I Like the Way this Feels: Using Classroom Response System Technology to Enhance Tactile Learners’ Introductory American Government Experience

References

• Babich, A. M., P. Burdine, L. Albright, and P. Randol. [1976] 2003. C.I.T.E. Learning Styles Inventory. Wichita, KS: Murdoch Teachers Center.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Larry J. 2008. “Lecture-Free High School Biology Using an Audience Response System.” American Biology Teacher 70(9): 531–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, Colleen R. and Pattie Johnston. 2011. “The Impact of Purposeful Movement in Algebra Instruction.” Education 132(1): 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, Janice. 2009. “Technology Support in Nursing Education: Clickers in the Classroom.” Nursing Education Perspectives 30(5): 295–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blood, Erika. 2010. “Effects of Student Response Systems on Participation and Learning of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.” Behavioral Disorders 35(3): 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckler, Jennifer and Justin R. Yu. 2011. “Student Responses to Hands-on Kinesthetic Lecture Activity for learning about the Oxygen Carrying Capacity of Blood.” Advanced Physiological Education 35: 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, Derek. 2009. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Jeff, Esther Black, and Jurgen Rohr. 2009. “An Audience Response System Strategy to Improve Student Motivation, Attention, and Feedback.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73(2): 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, Jeff and Evan Robinson. 2008. “A Primer on Audience Response Systems: Current Applications and Future Considerations.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 72(4): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, John, Dexter Whittinghill, and Jennifer Kadlowec. 2010. “Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction.” Journal of Engineering Education 99(2): 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, Anne. 2008. “Using Wireless Response Systems to Replicate Behavioral Research Findings in the Classroom.” Teaching of Psychology 35(1): 42–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damron, Danny and Jonathan Mott. 2005. “Creating an Interactive Classroom: Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning in Political Science Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 1: 367–383.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, John L. 2009. “Learning Style Preferences and Course Performance in an Undergraduate Physiology Class.” Advances in Physiology Education 33: 308–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, Rita and Kenneth Dunn. 2005. “Thirty-Five Years of Research on Perceptual Strengths: Essential Strategies to Promote Learning.” The Clearing House 78(6): 273–276.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather K. 2012. “Making Politics ‘Click’: The Costs and Benefits of Using Clickers in an Introductory Political Science Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 8: 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fies, Carman and Jill Marshall. 2006. “Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 15(1): 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, Diane K. 1994. “Analysis of Students’ Perceptual Styles and Their Use of Multimedia.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 79: 643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauci, Sally, Arianne Dantas, David Williams, and Robert E. Kemm. 2009. “Promoting Student-Centered Active Learning in Lectures with a Personal Response System.” Advances in Physiology Education 33: 60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershkoff, Amy R. 2005. “Multiple Methods, More Success: How to Help Students of All Learning Styles Succeed in Quantitative Political Analysis Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38(2): 299–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley-Hennan, Cathy and Kenny McCartan. 2009. “Making it Matter: Teaching and Learning in Political Science Using an Audience Response System.” European Political Science 1(3): 367–383.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Charles, Tonya Tripp, Larry Seawright, and George Joeckel III. 2007. “Empowering or Compelling Reluctant Participators Using Audience Response Systems.” Active Learning in Higher Education 8(3): 233–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, Jay, Murray Jensen, and Randy Moore. 2005. “Manna from heaven Or ‘Clickers’ From Hell: Experiences with an Electronic Response System.” Journal of College Science Teaching 34(7): 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, Clyde Freeman. 2006. “‘Clicker’ Cases: Introducing Case Study Teaching Into Large Classrooms.” Journal of College Science Teaching 39(2): 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Honigsfeld, Andera and Rita Dunn. 2009. “Learning-Style Responsive Approaches for Teaching Typically Performing and At-Risk Adolescents.” Clearing House 82(5): 220–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Robin and Liesel Knaack. 2009. “Exploring the Use of Audience Response Systems in Secondary School Science Classrooms.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 18(5): 382–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaykan, Zeynep and Melis Nacar. 2007. “Learning Styles of First-Year Medical Students Attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey.” Advances in Physiology Education 31: 158–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C., N. Finkelstein, K. Perkins, S. Pollock, C. Turpen, and M. Dubson. 2007. “Research-Based Practices for Effective Clicker Use.” AIP Conference Proceedings 951(1): 128–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kenwright, Kathy. 2009. “Clickers in the Classroom.” Tech Trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning 53(1): 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Roger H., Timothy Gilbert, Kyle Ristig, and Quyen D. Chu. 2013. “Surgical Resident Learning Styles: Faculty and Resident Accuracy at Identification of Preferences and Impact on ABSITE scores.” Journal of Surgical Research 184(1): 31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, James A. and Chen-Lin C. Kulik. 1987. “Review of Recent Research Literature on Computer-Based Instruction.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 12: 222–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, Dena O. 2005. “Effects of Traditional Versus Tactual and Kinesthetic Learning-Style Responsive Instruction Strategies on Bermudian Learning-Support Sixth-Grade Students’ Social Studies Achievement and Attitude-Test Scores.” Research for Educational Reform 10(2): 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Flora C., Jacob P. Gettig, and Nancy Fjortoft. 2010. “Impact of a Student Response System on Short- and Long-Term Learning in a Drug Literature Evaluation Course.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 74(1): 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujan, Heidi L. and Stephen E. DiCarlo. 2006. “First-Year Medical Students Prefer Multiple Learning Styles.” Advances in Physiology Education 30: 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, Erina, Scott Homan, John Dunning, David Elmore, Graham Bodie, Ed Evans, Sangeetha Khichadia, Steven Lichti, Bo Feng, and Brian Geddes. 2008. “Student Evaluation of Audience Response Technology in Large Lecture Classes.” Educational Technology Research & Development 56(2): 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Richard E. 1997. “Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking the Right Questions?” Educational Psychologist 32: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, Barbara J. and Karyn R. Nelson. 1991. “Meta-Analysis of Interactive Video Instruction: A 10-year Review of Achievement Effects.” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, Melissa S., Patrick J. Medina, Donald S. Wanzer, Jane E. Wilson, Nelson Er, and Mark L. Britton. 2008. “Use of an Audience Response System (ARS) in a Dual-Campus Classroom Environment.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 72(2): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Pamela. 2001. “Learning Styles: The Multimedia of the Mind.” Education Resources Information Center 451: 140. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED451140 (June 9, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Moredich, Cheryl and Ellen Moore. 2007. “Engaging Students Through the Use of Classroom Response Systems.” Nurse Educator 32(3): 113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, Harold, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer, and Robert Bjork. 2008. “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.” Psychological Sciences in the Public Interest 9(3): 105–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peacock, Matthew. 2002. “Match or Mismatch?: Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in EFL.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, Linda C. and Ellen F. Rosen. 1990. “Increase in Mastery Levels Using a Computer-Based Tutorial/Simulation in Experimental Psychology.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28: 282–285.
   Google Scholar
• Pillemer, David B., Paul Wink, Theresa E. DiDonato, and Rebecca L. Sanborn. 2003. “Gender Differences in Autobiographical Memory Styles of Older Adults.” Memory 11(6): 525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, Eva, Ellen Altermatt, and Jill Saxon. 2002. “Making the Grade but Feeling Distressed: Gender Differences in Academic Performance and Internal Distress.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94(2): 396–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar, Kalyani and Cyril Coupal. 2008. “Rules of Engagement — 12 Tips for Successful Use of ‘Clickers’ in the Classroom.” Medical Teacher 30(2): 146–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribbens, Eric. 2007. “Why I Like Clicker Personal Response Systems.” Journal of College Science Teaching 37(2): 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, Diana A. 2006. “Kinesthetic and Interpersonal Learning: A Compendium of ‘Hands-On’ and ‘Person-to-Person’ Projects for Teaching International Accounting.” Journal of Teaching in International Business 17(4): 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sekuler, Robert. 1996. “Teaching Sensory Processes with Multimedia: One of my Teaching Assistants is a Mouse.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 23: 301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, Mirmal Kumar, Amit Bhardwaj, Simerjit Singh, and Adinegara Lutfi Abas. 2013. “Learning Preferences of Clinical Students: A Study in a Malaysian Medical College.” International Journal of Medicine & Public Health 3(1): 60–63.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Stephen M. and Paul C. Woody. 2000. “Interactive Effect of Multimedia Instruction and Learning Styles.” Teaching of Psychology 27: 220–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, Pamela S., Sandra D. Challman, and Jennifer K. Brueckner. 2006. “Using Audience Response Technology for Pretest Reviews in an Undergraduate Nursing Course.” Journal of Nursing Education 45(11): 469–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, Jeffrey R. and Jason M. Nelson. 2007. “Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion.” Teaching of Psychology 34(4): 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Brian and Hitomi Mauhara. 2009. “Playing to Learn: A Review of Physical Games in Second Language Acquisition.” Simulation & Gaming 40(5): 645–668.
   Google Scholar
• Tranquillo, Joseph V. 2008. “Kinesthetic Learning in the Classroom.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, Andrew. 2005. “Technology Turns Test-Prep Into Clicking Experience.” Education Week 24(36): 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, Stacy G. and Fondren Notman. 2012. “Is Class Appreciation Just a Click Away?: Using Student Response System Technology to Enhance Shy Students’ Introductory American Government Experience.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(4): 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, Lisa M. and Raymond C. Baker. 2008. “Do Different Pairings of Teaching Styles and Learning Styles Make a Difference? Preceptor and Resident Perceptions.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 20(3): 239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, Erica P. and Mel S. Sabella. 2008. “Examining the Effectiveness of Clickers on Promoting Learning by Tracking the Evolution of Student Responses.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1064(1): 223–226.
   Google Scholar
• Weggelaar, Cornelis. 2006. “Kinesthetic Feedback and Dyslexic Students Learning to Read and Write.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 63(2): 144–151.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrwein, Erica A., Heidi L. Lujan, and Stephen E. DiCarlo. 2007. “Gender Differences I: Learning Style Preferences Among Undergraduate Physiology Students.” Advances in Physiology Education 31: 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, Josie A. and Cynthia H. Null. 1991. “The Effects of Computer-Based Instruction on College Students’ Comprehension of Classic Research.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 23: 301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Mariaemma and Victoria Kindle Hodson. 1999. Discover Your Child’s Learning Style. Roseville, CA: Prima Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Woelk, Klaus. 2008. “Optimizing the Use of Personal Response Devices (Clickers) in Large-Enrollment Introductory Courses.” Journal of Chemical Education 85(10): 1400–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, Everett L., Josephine A. Welsh, C. Ray Archer, E. J. Mindes, and D. R. Forsyth. 1996. “Computer-Assisted Instruction as a Supplement to Lectures in an Introductory Psychology Class.” Teaching of Psychology 23: 175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Virginia. 2002. “Moving Poems: Kinesthetic Learning in the Literature Classroom.” Pedagogy 2(3): 409–425.
   Google Scholar