More Than Multiple Choice: A Toolbox for Incorporating Clickers Into Political Science Courses

References

• Adams,Nancy . 2015. “Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Objectives.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 103 (3):152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, Zachary D., Kathleen Marchetti, and Benjamin Soltoff. 2015. “What’s the Payoff? Assessing the Efficacy of Student Response Systems.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (3):249–263. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1047104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beavers, Staci. 2010. Some days, things just “click” in the classroom. Presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Beekes, Wendy. 2006. “The ‘Millionaire’ Method for Encouraging Participation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (1):25–36. doi: 10.1177/1469787406061143.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. 2009. “Technology Support in Nursing Education: Clickers in the classroom.” Nursing Education Perspectives 30 (5):295–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, Lorena, Isabel Buil, Blanca Hernández-Ortega, and SeseF. Javier . 2013. “Using Clickers in Class.” Computers and Education 62:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, Derek 2009. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Jeff, Esther P. Black, and RohrJürgen . 2009. “An Audience Response System Strategy to Improve Student Motivation, Attention, and Feedback.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73 (2):21. doi: 10.5688/aj730221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Jane. 2007. “Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips.” CBE Life Science Education 6 (1):9–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon, Felicia A., Nina Yssel, John M. McConnell, and Travis Hardin. 2014. “Differentiated Instruction, Professional Development, and Teacher Efficacy.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37 (2):111–127. doi: 10.1177/0162353214529042.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather.2012. “Making Politics “click”: The Costs and Benefits of Using Clickers in an Introductory Political Science Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 8:85–93. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2012.641427.
   Google Scholar
• Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk 2016. “The Democratic Disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3):5–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23):8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, Rand, and Anna Carlin. 2004. “Waking the Dead: Using Interactive Technology to Engage Passive Listeners in the Classroom.” AMCIS Proceedings 2952–2959.
   Google Scholar
• Hart Research Associates (on behalf of the American Association of Colleges and Universities). 2016. Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment: Key Findings from a Survey among Administrators at AAC&U Member Institutions. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Lauren, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, and Jennifer Yim. 2013. “Adapting Clicker Technology to Diversity Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 9:273–291. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.796234.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Hsiu-Ting. 2017. “Clickers in the Flipped Classroom.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (8):983–995. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazeki, Jennifer. 2014. “Bring-Your-Own-Device: Turning Cell Phones into Forces for Good.” Journal of Economic Education 45 (3):240–250. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.917898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jamie L., Mark A. McDaniel, Steven M. Woodard, and Tyler Kummer. 2014. “Teaching to the Test…or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review 26 (2):307–329. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, Margaret. 2007. “Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach.” Educause Quarterly (2):71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Eric. 1997. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, Emily D., and Maha Zewail-Foote. 2018. “Investigating the Influence of Gender on Student Perceptions of the Clicker in a Small Undergraduate General Chemistry Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 95 (2):218–223. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, Lynn, Amanda Nili, Tutrang Nguyen, and Mark Warschauer. 2016. “Clickers in the Wild: A Campus-Wide Study of Student Response Systems.” In Transforming Institutions: Undergraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century, eds.Gabriela C. Weaver, Wilella D. Burgess, Amy L. Childress, and Linda Slakey. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salemi, Michael. 2009. “Clickenomics: Using the Classroom Response System to Increase Student Engagement in a Large-Enrollment Principles of Economics Course.” Journal of Economic Education 40 (4):385–404. doi: 10.1080/00220480903237950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Amy. 2009. “An Empirical Study of Personal Response Technology for Improving Attendance and Learning in a Large Class.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 9 (1):13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Amy M., Judith Sims-Knight, Grant V. O'Rielly, Paul Capaldo, Teal Pedlow, Leamarie Gordon, and Kristina Monteiro. 2017. “Clickers Can Promote Fact Retention But Impede Conceptual Understanding: The Effect of the Interaction Between Clicker Use and Pedagogy on Learning.” Computers & Education 111:44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Deborah Ann, and Marlene Rosenkoetter. 2009. “Effectiveness, Challenges, and Perceptions of Classroom Participation Systems.” Nurse Educator 34 (4):156–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Michelle K., William B. Wood, Wendy K. Adams, Carl Wieman, Jennifer K. Knight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su. 2009. “Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions.” Science 323 (5910):122–124. doi: 10.1126/science.1165919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staveley-O’Carroll, James. 2016. “A Classroom Market for Extra Credit.” The Journal of Economic Education 47 (4):324–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, Jeffrey, and Jason Nelson. 2007. “Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems On Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion.” Teaching of Psychology 34 (4):253–258. doi: 10.1080/00986280701700391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, Jeffrey, Terrah Oldham, and Dan Bennett. 2010. “Using Student Response Systems (“clickers”) to Combat Conformity and Shyness.” Teaching of Psychology 37 (2):135–140. doi: 10.1080/00986281003626631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbig, Stacy. 2016. “I Like the Way This Feels: Using Classroom Response System Technology to Enhance Tactile Learners’ Introductory American Government Experience.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (1):41–57. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1063435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbig, Stacy, and Notman.Fondren 2012. “Is Class Appreciation Just a Click Away?: Using Student Response System Technology to Enhance Shy Students’ Introductory American Government Experience.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (4):352–371. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2012.729450.
   Google Scholar
• Valiandes, Stavroula. 2015. “Evaluating the Impact of Differentiated Instruction on Literacy and Reading in Mixed Ability Classrooms.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 45:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., G. Van Der Berg, and H. Van Keulen. 2001. “Interactive Lectures in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 26 (1):15–28. doi: 10.1080/03043790123124.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco, Marcela, and Gamze Çavdar. 2013. “Teaching Large Classes with Clickers: Results from a Teaching Experiment in Comparative Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (4):823–829. doi: 10.1017/S1049096513001121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel, Fred, and Mark Bonica. 2014, January-March. “An Active Learning Approach to Bloom’s Taxonomy: 2 Games, 2 Classrooms, 2 Methods.” US Army Medical Department Journal21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wertheim, Edward. 2011. “Tragedy of the Commons: An Exercise Using Clickers to Illustrate and Teach a Key Concept in Negotiations.” Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning 38:373–374.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson Sprague, Elaine, and Darren Dahl. 2010. “Learning to Click.” Journal of Marketing Education 32 (1):93–103. doi: 10.1177/0273475309344806.
   Google Scholar