Association between Perceived Daylit Area and Self-reported Frequency of Electric Lighting Use in Multi-dwelling Buildings

References

• Arendt J, Middleton B. 2018. Human seasonal and circadian studies in Antarctica (Halley, 75°S). General and Comparative Endocrinology. 258: 250–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Barthelmes VM, Li R, Andersen RK, Bahnfleth W, Corgnati SP, Rode C. 2018. Profiling occupant behaviour in Danish dwellings using time use survey data. Energy and Buildings. 177: 329–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.044
   Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KM, Hays P. 1998. Dying in the dark: sunshine, gender and outcomes in myocardial infarction. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 91(7): 352–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689809100703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOVERKET. 2020a. Mandatory provisions and general recommendations BFS 2011:6 with amendments up to BFS 2018:4. Karlskrona (Sweden): The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning
   Google Scholar
• BOVERKET. (2020b). The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning. Dagsljus, solljus och belysning i byggnader [Daylight, sunlight and lighting in buildings]. Karlskrona (Sweden): BOVERKET, [accessed 2020 April 30]. https://www.boverket.se/sv/byggande/halsa-och-inomhusmiljo/ljussolljus/
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2017. Human factors in lighting (3rd edition). London (UK): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2018. European Standard EN 17037:2018 Daylight in Buildings. Brussels (Belgium): European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen J, Johnsen K. 1999. Vinduer og dagslys - en feltundersøgelse i kontorbygninger (Windows and Daylight - a Post-occupancy Evaluation of Offices). SBI-rapport 318, 71 pages (in Danish). Retrieved from https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/14365841/Rapport_318.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2016. International Lighting Vocabulary DIS 017/E:2016 ILV. Vienna (Austria): International Commision on Illumination.
   Google Scholar
• Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. 2016. Clinical Data Analysis on a Pocket Calculator. Understanding the Scientific Methods of Statistical Reasoning and Hypothesis Testing (2nd edition). Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). New York (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Czeisler C, Gooley J. 2007. Sleep and circadian rhythms in humans. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 72: 579–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2007.72.064
   Google Scholar
• de Winter JCF, Gosling SD, Potter J. 2016. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods. 21(3): 273–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079 & https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079.supp (Supplemental)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLaura DL, Houser KW, Mistrick RG, Steffy GR. 2011. The lighting handbook: reference and application (10th edition). New York (USA): Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• El Kontar R, Rakha T. 2018. Profiling Occupancy Patterns to Calibrate Urban Building Energy Models (UBEMs) Using Measured Data Clustering. Technology | Architecture + Design. 2(2): 206–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2018.1497369
   Google Scholar
• Elliot M, Fairweather I, Olsen W, Pampaka M. 2016. Cramer’s v. In: A Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Online version: Oxford University Press. 1st edition.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson S, Waldenström L, Tillberg M, Österbring M, Kalagasidis AS. 2019. Numerical simulations and empirical data for the evaluation of daylight factors in existing buildings in Sweden. Energies. 12(11):2200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerland MW, Lydersen S, Laake P. 2013. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional. BMC Med Res Methodol. 13(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiro MG. 2017. Disruption of circadian rhythms by light during day and night. Curr Sleep Med Rep. 3(2):76–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher RA. 1922. On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J Royal Stat Soc. 85(1):87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2019. Using category rating to evaluate the lit environment: is a meaningful opinion captured? LEUKOS. 15(2–3):127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass GV, Hopkins KD. 1995. Statistical methods in education and psychology. 3rd ed. Boston (USA): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Godden DR, Baddeley AD. 1975. Context dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. British J Psychol. 66(3):325–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein EB. 2014. Cognitive psychology: connecting mind, research, and everyday experience. 4th ed. Stamford (USA): Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Grasshopper. 2020. Version 1.0.0007 Seattle (WA): [software]. Seattle (WA): Robet McNeel & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• GWA. 2020. Global workplace analytics. Latest work-at-home/telecommuting/mobile work/remote work statistics. San Diego (USA): GWA [accessed 2020 May 12]. https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hall T, Rörby M. 2009. Stockholm: The Making of a Metropolis. 1st ed. London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardill I, Green A. 2003. Remote working—altering the spatial contours of work and home in the new economy. New Technol Work Employ. 18(3):212–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman A, Saad L. 2020. Reviewing remote work in the U.S. under COVID-19. Online article. Washington(USA): Gallup [accessed 2020 May 10]. http://ludwig.lub.lu.se/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=143431112&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK. 2003. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Light Res Technol. 35(3):183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hu S, Yan D, An J, Guo S, Qian M. 2019. Investigation and analysis of Chinese residential building occupancy with large-scale questionnaire surveys. Energy Build. 193:289–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson D, Bagge H, Lindstrii L. 2011, November 14–16. Measured occupancy levels in 18 Swedish apartment buildings - application to input data for building simulations. Paper presented at the 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Knoop M, Stefani O, Wirz-Justice A, Bueno B, Matusiak B, Hobday R, Martiny K, Kantermann T, Aarts MPJ, Zemmouri N, et al. 2019. Daylight: what makes the difference? Light Res Technol. 52(3):423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou CP, Hastings MH. 2010. Circadian clocks: genes, sleep, and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 14(6):259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam WMC. 1986. Sunlighting as formgiver for architecture. 1st ed. New York (USA): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Lietz P. 2010. Research into questionnaire design. Int J Market Res. 52(2):249–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobaccaro G, Savarino M, Goia F, Fabrizio E. 2019. Relation between daylight availability and electric lighting in a single-family house. Paper presented at the 1st Nordic conference on Zero Emission and Plus Energy Buildings; Trondheim (Norway).
   Google Scholar
• Malmö-Stad. 2020. Stadsbyggnadskontorets arkiv [Municipal building archives]. Malmö (Sweden): Malmö Stad [accessed 2020 May 7]. https://malmo.se/Service/Bygga-och-bo/Stadsbyggnadskontorets-arkiv.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, Christoffersen J. 2011. Daylighting metrics for residential buildings. Paper presented at the 27th Session of the CIE; Sun City (South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. 2013. The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica. 23(2):143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar Q. 1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 12(2):153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead MN. 2008. Benefits of sunlight: a bright spot for human health. Environ Health Perspect. 116(4):161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade AW, Craig SB. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods. 17(3):437–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menculini G, Verdolini N, Murru A, Pacchiarotti I, Volpe U, Cervino A, Steardo L, Moretti P, Vieta E, Tortorella A. 2018. Depressive mood and circadian rhythms disturbances as outcomes of seasonal affective disorder treatment: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 241:608–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra D, Steinmetz N, Chu Y, Cetin KS. 2020. Typical occupancy profiles and behaviors in residential buildings in the United States. Energy Build. 210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109713
   Google Scholar
• Münch M, Wirz-Justice A, Brown SA, Kantermann T, Martiny K, Stefani O, Vetter C, Wright KPJ, Wulff K, Skene DJ. 2020. The role of daylight for humans: gaps in current knowledge. Clocks Sleep 2(1):61–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olkin I, Finn JD. 1995. Correlations redux. Psychol Bull. 118(1):155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PremiumLight Project Consortium. 2014. Top quality energy-efficient lighting for the domestic sector, Final report. Vienna (Austria): Austrian Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Rådberg J, Friberg A. 1996. Svenska stadstyper: historik, exempel, klassificering. 1st ed. [Swedish city types: history (examples, classification]. Stockholm (Sweden)): Kungliga Tekniska Högsklolan Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2005. A simulation-based review of the ubiquitous window-head-height to daylit zone depth rule-of-thumb. Paper presented at the 9th International IBPSA Conference; Montréal (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2012. Swedish Time Use Survey 2010/11, Series title: LE - living conditions, in report 1654–1707 (Online); 0347–7193 (print). Örebro (Sweden): Statistics Sweden [accessed 2020 May 4] https://www.scb.se/publication/18561.
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2018. Dwelling stock 31/12/2018. Örebro (Sweden): Statistics Sweden [accessed 2020 May 4] https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/housing-construction-and-building/housing-construction-and-conversion/dwelling-stock/pong/statistical-news/dwelling-stock-2018-12-31/.
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2019. Completed dwellings and number of rooms including kitchen in newly constructed buildings by region and type of building, Year 1975–2018. Örebro (Sweden): Statistics Sweden [accessed 2020 May 2] http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__BO__BO0101__BO0101A/LghReHustypAr/.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Strack F, Mai H-P. 1991. Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: a conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Q. 55(1):3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens RG, Rea MS. 2001. Light in the built environment: potential role of circadian disruption in endocrine disruption and breast cancer. Cancer Causes Controls. 12(3):279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes M, Crosbie T, Guy S. 2006. Shedding light on domestic energy use: a cross-discipline - study of lighting homes. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors; London (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Strack F, Martin LL. 1987. Thinking, judging, and communicating: a process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In: Hippler H-J, Schwarz N, Sudman S, editors. Social information processing and survey methodology. 1st ed. New York (USA): Springer New York; p. 123–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tiller DK, Rea MS. 1992. Semantic differential scaling: prospects in lighting research. Light Res. Technol. 24(1):43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rasinski KA. 1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol Bull. 103(3):299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS. 1991. Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. J Health Care Inter Des. 3:97–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veitch JA, Hine DW, Gifford R. 1993. End-users’ knowledge, beliefs and preferences for lighting. J Inter Des. 19(2):15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Walch JM, Rabin BS, Day R, Williams JN, Choi K, Kang JD. 2005. The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication use: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Psychosom Med. 67(1):156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss B, Spies C, Piazena H, Penzel T, Fietze I, Luetz A. 2016. Exposure to light and darkness and its influence on physiological measures of intensive care unit patients-a systematic literature review. Physiol Meas. 37(9):R73–R87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widén J, Lundh M, Vassileva I, Dahlquist E, Ellegård K, Wäckelgård E. 2009a. Constructing load profiles for household electricity and hot water from time-use data—modelling approach and validation. Energy Build. 41(7):753–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widén J, Nilsson AM, Wäckelgård E. 2009b. A combined Markov-chain and bottom-up approach to modelling of domestic lighting demand. Energy Build. 41(10):1001–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S. 2020. ProccS - an occupancy simulation tool for private households - Maintainer: sebastian Wolf [accessed 2020 May 14] https://www.proccs.org/index.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Calì D, Alonso MJ, Li R, Andersen RK, Krogstie J, Madsen H (2019). Room-level occupancy simulation model for private households. Paper presented at the CISBAT 2019 – International Scientific Conference; Lausanne (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann ZP. 2009. End-use metering campaign in 400 households in Sweden - assessment of the potential electricity savings. Eskilstuna (Sweden): Swedish Energy Agency. Report No.: 17-05-2743. [accessed 2020 January 19]. https://www.enertech.fr/pdf/54/consommations%20usages%20electrodomestiques%20en%20Suede_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zou GY. 2007. Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychol Methods. 12(4):399–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar