Multiple futures literacies: An interdisciplinary review

References

• Ahmedien, D. A. M. (2020). New-media arts–based public engagement projects could reshape the future of the generative biology. Medical Humanities 47(3), 283–291. 10.1136/medhum-2020-011862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahvenharju, S., Minkkinen, M., & Lalot, F. (2018). The five dimensions of futures consciousness. Futures: The Futures, 104, 1–13. 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, T., & Burke, F. (2007, (January 1). What does it mean to think historically? Perspectives on history. https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2007/what-does-it-mean-to-think-historically
   Google Scholar
• Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2018). Foundations of multiliteracies: Reading, writing and talking in the 21st century. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315114194
   Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G. (2005). The psychology of future-oriented thinking: From achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augé, M. (2014). The Future (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king time: Material entanglements and rememberings: Cutting together-apart. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (pp. 16–31). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, D. (2009). Transforming teachers’ temporalities: Futures in curriculum practices. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Australian Catholic University.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, D., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2011). Neoliberalising learning: Generating alternate futures consciousness. Social Alternatives, 30(4), 32–37. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30041180
   Google Scholar
• Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, S. J. (2011). The development of future orientation: Underpinnings and related constructs. [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Nebraska, ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, F., Fletcher, G., Greenhill, A., Griffiths, M., & McLean, R. (2013). Science fiction prototypes: Visionary technology narratives between futures. Futures, 50, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. (2017). Ten principles for thinking about the future: A primer for environmental professionals. Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-175,19 Retrieved from: https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs175.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. (2018). Principles for thinking about the future and foresight education. World Futures Review, 10(3), 193–202. 10.1177/1946756718777252 https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756718777252
   Google Scholar
• Bleecker, J. (2009). Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory, 29, 1–97. https://drbfw5wfjlxon.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, F. (2004). Scientific method in curriculum-making. In D. J. Flinders, & S. J. Thornton, S. (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 9–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017609
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, E. (1988). Building a global civic culture: Education for an interdependent world. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. 10.1177/0263276418771486 https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick, A. (2019). Designing futures from the inside. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2020). Undoing the digital: Sociomaterialism and literacy education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2021). Returning to text: Affect, meaning making, and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussey, M. (2014). Intimate futures: Bringing the body into futures work. European Journal of Futures Research, 2(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0053-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussey, M. (2016). The hidden curriculum of futures studies: Introducing the futures senses. World Futures Review, 8(1), 39–45. 10.1177/1946756715627433 https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756715627433
   Google Scholar
• Cagnin, C. (2018). Developing a transformative business strategy through the combination of design thinking and futures literacy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(5), 524–539. 10.1080/09537325.2017.1340638 https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1340638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., & Hall, E. A. (2013). Mothership: Tales from Afrofuturism and beyond. Rosarium Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Canada and the United Nations Educational. (n.d.). Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/unesco/index.aspx?lang=eng
   Google Scholar
• Candy, S. (2010). The futures of everyday life: Politics and the design of experiential scenarios. [Doctoral dissertation], University of Hawai’i at Manoa. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305280378_The_Futures_of_Everyday_Life_Politics_and_the_Design_of_Experiential_Scenarios
   Google Scholar
• Candy, S., & Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished. Futures, 86, 136–153. 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clèries, L., & Morrison, A. (2020). Design futures now: Literacies & making. Temes de Disseny, (36), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD36.2020.8-15
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2016). Futures. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman (pp. 196–208). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091227.01
   Google Scholar
• Damber, U. (2009). Reading, schooling, and future time perspective: A small-scale study of five academically successful young swedes. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(1), 235–248. 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i01/58707 https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i01/58707
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2017). Doing better than just falling forward: Linking subject matter with explicit futures thinking. One World in Dialogue, 4(1), 5–10. https://ssc.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/OneWorldInDialogue/OneWorldinDialogue_2016Vol4No1/den%20Heyer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B. P. (2020). Tuning into rebellious matter: Affective literacies as more-than-human sonic bodies. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 19(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2019-0155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B. P., & Thiel, J. J. (2020). Literacy learning as cruelly optimistic: Recovering possible lost futures through transmedial storytelling. Literacy (Oxford, England), 54(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12207
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2014). Resistance is futile: Reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(4), 769–778. 10.1007/s00779-013-0678-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0678-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draudt, A., Hadley, J., Hogan, R., Murray, L., Stock, G., & West, J. R. (2015). Six insights about science fiction prototyping. Computer (Long Beach, Calif.), 48(5), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enciso, P. (2019). Stories of becoming: Implications of future-oriented theories for a vital literacy education. Literacy (Oxford, England), 53(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12175
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (Eds.). (2015). New directions in assessing historical thinking. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315779539
   Google Scholar
• Eshun, K. (2003). Further considerations of Afrofuturism. CR (East Lansing, Mich.), 3(2), 287–302. 10.1353/ncr.2003.0021 https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2003.0021
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K. (2019). Storytelling in troubled times: What is the role for educators in the deep crises of the 21st century? Literacy (Oxford, England), 53(1), 3–13. 10.1111/lit.12176 https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12176
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K., & Sriprakash, A. (2021). Provincialising futures literacy: A caution against codification. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies, 133, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102807
   Google Scholar
• Frame, B. (2019). A typology for Antarctic futures. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 236–246. 10.1080/2154896x.2018.1559015 https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2018.1559015
   Google Scholar
• Futures Literacy. (n.d.). Futures literacy: A skill for the 21st century. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/futures-literacy
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310. 10.1111/jtsb.12075 https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, D. (2018). Ecological exile: Spatial injustice and environmental humanities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, D. (2021). Rewriting our stories: Education, empowerment, and well-being. Cork University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, D., Horst, R., James, K., Sameshima, P. (2022). Imagining futures literacies: A collaborative practice. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(7), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i7.5246
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I., & Gill, S. (2014). Critical narrative as pedagogy. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, N. (2017). Specifying a curriculum for biopolitical critical literacy in science teacher education: Exploring roles for science fiction. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(4), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9834-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning & black study. Minor Compositions.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hideg, É., & Nováky, E. (2010). Changing attitudes to the future in Hungary. Futures, 42(3), 230–236. 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofvenschioeld, E., & Khodadadi, M. (2020). Communication in futures studies: A discursive analysis of the literature. Futures, 115, 102493. 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102493 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, R., James, K., Takeda, Y., & Rowluck, W. (2020). From play to creative extrapolation: Fostering emergent computational thinking in the makerspace. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 15(5), 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, R. (2021). Narrative futuring: An experimental writing inquiry into the future imaginaries. Art/Research International, 6(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29554
   Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, S. (1998). Causal layered analysis: Poststructuralism as method. Futures, 30(8), 815–829. 10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00086-X https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00086-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight (Cambridge), 10(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810855991
   Google Scholar
• Initiative for Indigenous futures. (n.d.). https://indigenousfutures.net/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Z. I. (2020). Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an antiblack world. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. (2011). Science fiction prototyping: Designing the future with science fiction. Synthesis Lectures on Computer Science, 3(1), 1–190. 10.2200/S00336ED1V01Y201102CSL003 https://doi.org/10.2200/S00336ED1V01Y201102CSL003
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D., Share, J., & Luke, A. (2019). The critical media literacy guide: Engaging media and transforming education. Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ketonen-Oksi, S. (2018). Creating a shared narrative: The use of causal layered analysis to explore value co-creation in a novel service ecosystem. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1), 1–12. 10.1186/s40309-018-0135-y https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. 10.1002/jaal.314 https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417715720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, C., & Solis, J. (2019). A study of digital science fiction prototyping in an elementary school setting. In A. Reyes-Munoz, P. Zheng, D. Crawford, V. Callaghan (Eds.). EAI international conference on technology, innovation, entrepreneurship and education. TIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 532. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02242-6_28
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Ehret, C. (2019). Affect in literacy learning and teaching: Pedagogies, politics and coming to know. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351256766
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Burriss, S. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. 10.1111/bjet.12924 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethabo-King, T. L., Navarro, J., & Smith, A. (2020). Otherwise worlds: Against settler colonialism and anti-blackness. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, W. (2018). Indigenous media futures: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, 33(2), 173–179. 10.14506/ca33.2.01 https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liveley, G., Slocombe, W., & Spiers, E. (2021). Futures literacy through narrative. Futures, 125, 102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. (2018). Old futures: Speculative fiction and queer possibility. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, T. (2007). The evolution and psychology of future consciousness. Journal of Futures Studies, 12(1) 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, T., & Cornish, E. (2010). Wisdom facing forward: What it means to have heightened future consciousness. The Futurist, 44(5), 34.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, S. (2013, August 5). What it’s like to be a corporate “Futurist.” BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/sapna/there-are-corporate-jobs-where-you-can-be-a-futurist-and-go
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, T., & Knutz, E. (2013, September). The poetics of design fiction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 231–240). https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513531
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2017). No future for crips: Disorderly conduct in the new world order; or, disability studies on the verge of a nervous breakdown. In Anne. Waldschmidt, Hanjo Berressem & Moritz Ingwersen (Eds.), Culture – Theory – Disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies (1. Aufl. ed.). transcript-Verlag. (pp. 63–77).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362. 10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (2015). Learning, the future, and complexity: An essay on the emergence of futures literacy. European Journal of Education, 50(4), 513–523. 10.1111/ejed.12157 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (Ed.). (2018). Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351048002
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (n.d.) About. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Riel_Miller2
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., Bjørnstad, N., Martinussen, E. S., Johansen, B., Kerspern, B., & Dudani, P. (2020). Lexicons, literacies and design futures. Temes De Disseny, 36, 114–149. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Temes/article/view/373847
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., & Chisin, A. (2017). Design fiction, culture and climate change: Weaving together personas, collaboration and fabulous futures. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S146–S159. 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352704 https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019). Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology: Some propositions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1504–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1570843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S., & Lousley, C. (2017). A history of environmental futurity: Special issue introduction. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, 4(2–3), 1–20. 10.5250/resilience.4.2-3.0001
   Google Scholar
• Perry, K. H. (2012). What is literacy?–A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 8(1), 50.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1994). The method of “Currere” (1975). Counterpoints, 2, 19–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42975620
   Google Scholar
• Polak, F. (1961). The image of the future. (E. Boulding, Trans.). Elsevier Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, R. (2017). Introduction to anticipation studies. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-63023-6
   Google Scholar
• Pride, S., Frame, B., & Gill, D. (2010). Futures literacy in New Zealand. Journal of Futures Studies, 15(1), 135–143.
   Google Scholar
• Rhisiart, M., Miller, R., & Brooks, S. (2015). Learning to use the future: Developing foresight capabilities through scenario processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 124–133. 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ross, k m. (2019). On Black education: Anti-blackness, refusal, and resistance. In C. A. Grant, A. Woodson, & M. Dumas (Eds.). The future is black: Afropessimism, fugitivity, and radical hope in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2013). Hidden, inconsistent, and influential: Images of the future in changing times. Futures, 45, S38–S44. 10.1016/j.futures.2012.11.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandahl, J. (2015). Civic consciousness: A viable concept for advancing students’ ability to orient themselves to possible futures? Historical Encounters, 2(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sande, Ö. (1972). Future consciousness. Journal of Peace Research, 9(3), 271–278. 10.1177/002234337200900307 https://doi.org/10.1177/002234337200900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardar, Z. (2010). The namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What’s in a name? Futures, 42(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seginer, R. (2008). Future orientation in times of threat and challenge: How resilient adolescents construct their future. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(4), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408090970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. (2014, July 24). 5 things you need to know about the future of math. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanshapiro/2014/07/24/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-future-of-math/?sh=318a64b3590e
   Google Scholar
• Shubert, J., Wray-Lake, L., & McKay, B. (2020). Looking ahead and working hard: How school experiences foster adolescents’ future orientation and perseverance. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(4), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, D. J. (2002). A history of the future. History and Theory, 41(4), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, D. J. (2007). History and future: Using historical thinking to imagine the future. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, R. M., Stoddard, S. A., & Pierce, J. (2017). Adolescents’ future orientation and nonmedical use of prescription drugs. Addictive Behaviors, 65, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulimani-Aidan, Y., & Melkman, E. (2021). Future orientation among at-risk youth in Israel. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(4), 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syms, M. (2013, December 17). The mundane Afrofuturist manifesto. Rhizome. https://rhizome.org/editorial/2013/dec/17/mundane-afrofuturist-manifesto/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. H. (2021). Me tomorrow: Indigenous views on the future. Douglas & McIntyre.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Lit learning (pp. 19–46). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203979402-6
   Google Scholar
• The queer futures collective. (n.d.). https://www.queerfutures.com/
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
   Google Scholar
• Trommsdorff, G. (1983). Future orientation and socialization. International Journal of Psychology, 18(1-4), 381–406. 10.1080/00207598308247489 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598308247489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, S. E. (2019). SF! Haraway’s situated feminisms and speculative fabulations in english class. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9632-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, S. E., Hackett, A., Pahl, K., McLean Davies, L., & Escott, H. (2021). The capaciousness of no: Affective refusals as literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, K. (2020, February 27). Why companies are hiring sci-fi writers to imagine the future. Pivot Magazine. https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/news/pivot-magazine/2020-02-27-sci-fi-prototyping
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2016). What is the future? Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E. (2018). Multidimensional curriculum enhancing future thinking literacy: Teaching learners to take control of their future. Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Visions of the future. (n.d.). Lessons from history. https://www.lessons-from-history.com/page/visions-future
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, K. (2018, November 9). How climate-change fiction, or "cli-fi," forces us to confront the incipient death of the planet. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/how-climate-change-fiction-or-cli-fi-forces-us-to-confront-the-incipient-death-of-the-planet
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. M. (1993). Future images: An art intervention with suicidal adolescents. Applied Nursing Research: ANR, 6(3), 111–118. 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80171-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80171-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wargo, J. M. (2019). Lives, lines, and spacetimemattering: An intra-active analysis of a ‘Once OK’ adult writer. In C. R. Kuby, K. Spector, & J. J. Thiel (Eds.), Posthumanism and literacy education (1st ed., pp. 130–141). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315106083-14
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. (2019). Curriculum SF (speculative fiction): Reflections on the future past of curriculum studies and science fiction. Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v13i2.191108
   Google Scholar
• Wilderson, F. (2021). Afropessimism and the ruse of analogy: Violence, freedom struggles, and the death of black desire. In M.-K. Jung & J. Costa Vargas (Eds.), Antiblackness (pp. 37–59). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. M., & Sandlin, J. A. (2007). Literacy for what? Literacy for whom? The politics of literacy education and neocolonialism in UNESCO-and World Bank–sponsored literacy programs. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(4), 275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozolek, B. (2018). The mothership connection: Utopian funk from bethune and beyond. The Urban Review, 50(5), 836–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0476-7
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S., & McKittrick, K. (2020). Unparalleled catastrophe for our species? or, to give humanness a different future: Conversations. In K. McKittrick (Ed.), Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis (pp. 9–89). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822375852-003
   Google Scholar