Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 16, 2020 - Issue 1
2,485
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Consideration of Light Level in Specifying Light Source Color Rendition

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 55-65 | Received 23 Dec 2017, Accepted 03 Mar 2018, Published online: 11 May 2018

References

  • Airola A. 1975. Changing the colour rendering properties of the light of incandescent lamps in a preferred direction by means of a special absorption method. Saehikoe. 47:283–284.
  • Bhattacharjee A., Pal S. 2017. Review on Sustainable Lighting Design in Art Galleries to Balance Between Visibility and Conservation of Light Sensitive Art Exhibits. In: Chakrabarti A., Chakrabarti D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore.
  • Chen H, Chou C, Luo H, Luo M. 2016. Museum lighting environment: designing a perception zone map and emotional response models. Lighting Res Technol. 48(5):589–607. doi:10.1177/1477153515596456.
  • [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1995. Method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties of light sources. Vol. 13.2. 20 pp. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.
  • [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2004. Control of damage to museum objects by optical radiation. Vol. 157. 35 pp. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.
  • David A, Fini PT, Houser KW, Ohno Y, Royer MP, Smet KAG, Wei M, Whitehead L. 2015. Development of the IES method for evaluating the color rendition of light sources. Opt Express. 23(12):15888–15906. doi:10.1364/OE.23.015888.
  • DiLaura DL, Houser KW, Mistrick RG, Steffy GR. 2011. The lighting handbook reference and application. 10th ed. 1328 pp. New York (NY): Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
  • European Committee for Standarization. 2014. Conservation of cultural heritage. Guidelines and procedures for choosing appropriate lighting for indoor exhibitions. PD CEN/TS 16163:2014. London (UK): British Standards Institution.
  • Houser KW, Wei M, David A, Krames MR, Shen XS. 2013. Review of measures for light-source color rendition and considerations for a two-measure system for characterizing color rendition. Opt Express. 21(8):10393–10411. doi:10.1364/OE.21.010393.
  • Huang Z, Liu Q, Westland S, Pointer M, Luo MR, Xiao K. 2017. Light dominates colour preference when correlated colour temperature differs. Lighting Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153517713542.
  • Hunt RW. 1952. Light and dark adaptation and the perception of color. J Opt Soc Am. 42(3):190–199. doi:10.1364/JOSA.42.000190.
  • Islam M, Dangol R, Hyvärinen M, Bhusal P, Puolakka M, Halonen L. 2013. User preferences for LED lighting in terms of light spectrum. Lighting Res Technol. 45(6):641–665. doi:10.1177/1477153513475913.
  • James WG. 1984. Incandescent lamps with neodymium oxide vitreous coatings. Google Patents. Patent number US4441046A.
  • Jost-Boissard S, Avouac P, Fontoynont M. 2015. Assessing the colour quality of LED sources: naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference. Lighting Res Technol. 47(7):769–794. doi:10.1177/1477153514555882.
  • Jost-Boissard S, Fontoynont M, Blanc-Gonnet J. 2009. Perceived lighting quality of LED sources for the presentation of fruit and vegetables. J Mod Opt. 56(13):1420–1432. doi:10.1080/09500340903056550.
  • Judd DB. 1967. A flattery index for artificial illuminants. Illum Eng. 62(10):593–598.
  • Lin Y, He J, Tsukitani A, Noguchi H. 2014. Colour quality evaluation of natural objects based on the feeling of contrast index. Lighting Res Technol. 48(3):323–339. doi:10.1177/1477153514564097.
  • Lin Y, Wei M, Smet KAG, Tsukitani A, Bodrogi P, Khanh TQ. 2015. Colour preference varies with lighting application. Lighting Res Technol. 49(3):316–328. doi:10.1177/1477153515611458.
  • Liu A, Tuzikas A, Zukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Vitta P, Shur M. 2013. Cultural preferences to color quality of illumination of different artwork objects revealed by a color rendition engine. IEEE Photonics J. 5(4):6801010–6801010. doi:10.1109/JPHOT.2013.2276742.
  • Loe DL, Rowlands E, Watson N. 1982. Preferred lighting conditions for the display of oil and watercolour paintings. Lighting Res Technol. 14(4):173–192. doi:10.1177/096032718201400401.
  • Ohno Y, Fein M, Miller C. 2015. Vision Experiment on chroma saturation for color quality preference. Proceedings of CIE 28th Session; 2015 Jun 28–Jul 4; Manchester, UK.
  • Ou L-C. 2016. A comparison of color preference between indoor and outdoor environments. Proceedings of CIE 2016 Lighting Quality & Energy Efficiency; 2016 Mar 3–5; Melbourne, Australia.
  • Rea MS, Freyssinier JP. 2010. Color rendering: beyond pride and prejudice. Color Res Appl. 35(6):401–409. doi:10.1002/col.v35:6.
  • Royer M, Wilkerson A, Wei M. 2017. Human perceptions of colour rendition at different chromaticities. Lighting Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153517725974.
  • Royer MP, Wilkerson AM, Wei M, Houser KW, Davis RG. 2017. Human perceptions of color rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Lighting Res Technol. 49(8):966–991. doi:10.1177/1477153516663615.
  • Sanders CL. 1959. Color preferences for natural objects. Illum Eng. 54(7):452–456.
  • Scuello M, Abramov I, Gordon J, Weintraub S. 2004. Museum lighting: why are some illuminants preferred? J Opt Soc Am A. 21(2):306–311. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.21.000306.
  • Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2011a. Colour appearance rating of familiar real objects. Color Res Appl. 36(3):192–200. doi:10.1002/col.v36.3.
  • Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2011b. Correlation between color quality metric predictions and visual appreciation of light sources. Opt Express. 19(9):8151–8166. doi:10.1364/OE.19.008151.
  • Szabo F, Keri R, Schanda J, Csuti P, Mihalyko-Orban E. 2014. A study of preferred colour rendering of light sources: home lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 48(2):103–125. doi:10.1177/1477153514555536.
  • Teunissen C, van der Heijden F, Poort S, de Beer E. 2016. Characterising user preference for white LED light sources with CIE colour rendering index combined with a relative gamut area index. Lighting Res Technol. 49(4):461–480. doi:10.1177/1477153515624484.
  • Thurstone LL. 1994. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 101(2):266–270. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.266.
  • Veitch JA, Whitehead LA, Mossman M, Pilditch TD. 2014. Chromaticity-matched but spectrally different light source effects on simple and complex color judgments. Color Res Appl. 39(3):263–274. doi:10.1002/col.v39.3.
  • Wei M, Houser KW. 2016. What is the cause of apparent preference for sources with chromaticity below the blackbody locus? LEUKOS. 12(1–2):95–99. doi:10.1080/15502724.2015.1029131.
  • Wei M, Houser KW. 2017. Systematic changes in gamut size affect color preference. LEUKOS. 13(1):23–32. doi:10.1080/15502724.2016.1192402.
  • Wei M, Houser KW, Allen GR, Beers WW. 2014. Color preference under LEDs with diminished yellow emission. LEUKOS. 10(3):119–131. doi:10.1080/15502724.2013.865212.
  • Wei M, Houser K, David A, Krames M. 2014. Perceptual responses to LED illumination with colour rendering indices of 85 and 97. Lighting Res Technol. 47(7):810–827. doi:10.1177/1477153514548089.
  • Wei M, Houser KW, David A, Krames MR. 2017. Color gamut size and shape influence colour preference. Lighting Res Technol. 49(8):992–1014. doi:10.1177/1477153516651472.