Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Methods? Methodological Games and Role Play

References

• Adams, Greg. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduate Methods.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Adriaensen, Johan, Bart Kerremans, and Koen Slootmaeckers. 2015. “Editors’ Introduction to the Thematic Issue: Mad about Methods? Teaching Research Methods in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.985017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor. 2017. Personal correspondence. March 21st, 2017. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Auman, C. 2011. “Using Simulation Games to Increase Student and Instructor Engagement.” College Teaching 59(4): 154–161. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.602134
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Jeffrey L. 2008. “Cultivating Civic Competence: Simulations and Skill-Building in an Introductory Government Class.” Journal of Political Science Education 4(1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Jeffrey L., and Brooke Thomas Allen. 2013. “Overcoming Methods Anxiety: Qualitative First, Quantitative Next, Frequent Feedback Along the Way.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.747830
   Google Scholar
• Biziouras, Nikolaos. 2013a. “Bureaucratic Politics and Decision Making Under Uncertainty in a National Security Crisis: Assessing the Effects of International Relations Theory and the Learning Impact of Role-Playing Simulation at the U.S. Naval Academy.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 184–196.
   Google Scholar
• Biziouras, Nikolaos. 2013b. “Midshipmen Form a Coalition Government in Belgium: Lessons from a Role-Playing Simulation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46(2): 400–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, Angela L., and Monica C. Schneider. 2009. “Stepping around the Brick Wall: Overcoming Student Obstacles in Methods Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(2): 375–383. doi:10.1017/S1049096509090519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchler, Justin. 2009. “Teaching Quantitative Methodology to the Math Averse.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(3): 527–530. doi:10.1017/S1049096509090842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney, James D., and Otto Feinstein. 1993. “Making Political Activity a Requirement in Introductory Political Science Courses.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26(3): 535–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, A. F., K. C. Woodford, and J. Maes. 2011. “Deal or No Deal: Using Games To Improve Student Learning, Retention and Decision-Making. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 42(2): 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Alistair. 2011. “Embedding Transferable Skills and Enhancing Student Learning in a Political Science Research Methods Module: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44(1): 135–139. doi:10.1017/s1049096510002039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, Rosalee, Aaron Hoffman, and James A. McCann. 2001. “If We Only Knew Then.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, Daniel J., William J. Miller, and Derek Feuerstein. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects Through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7(1): 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Charles and Cynthia Conrad. 2007. “Understanding the Negative Graduate Student Perceptions of Required Statistics and Research Methods Courses: Implications for Programs and Faculty.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning 4(3): 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Croco, Sara E., and Leanne C. Powner. 2005. “Making Formal Models Freshman-Friendly.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, Hawaii. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69174_index.html (accessed May 30, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Daniau, S. 2016. “The Transformative Potential of Role-Playing Games: From Play Skills to Human Skills. Simulation & Gaming 47(4): 423–444. doi:10.1177/1046878116650765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S. I. (2006). “Using Games and Simulations for Supporting Learning.” Learning, Media, and Technology 31(4): 343–358. doi:10.1080/17439880601021967
   Google Scholar
• Dion, Michelle, Leland M. Coxe, and Margaret Carne. 2008. “Teaching and Learning Track Summaries—Track Four: Teaching Research Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(3): 616–617.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, Mark A. 2014. “A Synthesis of the Literature on Research Methods Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 19(3): 242–253. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, Colin, Diana Kapiszewski, and Dessislava Kirilova 2015. “Learning through Research: Using Data to Train Undergraduates in Qualitative Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48(1): 39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareau, S., and R. Guo. 2009. “All Work and No Play’ Reconsidered: The Use of Games to Promote Motivation and Engagement in Instruction.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3(1): 1–12. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol3/iss1/12 (accessed May 30, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Gershkoff, Amy R. 2005. “Multiple Methods, More Success: How to Help Students of All Learning Styles Succeed in Quantitative Political Analysis Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38(2): 299–304. doi:10.1017/S1049096505056520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, William, and Jonathan Havercroft. 2012. “Using Historical Simulations to Teach Political Theory.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(1): 50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., K. Millis, A. C. Graesser, H. Butler, C. Forsyth, and Z. Cai. 2012. “Operation ARA: A Computerized Learning Game that Teaches Critical Thinking and scientific Reasoning.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 7(2): 93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Kyle. 2015. “Simulating the Bargaining Model of War.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48(4): 627–629. doi:10.1017/S1049096515000888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnacki, Marie. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduates about the Quantitative Study of Politics.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell, Larry. 1994. “Teaching Research Methods: An Experiential and Heterodoxical Approach.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27(1): 60–64. doi:10.2307/420460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, Kenneth. 2001. “Teaching Research Methods: The Best Job in the Department.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kirriemuir, J., and A. McFarlane. 2004. “Literature Review in Games and Learning: A NESTA Futurelab Research Report.” https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190453/document (accessed May 30, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina, and Amanda M. Rosen. 2013. “Simulations as Active Assessment? Typologizing by Purpose and Source.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina, and Amanda M. Rosen. 2016. “Bootstrapping and Portability in Simulation Design.” International Studies Perspectives 17(2): 202–213. doi:10.1093/isp/ekv007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., and R. Lightner 2007. “Games as an Interactive Classroom Technique: Perceptions of Corporate Trainers, College Instructors and Students.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19(1): 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Levintova, Ekaterina, Terri Johnson, Denise Scheberle, and Kevin Vonck. 2011. “Global Citizens Are Made, Not Born: Multiclass Role-Playing Simulation of Global Decision Making.” Journal of Political Science Education 7(3): 245–274. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.590075
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduates Methods: Overcoming ‘Stat’ Anxiety.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Loggins, Julie A. 2009. “Simulating the Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process in the Undergraduate Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(2): 401–407. doi:10.1017/S1049096509090544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, Allan. 1994. “Teaching Research Methods Using Appropriate Technology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27(3): 553–557. doi:10.2307/420226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. M. 2014. “Role of Games and Simulations to Teach Abstract Concepts of Anarchy Cooperation and Conflict in World Politics.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(4): 400–413. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.947417
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Lisa, Heather S. Mohamed, and Stephanie Slocum-Schaffer. 2015. “APSA Teaching and Learning Conference and Track Summaries.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48(3): 512–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, Katsuo A., and Joseph Jaeger. 2011. “A Computer Simulation Comparing the Incentive Structures of Dictatorships and Democracies.” Journal of Political Science Education 7(2): 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W., and M. Tang. 2004. “Examining the Effectiveness of Innovative Instructional Methods on Reducing Statistics Anxiety for Graduate Students in the Social Sciences.” Instructional Psychology 31(2): 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C., G. Featherstone, H. Aston, and E. Houghton. 2013. Game-Based learning: Latest Evidence and Future Directions (National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) Research Programme: Innovation in Education). Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Pgadey. 2012. “Zendo-The game of science.” Playing with Games Blog. https://playingwithgames.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/zendo-the-game-of-science/. Accessed May 30, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Powner, Leanne. 2006. “Teaching the Scientific Method in the Active Learning Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39(3): 521–524. doi:10.1017/S1049096506060756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. J. 2003. “Exploring the Probabilities of ‘Who Wants to be a Millionaire.’” Teaching Statistics 25(3): 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ramler, I. P., and J. L. Chapman. 2011. “Introducing Statistical Research to Undergraduate Mathematical Statistics Students Using the Guitar Hero Video Game Series.” Journal of Statistics Education 19(3): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad, and Kerstin Sorensen. 2008. “The Use of a Middle East Crisis Simulation in an International Relations Course.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47(1): 179–182. doi:10.1017/S104909650808027X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kürşad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning?: An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Vinod, Karen Butler-Perry, and Susan Pedersen. 2008. “Using Video Games to Enhance Learning in Digital Systems.” Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share. Association of Computing Machines (ACM): New York. 196–199.
   Google Scholar
• Stansbury, J. A., and G. D. Munro. 2013. “Gaming in the Classroom: Innovative Ways to Teach Factorial Designs.” Teaching of Psychology 40(2): 148–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansbury, J. A., E. A. Wheeler, and J. T. Buckingham. 2014. “Can Wii Engage College-Level Learners? Use of Commercial Off-The-Shelf Gaming in an Introductory Statistics Course.” Computers in the Schools 31(1–2): 103–115. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.879791
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter. 2001. “Making the World Safe for Methods.” The Political Methodologist 10(1): 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Touchton, Michael. 2015. “Flipping the Classroom and Student Performance in Advanced Statistics: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 28–44. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.985105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Charles C., and Camercon G. Thies. 2009. “What We Mean by Scope and Methods: A Survey of Undergraduate Scope and Methods Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(2): 376–373. doi:10.1017/D104909650909090507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., D. Carnine, and R. Gersten. 1988. “Teaching Problem Solving Through Computer Simulations.” American Educational Research Journal 25(1): 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar