Regional Differences in the Perception of Daylit Scenes across Europe Using Virtual Reality. Part I: Effects of Window Size

References

• Abd-Alhamid F, Kent M, Bennett C, Calautit J, Wu Y. 2019. Developing an innovative method for visual perception evaluation in a physical-based virtual environment. Build Environ. 162:106278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi H. 2007. The bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In: Salkind NJ, editor. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage. p. 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton J. 1975. The experience of Landscape, London, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton J. 1988. Prospects and refuges revisited. In: Nasar JL. (ed.) Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodrogi P, Lin Y, Xiao X. 2017. Intercultural observer preference for perceived illumination chromaticity for different coloured object scenes. Light Res Technol. 49(3):305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boubekri M, Hulliv R, Boyer L. 1991. Impact of window size and sunlight penetration on office workers’ mood and satisfaction: a novel way of assessing sunlight. Environ Behav. 23(4):474–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce P. 2003. Human Factors in Lighting., London and New York, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Butler DL, Biner PM. 1989. Effects of setting on window preferences and factors associated with those preferences. Environ Behav. 21(1):17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler DL, Steuerwald BL. 1991. Effects of view and room size on window size preferences made in models. Environ Behav. 23(34):334–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2007. 11664–4:2008: colorimetry - Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* colour space tech. Rep. Brussels (Belgium). Joint ISO/CIE Standard. CIE International Commission on Illumination.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2018. Daylight in buildings. European Standard NS-EN 17037:2018 (Vol. NS-EN 17037:2018). Brussels (Belgium): European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Chamilothori K. 2019. Perceptual effects of daylight patterns in architecture ( Doctoral Dissertation. École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M. 2019. Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. LEUKOS. 15(2–3):203–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple S, Ladaique M. 2009. Society at a glance 2009: OECD social indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Cox NJ. 2004. Speaking stata: graphing model diagnostics. Stata J. 4(4):449–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth PC. 1994. Sense, culture, and sensibility. In: Kitayama S, Markus HR, editors. Emotion and culture: empirical studies of mutual influence. Washington DC (USA): American Psychological Association; p. 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth PC, Scherer KR. 2003. Appraisal processes in emotion. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH, editors. Handbook of affective sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; p. 572–595.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson CJ. 2009. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 40(5):532–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goia F. 2016. Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential. Solar Energy. 132:467–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuera-Trujillo JL, Lopez-Tarruella Maldonado J, Linares Millan C. 2017. Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison between photographs, 360° panoramas, and virtual reality. Appl Ergon. 65:398–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillaire S, Lecuyer A, Cozot R, Casiez G. 2008. Using an eye-tracking system to improve camera motions and depth-of-field blur effects in virtual environments. 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Reno, NE, 47–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2008.4480749
   Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Liu Q, Westland S, Pointer MR, Ronnier Luo M, Xiao K. 2018. Light dominates colour preference when correlated colour temperature differs. Light Res Technol. 50(7):995–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston RL. 2013. Fundamentals of biomechanics. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inui M, Miyata T. 1973. Spaciousness in interiors. Light Res Technol. 5(2):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec A, Reinhart CF. 2011. DIVA 2.0: integrating daylight and thermal simulations using rhinoceros 3D, DAYSIM and energyplus. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Building Simulation (IBPSA), Sidney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. 1987. Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior. 19:2–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keighley EC. 1973a. Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in office buildings - A study of window shape. Build Sci. 8(4):311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Keighley EC. 1973b. Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in offices - a study of multiple apertures and window area. Build Sci. 8:321–331.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Mansfield KP. 2016. A cross-cultural study on perceived lighting quality and occupants’ well/being between UK and South Korea. Energy Build. 119:211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küller R, Ballal S, Laike T, Mikellides B, Tonello G. 2006. The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: a cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics. 49(14):1496–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau SS-Y, Gou Z, Li F-M. 2010. Users’ perceptions of domestic windows in Hong Kong: challenging daylighting-based design regulations. J Build Appraisal. 6(1):81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Leder S, Newsham GR, Veitch JA, Mancini S, Charles KE. 2016. Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: a new analysis. Build Res Inform. 44(1):34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Tuzikas A, Žukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Vitta P, Shur M 2013. Cultural preferences to color quality of illumination of different artwork objects revealed by a color rendition engine. IEEE Photonics J. 5(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2013.2276742
   Google Scholar
• Lysgaard S. 1955. Adjustment in a foreign society: norwegian fulbright grantees visiting the United States. Int Soc Sci Bull. 7:45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Maffei L, Masullo M, Pascale A, Ruggiero G, Romero VP. 2016. Immersive virtual reality in community planning: acoustic and visual congruence of simulated vs real world. Sustainable Cities Soc. 27:338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovizky G, Samig Y. 2008. The process of immigrant adjustment: the role of time in determining psychological adjustment. J Cross Cult Psychol. 39(6):782–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusiak B. 2006. The impact of window form on the size impression of the room. Full-scale studies. Archit Sci Rev. 49(1):43–51.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM. (2011). Generalized, linear, and mixed models (2nd ed. Vol. 651). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita B, Ellsworth PC. 2001. The role of culture in appraisal. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, editors. Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; p. 478.
   Google Scholar
• Moscoso C, Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M, Matusiak B. 2020. Window size effects on subjective impressions of daylit spaces: indoor studies at high latitudes using virtual reality. LEUKOS. 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1726183
   Google Scholar
• Moscoso C, Matusiak B. 2017. Aesthetic perception of a small office with different daylighting systems. Indoor and Built Environment. 27:1187–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoso C, Matusiak B, Svensson UP. 2015. Impact of window size and room reflectance on the perceived quality of a room. J Archit Plann Res. 32(4):294–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schieltzeth H. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J Royal Soc Interface. 14(134):20170213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ne’eman E, Hopkinson RG. 1970. Critical minimum acceptable window size: a study of window design and provision of a view. Light Res Technol. 21(1):17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki R. 2002. Housing as a reflection of culture: privatised living and privacy in England and Japan. J Hous Stud. 17(2):209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A. 2010. The effect of window views’ openness and naturalness on the perception of rooms’ spaciousness and brightness: a visual preference study. Sci Res Essays. 5(16):2275–2287.
   Google Scholar
• Papamanolis N. 2005. The main constructional characteristics of contemporary urban residential buildings in Greece. Build Environ. 40(3):391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park N-K, Farr CA. 2007. The effects of lighting on consumers’ emotions and behavioral intentions in a retail environment: a cross-cultural comparison. J Inter Des. 33(1):17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Park N-K, Pae JY, Meneely J. 2010. Cultural preferences in hotel guestroom lighting design. J Inter Des. 36(1):21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Šidák Z. 1967. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 62(318):626–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 11(5):1633–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson C, Piderit Moreno MB, Wienold J, Bodart M. 2017. Discomfort glare from daylighting: influence of culture on discomfort glare perception. Paper presented at the Conference on “Smarter Lighting for Better Life” at the CIE Midterm Meeting, Jeju, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Polat U, Schor C, Tong J-L, Zomet A, Lev M, Yehezkel O, … Levi DM. 2012. Training the brain to overcome the effect of aging on the human eye. Sci Rep. 2(278). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00278
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport A. 1969. House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs (N.J): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation concerning technical requirements of buildings in Norway (TEK17) - Chapter 13: indoor climate and health - §13-7 Light. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard E, Stark M, Shirley P, Ferwerda J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. SIGGRAPH ‘02, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL. 1991. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JA. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39:1161–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer KR. 1997a. Profiles of emotion - antecedent appraisal. Testing theoretical predictions across cultures. Cogn Emot. 11(2):113–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer KR. 1997b. The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol. 73(5):902–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltman H. 2012. Experimental design and analysis. Pittsburgh (PA): Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Hanselaer P. 2015. Impact of cross-regional differences on color rendition evaluation of white light sources. Opt Express. 23(23):30216–30226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Lin Y, Nagy BV, Németh Z, Duque-Chica GL, Quintero JM, … Hanselaer P. 2014. Cross-cultural variation of memory colors of familiar objects. Opt Express. 22(26):32308–32328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps AEI, Krishnan VV. 2006. Spaciousness and boundary roughness. Environ Behav. 38(6):841–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock MJ. 2017. view360stereo.cal: definitions for full 360 over-under stereo equirectangular projection: radiance version 5.1.
   Google Scholar
• Tifler DK, Rea MS. 1992. Semantic differential scaling: Prospects in lighting research. Lighting Research and Technology. 24:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 11(3):201–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Fotios SA, Houser KW. 2019. Judging the scientific quality of applied lighting research. LEUKOS:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Galasiu AD. 2012. The physiological and psychological effects of windows, daylight, and view at home: review and research Agenda. Ottawa (ON, Canada): National Research Council of Canada. Institute for Research in Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 1998. Determinants of Lighting Quality I: State of the Science. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society. 27:92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogels I. 2008. Atmosphere metrics: A tool to quantify perceived atmosphere. International Symposium Creating an Atmosphere. Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Boubekri M. 2010. Investigation of declared seating preference and measured cognitive performance in a sunlit room. J Environ Psychol. 30(2):226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward GJ. 1994. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. SIGGRAPH ´94, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Leung S-O. 2017. Can likert scales be treated as interval scales? - A simulation study. J Soc Serv Res. 43(4):527–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Byun E, Chung NS. 2000. Comparison of space perception between a real environment and a virtual environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar