Effects of Simulation-Based Learning and One Way to Analyze Them

References

• ALLBUScompact. 1980-2014. Variable Report. GESIS Studien-Nr. 4583. Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth L. Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/15512160500484119.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael K. 2006. “Single Session Simulations. The Effectiveness of Short Congressional Simulations in Introductory American Government Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):33–49. doi:10.1080/15512160500484135.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael K., and Kimberly A. Weir. 2015. “Political Simulations. What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4):391–403. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1065748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Yehuda. 1999. “Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis.” Human Relations 52 (4):421–438. doi:10.1177/001872679905200401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, Dave, and Simon Radford. 2014. “Teaching Diplomacy by Other Means: Using an Outside-of-Class Simulation to Teach International Relations Theory.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4):423–437. doi:10.1111/insp.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Scott W., and Frederick B. King. 2000. “Constructivist Pedagogy and How We Learn: Educational Psychology Meets International Studies.” International Studies Perspectives 1 (3):245–254. doi:10.1111/1528-3577.00025.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes, Cleo H. 1966. “Some Current Research On Effectiveness of Educational Simulations. Implications for Alternative Strategies.” American Behavioral Scientist 10 (2):4–7. doi:10.1177/000276426601000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, Jeffrey, Richard Dukes, and William Gamson. 2009. “Assessment in Simulation and Gaming.” Simulation & Gaming 40 (4):553–568. doi:10.1177/1046878109332955.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaus, David A. (2010). Research Design in Social Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, Richard D. 2000. “A Personal Perspective on the Evolution of Gaming.” Simulation & Gaming 31 (1):79–85. doi:10.1177/104687810003100107.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, Richard D., and Willy C. Kriz. 2014. Back to the Future of Gaming. 1st ed. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar
• ESOMAR World Research. 2011. World Research Codes and Guidelines: ESOMAR Guideline for Online Research. Online-resource (19.08.2017).
   Google Scholar
• Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, John L., Allan C. Lachman, and Ronald M. Mason. 1980. “Verstehen, Cognition, and the Impact of Political Simulations.” Simulation & Games 11 (2):223–241. doi:10.1177/0037550080112007.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Ronald D. 2017. “Sampling Methods for Web and E-mail Surveys.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, eds. Raymond M. Lee, Grant Blank, and Nigel G. Fielding. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE, 162–183.
   Google Scholar
• Goergen, Andreas, and Lionel Bobot. 2010. “Teaching European Negotiations. The EU Chocolate Directive Simulation.” International Negotiation 15 (2):301–323. doi:10.1163/157180610X506992.
   Google Scholar
• Göritz, Anja S. 2006. “Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review.” International Journal of Internet Science 1 (1):58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Robert M., Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltlinge, and Roderick J. A. Littler. 2002. Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Robert M., Eleanor Singer, and Amy Corning. 2000. “Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3):299–308. doi:10.1086/317990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, Robert M., Floyd J. Fowler, Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, Eleanor Singer, and Roger Tourangeau. 2011. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Frederick M. 1999. Bringing The Social Sciences Alive: 10 Simulations for History, Economics, Government, and Geography. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, John, William J. Miller, and Eszter Simon. 2015. Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jugend. 2015. Eine pragmatische Generation im Aufbruch. (Shell Jugendstudie 2015) Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, Willy C. 2017. “Types of Gaming Simulation Applications.” Simulation & Gaming 48 (1):3–7. doi:10.1177/1046878117689860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriz, Willy C., and Eberhard Auchter. 2016. “10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects.” Simulation & Gaming 47 (2):179–205. doi:10.1177/1046878116633972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurapati, Shalini. 2017. Situation Awareness for Socio Technical Systems. A simulation gaming study in intermodal transport operations. TRAIL Resarch School.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Raymond M., Grant Blank, and Nigel G. Fielding. (Ed.). 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE reference.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Banchik, Luba. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Retention, With and Without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3):341–359. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1405355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petranek, Charles F., Susan Corey, and Rebecca Black. 1992. “Three Levels of Learning in Simulations. Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writing.” Simulation & Gaming 23 (2):174–185. doi:10.1177/1046878192232005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petranek, Charles F. 2000. “Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations.” Simulation and Gaming 31 (1):108–119. doi:10.1177/104687810003100111.
   Google Scholar
• Pettenger, Mary, Douglas West, and Niki Young. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of Role-Play Simulations on Learning in Canadian and US Classrooms.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (2):491–508. doi:10.1111/insp.12063.
   Google Scholar
• Pierfy, David A. 1977. “Comparative Simulation Game Research.” Simulation & Games 8 (2):255–268. doi:10.1177/003755007782006.
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, Brent D. 1999: “Simulation, Games, and Experience-Based Learning: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning.” Simulation and Gaming 30 (4):498–506. doi:10.1177/104687819903000409.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kürşad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):19–32. doi:10.1080/15512160500484168.
   Google Scholar
• Stoop, Ineke, Jaak Billiet, Achim Koch, and Rory Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, Donald C. 1990. “Promoting Learning through Games and Simulations.” Simulation & Gaming 21 (3):262–273. doi:10.1177/1046878190213005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepoel, Vera. 2017. “Online Survey Design.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, eds. Raymond M. Lee, Grant Blank, and Nigel G. Fielding. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE, 184–202.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyke, Gretchen J., Edward G. Declair, and Peter H. Loedel. 2000. “Stimulating Simulations. Making the European Union a Classroom Reality.” International Studies Perspectives 1 (2):145–159. doi:10.1111/1528-3577.00014.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph, and David Crookall. 1998. “Developing a Scientific Knowledge of Simulation/Gaming.” Simulation and Gaming 29 (1):7–20. doi:10.1177/1046878198291002.
   Google Scholar