Curriculum in the digital age: Intensifying the work of teachers, the remix

References

• Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W., & Teitelbaum, K. (1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High stakes testing and curriculum control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with workload: Primary teachers’ experience of intensification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1150–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., Morrison, S., Craft, M., & Lee, M. (2020). How and why are teachers using Instagram? Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Shelton, C., & Schroeder, S. (2022). The education influencer: A new player in the educator professional landscape. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(5), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, I. (2016). Pedagogical design capacity and underlying knowledge of curriculum materials use of a Hong Kong English Teacher. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p85
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, S. L., & Wood, C. L. (2018). Using Pinterest to find and share evidence-based practices. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218765212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.) (2014). Handbook of research on new literacies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410618894
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, J., & Hutchison, A. C. (2017). Considering a Twitter-based professional learning network in literacy education. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1370749
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. J., Jones-Bromenshenkel, M., Huisinga, M. S., & Mullins, F. (2017). Online professional learning networks. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417696930
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. J., & Ross, V. (2008). Cultivating the image of teachers as curriculum makers. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 282–305). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curcio, R., Schroeder, S., & Lundgren, L. (2023). Affordances and constraints of the teacher-to-teacher online marketplace of ideas: Understanding early career elementary teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2163939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F. (2015). Understanding inquiry as stance: Illustration and analysis of one teacher researcher’s work. Learning Landscapes, 8(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v8i2.702
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C. (2021). Commentary: New paradigms for understanding elementary teachers’ interactions with instructional materials. The Elementary School Journal, 122(1), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/715631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droitcour, B. (2014). Vernacular criticism. The New Inquiry, July 25. https://thenewinquiry.com/vernacular-criticism/
   Google Scholar
• Easthope, C., & Easthope, G. (2000). Intensification, extension and complexity of teachers’ workload. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690095153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C., & Davis, E. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, H., & Krause, J. M. (2017). Winning with pinning: Enhancing health and physical education with Pinterest. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 88(5), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1280440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., Swalwell, K., & Bellows, E. (2019). “Pinning” with pause: Supporting teachers’ critical consumption on sites of curriculum sharing. Social Education, 83(4), 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. (2019). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Online Learning, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, C. H., & Thompson, L. (2021). Women teachers and the fight to be “good enough”: A call for pedagogy of authenticity. The Educational Forum, 85(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1908468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1985). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376–379.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Mata-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/681964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019a). What should be the role of social media in education? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219865290
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Gleason, B., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019b). Social scholarship revisited: Changing scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote-Garcia, S., & Vasinda, S. (2014). Pinning and practice: Using Pinterest as a tool for developing pedagogical content knowledge. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 2(1), 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. (2015). The Common Core and the evasion of curriculum. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 130(3), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2015.130.3.666
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. G. (2014). The Common Core State Standards initiative: A lead professional invitation. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 11(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2014.907100
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, J. T., & Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2017). Examining Pinterest as a curriculum resource for negative integers: An initial investigation. Education Sciences, 7(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, E. (2019). “Common” instruction: Logics of ability and teacher decision making across tracks in the era of Common Standards. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 638–675. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218803328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, E. M., Salloum, S. J., & Benko, S. L. (2019). The changing ecology of the curriculum marketplace in the era of the Common Core State Standards. Journal of Educational Change, 20(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09347-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Torphy, K. T., Opperman, A., Jansen, K., & Lo, Y. (2018). What do teachers share within socialized knowledge communities: A case of Pinterest. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(2), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-11-2017-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., & Bates, C. C. (2016). Are you (p)interested in 21st century teaching and learning? Young Children, 71(3), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. J., & Hall, C. M. (2017). A survey of K-12 teachers’ utilization of social networks as a professional resource. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9627-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, C. (2019). The edupreneur frontier: Creating a new system of curriculum and professional development for teachers. Art Education, 72(5), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2019.1621629
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, T. J. (2011). Pedagogical design capacity for teaching elementary mathematics: A cross-case analysis of four teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University]. University Library Digital Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Literat, I. (2019). Make, share, review, remix: Unpacking the impact of the internet on contemporary creativity. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(5–6), 1168–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517751391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström, U., & Holm, A.-S. (2011). Market competition in upper secondary education: Perceived effects on teachers’ work. Policy Futures in Education, 9(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.193
   Google Scholar
• Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott-McNulty, M. (2014). “Nothing in common”: Common Core. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 11(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2014.908431
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. (2018). Critical lesson evaluation for preservice teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(1), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_048_01_12
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, W., & Harvey, A. S. (2000). Is Teachers’Work Never Done? Time-Use and Subjective Outcomes. Radical Pedagogy, 2(Spring), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mitton-Kükner, J., & Murray Orr, A. (2017). A multi-year study of pre-service teachers’ literacy practices in the content areas: Time epistemologies and indicators of stasis and growth. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1376670
   Google Scholar
• Muls, J., Triquet, K., Vlieghe, J., De Backer, J. F., Zhu, C., & Lombaerts, K. (2019). Facebook group dynamics: An ethnographic study of the teaching and learning potential for secondary school teachers. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1583670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittard, E. A. (2017). Gettin’a little crafty: Teachers Pay Teachers©, Pinterest© and neo-liberalism in new materialist feminist research. Gender and Education, 29(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1197380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. (2020). Common standards aren’t enough. Education Next, 20(2), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M., & Dean, J. (2019). The supplemental-curriculum bazaar: Is what’s online any good?. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2020). PLNs for educators: Why do some educators lurk while others lead? Society for Information Technology, 2020(1), 1508–1513.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, N., Brown, M., & Vickery, A. (2020). Pinning for profit? Examining elementary preservice teachers’ critical analysis of online social studies resources about Black history. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 497–528.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. G., & Myers, J. (2018). Seeking comfort: How and why preservice teachers use internet resources for lesson planning. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2017.1387625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. G., Dick, L. K., Shapiro, E. J., & Wismer, T. (2019). The top 500 mathematics pins: An analysis of elementary mathematics activities on Pinterest. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 235–263.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. G., Dredger, K., Myers, J., Barnes, S., Wilson, R., Sullivan, J., & Sawyer, D. (2020). Developing teachers as critical curators: Investigating elementary preservice teachers’ inspirations for lesson planning. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119879894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Saultz, A. (2020). Authority and control: The tension at the heart of standards-based accountability. Harvard Educational Review, 90(3), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.3.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Curcio, R., & Lundgren, L. (2019). Expanding the learning network: How teachers use Pinterest. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1573354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Curcio, R., & Shelton, C. (2023). Crafting the consumer teacher: Education influencers and the figured world of K-12 teaching. Learning, Media, and Technology. Online First, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2207140
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2013). Digital labour: The Internet as playground and factory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., & Johnson, N. (2017). High-tech, hard work: An investigation of teachers’ work in the digital age. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1252770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. J., Sawyer, A. G., Dick, L. K., & Wismer, T. (2019). Just what online resources are elementary mathematics teachers using? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(19), 670–686.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C., Schroeder, S., & Curcio, R. (2020). Instagramming their hearts out: What do edu-influencers share on Instagram? Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 20(3), 529–554.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C., Schroeder, S., & Curcio, R. (2024). The Teacher-to-Teacher Online Marketplace of Ideas (TOMI): A New Future in Curriculum?. In V. Benson & R. Hartshorne (Eds.), Handbook of Social Media in Education, Consumer Behavior, and Politics (pp 21–43). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sie, R. L. L., Pataraia, N., Boursinou, E., Rajagopal, K., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., Bitter-Rijpkema, M., Littlejohn, A., & Sloep, P. B. (2013). Goals, motivation for, and outcomes of personal learning through networks: Results of a tweetstorm. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying teachers’ curriculum supplementation. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 455–489. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211063930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C., & Stillman, J. (2005). Standardizing knowledge in a multicultural society. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000). Teachers’ Work in a Globalizing Economy. Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, A. L. (2021, November 16–19). Red, white, and problematic: A critical content analysis of American symbols lessons [Paper presentation]. Graduate Forum of the College and University Faculty Assembly (CUFA) of the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS).
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, J. (2009). Taking back the standards: Equity-minded teaches’ responses to accountability-related instructional constraints. The New Educator, 5(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399569
   Google Scholar
• Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torphy, K. T., & Drake, C. (2019). Educators meet the fifth estate: The role of social media in teacher training. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 121(14), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torphy, K., Liu, Y., Hu, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Sources of professional support: Patterns of teachers’ curation of instructional resources in social media. American Journal of Education, 127(1), 13–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/711008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosh, K., Doan, S., Woo, A., & Henry, D. (2020). Digital instructional materials: What are teachers using and what barriers exist? (Technical report). RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2575.17
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2017). Moving beyond silos: Professional Learning Networks in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 35(October), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. (2017). Truth or consequences: Teaching students to assess web information. Neuron, 112(1), 7–24. https://www.emergingedtech.com/2017/07/truth-or-consequencesteaching- students-to-assess-web-information/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.10.037
   Google Scholar
• Wotherspoon, T. (2008). Teachers’ work intensification and educational contradictions in Aboriginal communities. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 45(4), 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2008.00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wraga, W. G. (2012). Beyond measurement: Context, caution, and the integrity of teachers’ work. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 14(1–2), 13–20.
   Google Scholar