Computational control for strongly coupled structure, electric, and fluid systems

References

• A. Mini, C. Lerch, R. Wuchner and K. U. Bletzinger, “Computational closed-loop control of fluid-structure interaction (fsci) for lightweight structures,” Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201610005.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Huimeng, D. Wagg and T. Wang, “Velocity plus displacement equivalent force control for real-time substructure testing,” Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87–102, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-018-0427-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kaneko, G. Hong, N. Mitsume, T. Yamada and S. Yoshimura, “Partitioned-coupling fsi analysis with active control,” Comput. Mech., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 549–558, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-017-1422-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ishihara, “Computational approach for the fluid-structure interaction design of insect-inspired micro flapping wings,” Fluids, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/fluids7010026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ishihara, et al., “Polymer micromachined transmission for insect-inspired flapping wing nano air vehicles,” Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular System, NEMS 2020, 2020, pp. 176–179.
   Google Scholar
• Rashmikant, D. Ishihara, R. Suetsugu, S. Murakami and P. C. Ramegowda, “Improved design of polymer micromachined transmission for flapping wing nano air vehicle,” Proceedings of the 16th Annual IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, NEMS 2021, 2021, pp. 1320–1325.
   Google Scholar
• Rashmikant, D. Ishihara, R. Suetsugu, S. Murakami and P. C. Ramegowda, “One-wing polymer micromachined transmission for insect-inspired flapping wing nano air vehicles,” Eng. Res. Express, vol. 3, pp. 1320–1325, 2021. DOI: 10.1088/2631-8695/ac2bf0.
   Google Scholar
• P. C. Ramegowda, “Coupled multiphysics analysis method for thin flexible piezoelectric bimorph in fluid,” PhD dissertation, Kyushu Institute of Technology Japan, March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• J. Curie and P. Curie, “Development via compression of electric polarization in hemihedral crystals with inclined faces,” bulmi, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 90–93, 1880. DOI: 10.3406/bulmi.1880.1564.
   Google Scholar
• H. S. Tzou, “Development of a light-weight robot end-effector using polymeric piezoelectric bimorph,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 3, pp. 1704–1709, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• T. Shibata, K. Unno, E. Makino and S. Shimada, “Fabrication and characterization of diamond afm probe integrated with pzt thin film sensor and actuator,” Sensors Actuators A: Phys., vol. 114, no. 2–3, pp. 398–405, 2004. pp.:DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2003.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, S. Chen and W. Han, “The static shape control for intelligent structures,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 303–314, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-874X(97)00086-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. Lim, V. V. Varadan and V. K. Varadan, “Closed loop finite element modeling of active structural damping in the frequency domain,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 1997. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/6/2/005.
   Google Scholar
• K. M. Liew, X. Q. He and S. Kitipornchai, “Finite element method for the feedback control of fgm shells in the frequency domain via piezoelectric sensors and actuators,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 37, pp. 161–168, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• V. Balamurugan and S. Narayanan, “Shell finite element for smart piezoelectric composite plate/shell structures and its application to the study of vibration control,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 713–738, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00070-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Chirco and S. Manservisi, “On the optimal control of stationary fluid–structure interaction systems,” Fluids, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 144, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/fluids5030144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Lasiecka and Y. Lu, “Interface feedback control stabilization of a nonlinear fluid–structure interaction,” Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1449–1460, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2011.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Y. Zhao, Y. Ma, H. Y. Zhang, H. G. Pan and Y. Cai, “Free vibration analysis of a rotating graphene nanoplatelet reinforced pre-twist blade-disk assembly with a setting angle,” APPl. Math. Model., vol. 93, pp. 578–596, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Li, et al., “Nonlinear vibrations of fiber-reinforced composite cylindrical shells with bolt loosening boundary conditions,” J. Sound Vibrat., vol. 496, pp. 115935, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.115935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Qin, Z. Yang, J. Zu and F. Chu, “Free vibration analysis of rotating cylindrical shells coupled with moderately thick annular plates,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 142–143, pp. 127–139, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. M. Zhang, L. Cheng and Y. Zhou, “Closed-loop controlled vortex shedding and vibration of a flexibly supported square cylinder under different schemes,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1439–1448, 2004. DOI: 10.1063/1.1687413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mehmood, A. Abdelkefi, I. Akhtar, A. H. Nayfeh, A. Nuhait and M. R. Hajj, “Linear and nonlinear active feedback controls for vortex-induced vibrations of circular cylinders,” J. Vib. Control, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1137–1147, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1077546312469425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. M. Newmark, “A method of computation for structural dynamics,” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 67–94, 1959. DOI: 10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ishihara and T. Horie, “A projection method for the monolithic interaction system of an incompressible fluid and a structure using a new algebraic splitting,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 421–440, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Hubner, E. Walhorn and D. Dinkler, “A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction using space–time finite elements,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 193, no. 23–26, pp. 2087–2104, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. Felippa, K. C. Park and C. Farhat, “Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical system,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 190, no. 24–25, pp. 3247–3270, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00391-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Minami and S. Yoshimura, “Performance evaluation of nonlinear algorithms with line search for partitioned coupling technique for fluid-structure interactions,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 64, no. 10–12, pp. 1129–1147, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/fld.2274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Yamada and S. Yoshimura, “Line search partitioned approach for fluid–structure interaction analysis of flapping wing,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 24, pp. 51–60, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Neumann, S. R. Tiyyagura and W. A. Wall, “Robustness and efficiency aspects for computational fluid structure interaction,” Computational Sci. High Performance Comput. II, vol. 91, pp. 99–114, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• J. Degroote, K. J. Bathe and J. Vierendeels, “Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction,” Comput. Struct., vol. 87, no. 11–12, pp. 793–801, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Baz and J. Ro, “Active control of flow-induced vibrations of a flexible cylinder using direct velocity feedback,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 33–35, 1991. DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90521-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Winterstein, C. Lerch, K. W. Bletzinger and R. Wuchner, “Partitioned simulation strategies for fluid–structure–control interaction problems by gauss–seidel formulations,” Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s40323-018-0123-6.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Pines and F. Bohorquez, “Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development,” J. Aircraft, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 290–305, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/1.4922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ishihara, N. Ohira, M. Takagi and T. Horie, 2017. “Fluid-structure interaction design of insect-like micro flapping wing,” Proceeding of the VII International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering (COUPLED PROBLEMS 2017), pp. 870–875.
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Joshi, “Robustness properties of collocated controllers for flexible spacecraft,” J. Guid. Control Dynam., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 1986. DOI: 10.2514/3.20071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Allik and T. J. R. Hughes, “Finite element method for piezoelectric vibration,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 1970. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620020202.
   Google Scholar
• P. C. Ramegowda, D. Ishihara, T. Niho and T. Horie, “Performance evaluation of numerical finite element coupled algorithms for structure-electric interaction analysis of mems piezoelectric actuator,” Int. J. Comput. Methods, vol. 16, no. 07, pp. 1850106, 2019. DOI: 10.1142/S0219876218501062.
   Google Scholar
• P. C. Ramegowda, D. Ishihara, T. Niho and T. Horie, “A novel coupling scheme for the electric field–structure interaction using a transformation method between solid and shell elements in a thin piezoelectric bimorph actuator and sensor analysis,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 159, pp. 33–49, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Niho, T. Horie, J. Uefhji and D. Ishihara, “Stability analysis and evaluation of staggered coupled analysis methods for electromagnetic and structural coupled finite element analysis,” Comput. Struct., vol. 178, pp. 129–142, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Nomura and T. J. R. Hughes, “An arbitrary lagrangian–eulerian finite element formulation for interaction of fluid and a rigid body,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 115–138, 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90085-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, “Streamline upwind/petrov–galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible navier–stokes equation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 32, no. 1–3, pp. 199–259, 1982. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90071-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. E. Tezduyar, “Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations,” Adv. APPl. Mech., vol. 28, pp. 1–44, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Noguchi and T. Hisada, “Sensitivity analysis in post-buckling problems of shell structures,” Comput. Struct., vol. 47, no. 4–5, pp. 699–710, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90352-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ishihara and S. Yoshimura, “A monolithic approach for interaction of incompressible viscous fluid and an elastic body based on fluid pressure poisson equation,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 167–203, 2005. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. P. Mok and W. A. Wall, 2001, “Partitioned analysis schemes for the transient interaction of incompressible flows and nonlinear flexible structures,” Trends in Computational Structural Mechanics. CIMNE: Barcelona, pp. 689–698.
   Google Scholar