A Vector Field Color Rendition Model for Characterizing Color Shifts and Metameric Mismatch

References

• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1989. 080: Special metamerism index: Change in observer. Vienna 880 (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1995. 13.3: Method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties of light sources. 3rd ed. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2017. Colour fidelity index for accurate scientific use. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JB, Kappauf WE. 1982. Metameric color stimuli, fundamental metamers, and Wyszecki’s metameric blacks. Am J Psychol. 95(4):537–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A. 2013. Color fidelity of light sources evaluated over large sets of reflectance samples. Leukos. 10(2):59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A, Fini PT, Houser KW, Ohno Y, Royer MP, Smet KAG, Wei M, Whitehead L. 2015. Development of the IES method for evaluating the color rendition of light sources. Opt Express. 23(12):15888–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis W, Ohno Y. 2010. Color quality scale. Opt Eng. 49(3). doi:10.1117/1.3360335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito T, Houser K. 2018. Models of colour quality over a wide range of spectral power distributions. Light Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153518765953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IES] Illuminating Engineering Society. 2015. IES-TM-30-15: Method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• [IES] Illuminating Engineering Society. 2018. IES-TM-30-15: Method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild M, Heckaman RL. 2015. Measuring observer metamerism: the nimeroff approach. Col Res App. 41(2):115–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logvinenko AD, Funt B, Godau C. 2014. Metamer mismatching. IEEE Trans Image Process. 23(1):34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo MR, Cui G, Li C. 2006. Uniform colour spaces based on CIECAM02 colour appearance model. Color Res Appl. 31(4):320–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei H, Funt B. 2015. Metamer mismatching as a measure of the color rendering of lights. Proceedings of AIC 2015 Color and Image; Tokyo, Japan. p. 1001–06.
   Google Scholar
• Nimeroff I, Yurow JA. 1965. Degree of metamerism. JOSA. 55(2):185–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Fein G, Miller C. 2015. Vision experiment on chroma saturation for color quality preference. Jun 28 - Jul 4 Manchester (UK), Vienna (Austria): Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 2124. 28th CIE Session.
   Google Scholar
• Royer M. 2018a. Comparing measures of average color fidelity. Leukos. 14(2):69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M. 2018b. Comparing measures of gamut area. Leukos. Accepted for publication doi:10.1080/15502724.2018.1500485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wilkerson A, Wei M. 2017. Human perceptions of color rendition at different chromaticities. Light Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153517725974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Wilkerson A, Wei M, Houser K, Davis R. 2016. Human perceptions of colour rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Light Res Technol. 49(8):966–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG. 2018. LuxPy. [ accessed 2018 Sep 25]. https://github.com/ksmet1977/luxpy.
   Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, David A, Whitehead L. 2016. Why color space uniformity and sample set spectral uniformity are essential for color rendering measures. Leukos. 12(1–2):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2010. Memory colours and colour quality evaluation of conventional and solid-state lamps. Opt Express. 18(25):26229–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Eastern Finland. 2018. Spectral database. [accessed 2019-01-16] http://www.uef.fi/spectral/spectral-database
   Google Scholar
• van der Burgt P, van Kemenade J. 1988. Light sources and colour rendering, additional information to the Ra index. Proceedings of CIBSE National Lighting Conference. Cambridge (UK) ; p. 133–48.
   Google Scholar
• van der Burgt P, van Kemenade J. 2010. About color rendition of light sources: the balance between simplicity and accuracy. Color Res Appl. 35(2):85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser K, David A, Krames M. 2016. Colour gamut size and shape influence colour preference. Light Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153516651472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW. 2017. Systematic changes in gamut size affect color preference. Leukos. 13(1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisstein EW. Least squares fitting–polynomial. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. [ accessed 2018 Apr 10]. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFittingPolynomial.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszecki G. 1953. Valenzmetrische untersuchung des zusammenhanges zwischen normaler und anomaler. Die Farbe. 2:39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Xu H, Feng H. 2017. Toward a unified model for predicting color quality of light sources. Appl Opt. 56(29):8186–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar