research.” BMC Public Health 17 (1): 620. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4546-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duda, E., H. Anacka, J. Kowal, and H. Obracht-Prondzyńska. 2022. “Participatory Co-Design Approach for Greencoin Educational Tool Shaping Urban Green Behaviors.” International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 98–100. doi:10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, K., and S. Ng. 2023. “The Potential of Religion for Promoting Sustainability: The Role of Stewardship.” Topics in Cognitive Science 15 (3): 480–499. doi:10.1111/tops.12641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freni, G., and L. Liuzzo. 2019. “Effectiveness of Rainwater Harvesting Systems for Flood Reduction in Residential Urban Areas.” Water 11 (7): 1389. doi:10.3390/w11071389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, C., and D. Brugge. 2020. “Environmental Justice: Disproportionate Impacts of Transportation on Vulnerable Communities.” In Traffic-Related Air Pollution, edited by H. Khreis, M. Nieuwenhuijsen, J. Zietsman, and T. Ramani, 495–510. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818122-5.00020-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazalli, A., C. Brack, X. Bai, and I. Said. 2019. “Physical and Non-Physical Benefits of Vertical Greenery Systems: A Review.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (4): 53–78. doi:10.1080/10630732.2019.1637694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghesla, C., M. Grieder, J. Schmitz, and M. Stadelmann. 2020. “Pro-Environmental Incentives and Loss Aversion: A Field Experiment on Electricity Saving Behavior.” Energy Policy 137: 111131. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S., J. Handley, A. Ennos, and S. Pauleit. 2007. “Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure.” Built Environment 33 (1): 115–133. doi:10.2148/benv.33.1.115.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, I. 2017. “The Dynamic Effect of Incentives on Postreward Task Engagement.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 146 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1037/xge0000206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang-Wen, Z., M. Murshed, A. Siddik, M. Alam, D. Balsalobre-Lorente, and H. Mahmood. 2023. “Achieving the Objectives of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda: Causalities Between Economic Growth, Environmental Sustainability, Financial Development, and Renewable Energy Consumption.” Sustainable Development 31 (2): 680–697. doi:10.1002/sd.2411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadavi, S. 2017. “Direct and Indirect Effects of the Physical Aspects of the Environment on Mental Well-Being.” Environment and Behavior 49 (10): 1071–1104. doi:10.1177/0013916516679876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H., J. Fu, X. Li, and R. Guo. 2019. “The Interplay Between Endorser Social Status and Normative Appeals on the Endorsement Effectiveness of Pro-Environmental Behaviors.” PLOS One 14 (1): e0210699. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckert, M., and M. Kondo. 2018. “Can ‘Cleaned and Greened’ Lots Take on the Role of Public Greenspace?” Journal of Planning Education and Research 38 (2): 211–221. doi:10.1177/0739456X16688766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetler, M., W. Allen, and C. Meurk. 2011. “Conserving Urban Biodiversity? Creating Green Infrastructure is Only the First Step.” Landscape and Urban Planning 100 (4): 369–371. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, A., J. Monstadt, P. Driessen, and A. Rudolph-Cleff. 2021. “Toward Resilient Rotterdam? Key Conditions for a Networked Approach to Managing Urban Infrastructure Risks.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 29 (1): 12–22. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetté, M., K. Sidney, and G. Blümchen. 1990. “Metabolic Equivalents (METS) in Exercise Testing, Exercise Prescription, and Evaluation of Functional Capacity.” Clinical Cardiology 13 (8): 555–565. doi:10.1002/clc.4960130809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautish, P., and R. Sharma. 2020. “Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior and Environmentally Conscious Consumer Behavior: An Empirical Investigation from Emerging Market.” Business Strategy & Development 3 (1): 112–127. doi:10.1002/bsd2.82.
   Google Scholar
• Keall, M., C. Shaw, R. Chapman, and P. Howden-Chapman. 2018. “Reductions in Carbon Dioxide Emissions from an Intervention to Promote Cycling and Walking: A Case Study from New Zealand.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 65: 687–696. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug, K., and T. Niemand. 2021. “The Lifestyle of Sustainability: Testing a Behavioral Measure of Precycling.” Journal of Cleaner Production 297: 126699. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut, N., C. Yaman, Y. Küçükağa, M. Jaunich, and İ. Demir. 2018. “Greenhouse Gas Contribution of Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A Case Study in the City of Istanbul, Turkey.” Waste Management & Research 36 (2): 131–139. doi:10.1177/0734242x17744656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., S. Handy, and A. Forsyth. 2009. “Explaining Changes in Walking and Bicycling Behavior: Challenges for Transportation Research.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36 (4): 725–740. doi:10.1068/b34023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, F., and S. Dewitte. 2019. “Measuring Pro-Environmental Behavior: Review and Recommendations.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 63: 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langemeyer, J., D. Wedgwood, T. McPhearson, F. Baró, A. Madsen, and D. Barton. 2020. “Creating Urban Green Infrastructure Where It Is Needed – A Spatial Ecosystem Service-Based Decision Analysis of Green Roofs in Barcelona.” Science of the Total Environment 707: 135487. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legault, L. 2023. “The ‘What’ and the ‘Why’ of Pro-Environmental Deeds: How Values and Self-Determined Motivation Interact to Predict Environmentally Protective Behavior.” In The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory, edited by R. Ryan, 1130–1148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., X. Guo, V. Krustev, J. Miao, H. Lu, J. Qiu, and S. Che. 2024. “Quantitative Study on the Relationships Between Smog and Online Reviews from the Perspective of Risk Perception.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 105: 107437. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, F., E. Molin, H. Timmermans, and B. van Wee. 2019. “Consumer Preferences for Business Models in Electric Vehicle Adoption.” Transport Policy 73: 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Dy, A. 2022. “Levelling the Playing Field? Toward a Critical-Social Perspective on Digital Entrepreneurship.” Futures 135: 102438. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, C., J. Liu, H. Wang, W. Shao, L. Xia, C. Xiang, and J. Zhou. 2018. “Modelling the Ability of Source Control Measures to Reduce Inundation Risk in a Community-Scale Urban Drainage System.” Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences 379: 223–229. doi:10.5194/piahs-379-223-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, J., A. Gallego-Schmid, and A. Azapagic. 2019. “A Methodological Framework for the Implementation of Circular Economy Thinking in Higher Education Institutions: Toward Sustainable Campus Management.” Journal of Cleaner Production 226: 831–844. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, J., P. Barnard, W. Rees, D. Smith, M. Maroni, C. Rhodes, J. Dederer, et al. 2023. “World Scientists’ Warning: The Behavioural Crisis Driving Ecological Overshoot.” Science Progress 106 (3): 368504231201372. doi:10.1177/00368504231201372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. 2016. “Heterogeneity in the Preferences and Pro-Environmental Behavior of College Students: The Effects of Years on Campus, Demographics, and External Factors.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 3451–3463. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L., R. Rice, A. Gustafson, and M. Goldberg. 2022. “Relationships Among Environmental Attitudes, Environmental Efficacy, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors Across and Within 11 Countries.” Environment and Behavior 54 (7–8): 1063–1096. doi:10.1177/001391652211310020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milovanoff, A., L. Minet, L. Cheah, I. Posen, H. MacLean, and R. Balasubramanian. 2021. “Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Pathways for Urban Passenger Land Transport Under Ambitious Climate Targets.” Environmental Science & Technology 55 (12): 8236–8246. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizdrak, A., L. Cobiac, C. Cleghorn, A. Woodward, and T. Blakely. 2020. “Fuelling Walking and Cycling: Human Powered Locomotion is Associated with Non-Negligible Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Scientific Reports 10 (1): 9196. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66170-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravčíková, D., and T. Fürjészová. 2018. “Ecovillage as an Alternative Way of Rural Life: Evidence From Hungary and Slovakia.” European Countryside 10 (4): 693–710. doi:10.2478/euco-2018-0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulalic, I., and J. Rouwendal. 2020. “Does Improving Public Transport Decrease Car Ownership? Evidence from a Residential Sorting Model for the Copenhagen Metropolitan Area.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 83: 103543. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narimissa, O., A. Kangarani-Farahani, and S. Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi. 2020. “Evaluation of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Performance: Indicators.” Sustainable Development 28 (1): 118–131. doi:10.1002/sd.1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen-Van, P., A. Stenger, and T. Tiet. 2021. “Social Incentive Factors in Interventions Promoting Sustainable Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis.” PLOS One 16 (12): e0260932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidzgorska-Lencewicz, J., and M. Czarnecka. 2015. “Winter Weather Conditions vs. Air Quality in Tricity, Poland.” Theoretical and Applied Climatology 119 (3–4): 611–627. doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1129-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obracht-Prondzyńska, H., E. Duda, H. Anacka, and J. Kowal. 2022. “Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (18): 11183. doi:10.3390/ijerph191811183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odu, G. 2019. “Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique.” Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 23 (8): 1449. doi:10.4314/jasem.v23i8.7.
   Google Scholar
• Oppong-Tawiah, D., J. Webster, S. Staples, A.-F. Cameron, A. Ortiz de Guinea, and T. Hung. 2020. “Developing a Gamified Mobile Application to Encourage Sustainable Energy Use in the Office.” Journal of Business Research 106: 388–405. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneru, C., and A. Tarigan. 2023. “Reviewing the Impacts of Smart Energy Applications on Energy Behaviours in Norwegian Households.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 183: 113511. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowar-Sulej, K., and I. Kołodziej. 2022. “Organizational Practices Promoting Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors in a Visegrad Group Country: How Much Does Company Ownership Matter?” PLOS One 17 (2): e0261547. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati, G., C. Albanesi, and L. Pietrantoni. 2017. “The Interplay Among Environmental Attitudes, Pro-Environmental Behavior, Social Identity, and Pro-Environmental Institutional Climate: A Longitudinal Study.” Environmental Education Research 23 (2): 176–191. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1118752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puska, P., E. Vartiainen, A. Nissinen, T. Laatikainen, and P. Jousilahti. 2016. “Background, Principles, Implementation, and General Experiences of the North Karelia Project.” Global Heart 11 (2): 173–178. doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2016.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radziszewski, K., H. Anacka, H. Obracht-Prondzyńska, D. Tomczak, K. Wereszko, and P. Weichbroth. 2021. “Greencoin: Prototype of a Mobile Application Facilitating and Evidencing Pro-Environmental Behavior of Citizens.” Procedia Computer Science 192: 2668–2677. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.037.
   Google Scholar
• Rakotonarivo, S., A. Bell, K. Abernethy, J. Minderman, A. Duthie, S. Redpath, A. Keane, et al. 2021. “The Role of Incentive-Based Instruments and Social Equity in Conservation Conflict Interventions.” Ecology and Society 26 (2): 8. doi:10.5751/ES-12306-260208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, S., J. Montambault, Y. Masuda, E. Keenan, W. Butler, J. Fisher, S. Asah, and A. Gneezy. 2016. “Advancing Conservation by Understanding and Influencing Human Behavior.” Conservation Letters 10 (2): 248–256. doi:10.1111/conl.12252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso, F., B. Pioppi, and A. L. Pisello. 2022. “Pocket Parks for Human-Centered Urban Climate Change Resilience: Microclimate Field Tests and Multi-Domain Comfort Analysis through Portable Sensing Techniques and Citizens’ Science.” Energy and Buildings 260: 111918.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rześny-Cieplińska, J., A. Szmelter-Jarosz, and S. Moslem. 2021. “Priority-Based Stakeholders Analysis in the View of Sustainable City Logistics: Evidence for Tricity, Poland.” Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102751. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. 2005. “Analytic Hierarchy Process.” In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, edited by P. Armitage and T. Colton. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002.
   Google Scholar
• Sangha, K., R. Ahammad, J. Russell-Smith, and R. Costanza. 2024. “Payments for Ecosystem Services Opportunities for Emerging Nature-Based Solutions: Integrating Indigenous Perspectives from Australia.” Ecosystem Services 66: 101600. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y.-S., and S.-C. Lung. 2017. “Mediation Pathways and Effects of Green Structures on Respiratory Mortality Via Reducing Air Pollution.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 42854. doi:10.1038/srep42854.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva, C., M. Ruano, and L. Sanchez-Alcalde. 2020. “Indirect Effects of COVID-19 on the Environment.” Science of the Total Environment 728: 138813. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., K. Dupré, A. McEvoy, and S. Kenny. 2021. “Community Perceptions and Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Social Norms and Climate Change Risk.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 53 (2): 200–210. doi:10.1037/cbs0000229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, S., S. Wang, M. Shi, S. Hu, and D. Xu. 2022. “Urban Blue-Green Space Landscape Ecological Health Assessment Based on the Integration of Pattern, Process, Function and Sustainability.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 7707. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11960-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srisathan, W., and P. Naruetharadhol. 2022. “A COVID-19 Disruption: The Great Acceleration of Digitally Planned and Transformed Behaviors in Thailand.” Technology in Society 68: 101912. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., J. Bolderdijk, K. Keizer, and G. Perlaviciute. 2014. “An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: The Role of Values, Situational Factors and Goals.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 38: 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinnett, B., and F. Gibson. 2016. “Sustainable Facility Development: Perceived Benefits and Challenges.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 17 (5): 601–612. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-09-2014-0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., C. Maller, K. Soanes, C. Ramalho, A. Aiyer, K. Parris, and C. Threlfall. 2021. “Enablers and Challenges When Engaging Local Communities for Urban Biodiversity Conservation in Australian Cities.” Sustainability Science 17 (3): 779–792. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01012-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tee, S., K. Win, W. Teo, L.-D. Koh, S. Liu, C. Teng, and M.-Y. Han. 2017. “Recent Progress in Energy-Driven Water Splitting.” Advanced Science 4 (5): 1600337. doi:10.1002/advs.201600337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo-Vargas, M., P. Perez-Contreras, D. Chandia-Poblete, and N. Aguilar-Farias. 2020. “Compliance of the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines in 9- to 11-Year-Old Children From a Low-Income Town in Chile.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 17 (10): 1034–1041. doi:10.1123/jpah.2019-0672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virgens, N. das., S. Silva, and E. Laranjeira. 2022. “Applications of the Circular Economy to the Second-Hand Textile and Clothing Market: The Case of Humana in Portugal.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 16 (2): 214–223. doi:10.1080/17543266.2022.2150447.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and Q. Shi. 2022. “The Impact of Municipal Solid Waste Sorting Policy on Air Pollution: Evidence from Shanghai, China.” PLOS One 17 (11): e0277035. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsaw Climate Panel. 2022. “Warszawski Panel Klimatyczny (Warsaw Climate Panel).” Warszawa, 19115. https://warszawa19115.pl/-/warszawski-panel-klimatyczny
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Z., and Y. Liu. 2021. “Aiding Pro-Environmental Behavior Measurement by Internet of Things.” Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 2: 100055. doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100055.
   Google Scholar
• Zawieska, J., H. Obracht-Prondzyńska, E. Duda, D. Uryga, and M. Romanowska. 2022. “In Search of the Innovative Digital Solutions Enhancing Social Pro-Environmental Engagement.” Energies 15 (14): 5191. doi:10.3390/en15145191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbigniew, K., and A. Kassenberg. 2019. “Environmental Transformation in CEE Countries.” In Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Stability and Change After 1990, edited by G. Gorzelak. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., W. Xie, and W. Gao. 2022. “Have Environmental Regulations Promoted Green Technological Innovation in Cities? Evidence from China’s Green Patents.” PLOS One 17 (12): e0278902. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., R. Allen, and E. Thomson. 2021. “An Implicit Air Quality Bias Due to the State of Pristine Aerosol.” Earth’s Future 9 (9): e2021. doi:10.1029/2021EF001979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., Y. Lin, and J. Mou. 2023. “Unpacking the Effect of Gamified Virtual CSR Co-Created on Users’ Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Holistic View of Gamification Affordance.” Technology in Society 73: 102228. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., D. Zhou, Y. Wang, D. Ma, and X. Meng. 2021. “Assessment of Urban Surface and Canopy Cooling Strategies in High-Rise Residential Communities.” Journal of Cleaner Production 288: 125599. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar