What is the Canon in American Politics? Analyses of Core Graduate Syllabi

References

• Abelson, Robert P. 1996. “The Secret Existence of Expressive Behavior.” In The Rational Choice Controversy: Economics Models of Politics Reconsidered, ed. Jeffrey Friedman. New Haven: Yale University Press, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 475–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1995. Why parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alex–Assensoh, Yvette M., Terri Givens, Kathie Golden, Vincent L. Hutchings, Sherri L. Wallace, and Kenny J. Whitby. 2005. “Mentoring and African–American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38(2): 283–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham T. 1969. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” American Political Science Review 63(3): 689–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Political Science Association (APSA). 2011. Political Science in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: APSA.
   Google Scholar
• American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” American Political Science Review 44(3): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Nicholas Valentino. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88(4): 829–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr, and Charles Stewart III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in US House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 136–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1994. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56(4): 947–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, James D. 1977. The Presidential Character. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, Robert C., Dalmas H. Nelson, and Peregrine Schwartz–Shea. 1985. “The Challenge of Recruiting Women and Minority Faculty Members in Political Science: A Case Study in Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 18(4): 789–793.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs–Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89(2): 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brintnall, Michael. 1992. “Affirmative Action: Women and Minorities in the Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 25(1): 105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2001. “The President’s Legislative Influence from Public Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, Michael X Delli, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, Joshua D., Anthony Bertelli, Christian R. Grose, David E. Lewis, and David C. Nixon. 2012. “Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Marty, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2009. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter, Joseph W. Elder, Clifford Geertz, Kenneth Prewitt, and Sheilah Rosenhack. London: Free Press of Glencoe, 206–261.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker.” Journal of Public Law 6(1): 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1961a. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 55(4): 763–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1961b. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Michael C. 1994. Behind the Mule. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Michael C., and Cathy Cohen. 2002. “Problems in the Study of the Politics of Race.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner. New York: W. W. Norton, 488–510.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Martin J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 103(3): 343–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2006. “Revolutions Without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 487–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2000. “Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 625–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Michael MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. Divided Government. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foner, Eric. 1984. “Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?” History Workshop (17): 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymer, Paul. 1999. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, F. Chris. 1986. “The Recruitment and Retention of Minority Graduate Students in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 19(1): 98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls so Variable When Votes Are so Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 409–451.
   Google Scholar
• George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 86(2): 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Christopher W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102(1): 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 778–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, Micheal W., and James C. Garand. 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40(4): 741–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Donald P., Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnell, John G. 2006. “The Founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, Profession, Political Theory, and Politics.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Richard L., and Alan V. Deardorff. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100(1): 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Richard L., and Frank W. Wayman. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84(3): 797–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 1999 [1787]. The Federalist Papers. New York: Mentor.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, John Mark. 1985. “The Political Economy of Group Membership.” American Political Science Review 79(1): 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1995. Facing up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, William G. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John D, Charles R. Shipan, and Madelaine Pfahler. 2001. “Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 330–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, John, Marijke Breuning, and Linda Lopez. 2006. “A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 659–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 773–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Timothy R., Paul J. Wahlbeck, and James F. Spriggs. 2006. “The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 100(1): 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. The Spectacle of US Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, Micahel. 2006. “History and Dissent: Bernard Crick's the American Science of Politics.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 547–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: A. A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17(1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, Donald R., and Lynn M. Sanders. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary. 1993. “The Methodology of Presidential Research.” In Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches, ed. George C. Edwards, John H. Kessel, and Bert A. Rockman. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 387–412.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, and Ivy Brown Rovner. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta‐analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19(2): 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Taeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1977. “Why No Socialism in the United States?” In Radicalism in the Contemporary Age, ed. Seweryn Bialer and Sophia Sluzar. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 31–149.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(2): 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, Theodore J. 1992. “The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1125–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007a. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40(1): 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007b. “Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40(3): 531–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1991. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClerking, Harwood K., and Tasha S. Philpot. 2008. “Struggling to be Noticed: The Civil Rights Movement as an Academic Agenda Setter.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(4): 813–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClosky, Herbert, and John Zaller. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 3(2): 243–277.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael P., and Samuel L., Popkin. 2001. “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” American Political Science Review 95(4): 963–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Wakken E., and Donald E., Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1): 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, Terry M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 28(4): 739–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, Terry M. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, ed. John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 235–271.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1987. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance’.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12(4): 475–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1989. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure.” In Can the Government Govern? ed. John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 267–329.
   Google Scholar
• Monforti, Jessica Lavariega, and Melissa R. Michelson. 2008. “Diagnosing the Leaky Pipeline: Continuing Barriers to the Retention of Latinas and Latinos in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(1): 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. Eric. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2002. “The Study of American Political Development.” In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner. New York: W.W. Norton, 722–754.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parenti, Michael. 2006. “Patricians, Professionals, and Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 499–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Paul E. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28(4): 664–683.
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, Lyn, and John J. Theis. 1997. “The Institutionalization of the American Presidency, 1924–92.” American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1280–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1996. “The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 971–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93(2): 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(2): 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, Charles R. 2004. “Regulatory Regimes, Agency Actions, and the Conditional Nature of Congressional Influence.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 467–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee. 2006a. “The American Political Science Review Citation Classics.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 667–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee. 2006b. “The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79(2): 293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Rogers M. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sniderman, Paul M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, edited by Ada W Finifter, 219–246. Washington D.C.: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sniderman, Paul M, Thomas Piazza, Philip E Tetlock, and Ann Kendrick. 1991. “The New Racism.” American Journal of Political Science 35(2): 423–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Revised ed. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2003 [1835]. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Susan J. Carroll. 2006. “‘Far from Ideal:’ The Gender Politics of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 507–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. News and World Report. 2013. “America’s Best Graduate Schools, 2013 Edition.” U.S. News and World Report, Accessed December 13, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L., Hutchings, and Ismail K. White. 2002. “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Jack L. 1966. “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60(2): 285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1983. “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77(2): 390–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1966. “The Two Presidencies.” Trans-Action 4(2): 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Ernest J., III, and Lorrie A. Frasure. 2007. “The Persistence of Neglect of African American Issues in Political Science, 1986–2003.” In African American Perspectives on Political Science, ed. Wilbur C. Rich. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. Dan, and Richard W. Waterman. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 801–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Cheryl D. 1995. “An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in 15 Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28(3): 525–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John, and Stanley Feldman. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar