Interpreting Art with Light: Museum Lighting between Objectivity and Hyperrealism

References

• Arnheim R. 1960. Art and visual perception - a psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barreneche RA. 2005. New Museums. London (UK): Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Binet H, Brandi U, Bunschoten R, Flagge I, Geissmar-Brandi C, Cachola Schmal P. 2002. The secret of the shadow. Light and shadow in architecture. Tübingen (Germany): Ernst Wasmuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bitgood S. 2009. Museum Fatigue: A critical review. Visitor Studies. 12:93–111. doi:10.15502724.2014/10645570903203406
   Google Scholar
• Bogner D, O’Connor FV, Quaintance D, Sharp J, Sonzogni V. 2005. Davidson S, Rylands P. (editor). Peggy Guggenheim & Frederick Kiesler: the story of art of this century. New York (NY): Guggenheim Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Bredekamp H, Stafford BM. 2006. One step beyond. Hyperrealism. London (UK): Tate etc; p. 76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Brookes S. 2000. Daylighting museum galleries: a review of performance criteria. Light Res Technol. 32:161–168. doi:10.1177/096032710003200311
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2004. CIE 157:2004: control of damage to museum objects by optical radiation. Vienna (Austria): Commission International de l’Éclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Csuti P, Fáy A, Schanda J, Szabó F, Tátrai V. 2015. Colour fidelity for picture gallery illumination, Part 2: test sample selection – museum tests. Light Res Technol. 47:522–532. doi:10.1177/1477153514555425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 1996. Damage to museum objects due to light exposure. Light Res Technol. 28:1–9. doi:10.1177/14771535960280010301
   Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2007. Light for art’s sake. Lighting for artworks and museum displays. Oxford (UK): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• De Duve T, Pelenc A, Groys B, Chevrier J-F, Lewis M. 2010. Jeff Wall: complete Edition. London (UK): Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Dicks B. 2003. Culture on display. The production of contemporary visitability. Maidenhead (UK): Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duane H, Pamer L, Livingstone M. 1999. Duane Hanson: A survey of his work from the ’30s to the ’90s. Lauderdale (UK): Museum of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Garside D, Curran K, Korenberg C, MacDonald L, Teunissen K, Robson S. 2017. How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums. J Inst Conserv. 40:3–14. doi:10.15502724.2014/19455224.2016.1267025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau O, Coones W, Rühse V. 2017. Museum and archive on the move. Changing cultural institutions in the digital era. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hill R. 1999. Designs and their consequences. Architecture and Aesthetics. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare N, Milliard C, Niemojewski R, Borthwick B, Watkins J. 2016. The New Curator. London (UK): Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill E. 2000. Changing Values in the Art Museum: rethinking communication and learning. Int J Herit Stud. 6:9–31. doi:10.15502724.2014/135272500363715
   Google Scholar
• Houser K, Mossman M, Smet K, Whitehead L. 2016. Tutorial: color Rendering and its applications in lighting. Leukos. 12:7–26. doi:10.1080/15502724.2014.989802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illuminating Engineering Society. 2017. Recommended practice for museum lighting. RP-30-17. New York (NY): Illuminating Engineering Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks C. 2005. The iconic building: the Power of enigma. London (UK): Frances Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Kaplan R. 1982. Cognition and Environment. New York (NY): Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher BD, O’Neill JP, Shultz E. 1985. The Age of Caravaggio. New York (NY): The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Kepes G. 1965. The nature and art of motion. New York (NY): G. Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Kesner CW. 1993. Museum exhibition lighting: visitor needs and perceptions of quality. J Illum Eng Soc. 22:45–54. doi:10.15502724.2014/00994480.1993.1074801
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler F. 1966. Inside the endless house. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Krautter M, Schielke T. 2009. Light perspectives between culture and technology. Lüdenscheid (Germany): ERCO.
   Google Scholar
• Lam WMC. 1977. Perception and lighting as formgivers for architecture. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lange S. 2006. Bernd and Hilla Becher. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert W. 2009. Light follows the curator – not the reverse. Lüdenscheid (Germany): Lichtbericht; p. 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald S. 2006. A companion to museum studies. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod S. 2005. Reshaping museum space. Architecture, design, exhibitions. London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern S. 2014. Animated Spaces. Senses Soc. 9:131–150. doi:10.2752/174589314X13953118734742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel L. 1996. Light: the shape of Space. Designing with space and light. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno S. 2010. Filtered Frescos. Amsterdam (NL): Frame; p. 230–233.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento SMC, Masuda O. 2014. Best lighting for visual appreciation of artistic paintings—experiments with real paintings and real illumination. J Opt Soc Am A. 31:A214. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.31.00A214
   Google Scholar
• O’Doherty B. 1976. Inside the white cube. The ideology of the gallery space. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawson-Bottom WE, Harris JB. 1958. Artificial lighting as applied to museums and art galleries. Light Res Technol. 23:6–27. doi:10.1177/147715355802300102
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt UJ, Teufel P. 2010. New exhibition design 02. Ludwigsburg (Germany): avedition.
   Google Scholar
• Richter JP, Leonardo Da V. 1989. The noteboooks of Leonardo Da Vinci. Vol. 1. New York (NY): Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Taylor J, Bollaert M. 2009. Exactitude: hyperrealist art today. London (UK): Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Schanda J, Csuti P, Szabó F. 2016. A new concept of color fidelity for museum lighting. Leukos. 12:71–77. doi:10.1080/15502724.2014.978503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2011. Interchangeable lenses allow for differentiated light distribution in architectural lighting. LEDs Magazine. [ accessed 2018 Jul 20]. https://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-8/issue-6/features/interchangeable-lenses-allow-for-differentiated-light-distribution-in-architectural-lighting-magazin.html
   Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2013. Tutorial: rationale, concepts, and techniques for lighting vertical surfaces. Leukos. 9:223–243. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2013.09.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schielke T 2017. Cubism to clarity. From dark concrete voids to luminous glass pyramids: the evolution of light in IM Pei’s museums. London (UK): Light Magazine. 49:18–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2018. The language of lighting: applying semiotics in the evaluation of lighting design. Leukos. doi:10.1080/15502724.2018.1518715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöne W. 1983. Über das Licht in der Malerei. Berlin (Germany): Gebr. Mann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sciacca C. 2012. Florence at the Dawn of the renaissance painting and illumination, 1300-1350. Los Angeles (CA): J. Paul Getty Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Seitinger S, Weiss A. 2015. Light for public space. Eindhoven (NL): Philips Lighting.
   Google Scholar
• Smithsonian American Art Museum. 2003. Snails Space with Vari-Lites, “Painting as Performance.” Smithson Am Art Museum. [ accessed 2018 Feb 21]. https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/snails-space-vari-lites-painting-performance-71863.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Light and Lighting. 2015. Lighting for the built environment. LG8: lighting for museums and art galleries. London (UK): Society of Light and Lighting.
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth S. 1985. Retouching and colour matching: the restorer and metamerism. Stud Conserv. 30:101–111. doi:10.1179/sic.1985.30.3.101
   Google Scholar
• Steiner J. 2004. Kunstausstellungen inszenieren. In Szenografie in Ausstellungen und Museen. DASA (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin), Kilger G (Ed.). Essen (Germany): Klartext Verlag; p. 90–104.
   Google Scholar
• Terstiege G 2015. Matthew Penn’s sense of light. ERCO. [ accessed 2017 Nov 20]. http://www.erco.com/projects/focus/report/matthew-penn-s-sense-of-light-6084/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Testino M. 2015. Mario Testino: in your face. Cologne (Germany): Taschen.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson G. 2013. The Museum Environment. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Voorhies J. 2017. Beyond objecthood. The exhibition as a critical form since 1968. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn GB. 1965. Structure and continuity in exhibition design. In The nature and art of motion. Kepes G (Ed.). New York (NY): G. Braziller; p. 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer M. 1923. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Berlin (Germany): Psychologische Forschung Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Grenzwissenschaften; p. 301–350.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin K, Belz C. 2007. Color as Field: american Painting, 1950-1975. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar